Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-61 | Other Identifier | CCRRC | |
| JT 2211 | Other Identifier | JeffTrial Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| GlaxoSmithKline | INDUSTRY |
| Novartis | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Phase I part of the study will apply to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and to define maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) for a new chemoimmunotherapy combination of bendamustine, ofatumumab, carboplatin, and etoposide in patients with Non Hodgkin's lymphoma whose disease has progressed or has recurred after prior chemotherapy.
The Phase II part of the study will be a single-arm, open-label study in which all patients will receive combination bendamustine, ofatumumab, carboplatin and etoposide at the MTD dose defined in phase I.
This study hopes to identify a life-prolonging therapy for patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma whose disease has progressed or has recurred after prior chemotherapy. The hypothesis is that the proposed combination of chemotherapy is well-tolerated and is efficacious for the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive B cell lymphomas.
Fifty percent of patients with aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas are expected to relapse after initial standard chemotherapy. There is no standard salvage regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory disease and at least 75% of patients are expected to succumb to their condition with the commonly used therapy. The recent CORAL study was evaluating the most frequently used rescue regimens R-ICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) vs. R-DHAP (rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine and cisplatin) for relapsed aggressive lymphomas, the overall response (OR) was 83% and 3 year event-free survival (EFS) was 47% for "rituximab naïve" patients. In contrast, OR was 51% and 3 year EFS was only 21% in patients who had relapsed after a rituximab containing regimen. There was no significant difference between R-ICE and R-DHAP (in 3-year EFS or overall survival). This study confirmed that rituximab containing rescue was less effective in those patients who had received prior rituximab. Currently, there is virtually no relapsed B-cell lymphoma patients who had not received a rituximab containing induction; therefore, novel strategies are needed to overcome rituximab resistance and to improve overall poor outcome in the relapsed setting. Ofatumumab is a human IgG1 monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody which binds to different CD20 epitopes and is presumed to destroy B cells that are insensitive to rituximab due to their low CD20-expression due to its higher binding avidity and higher antibody and complement dependent cytotoxicity. It was approved by FDA for the treatment of patients with refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). It is being actively studied in low grade and aggressive CD20 positive lymphomas. Bendamustine is an alkylator/purine analogue hybrid cytotoxic compound that has demonstrated single agent activity in lymphomas refractory to other alkylating agents, such as cyclophosphamide. Weidmann et al (2002) demonstrated single agent activity and safety of bendamustine at the dose of 120mg/m2 (day 1, 2) in relapse/refractory aggressive lymphomas. This study had an ORR of 44% in 18 patients. Non-hematological toxicity was mild (13% grade 3 and 0 grade 4). Bendamustine has shown impressive activity and a favorable safety profile when used in combination with rituximab and other cytotoxic drugs: Weide R et al (2007) studied bendamustine (90 mg/m2 day 1, 2) in combination with rituximab and mitoxantrone in 57 patients' with indolent lymphomas and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). ORR was 92% in follicular and 78% in MCL Vacirca et al presented interim safety analysis of bendamustine (120mg/m2, day 1, 2) and rituximab combination in aggressive B cell lymphomas at 2010 ASCO meeting (in 76 cycles 1 grade 4 neutropenia and 9 additional grade 3 events). Thus, bendamustine combinations are effective and can be given safely in patients with relapsed lymphomas.
The investigators propose a novel R-ICE-like salvage combination regimen in which rituximab is substituted with ofatumumab and ifosfamide with bendamustine in combination with carboplatin and etoposide for refractory or relapsed aggressive B cell lymphomas. The investigators hope to avoid the substantial ifosfamide mediated urinary bladder toxicity (incidence of grade 3 and 4 hemorrhagic cystitis 8-12%) and neurologic toxicity (10-30%: somnolence, confusion, psychosis and seizure) by substituting ifosfamide for bendamustine. The proposed regimen is convenient and can be administered on the outpatient basis which presents an additional benefit to the patients and to the providers. The investigators propose a phase I/II clinical trial and will first determine safety and toxicity of escalating dose bendamustine in combination with fixed doses of ofatumumab, carboplatin and etoposide. The investigators recognize that the commonly used doses of bendamustine in lymphoid malignancies range from 70-120 mg/m2. The investigators will determine maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the combination by using dose escalation of bendamustine from 70mg/m2 in a standard 3 by 3 design. The investigators will then assess efficacy of the combination regimen in relapsed and refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bendamustine 70mg/m^2 | Experimental | Level 1: Bendamustine 70mg/m^2 Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide |
|
| Bendamustine 50mg/m^2 | Experimental | Level -1: Bendamustine 50mg/m^2 Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide |
|
| Bendamustine 90mg/m^2 | Experimental | Level 2: Bendamustine 90mg/m^2 Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide |
|
| Bendamustine 120mg/m^2 | Experimental | Level 3: Bendamustine 120mg/m^2 Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bendamustine | Drug | Phase 1: Given via IV at the following dose levels:
Phase II: Given via IV on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle at the maximum-tolerated dose level found in the Phase I portion of the study. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Phase I: Maximum-Tolerated Dose of Bendamustine in Combination With Ofatumumab, Carboplatin and Etoposide (BOCE) | To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of bendamustine in combination with ofatumumab, carboplatin and etoposide for patients with refractory or relapsed aggressive B cell lymphomas. Toxicity levels will be assessed after every cycle until a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is found. Toxicities will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE version 4.0). DLT will be defined as any grade 4 infection, or grade >/= 3 non-hematologic toxicity that persists for 7 days or more. | Baseline through 50 days |
| Overall Frequency of Response With Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide at Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) | To determine the overall frequency of response with combination bendamustine, ofatumumab, carboplatin, and etoposide for refractory or relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Overall response is determined as cumulative Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR). | At 25 days and 3-8 weeks post-treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Phase I: Overall Frequency of Response | To determine the overall frequency of response--overall response will include all subjects with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Based on the revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma [Cheson 2007] CR= complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease related symptoms if present before therapy PR= >/= 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18 and above
Patients with histologically confirmed DLBCL, including primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma, T cell rich B cell lymphoma, "double hit" DLBCL, mantle cell lymphoma, any transformed low grade B cell lymphomas or grade 3 follicular lymphoma (Grade 3a or 3b) who were refractory to RCHOP-like or any anthracycline based chemotherapy or relapsed after at least one prior combination chemotherapeutic regimen and who are deemed candidates for a salvage type chemotherapy.
Measurable disease, defined by the revised lymphoma criteria (Cheson 2007).
Absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500 and platelet count ≥ 75,000, unless due to underlying lymphoma.
Left ventricular ejection fraction estimated by MUGA scan or 2D-echocardiogram of at least 45% Cardiology consult is recommended prior to enrollment if a history of coronary artery disease, CHF with estimated LVEF of <50% or clinically significant arrhythmia.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) must be ≥ 50 mL/min
Serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) unless deemed elevated secondary to lymphoma involvement of the liver or known Gilbert's syndrome.
Aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 × ULN; unless elevated secondary to lymphoma involvement of the liver
Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 × ULN; unless elevated secondary to lymphoma involvement of the liver.
Performance status of ECOG 0-2.
Both potentially AutoSCT or AlloSCT candidates and those who are not transplant candidates are eligible for the study.
Capable of understanding the investigational nature, potential risks and benefits of the study, and able to provide valid informed consent and HIPAA consent.
Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 3 days prior to enrollment.
Male and female patients of reproductive potential must use an effective contraceptive method during the study and for a minimum of 1 year after the after study treatment.
Must be able to comply with study and follow up requirements.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joanne Filicko-O'Hara, MD | Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, an NCI-Designated Cancer Center | View source |
| Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Bendamustine 70mg/m^2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: - Level 1: 70 mg/m2 |
| FG001 | Bendamustine 50mg/m^2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: - Level -1: 50 mg/m2 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1: 70mg/m^2 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 17, 2018 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Phase II MTD | Experimental | Phase II: Bendamustine at MTD from Phase I, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide |
|
|
|
| Ofatumumab | Drug | Phase II
|
|
|
| Carboplatin | Drug | Phase II: AUC 5 via IV on Day 2 of each cycle |
|
|
| Etoposide | Drug | Phase II: 100 mg/m2 via IV on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each cycle |
|
|
| CT Scan | Procedure | CT Scan to assess disease after Cycle 2 (approximately 25 days) and 3-8 weeks post-treatment |
|
|
| PET Scan | Procedure | PET Scan to assess disease after Cycle 2 (approximately 25 days) and 3-8 weeks post-treatment |
|
|
| Stem Cell Transplant (STC) | Genetic | For potential transplant candidates:
|
|
|
| CT and PET scans after Cycle 2 (approximately 25 days) and 3-8 weeks post-treatment |
| Overall Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) Rate | Based on the revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma [Cheson 2007] CR= complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease related symptoms if present before therapy PR= >/= 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; | CT and PET scans after Cycle 2 (approximately 25 days) and 3-8 weeks post-treatment |
| Overall Progression-Free Survival | To determine 1 and 2 year progression-free survival [Cheson 2007] CR= complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease related symptoms if present before therapy PR= >/= 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; | At 1 and 2 years after completion of treatment; year 2 reported |
| Total Overall Survival for Transplant vs Non-transplant | 1 and 2 year overall survival for those who received Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) versus those who did not receive SCT | At 1 and 2 years after completion of treatment; year 2 reported |
| Overall Proportion of Patients Who Are Able to Undergo Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) | To determine the proportion of patients who are able to undergo stem cell transplant among transplant-eligible patients. Patients can receive SCT after Cycle 2. | At 2 years after completion of treatment |
| Overall Safety and Tolerability of the Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide | To define safety and tolerability of the combination of ofatumumab, bendamustine, carboplatin and etoposide as measured by the number of dose modifications made to Bendamustine.. Determined through dose modifications for bendamustine according to patient's toxicity levels:
| After each cycle (after approximately 3 days, 25 days, and 50 days) |
| FG002 | Bendamustin 90mg/m^2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: - Level 2: 90 mg/m2 |
| FG003 | Bendamustine 120mg/m^2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: - Level 3: 120 mg/m^2 |
| FG004 | Bendamustine at MTD | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: Phase II at the MTD |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Period 2: 50mg/m^2 |
|
| Period 3: 90mg/m^2 |
|
| Period 4: 120mg/m^2 |
|
| Period 5: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) |
|
|
Bendamustine at 50mg/m2 was the dose level -1. No dose limiting toxicities were noted in the first Bendamustine dose level (70mg/m2) so a reduction to 50mg/m2 was not needed and therefore no patients were enrolled at the dose level -1.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Bendamustine 70 mg/m2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: Phase 1: Given via IV at the following dose levels: - Level 1: 70 mg/m2 |
| BG001 | Bendamustine 50 mg/m2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: Phase 1: Given via IV at the following dose levels: - Level -1: 50 mg/m2 |
| BG002 | Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: Phase 1: Given via IV at the following dose levels: - Level 2: 90 mg/m2 |
| BG003 | Bendamustine 120 mg/m2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: Phase 1: Given via IV at the following dose levels: - Level 3: 120 mg/m2 |
| BG004 | Bendamustine at MTD | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Phase II: Given via IV on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle at the maximum-tolerated dose level found in the Phase I portion of the study. Ofatumumab: Phase II
Carboplatin: Phase II: AUC 5 via IV on Day 2 of each cycle Etoposide: Phase II: 100 mg/m2 via IV on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each cycle |
| BG005 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Phase I: Maximum-Tolerated Dose of Bendamustine in Combination With Ofatumumab, Carboplatin and Etoposide (BOCE) | To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of bendamustine in combination with ofatumumab, carboplatin and etoposide for patients with refractory or relapsed aggressive B cell lymphomas. Toxicity levels will be assessed after every cycle until a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is found. Toxicities will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE version 4.0). DLT will be defined as any grade 4 infection, or grade >/= 3 non-hematologic toxicity that persists for 7 days or more. | Patients enrolled on the Phase 1 portion of the study | Posted | Number | mg/m^2 | Baseline through 50 days |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Overall Frequency of Response With Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide at Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) | To determine the overall frequency of response with combination bendamustine, ofatumumab, carboplatin, and etoposide for refractory or relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Overall response is determined as cumulative Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR). | Patients who received MTD in phase 1 and the phase 2 patients were evaluated in combined analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At 25 days and 3-8 weeks post-treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Phase I: Overall Frequency of Response | To determine the overall frequency of response--overall response will include all subjects with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Based on the revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma [Cheson 2007] CR= complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease related symptoms if present before therapy PR= >/= 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; | For the Phase 1 analysis, participants who received doses of Bendamustine below the MTD were combined for the statistical analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | CT and PET scans after Cycle 2 (approximately 25 days) and 3-8 weeks post-treatment |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) Rate | Based on the revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma [Cheson 2007] CR= complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease related symptoms if present before therapy PR= >/= 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; | one subject withdrew voluntarily and was not analyzed. The patients enrolled into Phase I portion were combined into one analysis group to compare the two phases of the study. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | CT and PET scans after Cycle 2 (approximately 25 days) and 3-8 weeks post-treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Progression-Free Survival | To determine 1 and 2 year progression-free survival [Cheson 2007] CR= complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease related symptoms if present before therapy PR= >/= 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; | Patients who achieved a complete or partial response. median progression free survival was not achieved in patients undergoing transplant. This population is patients who received the Maximum Tolerated Dose in both Phase I and Phase II. One patient withdrew and was not included in the analysis. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | At 1 and 2 years after completion of treatment; year 2 reported |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Total Overall Survival for Transplant vs Non-transplant | 1 and 2 year overall survival for those who received Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) versus those who did not receive SCT | One patient withdrew and was not included in the analysis. For the purpose of this analysis, patients in both phases were combined into two groups based on whether or not the patient received a transplant. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | At 1 and 2 years after completion of treatment; year 2 reported |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Proportion of Patients Who Are Able to Undergo Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) | To determine the proportion of patients who are able to undergo stem cell transplant among transplant-eligible patients. Patients can receive SCT after Cycle 2. | one subject withdrew voluntarily and was not analyzed. patients from both Phase I and Phase II were analyzed cumulatively for the purpose of analyzing the patients who received a transplant | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | No | At 2 years after completion of treatment |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Safety and Tolerability of the Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide | To define safety and tolerability of the combination of ofatumumab, bendamustine, carboplatin and etoposide as measured by the number of dose modifications made to Bendamustine.. Determined through dose modifications for bendamustine according to patient's toxicity levels:
| one subject withdrew voluntarily and was not analyzed. As no dose modifications were needed during the study, results of analysis are provided based on the overall patients enrolled to the study. | Posted | Number | dose modifications | After each cycle (after approximately 3 days, 25 days, and 50 days) |
|
2 years from baseline
adverse events are presented as a cumulative across both the Phase I and Phase II portions of the study to illustrate the overall safety of the combination of bendamustine, ofatumumab, carboplatin, and etoposide.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Bendamustine 70 mg/m2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: Phase 1: Given via IV at the following dose levels: - Level 1: 70 mg/m2 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| EG001 | Bendamustine 50 mg/m2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: Phase 1: Given via IV at the following dose levels: - Level -1: 50 mg/m2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG002 | Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: Phase 1: Given via IV at the following dose levels: - Level 2: 90 mg/m2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| EG003 | Bendamustine 120 mg/m2 | Combination of Bendamustine, Ofatumumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide Bendamustine: Phase 1: Given via IV at the following dose levels: - Level 3: 120 mg/m2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| EG004 | Bendamustine at MTD | Phase II: Given via IV on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle at the maximum-tolerated dose level found in the Phase I portion of the study. Ofatumumab: Phase II
Carboplatin: Phase II: AUC 5 via IV on Day 2 of each cycle Etoposide: Phase II: 100 mg/m2 via IV on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each cycle | 16 | 27 | 11 | 27 | 11 | 27 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutropenic Fever | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| thromboembolic event | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hyperglycemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hyperkalemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hyperurecemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Increase Bilirubin | Hepatobiliary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Decreased ANC | Hepatobiliary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypophosphatemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Increased AST | Hepatobiliary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hyponatremia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Decreased ALC | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Tumor Lysis Syndrome | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Decreased White Blood Cell Count | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joanna Filicko-O'Hara, MD | Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University | 215-503-7787 | Joanna.Filicko@jefferson.edu |
| Aug 6, 2019 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D016393 | Lymphoma, B-Cell |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069461 | Bendamustine Hydrochloride |
| C527517 | ofatumumab |
| D016190 | Carboplatin |
| D005047 | Etoposide |
| C061400 | etoposide phosphate |
| D015898 | Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed |
| D009682 | Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy |
| D033581 | Stem Cell Transplantation |
| D018380 | Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002087 | Butyrates |
| D000144 | Acids, Acyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D009588 | Nitrogen Mustard Compounds |
| D009150 | Mustard Compounds |
| D006846 | Hydrocarbons, Halogenated |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D001562 | Benzimidazoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D056831 | Coordination Complexes |
| D011034 | Podophyllotoxin |
| D013764 | Tetrahydronaphthalenes |
| D009281 | Naphthalenes |
| D011084 | Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D005960 | Glucosides |
| D006027 | Glycosides |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
| D013057 | Spectrum Analysis |
| D002623 | Chemistry Techniques, Analytical |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D017690 | Cell Transplantation |
| D064987 | Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy |
| D001691 | Biological Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D014180 | Transplantation |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|