Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study is an open label, randomized phase 3 study of MM-398 with or without 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Leucovorin (also known as folinic acid), versus 5-FU and leucovorin in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who have progressed on prior gemcitabine based therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MM-398 | Experimental | MM-398 120 mg/m2 Q3W IV. Note: The published dose of ONIVYDE was expressed as the irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate until October 2015. It is now expressed as the irinotecan free base. Converting a dose based on irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate to a dose based on irinotecan free base is accomplished by substituting the Molecular Weight of irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate (677.19 g/mole) with the Molecular Weight of irinotecan free base (586.68 g/mole), which results in a conversion factor of 0.866. 120 mg/m2 dose of irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate is equivalent to 100 mg/ m2 of irinotecan free base. |
|
| 5 Fluorouracil and Leucovorin IV | Active Comparator | 5 Fluorouracil and Leucovorin IV |
|
| MM-398, 5-FU and Leucovorin | Experimental | MM-398 80 mg/m2, 5-FU and Leucovorin Q2W IV. Note: The published dose of ONIVYDE was expressed as the irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate until October 2015. It is now expressed as the irinotecan free base. Converting a dose based on irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate to a dose based on irinotecan free base is accomplished by substituting the Molecular Weight of irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate (677.19 g/mole) with the Molecular Weight of irinotecan free base (586.68 g/mole), which results in a conversion factor of 0.866. 80 mg/m2 dose of irinotecan hydrochloride trihydrate is equivalent to 70 mg/ m2 of irinotecan free base. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM-398 | Drug | Arm A: MM-398 120 mg/m2 IV Q3W Arm C: MM-398 80mg/m2 IV Q2W |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival | Overall survival was the primary efficacy endpoint of the study and was defined as the time from the date of patient randomization to the date of death or the date the patient was last known to be alive. OS was summarized by Kaplan-Meier methodology for each treatment group. Pairwise treatment group comparisons were carried out using unstratified log rank analyses on the ITT population. Hazard ratio estimates are from Cox regression analysis. The comparison of Arm C is based only on patients who were randomized under the 3-arm version of the protocol. Consequently, the 5-FU+Leucovorin (Combo Therapy Comparison) group is a subset of all patients randomized to 5-FU+Leucovorin, which is the Mono Therapy Comparison control and contains patients randomized under both the 2-arm and 3-arm versions of the protocol. | From randomization to death; until the data cut off 14 Feb 2014. The maximum time in follow up was 25 months. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival | Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression, or death (any cause) on or prior to the clinical cutoff date, whichever occurred earlier. Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Patients with two or more consecutive missing response assessments prior to a visit with documented progression (or death) were censored at the last date of tumor assessment when the patient was documented to be progression free. PFS was summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods. The comparison of Arm C is based only on patients who were randomized under the 3-arm version of the protocol. Consequently, the 5-FU+Leucovorin (Combo Therapy Comparison) group is a subset of all patients randomized to 5-FU+Leucovorin, which is the Mono Therapy Comparison control and contains patients randomized under both the 2-arm and 3-arm versions of the protocol. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eliel Bayever, MD | Merrimack Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilbert | Arizona | United States | ||||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33214082 | Derived | Chen LT, Macarulla T, Blanc JF, Mirakhur B, de Jong FA, Belanger B, Bekaii-Saab T, Siveke JT. Early dose reduction/delay and the efficacy of liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): A post hoc analysis of NAPOLI-1. Pancreatology. 2021 Jan;21(1):192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.10.029. Epub 2020 Oct 10. | |
| 31856081 |
Not provided
Not provided
All patients were screened for UGT1A1*28 allele at baseline.
Patients were randomized over a period of 1.9 years starting from 2012-01-11 to 2013-09-11.
The study was initially a two-arm study with MM-398 monotherapy and 5-FU/LV control (protocol version 1) . A third arm of MM-398+5-FU/LV was added later (protocol version 2).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | MM-398 (Arm A) | • MM-398 120 mg/m2 IV on Day 1of a 3 weekly cycle Patients who were homozygous for UGT1A1*28 allele received the first cycle of therapy at a reduced dose of 80 mg/m2. If the patient did not experience any drug related toxicity after the first administration of MM-398, from cycle 2 onwards, the dose could be increased in increments of 20 mg/m2 up to a maximum of 120 mg/m2. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 5 Fluorouracil | Drug | Arm B: 5 Fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 IV for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest every 6 weeks Arm C: 5 Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks |
|
|
| Leucovorin | Drug | Arm B: Leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest every 6 weeks Arm C: Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks |
|
|
| Randomization until disease progression or death from any cause; Until the data cut off of 14 Feb 2014. The maximum time in follow up was 25 months. |
| Objective Response Rate | The objective response rate was a secondary efficacy endpoint of the study and was defined by the percentage of patients in the study population with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by the investigator. Best overall response was defined per RECIST (version 1.1) recorded from randomization until progression or end of study. RECIST (v 1.1) criteria does not require confirmation of response, but an additional, more stringent analysis was also conducted, with designation of CR (or PR) requiring confirmation of response at least 4 weeks following the initial assessment of CR (or PR). Stable disease (SD) required an assessment of SD at least 6 weeks after starting treatment. Subjects with insufficient data for response classification were classified as Not Evaluable for best overall response, and as a non-responder for objective response, in the ITT population. Treatment groups are as indicated for the primary outcome of OS. | Assessment every 6 weeks after initial response; Day 1 to data cut off of 14 Feb 2014; maximum time on study 25 months. |
| Time to Treatment Failure | Time from randomization to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression, treatment toxicity or death. | Randomization to treatment discontinuation (any cause). The maximum time in follow up was 25 months |
| Percentage of Patients With Clinical Benefit Response | Composite measure based on patient-reported pain (per VAS), patient-reported pain medication, KPS, and weight. Clinical benefit is indicated by either: (a) improvement in pain (less pain intensity with stable or decreased pain medication; or less pain medication with stable or decreased pain intensity) with stable or improved KPS; or (b) improvement in KPS with stable or improved pain. With stable for KPS and pain, clinical benefit may be indicated with an observation of positive weight change. Clinical benefit response (CBR) was classified weekly and a patient was considered a clinical benefit responder if clinical benefit was observed and maintained over a 4 week period. | Randomization to treatment discontinuation.The maximum time in follow up was 25 months |
| Percentage of Patients With Tumor Marker (CA 19-9) Response | Tumor marker response (TMR) was evaluated by the change in CA19-9 serum levels. Response was defined as a decrease of 50% of CA19-9 in relation to the baseline level at least once during the treatment period. | Baseline to treatment discontinuation every 6 weeks; The maximum time in follow up was 25 months |
| EORTC-QLQ-C30 | This patient recorded outcome consists of 15 subscales in 3 independent domains: global health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional scales (cognitive, emotional, physical, role and social functioning), and symptom scales (appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, insomnia, nausea and vomiting, and pain). For each subscale, patients were classified as improved, worsened or stable. Improvement is indicated by achievement of subscale score at least 10% improved from baseline and maintained for at least 6 weeks. Worsened is indicated by subscale score at least 10% worse than baseline. Stable is indicated by neither improvement nor worsened. Achievement of improvement prior to worsening was classified as improvement. | Baseline to treatment discontinuation every 6 weeks; The maximum time in follow up was 25 months |
| Pharmacokinetic Measurements of Total Irinotecan | Plasma concentration-time data for MM-398 will be analyzed using population pharmacokinetic methods. | 6 weeks after first study drug administration |
| Glendale |
| Arizona |
| United States |
| Scottsdale | Arizona | United States |
| Burbank | California | United States |
| Duarte | California | United States |
| Fresno | California | United States |
| LaVerne | California | United States |
| San Luis Obispo | California | United States |
| Boyton Beach | Florida | United States |
| Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| Kansas City | Missouri | United States |
| St Louis | Missouri | United States |
| Henderson | Nevada | United States |
| Albuquerque | New Mexico | United States |
| Buffalo | New York | United States |
| Columbus | Ohio | United States |
| Norman | Oklahoma | United States |
| Greenville | South Carolina | United States |
| Bedford | Texas | United States |
| Dallas | Texas | United States |
| Tyler | Texas | United States |
| Fairfax | Virginia | United States |
| Norfolk | Virginia | United States |
| Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Rosario | Argentina |
| Santa Fe | Argentina |
| Westmead | New South Wales | Australia |
| Kurralta Park | South Australia | Australia |
| Boxhill | Victoria | Australia |
| Heidelberg | Victoria | Australia |
| Melbourne | Victoria | Australia |
| Nedlands | Western Australia | Australia |
| Belo Horizonte | Brazil |
| Ijuí | Brazil |
| Passo Fundo | Brazil |
| Porto Alegre | Brazil |
| São Paulo | Brazil |
| Montreal | Quebec | Canada |
| Hořovice | Czechia |
| Olomouc | Czechia |
| Prague | Czechia |
| Příbram | Czechia |
| Bordeaux | France |
| Lille | France |
| Marseille | France |
| Berlin | Germany |
| Jens | Germany |
| Munich | Germany |
| Ulm | Germany |
| Budapest | Hungary |
| Pécs | Hungary |
| Szeged | Hungary |
| Szolnok | Hungary |
| Szombathely | Hungary |
| Castellana Grotte | Italy |
| Genova | Italy |
| Legnano | Italy |
| Naples | Italy |
| Roma | Italy |
| Port Elizabeth | South Africa |
| Pretoria | South Africa |
| Western Cape | South Africa |
| Hwasun-gun | South Korea |
| Seoul | South Korea |
| Alicante | Spain |
| Barcelona | Spain |
| Madrid | Spain |
| Santander | Spain |
| Valencia | Spain |
| Chiayi City | Taiwan |
| Kaohsiung City | Taiwan |
| Taiching | Taiwan |
| Tainan | Taiwan |
| Taipei | Taiwan |
| Taoyuan | Taiwan |
| Liverpool | United Kingdom |
| London | United Kingdom |
| Manchester | United Kingdom |
| Sutton | United Kingdom |
| Derived |
| Macarulla Mercade T, Chen LT, Li CP, Siveke JT, Cunningham D, Bodoky G, Blanc JF, Lee KH, Dean A, Belanger B, Wang-Gillam A. Liposomal Irinotecan + 5-FU/LV in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Subgroup Analyses of Patient, Tumor, and Previous Treatment Characteristics in the Pivotal NAPOLI-1 Trial. Pancreas. 2020 Jan;49(1):62-75. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001455. |
| 31789476 | Derived | Bang YJ, Li CP, Lee KH, Chiu CF, Park JO, Shan YS, Kim JS, Chen JS, Shim HJ, Rau KM, Choi HJ, Oh DY, Belanger B, Chen LT. Liposomal irinotecan in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in Asian patients: Subgroup analysis of the NAPOLI-1 study. Cancer Sci. 2020 Feb;111(2):513-527. doi: 10.1111/cas.14264. Epub 2019 Dec 20. |
| 30842038 | Derived | Macarulla T, Blanc JF, Wang-Gillam A, Chen LT, Siveke JT, Mirakhur B, Chen J, de Jong FA. Liposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer - A subgroup analysis of the pivotal NAPOLI-1 trial. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 May;10(3):427-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 4. |
| 30654298 | Derived | Wang-Gillam A, Hubner RA, Siveke JT, Von Hoff DD, Belanger B, de Jong FA, Mirakhur B, Chen LT. NAPOLI-1 phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Final overall survival analysis and characteristics of long-term survivors. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Feb;108:78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 Jan 14. |
| 30414528 | Derived | Chen LT, Siveke JT, Wang-Gillam A, Li CP, Bodoky G, Dean AP, Shan YS, Jameson GS, Macarulla T, Lee KH, Cunningham D, Blanc JF, Chiu CF, Schwartsmann G, Braiteh FS, Mamlouk K, Belanger B, de Jong FA, Hubner RA. Survival with nal-IRI (liposomal irinotecan) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in per-protocol and non-per-protocol populations of NAPOLI-1: Expanded analysis of a global phase 3 trial. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Dec;105:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Nov 8. |
| 26615328 | Derived | Wang-Gillam A, Li CP, Bodoky G, Dean A, Shan YS, Jameson G, Macarulla T, Lee KH, Cunningham D, Blanc JF, Hubner RA, Chiu CF, Schwartsmann G, Siveke JT, Braiteh F, Moyo V, Belanger B, Dhindsa N, Bayever E, Von Hoff DD, Chen LT; NAPOLI-1 Study Group. Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):545-557. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00986-1. Epub 2015 Nov 29. |
| FG001 | 5-FU + Leucovorin (Arm B) |
|
| FG002 | MM-398 + 5-FU + Leucovorin (Arm C) |
|
| Treated Population |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
All randomized patients.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | MM-398 | MM-398 Q3W IV MM-398: Arm A: MM-398 120 mg/m2 IV Q3W Arm C: MM-398 80mg/m2 IV Q2W |
| BG001 | 5 Fluorouracil and Leucovorin IV | 5 Fluorouracil and Leucovorin IV 5 Fluorouracil: Arm B: 5 Fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 IV for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest every 6 weeks Arm C: 5 Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks Leucovorin: Arm B: Leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest every 6 weeks Arm C: Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks |
| BG002 | MM-398, 5-FU and Leucovorin | MM-398, 5-FU and Leucovorin Q2W IV MM-398: Arm A: MM-398 120 mg/m2 IV Q3W Arm C: MM-398 80mg/m2 IV Q2W 5 Fluorouracil: Arm B: 5 Fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 IV for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest every 6 weeks Arm C: 5 Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks Leucovorin: Arm B: Leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest every 6 weeks Arm C: Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| RACE (NIH/OMB) | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Karnofsky Performance Status (Baseline KPS)[1] |
| Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Pancreatic Primary Tumor Location | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Survival | Overall survival was the primary efficacy endpoint of the study and was defined as the time from the date of patient randomization to the date of death or the date the patient was last known to be alive. OS was summarized by Kaplan-Meier methodology for each treatment group. Pairwise treatment group comparisons were carried out using unstratified log rank analyses on the ITT population. Hazard ratio estimates are from Cox regression analysis. The comparison of Arm C is based only on patients who were randomized under the 3-arm version of the protocol. Consequently, the 5-FU+Leucovorin (Combo Therapy Comparison) group is a subset of all patients randomized to 5-FU+Leucovorin, which is the Mono Therapy Comparison control and contains patients randomized under both the 2-arm and 3-arm versions of the protocol. | Intent to Treat population (ITT population) consisted of all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses in the ITT population consider treatment group according to randomization. Comparisons of the MM-398+5-FU/LV to 5-FU/LV were carried out only on patients who were randomized under protocol version 2 or later. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From randomization to death; until the data cut off 14 Feb 2014. The maximum time in follow up was 25 months. |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Progression Free Survival | Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression, or death (any cause) on or prior to the clinical cutoff date, whichever occurred earlier. Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Patients with two or more consecutive missing response assessments prior to a visit with documented progression (or death) were censored at the last date of tumor assessment when the patient was documented to be progression free. PFS was summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods. The comparison of Arm C is based only on patients who were randomized under the 3-arm version of the protocol. Consequently, the 5-FU+Leucovorin (Combo Therapy Comparison) group is a subset of all patients randomized to 5-FU+Leucovorin, which is the Mono Therapy Comparison control and contains patients randomized under both the 2-arm and 3-arm versions of the protocol. | ITT Population | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Randomization until disease progression or death from any cause; Until the data cut off of 14 Feb 2014. The maximum time in follow up was 25 months. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate | The objective response rate was a secondary efficacy endpoint of the study and was defined by the percentage of patients in the study population with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by the investigator. Best overall response was defined per RECIST (version 1.1) recorded from randomization until progression or end of study. RECIST (v 1.1) criteria does not require confirmation of response, but an additional, more stringent analysis was also conducted, with designation of CR (or PR) requiring confirmation of response at least 4 weeks following the initial assessment of CR (or PR). Stable disease (SD) required an assessment of SD at least 6 weeks after starting treatment. Subjects with insufficient data for response classification were classified as Not Evaluable for best overall response, and as a non-responder for objective response, in the ITT population. Treatment groups are as indicated for the primary outcome of OS. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage with confirmed response | Assessment every 6 weeks after initial response; Day 1 to data cut off of 14 Feb 2014; maximum time on study 25 months. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Treatment Failure | Time from randomization to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression, treatment toxicity or death. | ITT Population | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Randomization to treatment discontinuation (any cause). The maximum time in follow up was 25 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Clinical Benefit Response | Composite measure based on patient-reported pain (per VAS), patient-reported pain medication, KPS, and weight. Clinical benefit is indicated by either: (a) improvement in pain (less pain intensity with stable or decreased pain medication; or less pain medication with stable or decreased pain intensity) with stable or improved KPS; or (b) improvement in KPS with stable or improved pain. With stable for KPS and pain, clinical benefit may be indicated with an observation of positive weight change. Clinical benefit response (CBR) was classified weekly and a patient was considered a clinical benefit responder if clinical benefit was observed and maintained over a 4 week period. | Clinical Benefit Response Evaluable Population: Patients who received study drug and met at least one of the following criteria were defined as eligible for evaluation of CBR:
| Posted | Number | percentage of participants with CBR | Randomization to treatment discontinuation.The maximum time in follow up was 25 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Tumor Marker (CA 19-9) Response | Tumor marker response (TMR) was evaluated by the change in CA19-9 serum levels. Response was defined as a decrease of 50% of CA19-9 in relation to the baseline level at least once during the treatment period. | Patients with elevated baseline CA19-9 value (> 30 U/mL) who received study drug. | Posted | Number | percent of participants with TMR | Baseline to treatment discontinuation every 6 weeks; The maximum time in follow up was 25 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | EORTC-QLQ-C30 | This patient recorded outcome consists of 15 subscales in 3 independent domains: global health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional scales (cognitive, emotional, physical, role and social functioning), and symptom scales (appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, insomnia, nausea and vomiting, and pain). For each subscale, patients were classified as improved, worsened or stable. Improvement is indicated by achievement of subscale score at least 10% improved from baseline and maintained for at least 6 weeks. Worsened is indicated by subscale score at least 10% worse than baseline. Stable is indicated by neither improvement nor worsened. Achievement of improvement prior to worsening was classified as improvement. | ITT patients who had baseline and at least one-post baseline EORTC-QLQ-C30 assessment. | Posted | Number | percent of patients in category | Baseline to treatment discontinuation every 6 weeks; The maximum time in follow up was 25 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetic Measurements of Total Irinotecan | Plasma concentration-time data for MM-398 will be analyzed using population pharmacokinetic methods. | PK population was based on Protocol, all participants who received the appropriate dose of MM-398. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | Total irinotecan = ug/L; SN38= ug/L | 6 weeks after first study drug administration |
|
Study drug initiation through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or EOS, whichever is later; Up to 764 days.
5-FU= 5-fluorouracil; LV=leucovorin Events were collected by systematic assessment Term from vocabulary, MedDRA version 14.1
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | MM-398 | MM-398 Q3W IV MM-398: Arm A: MM-398 120 mg/m2 IV Q3W Arm C: MM-398 80mg/m2 IV Q2W | 90 | 147 | 145 | 147 | ||
| EG001 | 5 Fluorouracil and Leucovorin IV | 5 Fluorouracil and Leucovorin IV 5 Fluorouracil: Arm B: 5 Fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 IV for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest every 6 weeks Arm C: 5 Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks Leucovorin: Arm B: Leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest every 6 weeks Arm C: Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks | 58 | 134 | 132 | 134 | ||
| EG002 | MM-398, 5-FU and Leucovorin | MM-398, 5-FU and Leucovorin Q2W IV MM-398: Arm A: MM-398 120 mg/m2 IV Q3W Arm C: MM-398 80mg/m2 IV Q2W 5 Fluorouracil: Arm B: 5 Fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 IV for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest every 6 weeks Arm C: 5 Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks Leucovorin: Arm B: Leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest every 6 weeks Arm C: Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV every 2 weeks | 56 | 117 | 116 | 117 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Febrile Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal Pain Upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal Ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastro Intestinal Haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal Obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small Intestinal Obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| General Physical Health Deterioration | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-Cardiac Chest Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile Duct Obstruction | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholangitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic Failure | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice Cholestatic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biliary Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium Difficile Colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device Related Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic Shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decrease Appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tumour Haemorrhage | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tumour Pain | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular Accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute Prerenal Failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hydronephrosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal Failure Acute | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural Effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary Embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep Vein Thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased Appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight Decreased | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutrophil Count Decreased | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| White Blood Cell Count Decreased | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema Peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mucosal Inflammation | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet Count Decreased | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal Pain Upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal Distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mouth Ulceration | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine Aminotransferase Increased | Investigations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypomagnesaemia | Investigations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbumineamia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | General disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral Candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypocalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased | Investigations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood Alkaline Phosphatase Increased | Investigations | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (14.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Authorship/contents of any publication is determined by site and provides sponsor a publication prior to submission. Sponsor has 60 days to review and avoid editorial changes but may request site delete confidential data. If publication contains patentable matter, site agrees to delay publication for 60 days. If study is part of multicenter protocol, site agrees not to independently publish. If multicenter publication is not forthcoming in 18 months after study end, site may proceed accordingly.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Eliel Bayever | Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 6174411000 | 7676 | EBayever@merrimack.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010190 | Pancreatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C584112 | irinotecan sucrosofate |
| D005472 | Fluorouracil |
| D002955 | Leucovorin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014498 | Uracil |
| D011744 | Pyrimidinones |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D005575 | Formyltetrahydrofolates |
| D013763 | Tetrahydrofolates |
| D005492 | Folic Acid |
| D011622 | Pterins |
| D011621 | Pteridines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D003067 | Coenzymes |
| D045762 | Enzymes and Coenzymes |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| other race |
|
| 90% = normal activity, few symptoms of disease |
|
| 80% = normal activity, some symptoms of disease |
|
| 70% = caring for self, unable to work |
|
| 60% [2] = needs help, can manage most tasks |
|
| 50%[2]= needs help often and medical care |
|
| Not recorded |
|
| Body |
|
| Tail |
|
| Multiple locations including head |
|
| Multiple locations not including head |
|
| Unknown = not specified |
|
Unstratified logrank test.
| 0.012 |
| Hazard Ratio (HR) |
| 0.67 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.49 |
| 0.92 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
| OG001 | 5-FU + Leucovorin (Arm B) (Mono Therapy Comparison) |
|
| OG002 | MM-398 + 5-FU + Leucovorin(Arm C) Combo Therapy Comparison |
|
| OG003 | 5-FU + Leucovorin (Combo Therapy Comparison) |
|
|
|
|
| OG001 | 5-FU + Leucovorin (Arm B) (Mono Therapy Comparison) |
|
| OG002 | MM-398 + 5-FU + Leucovorin(Arm C) Combo Therapy Comparison |
|
| OG003 | 5-FU + Leucovorin (Combo Therapy Comparison) |
|
|
|
|
| OG003 | 5-FU + Leucovorin (Combo Therapy Comparison) |
|
|
|
|
| OG001 |
| 5-FU + Leucovorin (Arm B) (Mono Therapy Comparison) |
|
| OG002 | MM-398 + 5-FU + Leucovorin(Arm C) Combo Therapy Comparison |
|
| OG003 | 5-FU + Leucovorin (Combo Therapy Comparison) |
|
|
|
|
| MM-398 + 5-FU + Leucovorin(Arm C) Combo Therapy Comparison |
|
| OG003 | 5-FU + Leucovorin (Combo Therapy Comparison) |
|
|
|
|
| OG002 | MM-398 + 5-FU + Leucovorin(Arm C) Combo Therapy Comparison |
|
| OG003 | 5-FU + Leucovorin (Combo Therapy Comparison) |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|