Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-021491-28 | EudraCT Number | ||
| V419-008 | Other Identifier | Merck |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will determine whether participants who receive V419 (PR5I) at 2, 4, and 11 to 12 months of age have an acceptable response to the vaccine. This study will also determine whether the immune response to V419 is similar to that of participants who received a licensed vaccine control. The primary hypothesis is that participants who receive PR5I at 2, 4, and 11 to 12 months have an acceptable response rate to all PR5I-contained antigens at one month after the Toddler dose of PR5I.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PR5I | Experimental | Infant series: PR5I 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 2 and 4 months of age, and rotavirus vaccine (either Rotarixâ„¢ 1.5 mL oral dose at 2 and 4 months of age [subset 1] or RotaTeqâ„¢ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4 and 5 months of age [subset 2]). Toddler dose: PR5I 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 11 to 12 months of age. |
|
| INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa | Active Comparator | Infant series: INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 2 and 4 months of age, and rotavirus vaccine (either Rotarixâ„¢ 1.5 mL oral dose at 2 and 4 months of age [subset 1] or RotaTeqâ„¢ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4 and 5 months of age [subset 2]). Toddler dose: INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 11 to 12 months of age. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR5I | Biological | DTaP-HB-IPV-Hib (Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis [acellular, component], hepatitis B [recombinant DNA], polio virus [inactivated], and Haemophilus influenza type b conjugate vaccine [adsorbed]) Vaccine 0.5 mL intramuscular injection at 2, 4, and 11 to 12 months of age. Injection is to be administered in the upper anterolateral thigh, separate limb from the concomitant vaccine. PR5I is a liquid suspension hexavalent vaccine. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of Antibody (Ab) Response or Seroresponse Rates to All Antigens Contained in PR5I Vaccine One Month After the Toddler Dose of PR5I (11 to 12 Months of Age) | Acceptability response rates were defined as Ab titre ≥1.0 μg/mL for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) (polyribosylribitol phosphate, PRP); ≥10 mIU/mL for Hepatitis (HBsAg); ≥0.1 IU/mL for diphtheria and tetanus; ≥8 (1/dil) for inactive poliovirus type (IPV) 1, 2 & 3, and percentage of pertussis seroresponder participants (Pertussis toxoid [PT], Filamentous haemagglutinin [FHA], Fimbriae types 2 & 3 [FIM] and Pertactin [PRN]) 1 month Post-Toddler dose of PR5I. Seroresponse was defined: (1) If pre-Dose 1 Ab concentration (cc) was \ | 1 month after Toddler dose of PR51 (post-toddler dose) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Non-inferiority of Antibody (Ab) Response Rate to Haemophilus Influenzae Type b (PRP) One Month After the 2nd Dose of PR5I (4 Months of Age) as Compared With INFANRIX Hexa | Percentage of participants with an Ab titre ≥1.0 μg/mL for Hib (polyribosylribitol phosphate, PRP) measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) 1 month post-infant dose 2 of PR5I or INFANRIX hexa. | 1 month after the 2nd dose (post-infant dose 2) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Director | Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27288217 | Derived | Silfverdal SA, Icardi G, Vesikari T, Flores SA, Pagnoni MF, Xu J, Liu GF, Stek JE, Boisnard F, Thomas S, Ziani E, Lee AW. A Phase III randomized, double-blind, clinical trial of an investigational hexavalent vaccine given at 2, 4, and 11-12 months. Vaccine. 2016 Jul 19;34(33):3810-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.054. Epub 2016 Jun 18. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants from Italy and Sweden were randomized to Rotavirus Vaccine Subset 1 (Rotarixâ„¢). Participants from Finland were randomized to Rotavirus Vaccine Subset 2 (RotaTeqâ„¢).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | PR5I | Infant series: PR5I 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 2 and 4 months of age, and rotavirus vaccine (either Rotarixâ„¢ 1.5 mL oral dose at 2 and 4 months of age [subset 1] or RotaTeqâ„¢ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4 and 5 months of age [subset 2]). Toddler dose: PR5I 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 11 to 12 months of age. |
| FG001 | INFANRIXâ„¢ Hexa | Infant series: INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 2 and 4 months of age, and rotavirus vaccine (either Rotarixâ„¢ 1.5 mL oral dose at 2 and 4 months of age [subset 1] or RotaTeqâ„¢ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4 and 5 months of age [subset 2]). Toddler dose: INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 11 to 12 months of age. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infant Series |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interim Period |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Toddler Dose |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | PR5I | Infant series: PR5I 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 2 and 4 months of age, and rotavirus vaccine (either Rotarixâ„¢ 1.5 mL oral dose at 2 and 4 months of age [subset 1] or RotaTeqâ„¢ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4 and 5 months of age [subset 2]). Toddler dose: PR5I 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 11 to 12 months of age. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Acceptability of Antibody (Ab) Response or Seroresponse Rates to All Antigens Contained in PR5I Vaccine One Month After the Toddler Dose of PR5I (11 to 12 Months of Age) | Acceptability response rates were defined as Ab titre ≥1.0 μg/mL for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) (polyribosylribitol phosphate, PRP); ≥10 mIU/mL for Hepatitis (HBsAg); ≥0.1 IU/mL for diphtheria and tetanus; ≥8 (1/dil) for inactive poliovirus type (IPV) 1, 2 & 3, and percentage of pertussis seroresponder participants (Pertussis toxoid [PT], Filamentous haemagglutinin [FHA], Fimbriae types 2 & 3 [FIM] and Pertactin [PRN]) 1 month Post-Toddler dose of PR5I. Seroresponse was defined: (1) If pre-Dose 1 Ab concentration (cc) was \ | Participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, received PR51 vaccinations within acceptable day ranges, and had a blood draw sample window of Days 28 to 51 following the Toddler dose. Participants receiving INFANRIX™ hexa were excluded from the acceptability analyses. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | 1 month after Toddler dose of PR51 (post-toddler dose) |
Up to approximately 11 months (serious AEs and deaths were collected for the duration of the study; unsolicited adverse events were collected from D1 to D15 after each hexavalent vaccination, solicited adverse events were collected D1 to D5 after each hexavalent vaccination)
Analysis population includes all randomised participants who received at least 1 vaccination and had safety follow-up.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | PR5I | Infant series: PR5I 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 2 and 4 months of age, and rotavirus vaccine (either Rotarixâ„¢ 1.5 mL oral dose at 2 and 4 months of age [subset 1] or RotaTeqâ„¢ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4 and 5 months of age [subset 2]). Toddler dose: PR5I 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 11 to 12 months of age. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development | Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. | 1-800-672-6372 | ClinicalTrialsDisclosure@merck.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001424 | Bacterial Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D004165 | Diphtheria |
| D014917 | Whooping Cough |
| D013742 | Tetanus |
| D006509 | Hepatitis B |
| D006192 | Haemophilus Infections |
| D011051 | Poliomyelitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001423 | Bacterial Infections and Mycoses |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D003354 | Corynebacterium Infections |
| D000193 | Actinomycetales Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000617220 | Vaxelis |
| D022243 | Rotavirus Vaccines |
| C538862 | 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014765 | Viral Vaccines |
| D014612 | Vaccines |
| D001688 | Biological Products |
| D045424 | Complex Mixtures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Rotavirus vaccine | Biological | Rotarixâ„¢ 1.5 mL oral dose at 2 and 4 months of age (subset 1, Italy and Sweden) or RotaTeqâ„¢ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4 and 5 months of age (subset 2, Finland) |
|
| Prevenar 13â„¢ | Biological | Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL intramuscular injection at 2, 4, and 11 to 12 months of age. Injection is to be administered in the upper anterolateral thigh, separate limb from the concomitant vaccine. |
|
| INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa | Biological | Combined Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis [DTaP], Hepatitis B [HepB], Poliovirus [IPV] and Haemophilus influenzae type b [Hib] Vaccine 0.5 mL intramuscular injection at 2, 4 and 11 to 12 months of age. Injection is to be administered in the upper anterolateral thigh, separate limb from the concomitant vaccine. INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa is provided as 2 components (lyophilized Hib and liquid DTaP, IPV, and HepB). Prior to administration, the vaccine must be reconstituted by adding the liquid DTaP-HepB-IPV component to the vial containing the Hib pellet. |
|
| Superiority of Antibody (Ab) Response Rates to Haemophilus Influenzae Type b (PRP) One Month After the 2nd Dose of PR5I (4 Months of Age) as Compared With INFANRIX Hexa | Percentage of participants with an Ab titre ≥1.0 μg/mL for Hib (polyribosylribitol phosphate, PRP) measured by RIA 1 month post-infant dose 2 of PR5I or INFANRIX hexa. | 1 month after the 2nd dose (post-infant dose 2) |
| Non-inferiority Ab Response Rates to PR5I Antigens One Month After the Toddler Dose of PR5I (11 to 12 Months of Age) as Compared With INFANRIX Hexa | Percentage of participants with pre-specified Ab titre for PRP, HBsAg, diphtheria, tetanus, IPV1, 2 & 3, and percentage of pertussis seroresponder participants (PT, FHA, FIM and PRN) 1 month post-toddler dose were calculated based on the method by Miettinen and Nurminen stratified by country. Seroresponse was defined: (1) If pre-Dose 1 Ab cc was \ | 1 month after Toddler dose (post-toddler dose) |
| Non-inferiority of Rotavirus Response (Geometric Mean Titer, GMT) One Month After the 2nd Dose of Rotarix (4 Months of Age) Administered Concomitantly With PR5I Versus INFANRIX Hexa | Antibody titres expressed in units/mL were measured for Rotavirus IgA by Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA), 1 month after the 2nd dose of Rotarix, administered concomitantly with PR5I or INFANRIX hexa (Post-Dose 2). The 95% CI for GMT was based on the t-distribution of the natural log-transformed antibody titer. | 1 month after the 2nd dose of Rotarix, administered concomitantly with PR5I or INFANRIX hexa (Post-Dose 2) |
| Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) From Day 1 to Day 15 After Any Vaccination | Injection-site and systemic AEs were reported daily on the Vaccination Report Card (VRC) by the parent(s) or legal representative from Day 1 (D1) to D15 after each vaccination. Solicited injection site and systemic AEs were reported daily from D1 to D5 after each vaccination. AEs at injection sites were always considered as vaccine-related (V-related) (Injection-Site Reactions [ISRs]). The investigator had to assess whether systemic AEs were related or not to the vaccine. All AEs (related and unrelated) are displayed here. | Solicited AEs: up to 5 days (Days 1-5 after any vaccination); unsolicited AEs: up to 15 days (Day 1-15 after any vaccination) |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting Solicited ISRs From D1 to D5 After Any Vaccination | Adverse events at injection sites were always considered as related to vaccine (Injection-Site Reactions [ISRs]). Solicited ISRs were defined as injection-site erythema, injection-site pain, and injection-site swelling occurring from D1 to D5 after vaccination. | Up to 5 days (Day 1 to Day 5 following vaccination) |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting Unsolicited ISRs From D1 to D15 After Any Vaccination | Adverse events at injection sites were always considered as related to vaccine (Injection-Site Reactions {ISRs]). Unsolicited ISRs occurring from Day 1 (D1) to D15 after any vaccination were reported daily on the VRC by the parent(s) or legal representative. Unsolicited ISRs with incidence ≥1% are reported below. | From D1 to D15 after any vaccination |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Adverse Events (AEs) From D1 to D5 After Any Vaccination | Solicited systemic AEs were defined as crying, decreased appetite, irritability, pyrexia (rectal temperature ≥38.0°C), somnolence, and vomiting occurring from D1 to D5 after vaccination. The investigator had to assess whether these systemic AEs were related or not to the vaccines. All (related and unrelated) are displayed here. | Up to 5 days (from D1 to D5 after any vaccination) |
| Not Vaccinated |
|
| Adverse Event |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG001 | INFANRIXâ„¢ Hexa | Infant series: INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 2 and 4 months of age, and rotavirus vaccine (either Rotarixâ„¢ 1.5 mL oral dose at 2 and 4 months of age [subset 1] or RotaTeqâ„¢ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4 and 5 months of age [subset 2]). Toddler dose: INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 11 to 12 months of age. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Days |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Non-inferiority of Antibody (Ab) Response Rate to Haemophilus Influenzae Type b (PRP) One Month After the 2nd Dose of PR5I (4 Months of Age) as Compared With INFANRIX Hexa | Percentage of participants with an Ab titre ≥1.0 μg/mL for Hib (polyribosylribitol phosphate, PRP) measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) 1 month post-infant dose 2 of PR5I or INFANRIX hexa. | Participants who received 2nd dose in the Infant series and had a blood draw sample window of Days 28 to 51 post-infant dose 2. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | 1 month after the 2nd dose (post-infant dose 2) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Superiority of Antibody (Ab) Response Rates to Haemophilus Influenzae Type b (PRP) One Month After the 2nd Dose of PR5I (4 Months of Age) as Compared With INFANRIX Hexa | Percentage of participants with an Ab titre ≥1.0 μg/mL for Hib (polyribosylribitol phosphate, PRP) measured by RIA 1 month post-infant dose 2 of PR5I or INFANRIX hexa. | Participants who received 2nd dose in the Infant series and had a blood draw sample window of Days 28 to 51 post-infant dose 2. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | 1 month after the 2nd dose (post-infant dose 2) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Non-inferiority Ab Response Rates to PR5I Antigens One Month After the Toddler Dose of PR5I (11 to 12 Months of Age) as Compared With INFANRIX Hexa | Percentage of participants with pre-specified Ab titre for PRP, HBsAg, diphtheria, tetanus, IPV1, 2 & 3, and percentage of pertussis seroresponder participants (PT, FHA, FIM and PRN) 1 month post-toddler dose were calculated based on the method by Miettinen and Nurminen stratified by country. Seroresponse was defined: (1) If pre-Dose 1 Ab cc was \ | Participants who met the inclusion criteria, were not protocol violators, received vaccinations within acceptable day ranges, and had a blood draw sample window of Days 28 to 51 following the Toddler dose. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | 1 month after Toddler dose (post-toddler dose) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Non-inferiority of Rotavirus Response (Geometric Mean Titer, GMT) One Month After the 2nd Dose of Rotarix (4 Months of Age) Administered Concomitantly With PR5I Versus INFANRIX Hexa | Antibody titres expressed in units/mL were measured for Rotavirus IgA by Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA), 1 month after the 2nd dose of Rotarix, administered concomitantly with PR5I or INFANRIX hexa (Post-Dose 2). The 95% CI for GMT was based on the t-distribution of the natural log-transformed antibody titer. | Participants who received dose 2 of Rotarix. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titre (units/mL) | 1 month after the 2nd dose of Rotarix, administered concomitantly with PR5I or INFANRIX hexa (Post-Dose 2) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) From Day 1 to Day 15 After Any Vaccination | Injection-site and systemic AEs were reported daily on the Vaccination Report Card (VRC) by the parent(s) or legal representative from Day 1 (D1) to D15 after each vaccination. Solicited injection site and systemic AEs were reported daily from D1 to D5 after each vaccination. AEs at injection sites were always considered as vaccine-related (V-related) (Injection-Site Reactions [ISRs]). The investigator had to assess whether systemic AEs were related or not to the vaccine. All AEs (related and unrelated) are displayed here. | All randomized participants who received at least 1 vaccination and who had safety follow-up. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Solicited AEs: up to 5 days (Days 1-5 after any vaccination); unsolicited AEs: up to 15 days (Day 1-15 after any vaccination) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reporting Solicited ISRs From D1 to D5 After Any Vaccination | Adverse events at injection sites were always considered as related to vaccine (Injection-Site Reactions [ISRs]). Solicited ISRs were defined as injection-site erythema, injection-site pain, and injection-site swelling occurring from D1 to D5 after vaccination. | All randomised participants who received at least 1 vaccination and who had safety follow-up. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Up to 5 days (Day 1 to Day 5 following vaccination) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reporting Unsolicited ISRs From D1 to D15 After Any Vaccination | Adverse events at injection sites were always considered as related to vaccine (Injection-Site Reactions {ISRs]). Unsolicited ISRs occurring from Day 1 (D1) to D15 after any vaccination were reported daily on the VRC by the parent(s) or legal representative. Unsolicited ISRs with incidence ≥1% are reported below. | All randomised participants who received at least 1 vaccination and who had safety follow-up. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | From D1 to D15 after any vaccination |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Adverse Events (AEs) From D1 to D5 After Any Vaccination | Solicited systemic AEs were defined as crying, decreased appetite, irritability, pyrexia (rectal temperature ≥38.0°C), somnolence, and vomiting occurring from D1 to D5 after vaccination. The investigator had to assess whether these systemic AEs were related or not to the vaccines. All (related and unrelated) are displayed here. | All randomised participants who received at least 1 vaccination and who had safety follow-up. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Up to 5 days (from D1 to D5 after any vaccination) |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 653 |
| 6 |
| 653 |
| 650 |
| 653 |
| EG001 | INFANRIXâ„¢ Hexa | Infant series: INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 2 and 4 months of age, and rotavirus vaccine (either Rotarixâ„¢ 1.5 mL oral dose at 2 and 4 months of age [subset 1] or RotaTeqâ„¢ 2 mL oral dose at 2, 4 and 5 months of age [subset 2]). Toddler dose: INFANRIXâ„¢ hexa 0.5 mL injection + Prevenar 13â„¢ 0.5 mL injection administered at 11 to 12 months of age. | 0 | 659 | 10 | 659 | 653 | 659 |
| Heart disease congenital | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vitello-intestinal duct remnant | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia respiratory syncytial viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyelonephritis acute | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Streptococcal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Kawasaki's disease | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Crying | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site bruising | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site haemorrhage | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site induration | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site pain | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site swelling | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Irritability | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Otitis media | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The Sponsor and Sponsor representative must have the opportunity to review all proposed abstracts, manuscripts, or presentations regarding this study 60 days prior to submission for publication/presentation. Any information identified by the Sponsor or Sponsor representative as confidential must be deleted prior to submission.
| D016908 | Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections |
| D001885 | Bordetella Infections |
| D016905 | Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D003015 | Clostridium Infections |
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D018347 | Hepadnaviridae Infections |
| D004266 | DNA Virus Infections |
| D006525 | Hepatitis, Viral, Human |
| D006505 | Hepatitis |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D016871 | Pasteurellaceae Infections |
| D009187 | Myelitis |
| D002494 | Central Nervous System Infections |
| D004769 | Enterovirus Infections |
| D010850 | Picornaviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D000090862 | Neuroinflammatory Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| Anti-HBsAg ≥10 mIU/mL |
|
|
| Anti-Diphtheria ≥0.1 IU/mL |
|
|
| Anti-Tetanus ≥0.1 IU/mL |
|
|
| Anti-PT seroresponse |
|
|
| Anti-FHA seroresponse |
|
|
| Anti-PRN seroresponse |
|
|
| Anti-IPV1 ≥1:8 dilution |
|
|
| Anti-IPV2 ≥1:8 dilution |
|
|
| Anti-IPV3 ≥1:8 dilution |
|
|
| Non-Inferiority for HBsAg | Miettinen & Nurminen with stratification | Statistical analysis was based on the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by country. | <0.001 | ifference in percentages | -0.59 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.66 | 1.35 | Non-Inferiority | The estimate of the difference between PR5I & INFANRIX hexa groups in HBsAg response rate (based on Ab titre ≥10 mIU/mL) was calculated with its 1-sided P-value & 2-sided 95% CI. If the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -10% (non-inferiority margin), it was concluded that PR5I group response rate was non-inferior to INFANRIX hexa group response rate. |
| Non-Inferiority for Diptheria | Miettinen & Nurminen with stratification | Statistical analysis was based on the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by country. | <0.001 | Difference in percentages | -1.21 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.54 | -0.22 | Non-Inferiority | The estimate of the difference between PR5I & INFANRIX hexa groups in Diphtheria response rate (based on Ab titre ≥0.1 IU/mL) was calculated with its 1-sided P-value & 2-sided 95% CI. If the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -10% (non-inferiority margin), it was concluded that PR5I group response rate was non-inferior to INFANRIX hexa group response rate. |
| Non-Inferiority for Tetanus | Miettinen & Nurminen with stratification | Statistical analysis was based on the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by country. | <0.001 | Difference in percentages | -0.17 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.95 | 0.50 | Non-Inferiority | The estimate of the difference between PR5I & INFANRIX hexa groups in Tetanus response rate (based on Ab titre ≥0.1 IU/mL) was calculated with its 1-sided P-value & 2-sided 95% CI. If the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -5% (non-inferiority margin), it was concluded that PR5I group response rate was non-inferior to INFANRIX hexa group response rate. |
| Non-Inferiority for PT | Miettinen & Nurminen with stratification | Statistical analysis was based on the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by country. | <0.001 | Difference in percentages | -0.54 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.75 | 0.49 | Non-Inferiority | The estimate of the difference between PR5I & INFANRIX hexa groups in the percentage of seroresponder participants for PT was calculated with its 1-sided P-value & 2-sided 95% CI. If the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -10% (non-inferiority margin), it was concluded that PR5I group response rate was non-inferior to INFANRIX hexa group response rate. |
| Non-Inferiority for FHA | Miettinen & Nurminen with stratification | Statistical analysis was based on the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by country. | <0.001 | Difference in percentages | -1.73 | 2-Sided | 95 | -3.47 | -0.26 | Non-Inferiority | The estimate of the difference between PR5I & INFANRIX hexa groups in the percentage of seroresponder participants for FHA was calculated with its 1-sided P-value & 2-sided 95% CI. If the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -10% (non-inferiority margin), it was concluded that PR5I group response rate was non-inferior to INFANRIX hexa group response rate. |
| Non-Inferiority for PRN | Miettinen & Nurminen with stratification | Statistical analysis was based on the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by country. | <0.001 | Difference in percentages | -1.42 | 2-Sided | 95 | -3.42 | 0.39 | Non-Inferiority | The estimate of the difference between PR5I & INFANRIX hexa groups in the percentage of seroresponder participants for PRN was calculated with its 1-sided P-value & 2-sided 95% CI. If the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -10% (non-inferiority margin), it was concluded that PR5I group response rate was non-inferior to INFANRIX hexa group response rate. |
| Non-Inferiority for IPV1 | Miettinen & Nurminen with stratification | Statistical analysis was based on the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by country. | <0.001 | Difference in percentages | -0.51 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.59 | 0.34 | Non-Inferiority | The estimate of the difference between PR5I & INFANRIX hexa groups in IPV1 response rate (based on Ab titre ≥8 (1/dil)) was calculated with its 1-sided P-value & 2-sided 95% CI. If the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -5% (non-inferiority margin), it was concluded that PR5I group response rate was non-inferior to INFANRIX hexa group response rate. |
| Non-Inferiority for IPV2 | Miettinen & Nurminen with stratification | Statistical analysis was based on the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by country. | <0.001 | Difference in percentages | -0.17 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.96 | 0.49 | Non-Inferiority | The estimate of the difference between PR5I & INFANRIX hexa groups in IPV2 response rate (based on Ab titre ≥8 (1/dil)) was calculated with its 1-sided P-value & 2-sided 95% CI. If the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -5% (non-inferiority margin), it was concluded that PR5I group response rate was non-inferior to INFANRIX hexa group response rate. |
| Non-Inferiority for IPV3 | Miettinen & Nurminen with stratification | Statistical analysis was based on the Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by country. | <0.001 | Difference in percentages | -0.16 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.20 | 0.82 | Non-Inferiority | The estimate of the difference between PR5I & INFANRIX hexa groups in IPV3 response rate (based on Ab titre ≥8 (1/dil)) was calculated with its 1-sided P-value & 2-sided 95% CI. If the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -5% (non-inferiority margin), it was concluded that PR5I group response rate was non-inferior to INFANRIX hexa group response rate. |
| At least 1 ISR (D1-D15) |
|
| At least 1 solicited ISR (D1-D5) |
|
| At least 1 systemic AE (D1-D15) |
|
| At least 1 V-related systemic AE (D1-D15) |
|
| At least 1 solicited systemic AE (D1-D5) |
|
| At least 1 V-related solicited systemic AE (D1-D5) |
|
| ISR or V-related systemic AE | Risk Difference (RD) | 0.8 | 95 | -0.3 | 2.0 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| At least 1 ISR | Risk Difference (RD) | 2.6 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.7 | 6.0 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| At least 1 solicited ISR | Risk Difference (RD) | 2.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.9 | 5.9 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| At least 1 systemic AE | Risk Difference (RD) | 0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.1 | 1.4 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| At least 1 vaccine-related systemic AE | Risk Difference (RD) | 0.8 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.5 | 2.2 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| At least 1 solicited systemic AE | Risk Difference (RD) | 0.8 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.5 | 2.2 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| At least 1 vaccine-related solicited systemic AE | Risk Difference (RD) | 0.9 | 95 | -0.4 | 2.3 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| Injection-site swelling |
|
| Injection-site pain | Risk Difference (RD) | 3.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.5 | 8.3 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate whether an overall trend of risk differences existed. If the 95% CI for the risk differences included 0.0, the numerical differences were not considered significant. |
| Injection-site swelling | Risk Difference (RD) | 7.5 | 95 | 2.1 | 12.9 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate whether an overall trend of risk differences existed. If the 95% CI for the risk differences included 0.0, the numerical differences were not considered significant. |
| Injection-site induration |
|
| Injection-site nodule |
|
| Injection-site warmth |
|
| Injection-site haemorrhage | Risk Difference (RD) | 0.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.5 | 1.6 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| Injection-site induration | Risk Difference (RD) | 2.6 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.2 | 6.4 | Other |
| Injection-site nodule | Risk Difference (RD) | 0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.8 | 1.5 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| Injection-site warmth | Risk Difference (RD) | 1.1 | 95 | -0.4 | 2.7 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| Irritability |
|
| Pyrexia |
|
| Somnolence |
|
| Vomiting |
|
| Decreased appetite | Risk Difference (RD) | 3.6 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.6 | 8.8 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. If the 95% CI for the risk differences included 0.0, the numerical differences were not considered significant. |
| Irritability | Risk Difference (RD) | 2.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.0 | 5.4 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. If the 95% CI for the risk differences included 0.0, the numerical differences were not considered significant. |
| Pyrexia | Risk Difference (RD) | 6.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.5 | 11.3 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. If the 95% CI for the risk differences included 0.0, the numerical differences were not considered significant. |
| Somnolence | Risk Difference (RD) | 5.8 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.7 | 9.8 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. The aim of the 95% CI was to investigate an overall trend and not any specific difference. If 0.0 was excluded from the 95% CI, the trend could not be ruled out. |
| Vomiting | Risk Difference (RD) | 1.8 | 2-Sided | 95 | -3.2 | 6.9 | Other | The risk differences between groups (PR5I group - INFANRIX hexa group) and their 2-sided 95% CI were calculated for the above criteria based on the unstratified Miettinen & Nurminen method. If the 95% CI for the risk differences included 0.0, the numerical differences were not considered significant. |