Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Absolute Pro® Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System and the Absolute Pro® LL Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System for the treatment of subjects with atherosclerotic de novo or restenotic lesions in the native superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or the native proximal popliteal artery (PPA).
CAUTION: Absolute Pro® Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System and the Absolute Pro® LL Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems are investigational devices. Limited by Federal (U.S.) law to investigational use only.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute Pro® and Pro LL® Peripheral Stent Systems | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stenting using Absolute Pro® and Pro LL® Peripheral Stent Systems | Device | Stenting of the Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery using either of these devices. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Major Adverse Event (MAE) | Primary safety endpoint is freedom from MAE which is defined as a composite of:
| 30 days |
| Freedom From Vessel Patency | This is the primary effectiveness endpoint which is defined as the absence of in-stent restenosis (≥ 50%) as determined by duplex ultrasonography or arteriography and without clinically driven TLR. The vessel patency rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method with the standard error estimated using the Greenwood formula. | 0 to 365 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acute Success : Device Success | Device success defined on a per device basis, as the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the trial device at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the delivery catheter. | With in 2 days of index post procedure |
| Acute Success : Clinical Success |
Not provided
General Clinical Inclusion Criteria:
Subject is ≥ 18 years of age.
Subject or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, and is able to provide informed consent.
Subject agrees to undergo all protocol-required follow-up examinations and requirements at the investigational site.
Subject is diagnosed as having moderate to severe claudication (Rutherford-Becker Clinical Category 2-3) or ischemic rest pain (Rutherford-Becker Clinical Category 4).
Female subject of childbearing potential must:
Subject has life expectancy > 12 months.
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:
General Clinical Exclusion Criteria:
Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce H. Gray, DO | University Medical Center Greenville | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abbott Vascular | Santa Clara | California | 95054 | United States |
Not provided
The first patient was registered in the MOMENTUM trial on November 2011. Enrollment in the trial was closed on November 2013. Based on the February 19, 2015, data extraction, 141 patients were registered in the MOMENTUM trial.at 32 US sites
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Absolute Pro® and Pro LL® Peripheral Stent Systems | Stenting using Absolute Pro® and Pro LL® Peripheral Stent Systems: Stenting of the Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery using either of these devices. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Intent-to-Treat Population
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Absolute Pro® and Pro LL® Peripheral Stent Systems | Stenting using Absolute Pro® and Pro LL® Peripheral Stent Systems: Stenting of the Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery using either of these devices. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Major Adverse Event (MAE) | Primary safety endpoint is freedom from MAE which is defined as a composite of:
| Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 30 days |
|
|
12 months (365 days)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Absolute Pro® and Pro LL® Peripheral Stent Systems | Stenting using Absolute Pro® and Pro LL® Peripheral Stent Systems: Stenting of the Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery using either of these devices. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arrhythmia (Includes Brady And Tachy) | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert McGreevy | Abbott Vascular | 408-845-3932 | Robert.mcgreevy@abbott.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058729 | Peripheral Arterial Disease |
| D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases |
| D050197 | Atherosclerosis |
| D007383 | Intermittent Claudication |
| C564658 | Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease 1 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Clinical success: Defined on a per patient basis, as the attainment of a final residual stenosis of < 30% by core laboratory assessment using the study device(s) and/or any adjunctive device at all intended target lesion(s) without complications within 2 days after the index procedure or at hospital discharge, whichever is sooner. |
| With in 2 days after index post procedure or at hospital discharge (before 1 month) |
| Acute Success : Technical Success | Technical success: Device success plus attainment of final residual stenosis of < 30% | With in 2 days of index post procedure |
| Freedom From Vessel Patency | This is the primary effectiveness endpoint which is defined as the absence of in-stent restenosis (≥ 50%) as determined by duplex ultrasonography or arteriography and without clinically driven TLR. The vessel patency rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method with the standard error estimated using the Greenwood formula. | 0 to 30 days |
| Freedom From Vessel Patency | This is the primary effectiveness endpoint which is defined as the absence of in-stent restenosis (≥ 50%) as determined by duplex ultrasonography or arteriography and without clinically driven TLR. The vessel patency rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method with the standard error estimated using the Greenwood formula. | 0 to 180 days |
| Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) for the Treated Limb | A measure of the fall in blood pressure in the arteries supplying the legs and is used to detect evidence of blockages in the peripheral vessels. It is calculated by dividing the higher systolic blood pressure in the ankle (dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial) of the one leg by the higher of the two systolic blood pressures in the arms. ABI=Highest Ankle Systolic Pressure/Highest Brachial Systolic Pressure. The ABI is the ratio of the ankle to arm pressure, and an ABI between 0.9 and 1.3 is considered normal. A reduced ABI (less than 0.9) is consistent with peripheral artery occlusive disease, with values below 0.8 indicating moderate disease and below 0.5 severe disease. A value greater than 1.3 is considered abnormal suggesting calcification of the walls of the arteries and noncompressible vessels, reflecting severe peripheral vascular disease. For patients in whom the ABI cannot be accurately measured , toe pressure measurement and toe brachial index should be used. | Pre-Procedure |
| Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) for the Treated Limb | A measure of the fall in blood pressure in the arteries supplying the legs and is used to detect evidence of blockages in the peripheral vessels. It is calculated by dividing the higher systolic blood pressure in the ankle (dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial) of the one leg by the higher of the two systolic blood pressures in the arms. ABI=Highest Ankle Systolic Pressure/Highest Brachial Systolic Pressure. The ABI is the ratio of the ankle to arm pressure, and an ABI between 0.9 and 1.3 is considered normal. A reduced ABI (less than 0.9) is consistent with peripheral artery occlusive disease, with values below 0.8 indicating moderate disease and below 0.5 severe disease. A value greater than 1.3 is considered abnormal suggesting calcification of the walls of the arteries and noncompressible vessels, reflecting severe peripheral vascular disease. For patients in whom the ABI cannot be accurately measured , toe pressure measurement and toe brachial index should be used. | 1 month |
| Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) for the Treated Limb | A measure of the fall in blood pressure in the arteries supplying the legs and is used to detect evidence of blockages in the peripheral vessels. It is calculated by dividing the higher systolic blood pressure in the ankle (dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial) of the one leg by the higher of the two systolic blood pressures in the arms. ABI=Highest Ankle Systolic Pressure/Highest Brachial Systolic Pressure. The ABI is the ratio of the ankle to arm pressure, and an ABI between 0.9 and 1.3 is considered normal. A reduced ABI (less than 0.9) is consistent with peripheral artery occlusive disease, with values below 0.8 indicating moderate disease and below 0.5 severe disease. A value greater than 1.3 is considered abnormal suggesting calcification of the walls of the arteries and noncompressible vessels, reflecting severe peripheral vascular disease. For patients in whom the ABI cannot be accurately measured , toe pressure measurement and toe brachial index should be used. | 6 months |
| Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) for the Treated Limb | A measure of the fall in blood pressure in the arteries supplying the legs and is used to detect evidence of blockages in the peripheral vessels. It is calculated by dividing the higher systolic blood pressure in the ankle (dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial) of the one leg by the higher of the two systolic blood pressures in the arms. ABI=Highest Ankle Systolic Pressure/Highest Brachial Systolic Pressure. The ABI is the ratio of the ankle to arm pressure, and an ABI between 0.9 and 1.3 is considered normal. A reduced ABI (less than 0.9) is consistent with peripheral artery occlusive disease, with values below 0.8 indicating moderate disease and below 0.5 severe disease. A value greater than 1.3 is considered abnormal suggesting calcification of the walls of the arteries and noncompressible vessels, reflecting severe peripheral vascular disease. For patients in whom the ABI cannot be accurately measured , toe pressure measurement and toe brachial index should be used. | 12 months |
| Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) | Revascularization within the borders of the stent, +5 mm unstented vessel at both ends, with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (determined by duplex ultrasound or angiographic core laboratory) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon or stent into a study stent, that has <50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel) plus one or both of the following:
| At 1 month |
| Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) | Revascularization within the borders of the stent, +5 mm unstented vessel at both ends, with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (determined by duplex ultrasound or angiographic core laboratory) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon or stent into a study stent, that has <50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel) plus one or both of the following:
| At 6 months |
| Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) | Revascularization within the borders of the stent, +5 mm unstented vessel at both ends, with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (determined by duplex ultrasound or angiographic core laboratory) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon or stent into a study stent, that has <50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel) plus one or both of the following:
| At 1 year |
| Any Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) | TLR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be prospectively classified as clinically-driven or not clinically-driven by the investigator prior to repeat angiography. An independent angiographic core laboratory will verify that the severity of percent diameter stenosis meets requirements for clinical indication and will overrule in cases where investigator reports are not in agreement. The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the stent. | At 1 month |
| Any Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) | TLR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be prospectively classified as clinically-driven or not clinically-driven by the investigator prior to repeat angiography. An independent angiographic core laboratory will verify that the severity of percent diameter stenosis meets requirements for clinical indication and will overrule in cases where investigator reports are not in agreement. The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the stent. | At 6 months |
| Any Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) | TLR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be prospectively classified as clinically-driven or not clinically-driven by the investigator prior to repeat angiography. An independent angiographic core laboratory will verify that the severity of percent diameter stenosis meets requirements for clinical indication and will overrule in cases where investigator reports are not in agreement. The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the stent. | At 1 year |
| Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) | TVR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery and the proximal popliteal artery, including the target lesion itself. | At 1 month |
| Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) | TVR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery and the proximal popliteal artery, including the target lesion itself. | At 6 months |
| Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) | TVR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery and the proximal popliteal artery, including the target lesion itself. | At 1 year |
| Death | At 1 month |
| Death | At 6 months |
| Death | At 1 year |
| Freedom From Stent Patency | Primary Stent Patency defined as < 50% stenosis of the stented segment, as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | 0 to 30 days |
| Freedom From Stent Patency | Primary Stent Patency defined as < 50% stenosis of the stented segment, as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | 0 to 180 days |
| Freedom From Stent Patency | Primary Stent Patency defined as < 50% stenosis of the stented segment, as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | 0 to 365 days |
| Freedom From Stent Patency | Primary Stent Patency defined as < 50% stenosis of the stented segment, as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | 0 to 379 days |
| Freedom From Any Ipsilateral Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | At day 0 (on the day of index procedure) |
| Freedom From Any Ipsilateral Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | 0 to 30 days |
| Freedom From Any Ipsilateral Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | 0 to 180 days |
| Freedom From Any Ipsilateral Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | 0 to 365 days |
| Freedom From Any Ipsilateral Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | 0 to 379 days |
| Embolic Events in the Treated Limb (as Reported by Site) | Embolic Event is defined as formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery. | At 1 month |
| Embolic Events in the Treated Limb (as Reported by Site) | Embolic Event is defined as formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery. | At 6 months |
| Embolic Events in the Treated Limb (as Reported by Site) | Embolic Event is defined as formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery. | At 1 year |
| Rutherford-Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb | The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. | Pre-procedure |
| Rutherford-Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb | The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. | 1 month |
| Rutherford-Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb | The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. | 6 months |
| Rutherford-Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb | The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. | 12 months |
| Walking Impairment Questionnaire Scores | Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity. | Pre-procedure |
| Walking Impairment Questionnaire Scores | Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity. | 1 month |
| Walking Impairment Questionnaire Scores | Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity. | 6 months |
| Walking Impairment Questionnaire Scores | Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity. | 12 months |
| Maximum Walking Distance | Pre-procedure |
| Maximum Walking Distance | 1 month |
| Maximum Walking Distance | 6 months |
| Maximum Walking Distance | 12 months |
| Stent Integrity by X-ray | Xrays were performed to evaluate stent integrity and to determine the presence of any stent fractures. Grade of fracture as follows: 0 - No stent fracture(s) identified
| 12 months |
| Toe Brachial Index (TBI) | The toe brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral toe systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3. | At 1 month |
| Toe Brachial Index (TBI) | The toe brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral toe systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3. | At 6 months |
| Toe Brachial Index (TBI) | The toe brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral toe systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3. | At 1 year |
| Duplex Ultrasound: Maximum In-Stent Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) | In-Stent Restenosis: Re-narrowing within the margins of the stent following the reduction of a previous narrowing. It is defined as the presence of a hemodynamically significant restenosis (≥ 50%), as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | 1 month |
| Duplex Ultrasound: Maximum In-Stent Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) | In-Stent Restenosis: Re-narrowing within the margins of the stent following the reduction of a previous narrowing. It is defined as the presence of a hemodynamically significant restenosis (≥ 50%), as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | 12 months |
| Duplex Ultrasound: In-Stent Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) | In-Stent Restenosis: Re-narrowing within the margins of the stent following the reduction of a previous narrowing. It is defined as the presence of a hemodynamically significant restenosis (≥ 50%), as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. A PSVR of > 2.4 will be used to determine restenosis via duplex ultrasound. | 1 month |
| Duplex Ultrasound: In-Stent Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) | In-Stent Restenosis: Re-narrowing within the margins of the stent following the reduction of a previous narrowing. It is defined as the presence of a hemodynamically significant restenosis (≥ 50%), as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. A PSVR of > 2.4 will be used to determine restenosis via duplex ultrasound. | 12 months |
| Acute Stent Thrombosis | Stent thrombosis was defined as total occlusion identified within the stent by arteriography and/or ultrasound that occurs within 30 days post-index procedure. | 0 - 24 Hours Post Study Procedure |
| Sub-Acute Stent Thrombosis | Stent thrombosis was defined as total occlusion identified within the stent by arteriography and/or ultrasound that occurs within 30 days post-index procedure. | > 24 Hours - 30 Days Post Study Procedure |
| Stent Occlusion | Stent occlusion was defined as total occlusion identified within the stent by arteriography and/or ultrasound that occurs > 30 days post-index procedure. | > 30 Days Post Study Procedure |
| In-Segment Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | Percent Diameter Stenosis: The value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Lumen Diameter/Reference Vessel Diameter) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by Quantitative Analysis. | Pre-Procedure |
| In-Segment Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | Percent Diameter Stenosis: The value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Lumen Diameter/Reference Vessel Diameter) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by Quantitative Analysis. | Post-Procedure (≥ 1 day) |
| In-Stent Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | Percent Diameter Stenosis: The value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Lumen Diameter/Reference Vessel Diameter) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by Quantitative Analysis. | Post-Procedure (≥ 1 day) |
| Freedom From Ipsilateral Major Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | At day 0 (on the day of index procedure) |
| Freedom From Ipsilateral Major Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | 0 to 30 days |
| Freedom From Ipsilateral Major Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | 0 to 180 days |
| Freedom From Ipsilateral Major Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | 0 to 365 days |
| Freedom From Ipsilateral Major Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | 0 to 379 days |
| Quality of Life Measures : Physical Functioning (PF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 month |
| Quality of Life Measures : Physical Functioning (PF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 6 months |
| Quality of Life Measures : Physical Functioning (PF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 year |
| Quality of Life Measures : Role Physical (RP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 month |
| Quality of Life Measures : Role Physical (RP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 6 months |
| Quality of Life Measures : Role Physical (RP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 year |
| Quality of Life Measures : Bodily Pain (BP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 month |
| Quality of Life Measures : Bodily Pain (BP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 6 months |
| Quality of Life Measures : Bodily Pain (BP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 year |
| Quality of Life Measures : General Health (GH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 month |
| Quality of Life Measures : General Health (GH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 6 months |
| Quality of Life Measures : General Health (GH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 year |
| Quality of Life Measures : Vitality (VT) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 month |
| Quality of Life Measures : Vitality (VT) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 6 months |
| Quality of Life Measures : Vitality (VT) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 year |
| Quality of Life Measures : Social Functioning (SF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 month |
| Quality of Life Measures : Social Functioning (SF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 6 months |
| Quality of Life Measures : Social Functioning (SF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. rm-Based Scores. | 1 year |
| Quality of Life Measures : Role Emotional (RE) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 month |
| Quality of Life Measures : Role Emotional (RE) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 6 months |
| Quality of Life Measures : Role Emotional (RE) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 year |
| Quality of Life Measures : Mental Health (MH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 month |
| Quality of Life Measures : Mental Health (MH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 6 months |
| Quality of Life Measures : Mental Health (MH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 year |
| Quality of Life Measures : Physical Component Summary (PCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 month |
| Quality of Life Measures : Physical Component Summary (PCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 6 months |
| Quality of Life Measures : Physical Component Summary (PCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 year |
| Quality of Life Measures : Mental Component Summary (MCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 month |
| Quality of Life Measures : Mental Component Summary (MCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 6 months |
| Quality of Life Measures : Mental Component Summary (MCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | 1 year |
| Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Total Scores | Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) : A standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate vascular disease-specific health outcomes. VascuQol total score includes scores of Activity Domain, Symptom Domain, Pain Domain, Emotional Domain and Social Domain. Each item is rated as a 7 point response scale, with a score of 1 being the worst and a score of 7 the best possible. The total average score is the sum of all 25 items scores divided by 25. For each separate domain an average score can be calculated (sum of all items of one domain divided by the number of items of that domain). The highest score for each domain is 7, which indicates best health outcome. There are no sub scales. | 1 month |
| Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Total Scores | Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) : A standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate vascular disease-specific health outcomes. VascuQol total score includes scores of Activity Domain, Symptom Domain, Pain Domain, Emotional Domain and Social Domain. Each item is rated as a 7 point response scale, with a score of 1 being the worst and a score of 7 the best possible. The total average score is the sum of all 25 items scores divided by 25. For each separate domain an average score can be calculated (sum of all items of one domain divided by the number of items of that domain). The highest score for each domain is 7, which indicates best health outcome. There are no sub scales. | 6 months |
| Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Total Scores | Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) : A standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate vascular disease-specific health outcomes. VascuQol total score includes scores of Activity Domain, Symptom Domain, Pain Domain, Emotional Domain and Social Domain. Each item is rated as a 7 point response scale, with a score of 1 being the worst and a score of 7 the best possible. The total average score is the sum of all 25 items scores divided by 25. For each separate domain an average score can be calculated (sum of all items of one domain divided by the number of items of that domain). The highest score for each domain is 7, which indicates best health outcome. There are no sub scales. | 1 year |
| Administrative Closure Of The Study |
|
| Missed Visits |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Subjects who are in multiple race categories are counted in each checked category. The sum of the percentages of all race categories may not equal 100%. | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Freedom From Vessel Patency | This is the primary effectiveness endpoint which is defined as the absence of in-stent restenosis (≥ 50%) as determined by duplex ultrasonography or arteriography and without clinically driven TLR. The vessel patency rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method with the standard error estimated using the Greenwood formula. | Intention-to-treat (ITT) population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 365 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acute Success : Device Success | Device success defined on a per device basis, as the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the trial device at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the delivery catheter. | ITT population, per device analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of devices | With in 2 days of index post procedure | Device | Device |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acute Success : Clinical Success | Clinical success: Defined on a per patient basis, as the attainment of a final residual stenosis of < 30% by core laboratory assessment using the study device(s) and/or any adjunctive device at all intended target lesion(s) without complications within 2 days after the index procedure or at hospital discharge, whichever is sooner. | ITT population, per subject analysis | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | With in 2 days after index post procedure or at hospital discharge (before 1 month) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acute Success : Technical Success | Technical success: Device success plus attainment of final residual stenosis of < 30% | ITT population, per lesion analysis | Posted | Number | percentage of target lesions | With in 2 days of index post procedure | Target Lesions | Target Lesions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Vessel Patency | This is the primary effectiveness endpoint which is defined as the absence of in-stent restenosis (≥ 50%) as determined by duplex ultrasonography or arteriography and without clinically driven TLR. The vessel patency rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method with the standard error estimated using the Greenwood formula. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 30 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Vessel Patency | This is the primary effectiveness endpoint which is defined as the absence of in-stent restenosis (≥ 50%) as determined by duplex ultrasonography or arteriography and without clinically driven TLR. The vessel patency rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method with the standard error estimated using the Greenwood formula. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 180 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) for the Treated Limb | A measure of the fall in blood pressure in the arteries supplying the legs and is used to detect evidence of blockages in the peripheral vessels. It is calculated by dividing the higher systolic blood pressure in the ankle (dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial) of the one leg by the higher of the two systolic blood pressures in the arms. ABI=Highest Ankle Systolic Pressure/Highest Brachial Systolic Pressure. The ABI is the ratio of the ankle to arm pressure, and an ABI between 0.9 and 1.3 is considered normal. A reduced ABI (less than 0.9) is consistent with peripheral artery occlusive disease, with values below 0.8 indicating moderate disease and below 0.5 severe disease. A value greater than 1.3 is considered abnormal suggesting calcification of the walls of the arteries and noncompressible vessels, reflecting severe peripheral vascular disease. For patients in whom the ABI cannot be accurately measured , toe pressure measurement and toe brachial index should be used. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. ABI > 1.3 was excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Ratio | Pre-Procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) for the Treated Limb | A measure of the fall in blood pressure in the arteries supplying the legs and is used to detect evidence of blockages in the peripheral vessels. It is calculated by dividing the higher systolic blood pressure in the ankle (dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial) of the one leg by the higher of the two systolic blood pressures in the arms. ABI=Highest Ankle Systolic Pressure/Highest Brachial Systolic Pressure. The ABI is the ratio of the ankle to arm pressure, and an ABI between 0.9 and 1.3 is considered normal. A reduced ABI (less than 0.9) is consistent with peripheral artery occlusive disease, with values below 0.8 indicating moderate disease and below 0.5 severe disease. A value greater than 1.3 is considered abnormal suggesting calcification of the walls of the arteries and noncompressible vessels, reflecting severe peripheral vascular disease. For patients in whom the ABI cannot be accurately measured , toe pressure measurement and toe brachial index should be used. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. ABI > 1.3 was excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Ratio | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) for the Treated Limb | A measure of the fall in blood pressure in the arteries supplying the legs and is used to detect evidence of blockages in the peripheral vessels. It is calculated by dividing the higher systolic blood pressure in the ankle (dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial) of the one leg by the higher of the two systolic blood pressures in the arms. ABI=Highest Ankle Systolic Pressure/Highest Brachial Systolic Pressure. The ABI is the ratio of the ankle to arm pressure, and an ABI between 0.9 and 1.3 is considered normal. A reduced ABI (less than 0.9) is consistent with peripheral artery occlusive disease, with values below 0.8 indicating moderate disease and below 0.5 severe disease. A value greater than 1.3 is considered abnormal suggesting calcification of the walls of the arteries and noncompressible vessels, reflecting severe peripheral vascular disease. For patients in whom the ABI cannot be accurately measured , toe pressure measurement and toe brachial index should be used. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. ABI > 1.3 was excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Ratio | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) for the Treated Limb | A measure of the fall in blood pressure in the arteries supplying the legs and is used to detect evidence of blockages in the peripheral vessels. It is calculated by dividing the higher systolic blood pressure in the ankle (dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial) of the one leg by the higher of the two systolic blood pressures in the arms. ABI=Highest Ankle Systolic Pressure/Highest Brachial Systolic Pressure. The ABI is the ratio of the ankle to arm pressure, and an ABI between 0.9 and 1.3 is considered normal. A reduced ABI (less than 0.9) is consistent with peripheral artery occlusive disease, with values below 0.8 indicating moderate disease and below 0.5 severe disease. A value greater than 1.3 is considered abnormal suggesting calcification of the walls of the arteries and noncompressible vessels, reflecting severe peripheral vascular disease. For patients in whom the ABI cannot be accurately measured , toe pressure measurement and toe brachial index should be used. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. ABI > 1.3 was excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Ratio | 12 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) | Revascularization within the borders of the stent, +5 mm unstented vessel at both ends, with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (determined by duplex ultrasound or angiographic core laboratory) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon or stent into a study stent, that has <50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel) plus one or both of the following:
| ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) | Revascularization within the borders of the stent, +5 mm unstented vessel at both ends, with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (determined by duplex ultrasound or angiographic core laboratory) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon or stent into a study stent, that has <50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel) plus one or both of the following:
| ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) | Revascularization within the borders of the stent, +5 mm unstented vessel at both ends, with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (determined by duplex ultrasound or angiographic core laboratory) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon or stent into a study stent, that has <50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel) plus one or both of the following:
| ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Any Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) | TLR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be prospectively classified as clinically-driven or not clinically-driven by the investigator prior to repeat angiography. An independent angiographic core laboratory will verify that the severity of percent diameter stenosis meets requirements for clinical indication and will overrule in cases where investigator reports are not in agreement. The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the stent. | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Any Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) | TLR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be prospectively classified as clinically-driven or not clinically-driven by the investigator prior to repeat angiography. An independent angiographic core laboratory will verify that the severity of percent diameter stenosis meets requirements for clinical indication and will overrule in cases where investigator reports are not in agreement. The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the stent. | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Any Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) | TLR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be prospectively classified as clinically-driven or not clinically-driven by the investigator prior to repeat angiography. An independent angiographic core laboratory will verify that the severity of percent diameter stenosis meets requirements for clinical indication and will overrule in cases where investigator reports are not in agreement. The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the stent. | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) | TVR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery and the proximal popliteal artery, including the target lesion itself. | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) | TVR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery and the proximal popliteal artery, including the target lesion itself. | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) | TVR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery and the proximal popliteal artery, including the target lesion itself. | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Death | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Death | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Death | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Stent Patency | Primary Stent Patency defined as < 50% stenosis of the stented segment, as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 30 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Stent Patency | Primary Stent Patency defined as < 50% stenosis of the stented segment, as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 180 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Stent Patency | Primary Stent Patency defined as < 50% stenosis of the stented segment, as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 365 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Stent Patency | Primary Stent Patency defined as < 50% stenosis of the stented segment, as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 379 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Any Ipsilateral Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At day 0 (on the day of index procedure) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Any Ipsilateral Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 30 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Any Ipsilateral Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 180 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Any Ipsilateral Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 365 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Any Ipsilateral Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 379 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Embolic Events in the Treated Limb (as Reported by Site) | Embolic Event is defined as formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery. | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Embolic Events in the Treated Limb (as Reported by Site) | Embolic Event is defined as formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery. | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Embolic Events in the Treated Limb (as Reported by Site) | Embolic Event is defined as formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery. | ITT population, per subject analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Rutherford-Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb | The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Pre-procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Rutherford-Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb | The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Rutherford-Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb | The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Rutherford-Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb | The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 12 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Walking Impairment Questionnaire Scores | Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Pre-procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Walking Impairment Questionnaire Scores | Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Walking Impairment Questionnaire Scores | Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Walking Impairment Questionnaire Scores | Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | 12 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Maximum Walking Distance | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Pre-procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Maximum Walking Distance | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Maximum Walking Distance | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Maximum Walking Distance | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 12 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stent Integrity by X-ray | Xrays were performed to evaluate stent integrity and to determine the presence of any stent fractures. Grade of fracture as follows: 0 - No stent fracture(s) identified
| ITT population. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 12 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Toe Brachial Index (TBI) | The toe brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral toe systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ratio | At 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Toe Brachial Index (TBI) | The toe brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral toe systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ratio | At 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Toe Brachial Index (TBI) | The toe brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral toe systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ratio | At 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Duplex Ultrasound: Maximum In-Stent Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) | In-Stent Restenosis: Re-narrowing within the margins of the stent following the reduction of a previous narrowing. It is defined as the presence of a hemodynamically significant restenosis (≥ 50%), as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | ITT population, per lesion analysis. In-stent peak systolic velocity (PSV) and in-stent peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) are excluded from the analysis, for subjects who had TLR prior to the duplex ultrasound or duplex ultrasound was out of the protocol defined window or duplex ultrasound was not readable. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm/sec | 1 month | Target lesions | Target lesions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Duplex Ultrasound: Maximum In-Stent Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) | In-Stent Restenosis: Re-narrowing within the margins of the stent following the reduction of a previous narrowing. It is defined as the presence of a hemodynamically significant restenosis (≥ 50%), as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. | ITT population, per lesion analysis. In-stent peak systolic velocity (PSV) and in-stent peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) are excluded from the analysis, for subjects who had TLR prior to the duplex ultrasound or duplex ultrasound was out of the protocol defined window or duplex ultrasound was not readable. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm/sec | 12 months | Target lesions | Target lesions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Duplex Ultrasound: In-Stent Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) | In-Stent Restenosis: Re-narrowing within the margins of the stent following the reduction of a previous narrowing. It is defined as the presence of a hemodynamically significant restenosis (≥ 50%), as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. A PSVR of > 2.4 will be used to determine restenosis via duplex ultrasound. | ITT population, per lesion analysis. In-stent peak systolic velocity (PSV) and in-stent peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) are excluded from the analysis, for subjects who had TLR prior to the duplex ultrasound or duplex ultrasound was out of the protocol defined window or duplex ultrasound was not readable. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm/sec | 1 month | Target lesions | Target lesions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Duplex Ultrasound: In-Stent Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) | In-Stent Restenosis: Re-narrowing within the margins of the stent following the reduction of a previous narrowing. It is defined as the presence of a hemodynamically significant restenosis (≥ 50%), as determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography. A PSVR of > 2.4 will be used to determine restenosis via duplex ultrasound. | ITT population, per lesion analysis. In-stent peak systolic velocity (PSV) and in-stent peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) are excluded from the analysis, for subjects who had TLR prior to the duplex ultrasound or duplex ultrasound was out of the protocol defined window or duplex ultrasound was not readable. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm/sec | 12 months | Target lesions | Target lesions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acute Stent Thrombosis | Stent thrombosis was defined as total occlusion identified within the stent by arteriography and/or ultrasound that occurs within 30 days post-index procedure. | ITT population. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 - 24 Hours Post Study Procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Sub-Acute Stent Thrombosis | Stent thrombosis was defined as total occlusion identified within the stent by arteriography and/or ultrasound that occurs within 30 days post-index procedure. | ITT population. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | > 24 Hours - 30 Days Post Study Procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Stent Occlusion | Stent occlusion was defined as total occlusion identified within the stent by arteriography and/or ultrasound that occurs > 30 days post-index procedure. | ITT population. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | > 30 Days Post Study Procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | In-Segment Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | Percent Diameter Stenosis: The value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Lumen Diameter/Reference Vessel Diameter) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by Quantitative Analysis. | ITT population, per lesion analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Diameter stenosis | Pre-Procedure | Target lesions | Target lesions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | In-Segment Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | Percent Diameter Stenosis: The value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Lumen Diameter/Reference Vessel Diameter) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by Quantitative Analysis. | ITT population, per lesion analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Diameter stenosis | Post-Procedure (≥ 1 day) | Target lesions | Target lesions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | In-Stent Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | Percent Diameter Stenosis: The value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Lumen Diameter/Reference Vessel Diameter) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by Quantitative Analysis. | ITT population, per lesion analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Diameter stenosis | Post-Procedure (≥ 1 day) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Ipsilateral Major Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | At day 0 (on the day of index procedure) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Ipsilateral Major Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 30 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Ipsilateral Major Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 180 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Ipsilateral Major Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 365 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Freedom From Ipsilateral Major Amputation | Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this trial, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb that was treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle. | ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 0 to 379 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Physical Functioning (PF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Physical Functioning (PF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Physical Functioning (PF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Role Physical (RP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Role Physical (RP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Role Physical (RP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Bodily Pain (BP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Bodily Pain (BP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Bodily Pain (BP) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : General Health (GH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : General Health (GH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : General Health (GH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Vitality (VT) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Vitality (VT) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Vitality (VT) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Social Functioning (SF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Social Functioning (SF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Social Functioning (SF) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. rm-Based Scores. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Role Emotional (RE) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Role Emotional (RE) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Role Emotional (RE) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Mental Health (MH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Mental Health (MH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Mental Health (MH) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Physical Component Summary (PCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Physical Component Summary (PCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Physical Component Summary (PCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Mental Component Summary (MCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Mental Component Summary (MCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Measures : Mental Component Summary (MCS) | SF-12 Norm-Based Scores; Quality of Life (SF-12®) is a standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate general health outcomes. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Total Scores | Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) : A standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate vascular disease-specific health outcomes. VascuQol total score includes scores of Activity Domain, Symptom Domain, Pain Domain, Emotional Domain and Social Domain. Each item is rated as a 7 point response scale, with a score of 1 being the worst and a score of 7 the best possible. The total average score is the sum of all 25 items scores divided by 25. For each separate domain an average score can be calculated (sum of all items of one domain divided by the number of items of that domain). The highest score for each domain is 7, which indicates best health outcome. There are no sub scales. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Total Scores | Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) : A standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate vascular disease-specific health outcomes. VascuQol total score includes scores of Activity Domain, Symptom Domain, Pain Domain, Emotional Domain and Social Domain. Each item is rated as a 7 point response scale, with a score of 1 being the worst and a score of 7 the best possible. The total average score is the sum of all 25 items scores divided by 25. For each separate domain an average score can be calculated (sum of all items of one domain divided by the number of items of that domain). The highest score for each domain is 7, which indicates best health outcome. There are no sub scales. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Total Scores | Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) : A standardized, validated questionnaire used to evaluate vascular disease-specific health outcomes. VascuQol total score includes scores of Activity Domain, Symptom Domain, Pain Domain, Emotional Domain and Social Domain. Each item is rated as a 7 point response scale, with a score of 1 being the worst and a score of 7 the best possible. The total average score is the sum of all 25 items scores divided by 25. For each separate domain an average score can be calculated (sum of all items of one domain divided by the number of items of that domain). The highest score for each domain is 7, which indicates best health outcome. There are no sub scales. | ITT population, per subject analysis. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 year |
|
|
|
| 81 |
| 141 |
| 95 |
| 141 |
| Allergic Reaction To Diabetic Meds | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| other | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bleeding | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hematoma | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abnormal Lab Test | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Malignant | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pancreatic Disorder | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Angina | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arrhythmia (Includes Brady And Tachy) | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| CAD - Coronary stenosis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac Arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Congestive Heart Failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial Infarction - Non Q wave | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial Infarction - Unknown | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial Infarction ST Elevated | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Surgery/Intervention Procedure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Syncope | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ventricular Dysfunction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholecystitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| GI Bleed | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Kidney Damage Due To Other | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyelonephritis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal Failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal Insufficiency | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary Tract Infection | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pancreatic Disorder | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound Complication Or Wound Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Encephalopathy | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperkalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abnormal Lab Test | Investigations | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | Investigations | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Surgery/Intervention Procedure | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Trauma | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ischemic Encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Mental Status Change | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Edema (Non Pulmonary) | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pseudoaneurysm | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Asbestosis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| COPD | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest Congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lung Mass | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Malignant | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pleural Effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory Failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ischemic Stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Claudication | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Embolism | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ischemia | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Occlusion | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PAD | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PVD | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pseudoaneurysm | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary Emboli | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary Embolism | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal Artery Disease | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Restenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Stenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Claudication | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral vascular diseases (PVD) | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Restenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| D012816 |
| Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Category 3 |
|
| Category 4 |
|
| Category 5 |
|
| Category 6 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Category 3 |
|
| Category 4 |
|
| Category 5 |
|
| Category 6 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Category 3 |
|
| Category 4 |
|
| Category 5 |
|
| Category 6 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Category 3 |
|
| Category 4 |
|
| Category 5 |
|
| Category 6 |
|
|
| 150 feet |
|
| 300 feet |
|
| 600 feet |
|
| 900 feet |
|
| 1500 feet |
|
|
| 150 feet |
|
| 300 feet |
|
| 600 feet |
|
| 900 feet |
|
| 1500 feet |
|
|
| 150 feet |
|
| 300 feet |
|
| 600 feet |
|
| 900 feet |
|
| 1500 feet |
|
|
| 150 feet |
|
| 300 feet |
|
| 600 feet |
|
| 900 feet |
|
| 1500 feet |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 3 - Stent Fracture w/Alignment |
|
| 4 - Stent Fracture out of Alignment (2+ segments) |
|
| 5 - Spiral Fracture |
|