Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The role of chemotherapy for gliomas has been recently reappraised by the advent of temozolomide, especially for glioblastomas, and further investigation is now being directed to unveiling its optimal indications, dosing protocols, and the most relevant prognostic factors. Meanwhile, the management of anaplastic gliomas of WHO grade 3 (anaplastic astrocytomas, anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, and anaplastic oligoastrocytomas) is currently largely based on surgery followed by radiotherapy, of which prognosis remains still dismal with the median survival of 2-5 years. To date, the benefit of chemo for WHO grade 3 gliomas is unclear of modest at best with conventional cytotoxic agents, and the role of temozolomide for these entities still is not elucidated. Moreover, WHO grade 3 gliomas are now known to consist of heterogeneous groups of different histologic features, biological behaviors, and prognoses. Accordingly, relevant molecular markers are appreciated with the growing body of data that showing their implications on response to therapy and survival, including codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q, methylation status of methylguanine methyl transferase (MGMT), and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation.1,4-6,11 Among those, codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q is considered the most important marker of prognostic significance in WHO grade 3 gliomas.
One recent Korean prospective cohort study showed the potential survival benefit and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide for WHO grade 3 gliomas. In this study, however, the role of molecular markers such as codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q and MGMT methylation could not be determined because of small number of patients available. These results prompted this Korean group to project a randomized phase 2 screening trial examining the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide for WHO grade 3 gliomas without codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q. The basic concept of the present clinical trial is "a subgroup with expected worse prognosis according to the status of chromosome 1p/19q, i.e. one without codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q is to be managed more aggressively", to investigate the role of temozolomide. An aggressive therapy (surgery + concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide) will be compared to the conventional arm (surgery + radiotherapy only) in terms of its efficacy and safety for WHO grade 3 gliomas without chromosome 1p/19q codeletion. The prognostic significance of methylation status of MGMT and IDH1 mutation as molecular markers will be also assessed in each arm as key secondary analysis. Until now, there have been no such trials examining the efficacy and safety of temozolomide for WHO grade 3 gliomas based on prospective molecular stratification.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| only Radiotherapy | No Intervention | fractionated focal irradiation in daily fractions of 2 Gy given 5 days per week for 6 weeks, for a total of 60 Gy | |
| CCRT with Temozolomide | Active Comparator | RT with daily temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day, 7 days/week) from the first to the last day of radiotherapy) and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy (150-200 mg/m2 po qd for 5 days q 28 days for 6 cycles). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temozolomide (Temodal) | Drug | RT with daily temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day, 7 days/week) from the first to the last day of radiotherapy) and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy (150-200 mg/m2 po qd for 5 days q 28 days for 6 cycles) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 2-year progression free survival(PFS) | Final primary end-point: 2 year PFS. Progression free survival(PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease or death, which ever occurs earlier. | Assessed and followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 5-year overall survival (OS) | final secondary end-point : 5-year OS. Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death, which ever occurs earlier. | assessed at 10 wks, 22 wks, 34 wks, and followed up every 4 months until documentation of death. |
| 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jeong Hoon Kim, Professor | Asan Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Jae Young Kim, professor | SNUH | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asan Medical Center | Seoul | 138-736 | South Korea |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077204 | Temozolomide |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003606 | Dacarbazine |
| D014226 | Triazenes |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D007093 | Imidazoles |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
final end-point : 5-year PFS |
| assessed at 10 wks, 22 wks, 34 wks, and followed up every 4 months until documentation of disease progression or death. |
| Safety (adverse events) | up to 5 years |
| Methylation status of MGMT | confirmed by MS-PCR. | baseline |
| IDH mutation | baseline |
| D001393 |
| Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |