Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01DK091331-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Enrollment for this study is complete.
This study is designed to determine if use of a real-time continuous glucose monitor (RT-CGM) can reverse defective Glucose counter regulation and hypoglycemia unawareness in long standing type 1 diabetes.
The present protocol is designed to determine whether strict hypoglycemia avoidance by real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM), can restore endogenous glucose production in response to hypoglycemia in patients with long standing disease. Twelve subjects with long standing type 1 diabetes complicated by hypoglycemia unawareness underwent assessment of the endogenous glucose production response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia using paired hyperinsulinemic euglycemic and hypoglycemic clamps with stable glucose isotope infusions before and at 6 and 18 months following initiation of RT-CGM. The primary analysis will be change in the endogenous glucose production response from before to 6 months following initiation of RT-CGM, and a secondary analysis will consider the persistence of any change at 18 months. The clinical significance of any determined changes in the endogenous glucose production response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia will be determined by comparison to responses obtained using paired hyperinsulinemic euglycemic and hypoglycemic clamps on one occasion in a matched control group of 12 subjects with long-standing type 1 diabetes but no hypoglycemia unawareness (GROUP 2) and in a matched control group of 12 nondiabetic subjects (GROUP 3).
Arms are not assigned to these two control groups in ct.gov as they were only used as a baseline for clinical significance. Neither group wore a CGM nor are they analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points. This said, for control group clarification, inclusion and exclusion criteria for each group is included in ct.gov
Hypoglycemia is a major barrier to the achievement of adequate glycemic control for most patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. Type 1 diabetic patients with absolute insulin deficiency (C-peptide negative) are at greatest risk for experiencing severe hypoglycemic events because the near total destruction of insulin producing islet β-cells produces an associated defect in glucagon secretion from neighboring α-cells. Such patients then depend on the sympathoadrenal system as a final defense against hypoglycemia, but unfortunately, recurrent episodes of hypoglycemia blunt sympathoadrenal activation and produce a syndrome of hypoglycemia unawareness that is associated with a twenty-fold increased risk of life-threatening hypoglycemia. Without intact islet or sympathoadrenal (especially epinephrine) responses to hypoglycemia, these patients cannot increase endogenous (primarily hepatic) glucose production to prevent or correct low blood glucose.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoglycemia Unaware T1 Diabetes RT-CGM | Experimental | This arm is the intervention group. It consists of participants with type 1 diabetes complicated by hypoglycemia unawareness. Patients wore an RT-CGM for 18 months. We studied glucose production and symptom generation during insulin-induced hypoglycemia (metabolic testing) by subjecting this intervention group to a pair of metabolic clamps (hypoglycemic and euglycemic) at baseline, at 6 months and at 18 months to determine if hypoglycemia avoidance can reverse unawareness. Please note: Arms are not assigned to the two control groups (non-diabetics and T1Ds with intact awareness) in ct.gov as they are only used as a baseline for clinical significance. Neither group wore a CGM nor are they analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT-CGM | Device | Each device is approximately the size of a pager and transmits with a subcutaneously placed sensor consisting of a 21 - 26 gauge needle 5 - 12 mm in length. Sensors are placed using sterile precautions and changed every 3 - 7 days depending on the manufacturers' instructions. All devices are approved as adjunctive tools to blood glucose monitoring that will be continued at least 4 times daily, before each meal and at bedtime. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Endogenous Glucose Production | Measure of hepatic glucose output during final hour of hypoglycemic clamp. Outcome Measures are not assigned to the control groups in ct.gov as they were only used as a baseline for clinical significance. Neither group wore a CGM nor were they analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Endogenous Glucose Production | Measure of hepatic glucose output during final hour of hypoglycemic clamp | 18 months |
| Autonomic Symptom Response to Hypoglycemia | Response measure during hypoglycemic clamp using an Autonomic Symptom Questionnaire. The autonomic symptom response is calculated during the final hour of the Hypoglycemic clamp as the sum of scores ranging from 0 (none) to 5 (severe) for each of the following symptoms: anxiety, palpitations, sweating, tremor, hunger, and tingling. This results in a minimum of 0 or a maximum of 30 score with the higher score a better outcome. The scale title is Autonomic Symptom Response to hypoglycemia. |
Not provided
Key Inclusion Criteria for intervention GROUP 1 (Long-standing T1D complicated by hypoglycemia unawareness)
Male and female subjects aged 25 to 70 years
Able to provide written informed consent and to comply with the protocol procedures
Clinical history compatible with type 1 diabetes with disease onset < 40 years of age OR onset ≥ 40 years and documented islet autoimmunity
Insulin-dependent for > 10 years
Absent C-peptide (< 0.3 ng/mL).
Involvement in intensive diabetes management defined as self-monitoring of glucose values no less than a mean of three times each day averaged over each week and by the administration of three or more insulin injections each day or insulin pump therapy under the direction of an endocrinologist, diabetologist, or diabetes specialist with at least 3 clinical evaluations during the previous 12 months.)
Hypoglycemia unawareness manifested by a Clarke score of 4 or more AND at least one of the following:
At least one episode of severe hypoglycemia in the past 12 months defined as an event with symptoms or signs compatible with hypoglycemia in which the subject was unable to treat him/herself and which was associated with either a blood glucose level < 54 mg/dl [3.0 mmol/L] or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration; OR documented > 5% time spent in the hypoglycemic range (glucose < 60 mg/dl) by 72-hour blinded CGM.
Key Inclusion Criteria for control GROUP 2 (Long-standing T1D with intact hypoglycemia awareness)
Key Inclusion Criteria for control GROUP 3 (Non-diabetic controls)
Key Exclusion Criteria for ALL 3 groups
Body mass index (BMI) greater than 38 kg/m2.
Insulin requirement of more than 1.0 IU/kg/day.
HbA1c greater than 10%.
Untreated proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
SBP greater than 160 mmHg or DBP greater than 100 mmHg.
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 55 ml/min/1.73 m-squared
Positive pregnancy test, presently breast-feeding, or unwillingness to use effective contraceptive measures for the duration of the study.
Baseline hemoglobin less than 11 g/dl in women and less than12 g/dl in men.
Severe co-existing cardiac disease
Persistent elevation of liver function tests greater than 1.5 upper normal limits
Hyperlipidemia despite medical therapy
Receiving treatment for a medical condition requiring chronic use of systemic steroids
Presence of a seizure disorder not attributable to hypoglycemia.
Untreated hypothyroidism, Addisons disease, or Celiac disease.
Treatment with any anti-diabetic medication other than insulin within 4 weeks of enrollment.
Use of RT-CGM (continuous glucose monitor) within last 4 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael R Rickels, M.D., M.S. | University of Pennsylvania | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical and Translational Research Center, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9000705 | Background | Hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Diabetes. 1997 Feb;46(2):271-86. | |
| 16306382 | Background | Cryer PE. Mechanisms of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure and its component syndromes in diabetes. Diabetes. 2005 Dec;54(12):3592-601. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.12.3592. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Intervention Group (Group 1) consists of participants with Type 1 Diabetes complicated by Hypoglycemia Unawareness.
There were two Control Groups:
(Group 2) T1Ds With Intact Awareness and (Group 3) Non-diabetics are used as a baseline for clinical significance. Neither of these two Control Groups wore a CGM nor were they analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Hypoglycemia Unaware T1 Diabetics | This Intervention Group (Group 1) consists of participants with type 1 diabetes complicated by hypoglycemia unawareness. Patients wore an RT-CGM for 18 months. We studied glucose production and symptom generation during insulin-induced hypoglycemia (metabolic testing) by subjecting this intervention group to a pair of metabolic clamps (hypoglycemic and euglycemic) at baseline, at 6 months and at 18 months to determine if hypoglycemia avoidance can reverse unawareness. |
| FG001 | Control Group 2 - T1Ds With Intact Awareness | This control group was one of two control groups used as a baseline for clinical significance. Neither of these two control groups wore a CGM nor were they analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points. |
| FG002 | Control Group 3 - Non-diabetics | This control group was one of two control groups used as a baseline for clinical significance. Neither of these two control groups wore a CGM nor were they analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Hypoglycemia Unaware T1 Diabetics are the intervention group. The 2 control groups (Non-diabetics & T1Ds with intact Awareness) were used for clinical significance and were not assessed for outcome measures. These control group numbers have been included in the participant Flow, Baseline Characteristics and Adverse Events modules only.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Hypoglycemia Unaware T1 Diabetics | This main arm is the intervention group. It consists of participants with type 1 diabetes complicated by hypoglycemia unawareness. Patients wore an RT-CGM for 18 months. We studied glucose production and symptom generation during insulin-induced hypoglycemia (metabolic testing) by subjecting this intervention group to a pair of metabolic clamps (hypoglycemic and euglycemic) at baseline, at 6 months and at 18 months to determine if hypoglycemia avoidance can reverse unawareness. RT-CGM: Each device is approximately the size of a pager and transmits with a subcutaneously placed sensor consisting of a 21 - 26 gauge needle 5 - 12 mm in length. Sensors are placed using sterile precautions and changed every 3 - 7 days depending on the manufacturers' instructions. All devices are approved as adjunctive tools to blood glucose monitoring that will be continued at least 4 times daily, before each meal and at bedtime. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Endogenous Glucose Production | Measure of hepatic glucose output during final hour of hypoglycemic clamp. Outcome Measures are not assigned to the control groups in ct.gov as they were only used as a baseline for clinical significance. Neither group wore a CGM nor were they analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points. | Type 1 Diabetes with Hypoglycemia Unawareness. Patients wear an RT-CGM for 18 months. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mg/kg/min | 6 months |
|
18 months
Adverse event and/or serious adverse event definitions do not differ from those of clinical trials.gov
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Hypoglycemia Unaware T1 Diabetics | This main arm is the intervention group. It consists of participants with type 1 diabetes complicated by hypoglycemia unawareness. Patients wore an RT-CGM for 18 months. We studied glucose production and symptom generation during insulin-induced hypoglycemia (metabolic testing) by subjecting this intervention group to a pair of metabolic clamps (hypoglycemic and euglycemic) at baseline, at 6 months and at 18 months to determine if hypoglycemia avoidance can reverse unawareness. RT-CGM: Each device is approximately the size of a pager and transmits with a subcutaneously placed sensor consisting of a 21 to 26-gauge needle 5 to12 mm in length. Sensors are placed using sterile precautions and changed every 3 to 7 days depending on the manufacturers' instructions. All devices are approved as adjunctive tools to blood glucose monitoring that will be continued at least 4 times daily, before each meal and at bedtime. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cornelia V. Dalton Bakes | UPenn | 215-746-2085 | corneliv@pennmedicine.upenn.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| D007003 | Hypoglycemia |
| D014474 | Unconsciousness |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Hypoglycemia Unaware T1 Diabetics & 2 Control Groups. Non-Diabetics & T1Ds With Intact Awareness.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| 6 months |
| Autonomic Symptom Response to Hypoglycemia | Response measure during hypoglycemic clamp using an Autonomic Symptom Questionnaire. The autonomic symptom response is calculated during the final hour of the Hypoglycemic clamp as the sum of scores ranging from 0 (none) to 5 (severe) for each of the following symptoms: anxiety, palpitations, sweating, tremor, hunger, and tingling. This results in a minimum of 0 or a maximum of 30 score with the higher score a better outcome. The scale title is Autonomic Symptom Response to hypoglycemia. | 18 months |
| Rodebaugh Diabetes Center, University of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia |
| Pennsylvania |
| 19104 |
| United States |
| University of Pennsylvania - Institute for Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| 15386817 | Background | Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Pramming S, Heller SR, Wallace TM, Rasmussen AK, Jorgensen HV, Matthews DR, Hougaard P, Thorsteinsson B. Severe hypoglycaemia in 1076 adult patients with type 1 diabetes: influence of risk markers and selection. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004 Nov-Dec;20(6):479-86. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.482. |
| 15595336 | Background | Tanenberg R, Bode B, Lane W, Levetan C, Mestman J, Harmel AP, Tobian J, Gross T, Mastrototaro J. Use of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to guide therapy in patients with insulin-treated diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 Dec;79(12):1521-6. doi: 10.4065/79.12.1521. |
| 18779236 | Background | Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group; Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, Bode BW, Buckingham B, Chase HP, Clemons R, Fiallo-Scharer R, Fox LA, Gilliam LK, Hirsch IB, Huang ES, Kollman C, Kowalski AJ, Laffel L, Lawrence JM, Lee J, Mauras N, O'Grady M, Ruedy KJ, Tansey M, Tsalikian E, Weinzimer S, Wilson DM, Wolpert H, Wysocki T, Xing D. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 2;359(14):1464-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. Epub 2008 Sep 8. |
| 18715214 | Background | Hirsch IB, Abelseth J, Bode BW, Fischer JS, Kaufman FR, Mastrototaro J, Parkin CG, Wolpert HA, Buckingham BA. Sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy: results of the first randomized treat-to-target study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Oct;10(5):377-83. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0068. |
| 21294770 | Background | Hermanides J, Norgaard K, Bruttomesso D, Mathieu C, Frid A, Dayan CM, Diem P, Fermon C, Wentholt IM, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH. Sensor-augmented pump therapy lowers HbA(1c) in suboptimally controlled Type 1 diabetes; a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2011 Oct;28(10):1158-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03256.x. |
| 18828243 | Background | JDRF CGM Study Group. JDRF randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes: research design and methods. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Aug;10(4):310-21. doi: 10.1089/dia.2007.0302. |
| 16249446 | Background | Rickels MR, Schutta MH, Mueller R, Markmann JF, Barker CF, Naji A, Teff KL. Islet cell hormonal responses to hypoglycemia after human islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005 Nov;54(11):3205-11. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3205. |
| 17192287 | Background | Rickels MR, Schutta MH, Mueller R, Kapoor S, Markmann JF, Naji A, Teff KL. Glycemic thresholds for activation of counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses in islet transplant recipients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Mar;92(3):873-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2426. Epub 2006 Dec 27. |
| 29190340 | Derived | Rickels MR, Peleckis AJ, Dalton-Bakes C, Naji JR, Ran NA, Nguyen HL, O'Brien S, Chen S, Lee I, Schutta MH. Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Hypoglycemia Avoidance and Glucose Counterregulation in Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jan 1;103(1):105-114. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-01516. |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| BG001 | Control Group 2 - T1Ds With Intact Awareness | Control Group 2 consists of 12 type one diabetics with intact awareness. Participants in control group 2 are enrolled as a baseline for clinical significance and not assessed for outcome measures. Control group 2 did not wear a CGM. They attended 3 visits (screening, HypoGlycemic clamp and EuGlycemic clamp) and they were not analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points. |
| BG002 | Control Group 3 - Non-diabetics | Control Group 3 consists of 12 non-diabetics. Participants in control group 3 are enrolled as a baseline for clinical significance and not assessed for outcome measures. Control group 3 did not wear a CGM. They attended 3 visits (screening, HypoGlycemic clamp and EuGlycemic clamp) and they were not analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Hypoglycemia Unaware T1 Diabetes RT-CGM | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Endogenous Glucose Production | Measure of hepatic glucose output during final hour of hypoglycemic clamp | Type 1 Diabetes with Hypoglycemia Unawareness. Patients wear an RT-CGM for 18 months. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mg/kg/min | 18 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Autonomic Symptom Response to Hypoglycemia | Response measure during hypoglycemic clamp using an Autonomic Symptom Questionnaire. The autonomic symptom response is calculated during the final hour of the Hypoglycemic clamp as the sum of scores ranging from 0 (none) to 5 (severe) for each of the following symptoms: anxiety, palpitations, sweating, tremor, hunger, and tingling. This results in a minimum of 0 or a maximum of 30 score with the higher score a better outcome. The scale title is Autonomic Symptom Response to hypoglycemia. | Type 1 Diabetes with Hypoglycemia Unawareness. Patients wear an RT-CGM for 18 months. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Autonomic Symptom Response to Hypoglycemia | Response measure during hypoglycemic clamp using an Autonomic Symptom Questionnaire. The autonomic symptom response is calculated during the final hour of the Hypoglycemic clamp as the sum of scores ranging from 0 (none) to 5 (severe) for each of the following symptoms: anxiety, palpitations, sweating, tremor, hunger, and tingling. This results in a minimum of 0 or a maximum of 30 score with the higher score a better outcome. The scale title is Autonomic Symptom Response to hypoglycemia. | Type 1 Diabetes with Hypoglycemia Unawareness. Patients wear an RT-CGM for 18 months. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | 18 months |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 13 |
| 0 |
| 13 |
| 0 |
| 13 |
| EG001 | Control Group 2 - T1 Diabetics | Control Group 2 consists of 12 type one diabetics with intact awareness. Participants in control group 2 are enrolled as a baseline for clinical significance and not assessed for outcome measures. Control group 2 did not wear a CGM. They attended 3 visits (screening, HypoGlycemic clamp and EuGlycemic clamp) and they were not analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points. | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| EG002 | Control Group 3 - Non Diabetics | Control Group 3 consists of 12 non-diabetics. Participants in control group 3 are enrolled as a baseline for clinical significance and not assessed for outcome measures. Control group 3 did not wear a CGM. They attended 3 visits (screening, HypoGlycemic clamp and EuGlycemic clamp) and they were not analyzed at 6-month and 18-month time-points. | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D003244 | Consciousness Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |