Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation therapy for relief of pain associated with metastatic bone tumors.
Patients with painful bone metastases who meet the eligibility criteria and who have been determined to be an appropriate candidate for cryoablation therapy will be offered enrollment into the study. Cryoablation is the process of destroying tissue by the application of extremely cold temperatures. Galil Medical Cryoablation Systems are used as a surgical tool in the fields of general surgery, dermatology (skin), neurology (nerves), chest surgery (including lung), Ears-Nose-Throat (ENT), gynecology, oncology (cancer), proctology (colon/rectal) and urology (kidney).
Patients agreeing to participate will read and sign an informed consent form and thus become subjects in the study. Treatment will be performed using a Galil Medical cryoablation system and Galil Medical cryoablation needles. Subjects will be followed for up to 24 weeks (6 months) for palliation of pain, quality of life and analgesic usage. Baseline and follow-up data will be collected for each subject via a web-based electronic data collection tool.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Other | All subjects will have cryoablation on one or two painful metastatic bone tumors. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Procedure | For cryoablation in the palliation of painful bone metastases, subject preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management are identical to those of standard cryoablation routinely performed at all clinical centers participating in this study and are at the discretion of the investigator. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in worst pain scores | The endpoint for this study will be measured as follows: assessment of the effectiveness of cryoablation associated with palliation of pain in subjects with metastatic bone cancer by measuring the average difference of pre- and posttreatment worst pain in 24 hours from baseline to 24 hour, 1, 4, 12, and 24 week follow-up intervals as measured on the numeric 0 to 10 Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scale. | 24 weeks post-cryoablation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation retreatments | If the first cryoablation procedure effectively relieves pain but the relief wears off over time and the pain becomes unbearable, a second procedure may be performed. The number of repeat cryoablation treatments will be recorded. | 24 weeks post-cryoablation |
| Additional surgical treatments other than cryoablation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jerry Matteo, MD | Shands Medical Center, Jacksonville, FL | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karmanos Cancer Institute | Detroit | Michigan | 48201 | United States | ||
| University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17057075 | Background | Callstrom MR, Atwell TD, Charboneau JW, Farrell MA, Goetz MP, Rubin J, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Welch TJ, Maus TP, Wong GY, Brown KJ. Painful metastases involving bone: percutaneous image-guided cryoablation--prospective trial interim analysis. Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):572-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412051247. | |
| 11110597 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| D001859 | Bone Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003452 | Cryosurgery |
| D017679 | Cryotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055011 | Ablation Techniques |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
If pain is not effectively relieved by the cryoablation, other surgical treatments may be performed. The number of these treatments will be recorded. |
| 24 weeks post-cryoablation |
| Reduced analgesic usage | The number of subjects (percentage) who are able to reduce analgesic medications from baseline to 24 hours, 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after cryoablation will be recorded. | 24 weeks post-cryoablation |
| Time to maximal palliation of pain after cryoablation | The difference in pain scores will be assessed from baseline to follow-up intervals after cryoablation will be analyzed. The interval indicating the most relief from pain will be compared across subjects. | 24 weeks post-cryoablation |
| Subject satisfaction with the amount palliation of pain obtained from cryoablation | Subject satisfaction will be compared at baseline to follow-up intervals. | 24 weeks post-cryoablation |
| Number of adverse events | The safety endpoint for this study is to assess the incidence and severity of intra-operative events, post operative adverse events, serious adverse events and unanticipated adverse device effects related to the cryoablation procedure. | 30 days post-cryoablation |
| Difference in average pain scores | Difference in average pain scores from baseline to 24 hours, 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after cryoablation as measured on the numeric 0 to 10 BPI scale | 24 weeks post-cryoablation |
| Time to recurrence of worst pain | Time to recurrence of worst pain at or above baseline; worst pain score in the 24 week follow-up period as measured on the numeric 0 to 10 BPI scale | 24 weks post-cryoablation |
| Houston |
| Texas |
| 77030 |
| United States |
| University of British Columbia | Vancouver | British Columbia | V5Z 1L8 | Canada |
| University Hospital of Strasbourg | Strasbourg | F-67091 | France |
| Coleman RE. Management of bone metastases. Oncologist. 2000;5(6):463-70. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-6-463. |
| 14722039 | Background | Goetz MP, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Farrell MA, Maus TP, Welch TJ, Wong GY, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Petersen IA, Beres RA, Regge D, Capanna R, Saker MB, Gronemeyer DH, Gevargez A, Ahrar K, Choti MA, de Baere TJ, Rubin J. Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation of painful metastases involving bone: a multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):300-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.097. |
| 12091666 | Background | Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Goetz MP, Rubin J, Wong GY, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Lewis BD, Welch TJ, Farrell MA, Maus TP, Lee RA, Reading CC, Petersen IA, Pickett DD. Painful metastases involving bone: feasibility of percutaneous CT- and US-guided radio-frequency ablation. Radiology. 2002 Jul;224(1):87-97. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2241011613. |
| 16598666 | Background | Simon CJ, Dupuy DE. Percutaneous minimally invasive therapies in the treatment of bone tumors: thermal ablation. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2006 Jun;10(2):137-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939031. Epub 2006 Apr 5. |
| 18054665 | Background | Ullrick SR, Hebert JJ, Davis KW. Cryoablation in the musculoskeletal system. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;37(1):39-48. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.05.001. |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |