Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Florida | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Exposure to loud sounds can cause hearing loss. The purpose of this research study is to evaluate potential prevention of temporary changes in hearing that may occur after listening to music through an iPod or personal music player. We will measure temporary changes in hearing in subjects who listen to music and take either the study drug, SPI-1005, or a placebo for 4 days. SPI-1005 is a proprietary preparation of ebselen that allows it to be taken by mouth. Ebselen contains the mineral selenium and behaves like Glutathione Peroxidase, an enzyme that helps to rid the body of damaging chemicals caused by loud sounds.
The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of SPI-1005 in the prevention of sensorineural hearing loss or temporary auditory threshold shift (TTS) using pure tone audiometry. Subjects with normal to slight hearing loss were screened on clinic visit day 1 (CV1) and after satisfying specific otologic inclusion and exclusion criteria, were enrolled and randomized to either SPI-1000 (placebo) or one of three doses of ebselen (SPI-1005): 200, 400 or 600 mg. Subjects began taking placebo or SPI-1005 by mouth for four days beginning two days prior to CV2. On CV2 subjects had their blood drawn for peak/trough analysis of ebselen and metabolites and their baseline hearing thresholds determined by audiometry. Subjects were then exposed to 100 decibels (dBA) of sound delivered from a calibrated iPod® via insert earphones for 4 continuous hours. Subjects had their hearing serially tested at 4 additional times post-noise exposure on the same day to determine their threshold shift. Subjects returned to clinic 24 hours later on CV3 and 7 days later on CV4 for additional safety and efficacy assessments including repeat audiometry. Efficacy was determined by comparing the threshold shift in an SPI-1005 treated group vs placebo.
Exposure to SPI-1005 (ebselen and the major and minor metabolites) was quantified from plasma by LC-MS/MS. The plasma values from the peak/trough sampling were taken before and after the 5th oral dose on Clinic Visit 2 (CV2) when subjects were expected to be at steady-state. Plasma selenium levels were quantified by ICP-MS prior to dosing at CV1, at CV2 during peak/trough sampling for ebselen and metabolites, and at CV4 or 5 days after the last scheduled dose.
The multi-dose safety of SPI-1005 was determined by repeated History & Physical examinations, serology (Chemistry Panel-20), hematology (CBC with differential), and radiology (chest x-rays). Safety was determined by comparing the changes in laboratory values in SPI-1005 groups vs placebo.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPI-1005 Low dose | Active Comparator | 200mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d |
|
| SPI-1005 Middle Dose | Active Comparator | 400mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d |
|
| SPI-1005 High Dose | Active Comparator | 600mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | 0mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPI-1005 Low dose | Drug | Oral capsules, 200 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Temporary Threshold Shift at 4 kHz--Intent To Treat (ITT) Population | The primary efficacy analysis was change in air conduction threshold at 4 kHz collected in the ITT Population on the day of sound exposure. Baseline hearing thresholds were collected on Clinic Visit 2 prior to sound exposure and used in calculating the primary efficacy endpoints. Hearing thresholds after sound exposure were collected and compared to baseline threshold to calculate change from baseline. Threshold changes from baseline were determined for each ear, frequency, and post sound time point, then analyzed by Mixed-effects Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) methods using triply repeated measurements for each subject. The MMRM had fixed effects for treatment, ear, frequency, and time, all 2-way interactions and the 3-way interaction treatment by-frequency-by-time plus a random effect for subject nested within treatment. | 15 minutes post Controlled Sound Challenge |
| Change in Temporary Threshold Shift at 4 kHz--Per Protocol (PP) Population | The primary efficacy analysis was change in air conduction threshold at 4 kHz collected in the PP Population on the day of sound exposure. Baseline hearing thresholds were collected on Clinic Visit 2 prior to sound exposure and used in calculating the primary efficacy endpoints. Hearing thresholds after sound exposure were collected and compared to baseline threshold to calculate change from baseline. Threshold changes from baseline were determined for each ear, frequency, and post sound time point, then analyzed by Mixed-effects Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) methods using triply repeated measurements for each subject. The MMRM had fixed effects for treatment, ear, frequency, and time, all 2-way interactions and the 3-way interaction treatment by-frequency-by-time plus a random effect for subject nested within treatment. | 15 minutes post Controlled Sound Challenge |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Colleen Le Prell, PhD | University of Florida | Principal Investigator |
| Jonathan Kil, MD | Sound Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Florida | Gainesville | Florida | 32610 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12855368 | Background | Pourbakht A, Yamasoba T. Ebselen attenuates cochlear damage caused by acoustic trauma. Hear Res. 2003 Jul;181(1-2):100-8. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00178-3. | |
| 14755214 | Background | Lynch ED, Gu R, Pierce C, Kil J. Ebselen-mediated protection from single and repeated noise exposure in rat. Laryngoscope. 2004 Feb;114(2):333-7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200402000-00029. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | SPI-1005 Low Dose | 200mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 Low dose: Oral capsules, 200 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| FG001 | SPI-1005 Middle Dose | 400mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 Middle dose: Oral capsules, 400 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| FG002 | SPI-1005 High Dose | 600mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 High dose: Oral capsules, 600 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| FG003 | Placebo | 0mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d Placebo: Oral capsules, 0 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
The study design included subjects with normal to slight hearing loss. Normal hearing is defined as having a baseline threshold of -10 dB to 15 dB at one or more tested frequencies. Slight hearing loss is defined as having baseline thresholds greater than 15 dB HL and up to 25 dB HL at one or more tested frequencies.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | SPI-1005 Low Dose | 200mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 Low dose: Oral capsules, 200 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| BG001 | SPI-1005 Middle Dose | 400mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 Middle dose: Oral capsules, 400 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Temporary Threshold Shift at 4 kHz--Intent To Treat (ITT) Population | The primary efficacy analysis was change in air conduction threshold at 4 kHz collected in the ITT Population on the day of sound exposure. Baseline hearing thresholds were collected on Clinic Visit 2 prior to sound exposure and used in calculating the primary efficacy endpoints. Hearing thresholds after sound exposure were collected and compared to baseline threshold to calculate change from baseline. Threshold changes from baseline were determined for each ear, frequency, and post sound time point, then analyzed by Mixed-effects Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) methods using triply repeated measurements for each subject. The MMRM had fixed effects for treatment, ear, frequency, and time, all 2-way interactions and the 3-way interaction treatment by-frequency-by-time plus a random effect for subject nested within treatment. | Intent To Treat (ITT) Population | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | dbHL | 15 minutes post Controlled Sound Challenge | Ears | Ears |
|
AEs were collected over a period of roughly 1 year.
University of Florida clinics collect all changes in AE condition as separate AEs. If an AE that was reported during the study changed in severity or frequency, that AE was given a stop date/time and another AE was recorded in the database with a start date/time that matched the stop date/time of the original AE. If the AE changed again, another AE was recorded in the database with a start date/time that matched the previous AE record.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | SPI-1005 Low Dose | 200mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 Low dose: Oral capsules, 200 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoacusis | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
The primary limitations of this study are small sample size and results from a single center. The data collected is supportive of continued evaluation of SPI-1005 for prevention of Temporary Auditory Threshold shift in larger multi-center trials.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Jonathan Kil, Chief Medical Officer | SOUND PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. | 2066342559 | jkil@soundpharma.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| D003638 | Deafness |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D012678 | Sensation Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C042986 | ebselen |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| SPI-1005 Middle dose | Drug | Oral capsules, 400 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
|
|
| SPI-1005 High dose | Drug | Oral capsules, 600 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
|
|
| Placebo | Drug | Oral capsules, 0 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
|
|
| 15721563 | Background | Lynch ED, Gu R, Pierce C, Kil J. Reduction of acute cisplatin ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity in rats by oral administration of allopurinol and ebselen. Hear Res. 2005 Mar;201(1-2):81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.002. |
| 15862892 | Background | Yamasoba T, Pourbakht A, Sakamoto T, Suzuki M. Ebselen prevents noise-induced excitotoxicity and temporary threshold shift. Neurosci Lett. 2005 Jun 3;380(3):234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.01.047. Epub 2005 Feb 1. |
| 16214673 | Background | Lynch ED, Kil J. Compounds for the prevention and treatment of noise-induced hearing loss. Drug Discov Today. 2005 Oct 1;10(19):1291-8. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03561-0. |
| 17030476 | Background | Kil J, Pierce C, Tran H, Gu R, Lynch ED. Ebselen treatment reduces noise induced hearing loss via the mimicry and induction of glutathione peroxidase. Hear Res. 2007 Apr;226(1-2):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Oct 6. |
| Background | Lynch E, Kil J. Development of Ebselen, a Glutathione Peroxidase Mimic, for the Prevention and Treatment of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Semin Hear 2009; 30(1): 047-055 |
| 21974483 | Background | Le Prell CG, Yang Q, Harris JG. Modification of digital music files for use in human temporary threshold shift studies. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):EL142-6. doi: 10.1121/1.3630017. |
| 22885407 | Background | Le Prell CG, Dell S, Hensley B, Hall JW 3rd, Campbell KC, Antonelli PJ, Green GE, Miller JM, Guire K. Digital music exposure reliably induces temporary threshold shift in normal-hearing human subjects. Ear Hear. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):e44-58. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825f9d89. |
| 28716314 | Derived | Kil J, Lobarinas E, Spankovich C, Griffiths SK, Antonelli PJ, Lynch ED, Le Prell CG. Safety and efficacy of ebselen for the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2017 Sep 2;390(10098):969-979. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31791-9. Epub 2017 Jul 14. |
| 24975234 | Derived | Spankovich C, Le Prell CG. Associations between dietary quality, noise, and hearing: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2002. Int J Audiol. 2014 Nov;53(11):796-809. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.921340. Epub 2014 Jun 30. |
| BG002 | SPI-1005 High Dose | 600mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 High dose: Oral capsules, 600 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| BG003 | Placebo | 0mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d Placebo: Oral capsules, 0 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG000 |
| SPI-1005 Low Dose |
200mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 Low dose: Oral capsules, 200 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| OG001 | SPI-1005 Middle Dose | 400mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 Middle dose: Oral capsules, 400 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| OG002 | SPI-1005 High Dose | 600mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 High dose: Oral capsules, 600 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
| OG003 | Placebo | 0mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d Placebo: Oral capsules, 0 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Temporary Threshold Shift at 4 kHz--Per Protocol (PP) Population | The primary efficacy analysis was change in air conduction threshold at 4 kHz collected in the PP Population on the day of sound exposure. Baseline hearing thresholds were collected on Clinic Visit 2 prior to sound exposure and used in calculating the primary efficacy endpoints. Hearing thresholds after sound exposure were collected and compared to baseline threshold to calculate change from baseline. Threshold changes from baseline were determined for each ear, frequency, and post sound time point, then analyzed by Mixed-effects Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) methods using triply repeated measurements for each subject. The MMRM had fixed effects for treatment, ear, frequency, and time, all 2-way interactions and the 3-way interaction treatment by-frequency-by-time plus a random effect for subject nested within treatment. | Analysis of the Per Protocol population includes all subjects (n=77) that were noise exposed, and completed the protocol as directed. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | dB HL | 15 minutes post Controlled Sound Challenge |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 22 |
| 3 |
| 22 |
| EG001 | SPI-1005 Middle Dose | 400mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 Middle dose: Oral capsules, 400 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days | 0 | 20 | 5 | 20 |
| EG002 | SPI-1005 High Dose | 600mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d SPI-1005 High dose: Oral capsules, 600 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days | 0 | 21 | 4 | 21 |
| EG003 | Placebo | 0mg SPI-1005, capsule, bid, po, x4d Placebo: Oral capsules, 0 mg ebselen, twice daily, 4 days | 0 | 20 | 2 | 20 |
| Abdominal Discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Procedural dizziness | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sunburn | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood phosphorus increased | Investigations | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haemoglobin decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| White blood cell count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nystagmus | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rhinitis allergic | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hot flush | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (16.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| D009461 |
| Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| Pairwise comparisons of the three different SPI-1005 dose groups to placebo in dB HL at 4 kHz and 15 minutes post-sound exposure were performed for the primary efficacy or endpoint analysis. | Mixed Models Analysis | <0.05 | Multiple comparisons were made using the Mixed effects Multiple Repeated Measures model. | Superiority or Other (legacy) |