Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Funding was not received for this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Innovative advances in rehabilitation technology have created a split-belt treadmill capable of providing a much needed intervention aimed at limiting mobility disability. When desynchronized, the split-belt treadmill imposes demands on each leg such that the central nervous system must adapt to the challenge. Based on preliminary data from our lab utilizing the split-belt treadmill, the investigators hypothesize this intervention can challenge the locomotor processes required for safe, efficient gait while concurrently providing an aerobic stimulus will produce favorable changes in physical function in older adults at risk for mobility disability.
For this pilot study the investigators will enroll 20 sedentary older adults at risk for disability (usual gait speed ≤ 1.0 m/s). Participants will be assigned to one of two 12-week interventions. Therefore the final training pool will consist of 10 split-belt participants and 10 traditional treadmill participants. Aim 1 will test the hypothesis that compared with a traditional treadmill intervention a split-belt treadmill intervention will result in improved mobility, as measure by 400 meter walk time, as well self reported physical function/disability as measured by the Pepper Assessment Tool for Disability. Aim 2 will test the hypothesis that compared with a traditional treadmill intervention a split-belt treadmill intervention will results in improved gait variability. To date, no experimental study has evaluated these propositions in a controlled trial testing the effects of split-belt training in older adults at risk for disability.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Treadmill | Active Comparator | Participants will follow the same guidelines as the split belt component but will complete the intervention on a traditional, single belt/speed treadmill. |
|
| Split-belt | Experimental | Participants will walk on a custom-built split-belt treadmill comprised of two separate belts, each with its own motor, that permitted the speed of each belt (i.e. each leg) to be controlled independently. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Treadmill | Behavioral | Participants will complete the intervention in 12-weeks, 3 times per week sessions. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in gait speed, as measure by 400 meter walk time, following 12-weeks of intervention | Participants will be asked to walk at their usual pace, without over exerting. They can stop for up to 1 min for fatigue or other symptoms. A time limit of 15 minutes to perform the test has been established based on the following considerations. | Participants will be evaluated within 1-week prior to begining the intervention and within 1-week following completion of the 12-week intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in gait variability from pre to post 12-week intervention | We will test this working hypothesis by examining changes in spatial and temporal characteristics of gait that occur following 12-weeks of split-belt versus traditional treadmill training. Measures of interest will include variability in stance time, step length, stride length, stride time, swing time, and double limb support time directly from the GAITRite. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Chris Hass, Ph.D. | University of Florida | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Split-belt | Behavioral | Participants will complete the intervention in 12-weeks, 3 times per week sessions. |
|
|
| Participants will be evaluated within 1-week prior to begining the intervention and within 1-week following completion of the 12-week intervention |