Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-002480-19 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The intent of this study is to identify and treat fibromyalgia subjects with comorbid depression who are receiving an SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) or SNRI (selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) primarily for their depression and to determine whether pregabalin demonstrates improvement relative to placebo in improving pain associated with fibromyalgia.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pregabalin | Experimental | Group 1 as Pregabalin vs. Placebo (cross over study in which period one has this group) |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Group 2 as placebo vs. pregabalin (cross over study in which period two will have this group) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregabalin | Drug | Pregabalin 300 or 450 mg/day dosed BID ( twice a day) for 14 weeks; 150 mg/day starting dose |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean NRS Pain Score at End of Period. | The daily pain diary consists of an 11-point numeric scale (NRS) ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants describe their pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10. The endpoint mean pain scores for Period 1 and Period 2 are defined as the mean of the last 7 non-missing daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in the double-blind phase during Period 1 and Period 2, respectively. | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline. | This was a 20-item participant reported outcome instrument. It contained 10 subscales, which were combined to yield a total score. The first 11 questions were related specifically to physical functioning subscale, ranging from 0 to 10. The remaining 9 questions assessed pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiety and depression ranging from 0 to 10. The higher values indicated greater impairment. All 20 were combined to form a total score ranging from 0 to 100, provides an estimation of fibromyalgia impact with higher scores indicating more impairment. The severity categorizations for the FIQ are: less than 40 (mild), 40-60 (moderate), and above 60 (severe). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PGIC at the End of Period 2. | PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Because of the crossover design and PGIC recall period (since starting study medication), the Period 1 PGIC data were felt to provide the clearest comparison across treatments, whereas Period 2 PGIC data were felt to have a more complex interpretation. Thus PGIC at End of Period 2 was separately analyzed from PGIC at End of Period 1. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pfizer CT.gov Call Center | Pfizer | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genova Clinical Research | Tucson | Arizona | 85704 | United States | ||
| SDS Clinical Trials |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27057659 | Derived | Bateman L, Sarzi-Puttini P, Burbridge CL, Landen JW, Masters ET, Bhadra Brown P, Scavone JM, Emir B, Vissing RS, Clair AG, Pauer LR. Burden of illness in fibromyalgia patients with comorbid depression. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34(2 Suppl 96):S106-13. Epub 2016 Mar 10. | |
| 26034150 | Derived | Arnold LM, Sarzi-Puttini P, Arsenault P, Khan T, Bhadra Brown P, Clair A, Scavone JM, Driscoll J, Landen J, Pauer L. Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin in Patients with Fibromyalgia and Comorbid Depression Taking Concurrent Antidepressant Medication: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study. J Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;42(7):1237-44. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141196. Epub 2015 Jun 1. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here. | View source |
Not provided
Participants with mean Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score of ≥4 at Baseline and meeting all other inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to receive double blind treatment with either pregabalin followed by placebo with background antidepressant or placebo followed by pregabalin with background antidepressant.
In this double blind, crossover study, a total of 197 participants were randomized to either pregabalin/placebo or placebo/pregabalin treatment sequence. Of these, 193 took at least one dose of study medication. Four randomized participants never took study medication. Randomized participants were recruited from 4 countries at 38 study centers.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Pregabalin/Placebo | Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to double-blind treatment with pregabalin for 6 weeks (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose) in period 1 followed by placebo in period 2 with background antidepressants. Pregabalin was administered as immediate release (IR) capsule with a starting dose of 150 mg/day and increased up to 300 - 450 mg/day during the dose optimization process. There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| placebo | Drug | placebo capsules twice a day for 14 weeks |
|
| Baseline |
| FIQ Score at End of Period. | This was a 20-item participant reported outcome instrument. It contained 10 subscales, which were combined to yield a total score. The first 11 questions were related specifically to physical functioning subscale, ranging from 0 to 10. The remaining 9 questions assessed pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiety and depression ranging from 0 to 10. The higher values indicated greater impairment. All 20 were combined to form a total score ranging from 0 to 100, provides an estimation of fibromyalgia impact with higher scores indicating more impairment. The severity categorizations for the FIQ are: less than 40 (mild), 40-60 (moderate), and above 60 (severe). | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Period 1. | PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). | End of Period 1 at Week 6 |
| Percentage of Participants With >=30% and >=50% Pain Reduction Based on Daily Pain Diary. | Participant with at least a 30% reduction in mean pain score from baseline (at randomization) to the endpoint at the end of each period (Visits 6 and 12) is considered a 30% responder, for the respective period. Similarly, a subject with at least a 50% reduction in mean pain score from baseline (at randomization) to the endpoint at the end of each period (Visits 6 and 12) is considered a 50% responder, for the respective period. | Visits 2, 6, and 12 |
| Subjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Sleep Quality at End of Period. | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included 5 items: participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Subjective rating of quality of sleep during the past night was done by selecting a number between 0 (very poor) and 10 (excellent). Mean sleep quality was calculated as the mean of the last seven days, the potential range of responses was therefore 0-10. | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| Subjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Subjective Wake After Sleep Onset at End of Period. | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective wake after sleep onset was the subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was awake after initial sleep onset until final awakening. | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| Subjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Latency to Sleep Onset at End of Period. | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective latency to sleep onset was the subjective estimate of the amount of time to fall asleep after lights out. | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| Subjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Subjective Total Sleep Time at End of Period. | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective total sleep time was the subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was asleep after lights out until final awakening. | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| Subjective Sleep Questionnaire - Parameter Estimates for Subjective Number of Awakenings Per Night After Sleep Onset at End of Period. | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective number of awakenings after sleep onset was the subjective estimate of the total number of times the participant awakened during the night until final awakening. | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Baseline. | HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A (anxiety) assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D (depression) assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. | Baseline |
| HADS at End of Period. | HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A (anxiety) assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D (depression) assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| Mean EuroQoL 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Baseline. | EQ-5D is a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcome. It provides a descriptive profile for 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), using 3 levels (no, moderate, or extreme problems) and a single index value characterizing current health status using a 100-point visual analog scale (0=worst, 100=best). EQ-5D summary index is obtained with a formula that weights each level of the dimensions. The index-based score is interpreted along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). | Baseline |
| EQ-5D Score at End of Period. | EQ-5D is a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcome. It provides a descriptive profile for 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), using 3 levels (no, moderate, or extreme problems) and a single index value characterizing current health status using a 100-point visual analog scale (0=worst, 100=best). EQ-5D summary index is obtained with a formula that weights each level of the dimensions. The index-based score is interpreted along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| End of Period 2 at Week 14 |
| Mean Patient Static Global Assessment (PSGA) Score at Baseline. | PSGA was a single-item self-rated instrument that measured the participant's overall status on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (very poor) to 10 (very good). | Baseline |
| Mean PSGA Score at End of Period. | PSGA was a single-item self-rated instrument that measured the participant's overall status on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (very poor) to 10 (very good). | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Baseline. | C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following: completed suicide (1), suicide attempt (2) (response of "Yes" on "actual attempt"), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3) ("Yes" on "preparatory acts or behavior"), suicidal ideation (4) ("Yes" on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), any suicidal behavior or ideation, self-injurious behavior (7) ("Yes" on "Has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior"). | Baseline |
| Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at Post-Baseline. | C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following:completed suicide (1), suicide attempt (2) (response of Yes on "actual attempt"), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3) (Yes on "preparatory acts or behavior"), suicidal ideation (4) (Yes on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), any suicidal behavior or ideation, self-injurious behavior (7) (Yes on "Has subject engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior"). Below table indicated one participant (10141023) treated with Pregabalin reported preparatory act. However upon study unblinding it was clarified that preparatory act occurred while the participant was taking placebo. Since preparatory act was reported at first visit of Period 2, by convention statistical summaries classified this under Pregabalin treatment. | From Visit 3 to Visit 14 |
| Work Productivity and Activity Index-Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Questionnaire at Baseline. | WPAI-SHP assessed work productivity and impairment. It was a participant-rated, six-item questionnaire regarding current employment, hours missed and actually worked, and degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days. Subscale scores included percent work time missed due to the health problem; percent impairment while working due to problem; percent overall work impairment due to problem; and percent activity impairment due to problem. Each subscale score was expressed as an impairment percentage (0-100) where higher numbers indicated greater impairment and less productivity. | Baseline |
| Health Utilization Assessment (Total Office Visits, Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Emergency Room Visits) at Baseline. | The healthcare utilization assessment was used to capture healthcare utilization data at Baseline. This assessment contained 10 questions related to aspects of healthcare services. | Baseline |
| Health Utilization Assessment (Time for Help no Payment) at Baseline. | The healthcare utilization assessment was used to capture healthcare utilization data at Baseline. This assessment contained 10 questions related to aspects of healthcare services. 'Time for help no payment' refers to time other people spent without receiving payment to help with activities the patient cannot perform due to fibromyalgia. | Baseline |
| Orange |
| California |
| 92868 |
| United States |
| Research Across America | Santa Ana | California | 92705 | United States |
| Innovative Research of West Florida, Inc. | Clearwater | Florida | 33756 | United States |
| Florida Medical Center & Research, Inc. | Coral Gables | Florida | 33134 | United States |
| Meridien Research | Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
| Medical Research and Health Education Foundation, Inc. | Columbus | Georgia | 31909 | United States |
| Heartland Research Associates, LLC | Wichita | Kansas | 67207 | United States |
| Central Kentucky Research Associates, Inc. | Lexington | Kentucky | 40509 | United States |
| Boston Clinical Trials | Boston | Massachusetts | 02131 | United States |
| Michigan Head Pain and Neurological Institute | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48104 | United States |
| Quality Clinical Research, Inc. | Omaha | Nebraska | 68114 | United States |
| Social Psychiatry Research Institute | Brooklyn | New York | 11235 | United States |
| University of Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Radiant Research, Inc. | Columbus | Ohio | 43212 | United States |
| Midwest Clinical Research Center | Dayton | Ohio | 45417 | United States |
| Sunstone Medical Research, LLC | Medford | Oregon | 97504 | United States |
| Behavioral Medicine Center | Wyomissing | Pennsylvania | 19610 | United States |
| Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLP | Wyomissing | Pennsylvania | 19610 | United States |
| Coastal Medical | East Greenwich | Rhode Island | 02818 | United States |
| Omega Medical Research | Warwick | Rhode Island | 02886 | United States |
| Coastal Carolina Research Center | Mt. Pleasant | South Carolina | 29464 | United States |
| FutureSearch Trials of Neurology | Austin | Texas | 78731 | United States |
| Fatigue Consultation Clinic | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84102 | United States |
| Lifetree Clinical Research, LC | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84106 | United States |
| Charlottesville Medical Research | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22911 | United States |
| Dr. Alexander McIntyre Inc. | Penticton | British Columbia | V2A 4M4 | Canada |
| Canadian Centre for Clinical Trials | Thornhill | Ontario | L4J 1W3 | Canada |
| Diex Research Sherbrooke Inc. | Sherbrooke | Quebec | J1H 1Z1 | Canada |
| Azienda Ospedaliera Luigi Sacco - Polo Universitario | Milan | 20157 | Italy |
| Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" | Roma | 00161 | Italy |
| Hospital de lˊEsperança | Barcelona | 08024 | Spain |
| Instituto Universitario USP Dexeus | Barcelona | 08028 | Spain |
| Servicio de Reumatologia,Institut Ferran de Reumatologia-Clinica CIMA | Barcelona | 08034 | Spain |
| Hospital Clínic de Barcelona | Barcelona | 08036 | Spain |
| Hospital General Universitario de Guadalajara | Guadalajara | 19002 | Spain |
| Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon | Madrid | 28028 | Spain |
| FG001 | Placebo/Pregabalin | Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to double-blind treatment with placebo for 6 weeks in period 1 followed by pregabalin in period 2 (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose) with background antidepressants. Pregabalin was administered as immediate release (IR) capsule with a starting dose of 150 mg/day and increased up to 300 - 450 mg/day during the dose optimization process. There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Pregabalin/Placebo | Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to double-blind treatment with pregabalin for 6 weeks (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose) in period 1 followed by placebo in period 2 with background antidepressants. Pregabalin was administered as immediate release (IR) capsule with a starting dose of 150 mg/day and increased up to 300 - 450 mg/day during the dose optimization process. There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
| BG001 | Placebo/Pregabalin | Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to double-blind treatment with placebo for 6 weeks in period 1 followed by pregabalin in period 2 (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose) with background antidepressants. Pregabalin was administered as immediate release (IR) capsule with a starting dose of 150 mg/day and increased up to 300 - 450 mg/day during the dose optimization process. There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Number | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Mean NRS Pain Score at End of Period. | The daily pain diary consists of an 11-point numeric scale (NRS) ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants describe their pain during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10. The endpoint mean pain scores for Period 1 and Period 2 are defined as the mean of the last 7 non-missing daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in the double-blind phase during Period 1 and Period 2, respectively. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Score at Baseline. | This was a 20-item participant reported outcome instrument. It contained 10 subscales, which were combined to yield a total score. The first 11 questions were related specifically to physical functioning subscale, ranging from 0 to 10. The remaining 9 questions assessed pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiety and depression ranging from 0 to 10. The higher values indicated greater impairment. All 20 were combined to form a total score ranging from 0 to 100, provides an estimation of fibromyalgia impact with higher scores indicating more impairment. The severity categorizations for the FIQ are: less than 40 (mild), 40-60 (moderate), and above 60 (severe). | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | FIQ Score at End of Period. | This was a 20-item participant reported outcome instrument. It contained 10 subscales, which were combined to yield a total score. The first 11 questions were related specifically to physical functioning subscale, ranging from 0 to 10. The remaining 9 questions assessed pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiety and depression ranging from 0 to 10. The higher values indicated greater impairment. All 20 were combined to form a total score ranging from 0 to 100, provides an estimation of fibromyalgia impact with higher scores indicating more impairment. The severity categorizations for the FIQ are: less than 40 (mild), 40-60 (moderate), and above 60 (severe). | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. Different number (N) for each category represents participants that were actually treated with pregabalin and placebo during the study. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at the End of Period 1. | PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | End of Period 1 at Week 6 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | PGIC at the End of Period 2. | PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Because of the crossover design and PGIC recall period (since starting study medication), the Period 1 PGIC data were felt to provide the clearest comparison across treatments, whereas Period 2 PGIC data were felt to have a more complex interpretation. Thus PGIC at End of Period 2 was separately analyzed from PGIC at End of Period 1. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | End of Period 2 at Week 14 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With >=30% and >=50% Pain Reduction Based on Daily Pain Diary. | Participant with at least a 30% reduction in mean pain score from baseline (at randomization) to the endpoint at the end of each period (Visits 6 and 12) is considered a 30% responder, for the respective period. Similarly, a subject with at least a 50% reduction in mean pain score from baseline (at randomization) to the endpoint at the end of each period (Visits 6 and 12) is considered a 50% responder, for the respective period. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Visits 2, 6, and 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Sleep Quality at End of Period. | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included 5 items: participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Subjective rating of quality of sleep during the past night was done by selecting a number between 0 (very poor) and 10 (excellent). Mean sleep quality was calculated as the mean of the last seven days, the potential range of responses was therefore 0-10. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Subjective Wake After Sleep Onset at End of Period. | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective wake after sleep onset was the subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was awake after initial sleep onset until final awakening. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Minutes | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Latency to Sleep Onset at End of Period. | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective latency to sleep onset was the subjective estimate of the amount of time to fall asleep after lights out. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Minutes | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire - Mean Subjective Total Sleep Time at End of Period. | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective total sleep time was the subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was asleep after lights out until final awakening. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Minutes | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire - Parameter Estimates for Subjective Number of Awakenings Per Night After Sleep Onset at End of Period. | Subjective Sleep Questionnaire included, participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (numeric rating scale) for the previous night. Subjective number of awakenings after sleep onset was the subjective estimate of the total number of times the participant awakened during the night until final awakening. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Number of times awakened | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Baseline. | HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A (anxiety) assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D (depression) assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | HADS at End of Period. | HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A (anxiety) assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D (depression) assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean EuroQoL 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score at Baseline. | EQ-5D is a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcome. It provides a descriptive profile for 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), using 3 levels (no, moderate, or extreme problems) and a single index value characterizing current health status using a 100-point visual analog scale (0=worst, 100=best). EQ-5D summary index is obtained with a formula that weights each level of the dimensions. The index-based score is interpreted along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | EQ-5D Score at End of Period. | EQ-5D is a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcome. It provides a descriptive profile for 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), using 3 levels (no, moderate, or extreme problems) and a single index value characterizing current health status using a 100-point visual analog scale (0=worst, 100=best). EQ-5D summary index is obtained with a formula that weights each level of the dimensions. The index-based score is interpreted along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Mean Patient Static Global Assessment (PSGA) Score at Baseline. | PSGA was a single-item self-rated instrument that measured the participant's overall status on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (very poor) to 10 (very good). | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Mean PSGA Score at End of Period. | PSGA was a single-item self-rated instrument that measured the participant's overall status on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (very poor) to 10 (very good). | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | End of each period, at Weeks 6 and 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Baseline. | C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following: completed suicide (1), suicide attempt (2) (response of "Yes" on "actual attempt"), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3) ("Yes" on "preparatory acts or behavior"), suicidal ideation (4) ("Yes" on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), any suicidal behavior or ideation, self-injurious behavior (7) ("Yes" on "Has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior"). | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at Post-Baseline. | C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following:completed suicide (1), suicide attempt (2) (response of Yes on "actual attempt"), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3) (Yes on "preparatory acts or behavior"), suicidal ideation (4) (Yes on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), any suicidal behavior or ideation, self-injurious behavior (7) (Yes on "Has subject engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior"). Below table indicated one participant (10141023) treated with Pregabalin reported preparatory act. However upon study unblinding it was clarified that preparatory act occurred while the participant was taking placebo. Since preparatory act was reported at first visit of Period 2, by convention statistical summaries classified this under Pregabalin treatment. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Number | Participants | From Visit 3 to Visit 14 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Work Productivity and Activity Index-Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Questionnaire at Baseline. | WPAI-SHP assessed work productivity and impairment. It was a participant-rated, six-item questionnaire regarding current employment, hours missed and actually worked, and degree to which a specified health problem affected work productivity and regular activities over the past 7 days. Subscale scores included percent work time missed due to the health problem; percent impairment while working due to problem; percent overall work impairment due to problem; and percent activity impairment due to problem. Each subscale score was expressed as an impairment percentage (0-100) where higher numbers indicated greater impairment and less productivity. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Health Utilization Assessment (Total Office Visits, Number of Hospitalizations and Number of Emergency Room Visits) at Baseline. | The healthcare utilization assessment was used to capture healthcare utilization data at Baseline. This assessment contained 10 questions related to aspects of healthcare services. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Visits | Baseline |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Health Utilization Assessment (Time for Help no Payment) at Baseline. | The healthcare utilization assessment was used to capture healthcare utilization data at Baseline. This assessment contained 10 questions related to aspects of healthcare services. 'Time for help no payment' refers to time other people spent without receiving payment to help with activities the patient cannot perform due to fibromyalgia. | ITT population defined as all participants who were randomized, treated (ie, received at least one dose of study medication) and had at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Hours | Baseline |
|
|
Up to Week 16
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Pregabalin | The below table included participants who received pregabalin in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). Pregabalin was administered as immediate release (IR) capsule with a starting dose of 150 mg/day and increased up to 300 - 450 mg/day during the dose optimization process. There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. | 3 | 181 | 139 | 181 | ||
| EG001 | Placebo | The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. | 1 | 177 | 106 | 177 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Brain neoplasm malignant | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Detoxification | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutrophilia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear pain | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conjunctival haemorrhage | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry eye | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eye disorder | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eyelid oedema | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Visual impairment | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dental caries | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhoids | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Irritable bowel syndrome | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lip swelling | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Odynophagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia oral | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Salivary gland pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest discomfort | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crying | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cyst | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Energy increased | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Feeling abnormal | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Feeling drunk | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Feeling hot | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Feeling jittery | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gait disturbance | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hunger | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inflammation | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Irritability | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malaise | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mucosal dryness | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Swelling | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatomegaly | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seasonal allergy | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cystitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Folliculitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laryngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral herpes | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis streptococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vaginal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthropod bite | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hand fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ligament sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle strain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post concussion syndrome | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Road traffic accident | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skeletal injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tendon rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thoracic vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood glucose increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eosinophil count increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urine output decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fluid retention | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Folate deficiency | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Food craving | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperlipidaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Increased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Polydipsia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fibromyalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flank pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint swelling | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Medial tibial stress syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle twitching | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in jaw | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Amnesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Areflexia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Balance disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Burning sensation | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clumsiness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cognitive disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Disturbance in attention | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness postural | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersomnia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyporeflexia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lethargy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Memory impairment | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mental impairment | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Migraine | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myoclonus | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Presyncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Psychomotor hyperactivity | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Repetitive speech | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sedation | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stupor | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tension headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abnormal dreams | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Apathy | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bradyphrenia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Confusional state | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depressed mood | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Disorientation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Euphoric mood | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Initial insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nervousness | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nightmare | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Panic attack | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Restlessness | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sleep disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thinking abnormal | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Incontinence | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oliguria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pollakiuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysmenorrhoea | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vulvovaginal dryness | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vulvovaginal pruritus | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal dryness | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper-airway cough syndrome | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acne | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis contact | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperhidrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Night sweats | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus generalised | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash generalised | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin lesion | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth extraction | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hot flush | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center | Pfizer, Inc. | 1-800-718-1021 | ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005356 | Fibromyalgia |
| D003863 | Depression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069583 | Pregabalin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005680 | gamma-Aminobutyric Acid |
| D000613 | Aminobutyrates |
| D002087 | Butyrates |
| D000144 | Acids, Acyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000596 | Amino Acids |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 45-64 Years |
|
| >= 65 Years |
|
| Male |
|
Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to double-blind treatment with placebo for 6 weeks in period 1 followed by pregabalin in period 2 (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose) with background antidepressants. Pregabalin was administered as immediate release (IR) capsule with a starting dose of 150 mg/day and increased up to 300 - 450 mg/day during the dose optimization process in period 2. There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods |
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo | The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
|
| OG001 |
| Placebo |
The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
|
| Placebo |
The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
|
The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
|
The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
|
| OG001 |
| Placebo |
The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Placebo |
The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
|
|
|
| OG001 |
| Placebo |
The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to double-blind treatment with placebo for 6 weeks in period 1 followed by pregabalin in period 2 (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose) with background antidepressants. Pregabalin was administered as immediate release (IR) capsule with a starting dose of 150 mg/day and increased up to 300 - 450 mg/day during the dose optimization process. There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo | The below table included participants who received placebo in either treatment period pooled together due to the crossover study design. This crossover study consisted of two double blind 6-week treatment periods where participants were randomized to pregabalin or placebo for the first period, and were then switched to the other treatment for the second period (3 weeks dose optimization and 3 weeks fixed dose for each treatment period). There was a 2-week single-blind taper/washout period between treatment periods. |
|
|
|
|
|