Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-002067-20 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Parexel | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is conducted to evaluate the short (12 Weeks) and long term (104 Weeks) efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol compared with Adalimumab both in combination with Methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of moderate to severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) that is not responding adequately to MTX.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Certolizumab Pegol + Methotrexate (CZP + MTX) | Active Comparator |
| |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate (ADA + MTX) | Active Comparator |
| |
| CZP + MTX followed by ADA + MTX | Active Comparator | Those subjects who received Certolizumab Pegol (400 mg at Weeks 0, 2, 4 followed by 200 mg every two weeks) + Methotrexate (CZP+ MTX) at Baseline and are Non-Responders at Week 12, switch to Adalimumab (40 mg) + Methotrexate (ADA + MTX) after Week 12. |
|
| ADA + MTX followed by CZP + MTX | Active Comparator | Those subjects who received Adalimumab (40 mg + Placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 4 followed by 40 mg ADA every two weeks) + Methotrexate (ADA+ MTX) at Baseline and are Non-Responders at Week 12, switch to Certolizumab Pegol (400 mg at Weeks 12, 14, 16 followed by 200 mg every two weeks) + Methotrexate (CZP+ MTX) after Week 12. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) | Biological |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects Who Met the American College of Rheumatology 20 % (ACR20) Criteria at Week 12 | Subjects who met the ACR20 criteria were those subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS). | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Subjects Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 104 | DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. | Week 104 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Week 12 Responders Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 104 | DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. The definition of Week 12 responders was DAS28[ESR] Low Disease Activity (LDA) (ie ≤ 3.2) or an improvement of ≥ 1.2 in DAS28[ESR] relative to Baseline. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject must have a diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) at Screening, as defined by the 2010 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria (Aletaha D et al, 2010)
Subject must have a positive Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and/or a positive anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide antibody (anti-CCP) as determined by the central laboratory at Screening
Subject must have moderate to severe RA disease at Screening and Baseline defined as:
Screening (all criteria required)
Baseline (both criteria required)
Subject must have inadequately responded previously to Methotrexate (MTX)
Subject is using MTX 15 to 25 mg/week orally or subcutaneously at Screening and has used the same MTX regimen for a minimum of 28 days prior to Baseline
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| UCB Cares | +1 877 822 9493 (UCB) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 141 | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | |||
| 214 |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27863807 | Result | Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Combe B, Curtis JR, Hall S, Haraoui B, van Vollenhoven R, Cioffi C, Ecoffet C, Gervitz L, Ionescu L, Peterson L, Fleischmann R. Head-to-head comparison of certolizumab pegol versus adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year efficacy and safety results from the randomised EXXELERATE study. Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2763-2774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31651-8. Epub 2016 Nov 15. | |
| 39222436 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| FDA Safety Alerts and Recalls | View source |
Not provided
Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Treatment Group (RTG) that consisted of all subjects randomized into the study.
The study started to enroll patients in December 2011 and concluded in January 2016.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | CZP+MTX (RTG) | Subjects received loading doses of CZP 400mg (200mg/PFS, ie, 2 injections) at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4; and CZP 200mg at Weeks 6, 8, and 10. Week 12 Responders continued CZP 200mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks thereafter through Week 102. Week 12 Non-Responders were switched to receive ADA 40mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks through Week 22. At Week 24, Week 12 Non-Responders who did not have DAS28(ESR) LDA or a DAS28(ESR) change from Week 12 reduction of ≥1.2 discontinued ADA treatment and were withdrawn from the Treatment Period. All subjects received Methotrexate 15 to 25mg/week orally or subcutaneously from Baseline through Week 104. Regimens could have been changed at Week 52 only. Subjects who could not tolerate these doses could receive MTX at a minimum dose of 10mg/week orally or subcutaneously. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 - Week 12 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Adalimumab (ADA) | Biological |
|
|
|
| Methotrexate (MTX) | Drug |
|
|
|
| Week 104 |
| Percentage of Subjects Who Met the American College of Rheumatology 20 % (ACR20) Criteria at Week 6 | Subjects who met the ACR20 criteria were those subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS). | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Subjects Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 6 | DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. | Week 6 |
| Percentage of Subjects Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 12 | DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. | Week 12 |
| Percentage of Subjects With a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 104, in Subjects Responding at Both Week 6 and Week 12 | DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. The definition of Week 6/12 responders was DAS28[ESR] Low Disease Activity (LDA) (ie ≤ 3.2) or an improvement of ≥ 1.2 in DAS28[ESR] relative to Baseline. | Week 104 |
| Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 104 | HAQ-DI was derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question was scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do), and the total HAQ-DI was scored on the scale of 0-3 as well. Change from Baseline was computed as the value at Week 104 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement. | From Baseline to Week 104 |
| Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Proportion of Subjects Who Discontinued After Response at Week 12 | Response at Week 12 means that a subject had either a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 12 or had a reduction of DAS28 [ESR] ≥ 1.2 from Baseline to Week 12. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Proportion of Subjects Discontinued are presented per study week (days relative to Week 12 visit). | From Week 12 up to Week 104 |
| Tuscaloosa |
| Alabama |
| United States |
| 159 | Tucson | Arizona | United States |
| 152 | Hot Springs | Arkansas | United States |
| 147 | Covina | California | United States |
| 161 | Fullerton | California | United States |
| 217 | La Mesa | California | United States |
| 149 | Los Angeles | California | United States |
| 144 | Menifee | California | United States |
| 185 | Roseville | California | United States |
| 208 | Sacramento | California | United States |
| 189 | Van Nuys | California | United States |
| 148 | Whittier | California | United States |
| 220 | Lewes | Delaware | United States |
| 142 | Aventura | Florida | United States |
| 216 | Fort Lauderdale | Florida | United States |
| 162 | Gainesville | Florida | United States |
| 209 | Vero Beach | Florida | United States |
| 145 | Coeur d'Alene | Idaho | United States |
| 202 | Maywood | Illinois | United States |
| 134 | Lexington | Kentucky | United States |
| 178 | Baltimore | Maryland | United States |
| 137 | Battle Creek | Michigan | United States |
| 153 | Detroit | Michigan | United States |
| 155 | Lansing | Michigan | United States |
| 204 | Eagan | Minnesota | United States |
| 180 | Rochester | Minnesota | United States |
| 143 | Saint Louis Park | Minnesota | United States |
| 135 | Omaha | Nebraska | United States |
| 170 | Reno | Nevada | United States |
| 201 | Teaneck | New Jersey | United States |
| 150 | Voorhees Township | New Jersey | United States |
| 205 | Albuquerque | New Mexico | United States |
| 154 | Albany | New York | United States |
| 136 | Brooklyn | New York | United States |
| 219 | Orchard Park | New York | United States |
| 207 | Plainview | New York | United States |
| 167 | Syracuse | New York | United States |
| 140 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States |
| 184 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States |
| 164 | Bethlehem | Pennsylvania | United States |
| 132 | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | United States |
| 190 | Wyomissing | Pennsylvania | United States |
| 210 | Charleston | South Carolina | United States |
| 187 | Myrtle Beach | South Carolina | United States |
| 203 | Orangeburg | South Carolina | United States |
| 133 | Jackson | Tennessee | United States |
| 160 | Knoxville | Tennessee | United States |
| 138 | Austin | Texas | United States |
| 151 | Corpus Christi | Texas | United States |
| 131 | Dallas | Texas | United States |
| 146 | Dallas | Texas | United States |
| 213 | Dallas | Texas | United States |
| 166 | Houston | Texas | United States |
| 212 | Houston | Texas | United States |
| 139 | San Antonio | Texas | United States |
| 181 | Sugar Land | Texas | United States |
| 165 | Victoria | Texas | United States |
| 211 | Arlington | Virginia | United States |
| 157 | Spokane | Washington | United States |
| 163 | Clarksburg | West Virginia | United States |
| 215 | Glendale | Wisconsin | United States |
| 6 | Camperdown | New South Wales | Australia |
| 5 | Kogarah | New South Wales | Australia |
| 2 | Maroochydore | Queensland | Australia |
| 4 | Hobart | Tasmania | Australia |
| 7 | Clayton | Victoria | Australia |
| 8 | Fitzroy | Victoria | Australia |
| 1 | Malvern | Victoria | Australia |
| 3 | Subiaco | Western Australia | Australia |
| 85 | Stockerau | Austria |
| 22 | Vienna | Austria |
| 18 | Pleven | Bulgaria |
| 35 | Plovdiv | Bulgaria |
| 21 | Sofia | Bulgaria |
| 29 | Sofia | Bulgaria |
| 34 | Sofia | Bulgaria |
| 46 | Sofia | Bulgaria |
| 179 | Edmonton | Alberta | Canada |
| 168 | St. John's | Newfoundland and Labrador | Canada |
| 176 | St. John's | Newfoundland and Labrador | Canada |
| 183 | Halifax | Nova Scotia | Canada |
| 172 | Hamilton | Ontario | Canada |
| 174 | Hamilton | Ontario | Canada |
| 177 | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada |
| 206 | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada |
| 175 | St. Catharines | Ontario | Canada |
| 218 | Rimouski | Quebec | Canada |
| 169 | Sainte-Foy | Quebec | Canada |
| 221 | Barrie | Canada |
| 171 | Québec | Canada |
| 103 | Brno | Czechia |
| 61 | Hradec Králové | Czechia |
| 58 | Pilsen | Czechia |
| 49 | Prague | Czechia |
| 40 | Uherské Hradiště | Czechia |
| 89 | Brest | France |
| 70 | Le Mans | France |
| 62 | Lyon | France |
| 72 | Montpellier | France |
| 90 | Orléans | France |
| 105 | Toulouse | France |
| 56 | Berlin | Germany |
| 64 | Cologne | Germany |
| 47 | Fulda | Germany |
| 17 | Hamburg | Germany |
| 31 | Heidelberg | Germany |
| 37 | Herne | Germany |
| 63 | Osnabrück | Germany |
| 11 | Ratingen | Germany |
| 66 | Rheine | Germany |
| 48 | Rostock | Germany |
| 71 | Traunstein | Germany |
| 44 | Zerbst | Germany |
| 94 | Heraklion | Greece |
| 95 | Larissa | Greece |
| 13 | Budapest | Hungary |
| 42 | Budapest | Hungary |
| 68 | Gyula | Hungary |
| 100 | Kistarcsa | Hungary |
| 43 | Szeged | Hungary |
| 33 | Veszprém | Hungary |
| 23 | Dublin | Ireland |
| 51 | Dublin | Ireland |
| 20 | Limerick | Ireland |
| 80 | Bergamo | Italy |
| 38 | Genova | Italy |
| 88 | Genova | Italy |
| 79 | Magenta | Italy |
| 98 | Naples | Italy |
| 67 | Prato | Italy |
| 36 | Roma | Italy |
| 39 | Verona | Italy |
| 194 | Chihuahua City | Mexico |
| 195 | Chihuahua City | Mexico |
| 193 | Guadalajara | Mexico |
| 192 | Monterrey | Mexico |
| 191 | San Luis Potosí City | Mexico |
| 60 | Monaco | Monaco |
| 107 | Bydgoszcz | Poland |
| 106 | Poznan | Poland |
| 113 | Warsaw | Poland |
| 115 | Warsaw | Poland |
| 108 | Wroclaw | Poland |
| 69 | Coimbra | Portugal |
| 27 | Lisbon | Portugal |
| 76 | Lisbon | Portugal |
| 14 | Ponte de Lima | Portugal |
| 81 | Porto | Portugal |
| 54 | Bacau | Romania |
| 74 | Brăila | Romania |
| 24 | Bucharest | Romania |
| 25 | Bucharest | Romania |
| 28 | Bucharest | Romania |
| 32 | Bucharest | Romania |
| 57 | Bucharest | Romania |
| 12 | Cluj-Napoca | Romania |
| 96 | Galati | Romania |
| 26 | Iași | Romania |
| 16 | A Coruña | Spain |
| 52 | A Coruña | Spain |
| 30 | Madrid | Spain |
| 83 | Madrid | Spain |
| 82 | Sabadell | Spain |
| 65 | Vigo | Spain |
| 53 | Sankt Gallen | Switzerland |
| 50 | Zurich | Switzerland |
| 86 | Ashford | United Kingdom |
| 78 | Brighton | United Kingdom |
| 59 | Leeds | United Kingdom |
| 19 | London | United Kingdom |
| 77 | Poole | United Kingdom |
| 55 | Sheffield | United Kingdom |
| 73 | Upton | United Kingdom |
| 99 | Wigan | United Kingdom |
| Derived |
| Smolen JS, Taylor PC, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Hashimoto M, Cara C, Lauwerys B, Tilt N, Ufuktepe B, Xavier RM, Balsa A, Curtis JR, Mikuls TR, Weinblatt M. Impact of high rheumatoid factor levels on treatment outcomes with certolizumab pegol and adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Nov 1;63(11):3015-3024. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae435. |
| 32100960 | Derived | Paul S, Marotte H, Kavanaugh A, Goupille P, Kvien TK, de Longueville M, Mulleman D, Sandborn WJ, Vande Casteele N. Exposure-Response Relationship of Certolizumab Pegol and Achievement of Low Disease Activity and Remission in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul;13(4):743-751. doi: 10.1111/cts.12760. Epub 2020 Apr 1. |
| FG001 | ADA+MTX (RTG) | Subjects received ADA 40mg (40mg/PFS, ie, 1 injection) at Baseline and then every 2 weeks through Week 10. In order to preserve the blind (ie, use of 2 injections) until Week 12, subjects received an injection of PBO in addition to ADA at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4. Week 12 Responders continued ADA 40mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks thereafter through Week 102. Week 12 Non-Responders were switched to a loading dose of CZP 400mg at Weeks 12, 14, and 16 followed by CZP 200mg every 2 weeks through Week 22. At Week 24, Week 12 Non-Responders who did not have DAS28(ESR) LDA or a DAS28(ESR) change from Week 12 reduction of ≥1.2 discontinued CZP treatment and were withdrawn from the Treatment Period. All subjects received Methotrexate 15 to 25mg/week orally or subcutaneously from Baseline through Week 104. Regimens could have been changed at Week 52 only. Subjects who could not tolerate these doses could receive MTX at a minimum dose of 10mg/week orally or subcutaneously. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Week 13 - Week 104 |
|
|
Baseline Characteristics refer to the Randomized Treatment Group (RTG) that consisted of all subjects randomized into the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | CZP+MTX (RTG) | Subjects received loading doses of CZP 400mg (200mg/PFS, ie, 2 injections) at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4; and CZP 200mg at Weeks 6, 8, and 10. Week 12 Responders continued CZP 200mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks thereafter through Week 102. Week 12 Non-Responders were switched to receive ADA 40mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks through Week 22. At Week 24, Week 12 Non-Responders who did not have DAS28(ESR) LDA or a DAS28(ESR) change from Week 12 reduction of ≥1.2 discontinued ADA treatment and were withdrawn from the Treatment Period. All subjects received Methotrexate 15 to 25mg/week orally or subcutaneously from Baseline through Week 104. Regimens could have been changed at Week 52 only. Subjects who could not tolerate these doses could receive MTX at a minimum dose of 10mg/week orally or subcutaneously. |
| BG001 | ADA+MTX (RTG) | Subjects received ADA 40mg (40mg/PFS, ie, 1 injection) at Baseline and then every 2 weeks through Week 10. In order to preserve the blind (ie, use of 2 injections) until Week 12, subjects received an injection of PBO in addition to ADA at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4. Week 12 Responders continued ADA 40mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks thereafter through Week 102. Week 12 Non-Responders were switched to a loading dose of CZP 400mg at Weeks 12, 14, and 16 followed by CZP 200mg every 2 weeks through Week 22. At Week 24, Week 12 Non-Responders who did not have DAS28(ESR) LDA or a DAS28(ESR) change from Week 12 reduction of ≥1.2 discontinued CZP treatment and were withdrawn from the Treatment Period. All subjects received Methotrexate 15 to 25mg/week orally or subcutaneously from Baseline through Week 104. Regimens could have been changed at Week 52 only. Subjects who could not tolerate these doses could receive MTX at a minimum dose of 10mg/week orally or subcutaneously. |
| BG002 | Total Title |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects Who Met the American College of Rheumatology 20 % (ACR20) Criteria at Week 12 | Subjects who met the ACR20 criteria were those subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS). | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who had a valid Baseline and valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement. | Posted | Number | Percentage of subjects | Week 12 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 104 | DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who had a valid Baseline and valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement. | Posted | Number | Percentage of subjects | Week 104 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Week 12 Responders Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 104 | DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. The definition of Week 12 responders was DAS28[ESR] Low Disease Activity (LDA) (ie ≤ 3.2) or an improvement of ≥ 1.2 in DAS28[ESR] relative to Baseline. | Week 12 Responders were defined as those with DAS28(ESR) LDA (defined as DAS28[ESR] ≤3.2) or a DAS28(ESR) CFB reduction of ≥1.2 at Week 12. | Posted | Number | Percentage of subjects | Week 104 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects Who Met the American College of Rheumatology 20 % (ACR20) Criteria at Week 6 | Subjects who met the ACR20 criteria were those subjects with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS). | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who had a valid Baseline and valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement. | Posted | Number | Percentage of subjects | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 6 | DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who had a valid Baseline and valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement. | Posted | Number | Percentage of subjects | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects Who Had a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 12 | DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who had a valid Baseline and valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement. | Posted | Number | Percentage of subjects | Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 104, in Subjects Responding at Both Week 6 and Week 12 | DAS28 [ESR] was calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR in mm/hour), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √ (TJC) + 0.28 x √ (SJC) + 0.70 x lognat (ESR) + 0.014 x Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, where 28 joints were examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. The definition of Week 6/12 responders was DAS28[ESR] Low Disease Activity (LDA) (ie ≤ 3.2) or an improvement of ≥ 1.2 in DAS28[ESR] relative to Baseline. | Week 12 Responders were defined as those with DAS28(ESR) LDA (defined as DAS28[ESR] ≤3.2) or a DAS28(ESR) CFB reduction of ≥1.2 at Week 12. Only subjects responding at both Week 6 and Week 12 are included in this analysis. | Posted | Number | Percentage of subjects | Week 104 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 104 | HAQ-DI was derived based on the mean of individual scores in 8 categories of daily living actives (using 20 questions). Each question was scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do), and the total HAQ-DI was scored on the scale of 0-3 as well. Change from Baseline was computed as the value at Week 104 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement. | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all subjects who had a valid Baseline and valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a Scale | From Baseline to Week 104 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Proportion of Subjects Who Discontinued After Response at Week 12 | Response at Week 12 means that a subject had either a Disease Activity Score 28 [Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate] (DAS28 [ESR]) ≤ 3.2 at Week 12 or had a reduction of DAS28 [ESR] ≥ 1.2 from Baseline to Week 12. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Proportion of Subjects Discontinued are presented per study week (days relative to Week 12 visit). | Week 12 Responders were defined as those with DAS28(ESR) LDA (defined as DAS28[ESR] ≤3.2) or a DAS28(ESR) CFB reduction of ≥1.2 at Week 12. | Posted | Number | proportion of subjects | From Week 12 up to Week 104 |
|
During the entire study period (From Week -4 to Week 104).
The AEs of subjects who switched study treatment at Week 12 (W12) were presented under the original treatment group if they occurred after the 1st administration of study treatment (W0) until the day before W12 treatment administration, and were presented under the switched treatment group if they occurred after the W12 treatment administration up to and including 70 days after the last injection. Subjects who switched treatment at W12 were included in both CZP+MTX(SS) and ADA+MTX(SS) group.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | CZP+MTX (SS) | All subjects who received at least 1 dose of Certolizumab pegol (CZP). All adverse events that occurred when the subject was receiving CZP treatment are summarized in this group. | 67 | 516 | 269 | 516 | ||
| EG001 | ADA+MTX (SS) | All subjects who received at least 1 dose of Adalimumab (ADA). All adverse events that occurred when the subject was receiving ADA treatment are summarized in this group. | 58 | 523 | 244 | 523 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic valve incompetence | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic valve stenosis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stress cardiomyopathy | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiogenic shock | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina unstable | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial ischaemia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ophthalmic vein thrombosis | Eye disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diplopia | Eye disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Obstruction gastric | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Irritable bowel syndrome | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anorectal varices | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sudden death | General disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Impaired healing | General disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Systemic inflammatory response syndrome | General disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatotoxicity | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Drug-induced liver injury | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis perforated | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Perirectal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mycobacterial infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oophoritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis A | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subcutaneous abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Disseminated tuberculosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis acute | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subdural heamatoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint dislocation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Humerus fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wrist fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ancle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femoral neck fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hand fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thoracic vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cervical vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthropathy | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bone disorder | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteonecrosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Foot deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Invertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint effusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint swelling | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Torticollis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lumbar spinal stenosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tendon disorder | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| B-cell lymphoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bladder cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Invasive ductal breast carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Borderline mucinous tumour of ovary | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic myeloid leukaemia | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung adenocarcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ovarian adenoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Basal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thyroid cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral haematoma | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral ischaemia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coma | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Generalised tonic-clonic seizure | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Amnesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post herpetic neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abortion | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pregnancy with contraceptive device | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Adjustment disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bipolar disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cervical dysplasia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Menorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia aspiration | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal polyps | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Interstitial lung disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteosynthesis | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip arthroplasty | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Venous thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral venous disease | Vascular disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Venous thrombosis limb | Vascular disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Latent tuberculosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA18.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCB | Cares | +1877 822 | 9493 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068582 | Certolizumab Pegol |
| D000068879 | Adalimumab |
| D008727 | Methotrexate |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011092 | Polyethylene Glycols |
| D011108 | Polymers |
| D046911 | Macromolecular Substances |
| D007140 | Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments |
| D007128 | Immunoglobulin Fragments |
| D010446 | Peptide Fragments |
| D010455 | Peptides |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
| D000630 | Aminopterin |
| D011622 | Pterins |
| D011621 | Pteridines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Week 24 Non-Responder |
|
| Non/bad compliance |
|
| Recurrent infections |
|
| False positive test |
|
| Sponsor request |
|
| Withdrawn in error |
|
| Exclusion criteria not met |
|
| Protocol deviation |
|
| Principal investigator retiring |
|
| Patient declined Safety Follow Up Visit |
|
| Abnormal questionable chest X-ray |
|
| Relocation |
|
| Sponsor decision |
|
| Medical monitor decision |
|
| Personal reason |
|
| Not completed |
|
| Death |
|
| Adverse Event |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| ADA+MTX (FAS) |
Subjects received ADA 40mg (40mg/PFS, ie, 1 injection) at Baseline and then every 2 weeks through Week 10. In order to preserve the blind (ie, use of 2 injections) until Week 12, subjects received an injection of PBO in addition to ADA at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4. Week 12 Responders continued ADA 40mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks thereafter through Week 102. Week 12 Non-Responders were switched to a loading dose of CZP 400mg at Weeks 12, 14, and 16 followed by CZP 200mg every 2 weeks through Week 22. At Week 24, Week 12 Non-Responders who did not have DAS28(ESR) LDA or a DAS28(ESR) change from Week 12 reduction of ≥1.2 discontinued CZP treatment and were withdrawn from the Treatment Period. All subjects received Methotrexate 15 to 25mg/week orally or subcutaneously from Baseline through Week 104. Regimens could have been changed at Week 52 only. Subjects who could not tolerate these doses could receive MTX at a minimum dose of 10mg/week orally or subcutaneously. |
|
|
|
|
|
| OG001 | ADA+MTX (FAS) | Subjects received ADA 40mg (40mg/PFS, ie, 1 injection) at Baseline and then every 2 weeks through Week 10. In order to preserve the blind (ie, use of 2 injections) until Week 12, subjects received an injection of PBO in addition to ADA at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4. Week 12 Responders continued ADA 40mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks thereafter through Week 102. Week 12 Non-Responders were switched to a loading dose of CZP 400mg at Weeks 12, 14, and 16 followed by CZP 200mg every 2 weeks through Week 22. At Week 24, Week 12 Non-Responders who did not have DAS28(ESR) LDA or a DAS28(ESR) change from Week 12 reduction of ≥1.2 discontinued CZP treatment and were withdrawn from the Treatment Period. All subjects received Methotrexate 15 to 25mg/week orally or subcutaneously from Baseline through Week 104. Regimens could have been changed at Week 52 only. Subjects who could not tolerate these doses could receive MTX at a minimum dose of 10mg/week orally or subcutaneously. |
|
|
| ADA+MTX (FAS) |
Subjects received ADA 40mg (40mg/PFS, ie, 1 injection) at Baseline and then every 2 weeks through Week 10. In order to preserve the blind (ie, use of 2 injections) until Week 12, subjects received an injection of PBO in addition to ADA at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4. Week 12 Responders continued ADA 40mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks thereafter through Week 102. Week 12 Non-Responders were switched to a loading dose of CZP 400mg at Weeks 12, 14, and 16 followed by CZP 200mg every 2 weeks through Week 22. At Week 24, Week 12 Non-Responders who did not have DAS28(ESR) LDA or a DAS28(ESR) change from Week 12 reduction of ≥1.2 discontinued CZP treatment and were withdrawn from the Treatment Period. All subjects received Methotrexate 15 to 25mg/week orally or subcutaneously from Baseline through Week 104. Regimens could have been changed at Week 52 only. Subjects who could not tolerate these doses could receive MTX at a minimum dose of 10mg/week orally or subcutaneously. |
|
|
| ADA+MTX (FAS) |
Subjects received ADA 40mg (40mg/PFS, ie, 1 injection) at Baseline and then every 2 weeks through Week 10. In order to preserve the blind (ie, use of 2 injections) until Week 12, subjects received an injection of PBO in addition to ADA at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4. Week 12 Responders continued ADA 40mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks thereafter through Week 102. Week 12 Non-Responders were switched to a loading dose of CZP 400mg at Weeks 12, 14, and 16 followed by CZP 200mg every 2 weeks through Week 22. At Week 24, Week 12 Non-Responders who did not have DAS28(ESR) LDA or a DAS28(ESR) change from Week 12 reduction of ≥1.2 discontinued CZP treatment and were withdrawn from the Treatment Period. All subjects received Methotrexate 15 to 25mg/week orally or subcutaneously from Baseline through Week 104. Regimens could have been changed at Week 52 only. Subjects who could not tolerate these doses could receive MTX at a minimum dose of 10mg/week orally or subcutaneously. |
|
|
ADA 40 mg at Baseline and then every 2 Weeks until Week 102. Subjects received PBO in addition to ADA at baseline and weeks 2 and 4 in order to maintain the blinding. All subjects received Methotrexate 15 to 25mg/week orally or subcutaneously from Baseline through Week 104. Regimens could have been changed at Week 52 only. Subjects who could not tolerate these doses could receive MTX at a minimum dose of 10mg/week orally or subcutaneously. |
|
|
| OG001 |
| ADA+MTX (FAS) |
Subjects received ADA 40mg (40mg/PFS, ie, 1 injection) at Baseline and then every 2 weeks through Week 10. In order to preserve the blind (ie, use of 2 injections) until Week 12, subjects received an injection of PBO in addition to ADA at Baseline, and Weeks 2 and 4. Week 12 Responders continued ADA 40mg at Week 12 and every 2 weeks thereafter through Week 102. Week 12 Non-Responders were switched to a loading dose of CZP 400mg at Weeks 12, 14, and 16 followed by CZP 200mg every 2 weeks through Week 22. At Week 24, Week 12 Non-Responders who did not have DAS28(ESR) LDA or a DAS28(ESR) change from Week 12 reduction of ≥1.2 discontinued CZP treatment and were withdrawn from the Treatment Period. All subjects received Methotrexate 15 to 25mg/week orally or subcutaneously from Baseline through Week 104. Regimens could have been changed at Week 52 only. Subjects who could not tolerate these doses could receive MTX at a minimum dose of 10mg/week orally or subcutaneously. |
|
|
|
|