Parameters will be identical to the lower intensity (Small amplitude oscillation mobilization; Grade IV) talocrural mobilization. No force, other than light hand contact will be applied by the therapist.

The subject will be in a seated position and the therapist will stabilize the distal tibia with one hand and make contact the anterior talus with the opposite hand. Three 60-second anterior to posterior joint mobilizations of the talus (small amplitude at end range; Grade IV) will be applied by the therapist with one minute rest in between sets.

The subject will be in a seated position and the therapist will grasp the dorsum of the foot with their fingers. The ankle will be dorsiflexed until the restrictive barrier is reached. A small amplitude, quick thrust at end of range (High velocity, low amplitude; Grade V mobilization/manipulation) will be applied. If joint cavitation is not felt or heard by the therapist or subject the technique will be repeated one additional time.

The subject will be in a seated position and the therapist will stabilize the distal tibia with one hand and make contact the anterior talus with the opposite hand. Three 60-second anterior to posterior joint mobilizations of the talus (small amplitude at end range; Grade IV) will be applied by the therapist with one minute rest in between sets.

To determine cortical and spinal changes in muscle activation of the fibularis longus and soleus following one of three intervention protocols. Changes in cortical and spinal muscle activation will be measured by examining resting motor threshold via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and the H-reflex technique, respectively.

The investigators hypothesize that the higher intensity talocrural joint mobilization will result in a greater increase in cortical and spinal activation of the fibularis longus and soleus muscles than the lower intensity talocrural joint mobilization.

To determine the changes in ankle dorsiflexion ROM following one of two talocrural joint mobilization techniques (higher or lower intensity) or control intervention in individuals with CAI. Changes in ankle dorsiflexion ROM will be quantified using a weight bearing lunge.

The investigators hypothesize that the higher intensity (Grade V) talocrural joint mobilization will result in a greater improvement in ankle dorsiflexion ROM than the lower intensity (Grade IV) talocrural joint mobilization and the control intervention will result in no change in ROM.

To determine the acute changes in balance following one of two talocrural joint mobilization techniques or control intervention in individuals with CAI. Changes in balance will be quantified using the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral components of the Star Excursion Balance Test.

The investigators hypothesize that the higher intensity talocrural joint mobilization will result in greater improvements in reach distance in all three SEBT directions compared to the lower intensity talocrural joint mobilization.