Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this randomized prospective study is to compare two laryngeal mask airways with a provision for evacuation of gastric contents, the LMA Proseal and The investigators hypothesize that airway leak pressures with the LMA Proseal will be significantly different (higher) when compared with the LMA Supreme.
The goal of this study is to compare the LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme in children having surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the airway leak pressures with the LMA Proseal will be superior to the LMA Supreme. Airway leak pressures will be measured by recording the circuit pressure at which equilibrium is reached. The ease of placement of the device and gastric tube, fiberoptic grade of laryngeal view, feasibility of use during positive pressure ventilation, and complications (airway related, gastric insufflation, trauma) will also be assessed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMA proseal |
| ||
| LMA Supreme |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMA Proseal: control device | Device | LMA Proseal will be placed in children weighing 10-20kg based on a computer generated randomization |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Airway Leak Pressure | Airway leak pressures will be measured by recording the circuit pressure at which equilibrium is reached when fresh gas flow is delivered at 3L/min when the pressure limiting valve is closed completely. | participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to secure the airway | From picking up the airway device to bilateral chest expansion and presence of ETCO2 | participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours |
| Number of attempts to place the device |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Children weighing 10 to 20 kg undergoing surgical or medical procedures under anesthesia requiring a supraglottic airway device
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Narasimhan Jagannathan, MD | Childrens Memorial Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Childrens Memorial Hospital | Chicago | Illinois | 60614 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21839703 | Background | Trevisanuto D, Parotto M, Doglioni N, Ori C, Zanardo V, Micaglio M. The Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA): a new neonatal supraglottic device: comparison with Classic and ProSeal LMA in a manikin. Resuscitation. 2012 Jan;83(1):97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Aug 11. | |
| 20540172 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017214 | Laryngeal Masks |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007442 | Intubation, Intratracheal |
| D058109 | Airway Management |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D007440 | Intubation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| LMA Supreme: comparison device | Device | LMA Supreme will be placed in children weighing 10-20kg based on a computer generated randomization |
|
|
number of attempts needed for successful placement will be recorded (maximum of 3 attempts will be considered as a failure) |
| participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours |
| Fiberoptic grade of laryngeal view | The laryngeal alignment through the devices will be graded using an established scoring system | participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours |
| Gastric insufflation | The presence of gastric insufflations will be assessed during leak pressure testing by using epigastric auscultation | participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours |
| Ease of gastric tube placement | The ease of gastric placement will be timed and assessed using a subjective scale | participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours |
| Fiberoptic view through the gastric tube | The view through the gastric drain tube of the LMA supreme will be assessed and graded using an established scoring system | participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours |
| feasibility of positive pressure ventilation | Peak inspiratory pressure and tidal volumes will be recorded. Maximum peak inspiratory pressure will be the airway leak pressure was determined for each patient | participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours |
| Quality of the airway | The quality of hands free anesthesia will be assessed during maintenance of anesthesia using a previously described scale | participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours |
| Adverse effects | complications such as oxygen desaturations, mucosal trauma, reflex activation of the airway, sore throat, dysphonia will be recorded | Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and 24 hours postoperatively |
| Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, Yousaf F, Wong J, Wong DT, Chung F. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jul;27(7):602-7. doi: 10.1097/eja.0b013e32833679e3. |
| 19572845 | Background | White MC, Cook TM, Stoddart PA. A critique of elective pediatric supraglottic airway devices. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Jul;19 Suppl 1:55-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.02997.x. |
| D008919 |
| Investigative Techniques |
| D008397 | Masks |
| D011482 | Protective Devices |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
| D000067393 | Personal Protective Equipment |
| D008420 | Manufactured Materials |
| D013676 | Technology, Industry, and Agriculture |