| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV) Antibody Levels >=5 gpELISA Units/mL | Sera were tested for VZV Immunoglobulin (IgG) antibody levels by a glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA) | The per protocol population included participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine, were seronegative at baseline and had postvaccination VZV serology results | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | | Six weeks after vaccination 1 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| | | Title | Measurements |
|---|
| - OG00097.3(95.6 to 98.4)
- OG00193.0(90.7 to 95.0)
|
|
| | Group IDs | Group Description | Statistical Method | Statistical Comment | P-Value | P-Value Comment | Parameter Type | Parameter Value | Dispersion Type | Dispersion Value | Confidence Interval Sides | Confidence Interval % | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | CI Lower Limit Comment | CI Upper Limit Comment | Estimate Comment | Tested Non-Inferiority | Non-Inferiority Type | Non-Inferiority Comment | Other Analysis Description |
|---|
| | Miettinen and Nurminen | | <0.001 | | Risk Difference (RD) | 4.2 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.8 | 6.8 | | | RD = MMRV (AMP) - MMRV (2006 process) | | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | The non-inferiority evaluation is based on the lower bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) on the risk difference excluding a decrease >= the prespecified criterion of 10 percentage points | | |
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Measles Virus Antibody Levels >=255 mIU/mL | Sera were tested for measles virus IgG antibody levels by an ELISA | The per protocol population included participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine, were seronegative at baseline and had postvaccination measles virus serology results | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | | Six weeks after vaccination 1 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Mumps Virus Antibody Levels >=10 Units/mL | Sera were tested for mumps virus IgG antibody levels by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) | The per protocol population included participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine, were seronegative at baseline and had postvaccination mumps virus serology results | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | | Six weeks after vaccination 1 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Rubella Virus Antibody Levels >=10 International Units/mL (IU/mL) | Sera were tested for rubella virus IgG antibody levels by an ELISA | The per protocol population included participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine, were seronegative at baseline and had postvaccination rubella serology results | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | | Six weeks after vaccination 1 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Primary | Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) of VZV Antibodies | Sera were tested for VZV IgG antibody levels by gpELISA | The per protocol population included participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine, were seronegative at baseline and had postvaccination VZV serology results | Posted | | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | ELISA units/mL | | Six weeks after vaccination 1 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Primary | Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Measles Virus Antibodies | Sera were tested for measles virus IgG antibody levels by ELISA | The per protocol population included participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine, were seronegative at baseline and had postvaccination measles virus serology results | Posted | | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mIU/mL | | Six weeks after vaccination 1 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Primary | Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Mumps Virus Antibodies | Sera were tested for mumps virus IgG antibody levels by ELISA | The per protocol population included participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine, were seronegative at baseline and had postvaccination mumps virus serology results | Posted | | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Mumps Ab units/mL | | Six weeks after vaccination 1 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Primary | Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Rubella Virus Antibodies | Sera were tested for rubella virus IgG antibody levels by ELISA | The per protocol population included participants who received >=1 dose of study vaccine, were seronegative at baseline and had postvaccination rubella virus serology results | Posted | | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | IU/mL | | Six weeks after vaccination 1 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Fever (>=102.2°F [39.0°C] or Oral Equivalent) | | The population analyzed included participants who received >=1 study vaccination and had follow-up safety data | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of participants | | Up to 5 days after vaccination 1 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Fever (>=102.2°F [39.0°C] or Oral Equivalent) | | The population analyzed included participants who received >=1 study vaccination and had follow-up safety data | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of participants | | Up to 42 days after each vaccination | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Zoster-like Rash | | The population analyzed included participants who received >=1 study vaccination and had follow-up safety data | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of participants | | Up to 42 days after each vaccination | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Mumps-like Symptoms | | The population analyzed included participants who received >=1 study vaccination and had follow-up safety data | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of participants | | Up to 42 days after each vaccination | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Measles-like Rash | | The population analyzed included participants who received >=1 study vaccination and had follow-up safety data | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of participants | | Up to 42 days after each vaccination | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Rubella-like Rash | | The population analyzed included participants who received >=1 study vaccination and had follow-up safety data | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of participants | | Up to 42 days after each vaccination | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Varicella-like Rash | | The population analyzed included participants who received >=1 study vaccination and had follow-up safety data | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of participants | | Up to 42 days after each vaccination | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With an Injection-site Adverse Event | An adverse event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the study vaccine, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the study vaccine is also an AE. Injection-site AEs reported were solicited with a Vaccine Report Card. | The population analyzed included participants who received >=1 study vaccination and had follow-up safety data | Posted | | Number | | Percentage of participants | | Up to 5 days after each vaccination | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | MMRV (AMP) | Participants were to received two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of Mumps, Measles, Rubella, Varicella (MMRV) vaccine made with an alternative manufacturing process (AMP) | | OG001 | MMRV (2006 Process) | Participants were to receive two 0.5 mL subcutaneous injections of MMRV made with the 2006 manufacturing process |
| |