Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recently a novel stimulation design was developed, called burst stimulation. In a non-placebo controlled pilot study burst stimulation seemed superior to tonic stimulation over a period extending more than 2 years, and even though an incidental finding, this design seemed capable of suppressing pain without mandatory induction of paresthesias. This permits for the first time to scientifically prove that spinal cord stimulation is better than placebo stimulation. A study was therefore initiated to find out whether spinal cord stimulation is indeed capable of suppressing neuropathic limb pain in a placebo controlled way.
Patients receive three type of stimulation (burst, tonic and sham). We want to compare these different stimulation protocol to verify which one is the one the patient prefer the most and have the least side-effects (paresthesia)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tonic | Experimental | 5 hz stimulation at an amplitude that the patient find bearable (+/- 1.5 mA) |
|
| Sham | Experimental | no stimulation, patient receive a sham stimulation (actually the IPG is not running) |
|
| burst | Experimental | 500 hz burst at 5 hz stimulation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dorsal column stimulator | Procedure | test different settings of stimulation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scales for pain back, pain limb, pain general and paresthesia |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| VAS scores for pain now, worst pain, least pain and pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire |
Not provided
All patients were selected after multidisciplinary discussion with a specialized pain physician, a psychological and psychiatric evaluation was performed to rule out psychogenic pain as well as other psychiatric morbidity contraindicating an implant. After authorization by the psychologist and psychiatrist an implant was offered.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
A patient will be excluded from participation in this study if they meet any one of the following criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sven Vanneste, PhD | Universiteit Antwerpen | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital Antwerp | Edegem | 2650 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34854473 | Derived | O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009437 | Neuralgia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D010146 | Pain |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D009461 |
| Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |