Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a specific surgical technique, blunt compared with sharp expansion of the transverse lower uterine incision, is associated with risk of unintended extension of uterine incision
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| blunt | Blunt expansion of the primary incision was derived by placing the index fingers of the operating surgeon into the incision and pulling the fingers apart laterally and cephalad. | ||
| sharp | Sharp expansion of the primary incision was developed by cutting laterally and cephalad using bandage scissors |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| unintended extension of uterine incision | during the operation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| intraoperative maternal blood loss | after 48 hours than operation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
elective cesarean delivery cases
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| İstanbul Bakırköy Maternal and Childrens Hospital | Istanbul | Bakırköy | 34274 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12013167 | Result | Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Bufkin L, Field K, Roberts WE, Martin JN Jr. Intra-operative haemorrhage by blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision at caesarean delivery: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG. 2002 Apr;109(4):448-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01296.x. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided