Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study is designed to investigate the effects of rilapladib on biomarkers related to the Alzheimer's disease, and cognitive function.
The study is in subjects with Alzheimer's disease and evidence of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) who are currently treated with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) and/or memantine. The study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group, repeat dose design, in which subjects (up to 60 randomized subjects per arm) will receive oral placebo or rilapladib (250 mg), once daily for 24 weeks in addition to their stable background AD therapy consisting of an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) and/or memantine. Subjects will take 250mg of rilapladib or placebo once daily for a period of 24 weeks. The total duration of participation for each subject will be approximately 30 weeks comprising approximately 4 weeks screening, 24 weeks treatment and 2 weeks follow-up. From the time of randomization and throughout the treatment period subjects will attend visits after 1 week, 4 weeks and thereafter every 4 weeks until Week 24. A follow-up visit will occur approximately 2 weeks after the final dose of study medication. Cognitive assessments will be performed at the screening visit, at the randomization (baseline) visit and at weeks 12 and 24 of the treatment period. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples will be taken via lumbar puncture at baseline and Week 24 for biomarker analyses related to Alzheimer's disease. Blood samples will be collected throughout the study for pharmacokinetics and a range of biomarker analyses. A range of safety and tolerability assessments will also be performed (including vital signs, laboratory tests, eye examinations and ECGs).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 250mg rilapladib | Experimental | Experimental drug |
|
| placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 250mg rilapladib | Drug | Experimental Drug |
| |
| placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Cerebral Spinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta Peptide (Abeta) 42 and Abeta40 at Week 24 | CSF Abeta biomarkers (Abeta42, Abeta40) were assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in CSF Abeta42 and Abeta40 are summarized. Baseline and Week 24 study visits were taken place at approximately the same time of day in the morning (preferably between 08:00 and 12:00) to improve the reliability of CSF. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline (Day 0) in CSF Abeta42/ Abeta40 Ratio at Week 24 | CSF Abeta biomarkers (Abeta42, Abeta40) were assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in CSF Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio is summarized. Baseline and Week 24 study visits were taken place at approximately the same time of day in the morning (preferably between 08:00 and 12:00) to improve the reliability of CSF. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline (Day 0) in CSF Tau and Phosphorylated Tau (P-tau) Measures at Week 24 | CSF tau and P-tau were assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in CSF tau and P-tau was summarized. Baseline and Week 24 study visits were taken place at approximately the same time of day in the morning (preferably between 08:00 and 12:00) to improve the reliability of CSF. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline (Day 0) in the Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Battery Working Memory/Executive Function (WM/EF) Composite Score at Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline (Day 0) in CSF Albumin Quotients at Week 24 | CSF albumin quotient was assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in albumin quotient is summarized. Baseline and Week 24 study visits were taken place at approximately the same time of day in the morning (preferably between 08:00 and 12:00) to improve the reliability of CSF. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
History and/or evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia: e.g. structural or developmental abnormality, epilepsy, infectious, degenerative or inflammatory/demyelinating CNS conditions such as, Parkinson's disease and frontotemporal dementia
History of significant psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder that in the opinion of the Investigator would interfere with participation in the study; major depressive disorder (according to DSM-IV) in the past year; current active depression requiring initiation of treatment (or is believed to account for substantial degree of cognitive impairment)
Evidence of the following disorders: current vitamin B12 deficiency, positive syphilis serology (unless neurosyphilis was ruled out) or active thyroid dysfunction (particularly suggestive of hypothyroidism), including abnormally high or low serum levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), where this is thought to be the cause of, or to contribute to the severity of the subject's dementia.
History of alcohol or other substance abuse, according to the DSM-IV criteria, or recent or remote history of the same if that could be a contributing factor to dementia.
History of intra cerebral haemorrhage due to any of the following causes: cerebral amyloid angiopathy, uncontrolled hypertension, cerebral arteriovenous malformation, coagulopathy, CNS vasculitis or any other condition that the investigator and/or medical monitor considers as a relevant risk factor for intracerebral haemorrhage
Recent (i.e.,<6 months from Screening Visit) cardiovascular event defined as:
Poorly controlled hypertension despite lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapy (either systolic blood pressure >160mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110mmHg)
QTcB interval >450 msec; or QTcB > 480 msec in subjects with bundle branch block based on ECG assessment at the Screening visit.
HbA1c >12.0 at Screening, or uncontrolled diabetes in the opinion of the investigator.
History of glaucoma or any other findings in the baseline eye exam that, in the opinion of the investigator, would exclude the subject from participation in the study.
History of adult asthma (or reactive airway disease) manifested by bronchospasm in the past 6 months, or currently taking regular anti-asthmatic medication(s).
Previous history of anaphylaxis, severe allergic reaction or history of hypersensitivity to any of the components of the formulation.
Significant abnormalities on clinical chemistry, haematology or urinalysis at Screening, including clinically significant anaemia.
History of chronic viral hepatitis (including presence of B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody), or other chronic hepatic disorders.
Abnormal Screening blood tests exceeding any of the limits defined below:
Other clinically significant abnormality on physical (including neurological), laboratory or ECG examination that could be detrimental to the subject in the opinion of the Investigator or could compromise the integrity of the study.
Planned major surgery within the study period.
Use of systemic steroids or other immunosuppressants within the last 30 days prior to screening.
Current treatment with barbiturates, MAO inhibitors, butyrophenones, phenothiazines and other "conventional" antipsychotic within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to Screening, whichever is longer.
Treatment with antidepressants, (other than MAO inhibitors), thyroid hormones, atypical antipsychotics (e.g. risperidone), benzodiazepines and other sedatives / hypnotics unless prescribed at a stable dose for at least 2 months prior to Screening. Note: Benzodiazepines or other sedatives/hypnotics (including antihistamines) with half-life less than 6 hours can be taken on a prn (as needed) basis but must not be taken within 5 half lives prior to cognitive testing.
Current treatment with known potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 (e.g. ketoconazole, rifampin, modafinil).
Current treatment with known potent Pgp inhibitors (itraconazole, ketoconazole, cyclosporin, loperamide, diltiazem, verapamil, spironolactone, quinidine, bepridil, quinine, carvedilol)
Cognitive tasks prescribed for cognitive rehabilitation and performed under medical supervision in the 6 months prior to screening and/or during study
Investigational medications or devices including symptomatic AD treatment during the 60 days prior to the Screening visit, or within 5 half-lives of use of the investigational drug prior to the Screening Visit, whichever is longer.
Participation in another investigational drug (with the exception of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies [mAbs]) or device study where subject was treated chronically (i.e. > 1 single dose) with a study agent intended to impact AD progression during the 12 months prior to the Screening visit.
Subjects, who in the investigator's judgement, pose a significant suicide risk (e.g. history of suicidal behaviour in the last 6 months and/or any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the C-SSRS in the last 2 months).
Subject or caregiver is an immediate family member or employee of the participating Investigator, any of the participating site staff or GSK staff.
Any contraindication to lumbar puncture or insertion of CSF catheter, including but not limited to
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Sofia | 1113 | Bulgaria | |||
| GSK Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29854933 | Derived | Maher-Edwards G, De'Ath J, Barnett C, Lavrov A, Lockhart A. A 24-week study to evaluate the effect of rilapladib on cognition and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2015 Jun 30;1(2):131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2015.06.003. eCollection 2015 Sep. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research. | View source |
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 114458 | Dataset Specification | View IPD |
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Total of 170 participants were screened, of which 124 were randomized in 24 centres. Out of 124 participants, one was excluded from safety population due to randomization error. Out of 123 participants, 2 were excluded due to unavailability of post-baseline efficacy data. Intention to treat (ITT) population consisted of 121 participants.
Participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD) were randomized to either rilapladib or placebo from October-2011 to February-2013. The study duration was approximately 30 weeks (screening: 4 weeks, treatment: 24 weeks and follow-up: 2 weeks).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo Once Daily | Participants randomized to receive oral placebo tablet once daily following breakfast for a period of 24 weeks. In addition, to their stable background therapy consisting of an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) and/or memantine. |
| FG001 | Rilapladib 250 mg Once Daily |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
Placebo comparator |
|
The WM/EF composite score was comprised of 5 functional tests including 1) Controlled oral word association which measured language fluency, planning and working memory, 2) Category naming: It measures semantic fluency, planning and working memory, 3) One-back: This is a measure of working memory. 4) Trail B: This is a measure of motor speed, visual scanning, and visual-motor integration. This test required attention and cognitive flexibility. 5) Go No-Go task: This test evaluate accuracy and reaction time for each response. The composite score calculated by standardizing the total score: sum of all responses obtained from these 5 functional test by using the formula (Total score of ITT population at baseline - Total score at Week 24) /standard deviation of mean total mean score at baseline. The observed composite score ranged from minimum -1.474 and maximum 1.596. Lower score means better cognitive status. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit minus Baseline value. |
| Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Plasma Levels of Abeta42 and Abeta40 at Week 24 | Plasma Abeta biomarkers (Abeta42, Abeta40) were assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in plasma Abeta42 and Abeta40 are summarized. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Plasma Levels of Abeta42/Abeta40 Ratio at Week 24 | Plasma Abeta biomarkers (Abeta42, Abeta40) were assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio is summarized. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| Percentage Inhibition in Plasma Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at Week 24 | Plasma Lp-PLA2 was assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Percentage inhibition in plasma Lp-PLA2 activity ratio is summarized. Percentage inhibition was calculated by dividing change from Baseline in plasma LpPLA2 by Baseline LpPLA2 multiplied by -100. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline (Day 0) in CogState Battery Overall Composite Score | CogState battery overall composite score comprised of 8 functional tests 1) Controlled oral word association test measured language fluency, planning and working memory. 2) Category naming test measured semantic fluency, planning and working memory. 3) One-back test measured working memory. 4) Trail B test measured motor speed, visual scanning and visual-motor integration, required attention and cognitive flexibility. 5) Go No-Go task evaluated accuracy and reaction time for each response. 6) International shopping list immediate and delayed recall tests measured episodic memory. 7) Identification task test assessed visual attention. 8) Trail A test measured psychomotor speed and attention. Composite score= total score (sum of all responses from 8 functional test) by formula (Total score at baseline - Week 24) / SD of total score at baseline. Score ranged: -1.070 to 0.907. Lower score indicated the better cognitive status. Change from Baseline= post-dose visit minus Baseline value | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12 (Day 84), Week 24 (Day 168) |
| Change From Baseline (Day 0) in CogState Battery Attention Composite Score | CogState battery attention composite score comprised of 2 functional tests including 1) Identification task test assessed visual attention and 2) Trail A test measured psychomotor speed and attention. Composite score calculated by standardizing the total score (sum of all responses from 2 functional test) by formula (Total score at baseline - Week 24) / SD of total score at baseline. The observed composite score ranged from minimum -1.756 and maximum 1.330. Higher score indicated the better attention. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value and Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit minus Baseline value | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12 (Day 84), Week 24 (Day 168) |
| Sofia |
| 1431 |
| Bulgaria |
| GSK Investigational Site | Toronto | Ontario | M3B 2S7 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Gatineau | Quebec | J9A 1K7 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sherbrooke | Quebec | J1H 1Z1 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ellwangen | Baden-Wurttemberg | 73479 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tübingen | Baden-Wurttemberg | 72076 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ulm | Baden-Wurttemberg | 89081 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Alzenau in Unterfranken | Bavaria | 63755 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bad Homburg | Hesse | 61348 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Achim | Lower Saxony | 28832 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hanover | Lower Saxony | 30559 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44787 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44791 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44892 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Cologne | North Rhine-Westphalia | 50935 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Oldenburg in Holstein | Schleswig-Holstein | 26122 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rome | Lazio | 00185 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Genoa | Liguria | 16132 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Brescia | Lombardy | 25125 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Milan | Lombardy | 20122 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Verona | Veneto | 37134 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lørenskog | 1478 | Norway |
| GSK Investigational Site | Baracaldo/Vizcaya | 48903 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Barcelona | 08014 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Castellon | 12004 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Getafe/Madrid | 28905 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | L'Hospitalet de Llobregat | 08907 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | 28006 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Stockholm | se-141 86 | Sweden |
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 114458 | Individual Participant Data Set | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 114458 | Informed Consent Form | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 114458 | Statistical Analysis Plan | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 114458 | Study Protocol | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 114458 | Annotated Case Report Form | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 114458 | Clinical Study Report | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
Participants randomized to receive oral rilapladib 250 milligrams (mg) tablet once daily following breakfast for a period of 24 weeks. In addition, to their stable background therapy consisting of an AChEI and/or memantine. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The data for ITT population is presented and defined as participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one non-missing post Baseline efficacy assessment. One participant from each group was excluded from ITT population as no post-baseline efficacy data available and total ITT population was 121.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo Once Daily | Participants randomized to receive oral placebo tablet once daily following breakfast for a period of 24 weeks. In addition to their stable background therapy consisting of an AChEI and/or memantine. |
| BG001 | Rilapladib 250 mg Once Daily | Participants randomized to receive oral rilapladib 250 mg tablet once daily following breakfast for a period of 24 weeks. In addition to their stable background therapy consisting of an AChEI and/or memantine. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Cerebral Spinal Fluid (CSF) Amyloid Beta Peptide (Abeta) 42 and Abeta40 at Week 24 | CSF Abeta biomarkers (Abeta42, Abeta40) were assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in CSF Abeta42 and Abeta40 are summarized. Baseline and Week 24 study visits were taken place at approximately the same time of day in the morning (preferably between 08:00 and 12:00) to improve the reliability of CSF. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Nanograms per Liter | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in CSF Abeta42/ Abeta40 Ratio at Week 24 | CSF Abeta biomarkers (Abeta42, Abeta40) were assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in CSF Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio is summarized. Baseline and Week 24 study visits were taken place at approximately the same time of day in the morning (preferably between 08:00 and 12:00) to improve the reliability of CSF. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Ratio | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in CSF Tau and Phosphorylated Tau (P-tau) Measures at Week 24 | CSF tau and P-tau were assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in CSF tau and P-tau was summarized. Baseline and Week 24 study visits were taken place at approximately the same time of day in the morning (preferably between 08:00 and 12:00) to improve the reliability of CSF. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Nanograms per Liter | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in the Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Battery Working Memory/Executive Function (WM/EF) Composite Score at Week 24 | The WM/EF composite score was comprised of 5 functional tests including 1) Controlled oral word association which measured language fluency, planning and working memory, 2) Category naming: It measures semantic fluency, planning and working memory, 3) One-back: This is a measure of working memory. 4) Trail B: This is a measure of motor speed, visual scanning, and visual-motor integration. This test required attention and cognitive flexibility. 5) Go No-Go task: This test evaluate accuracy and reaction time for each response. The composite score calculated by standardizing the total score: sum of all responses obtained from these 5 functional test by using the formula (Total score of ITT population at baseline - Total score at Week 24) /standard deviation of mean total mean score at baseline. The observed composite score ranged from minimum -1.474 and maximum 1.596. Lower score means better cognitive status. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit minus Baseline value. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on a scale | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in CSF Albumin Quotients at Week 24 | CSF albumin quotient was assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in albumin quotient is summarized. Baseline and Week 24 study visits were taken place at approximately the same time of day in the morning (preferably between 08:00 and 12:00) to improve the reliability of CSF. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Nanograms per Liter | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Plasma Levels of Abeta42 and Abeta40 at Week 24 | Plasma Abeta biomarkers (Abeta42, Abeta40) were assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in plasma Abeta42 and Abeta40 are summarized. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Nanograms per Liter | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Plasma Levels of Abeta42/Abeta40 Ratio at Week 24 | Plasma Abeta biomarkers (Abeta42, Abeta40) were assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Change from Baseline in plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio is summarized. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Ratio | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage Inhibition in Plasma Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) Activity at Week 24 | Plasma Lp-PLA2 was assessed at Baseline visit (Day 0) and Week 24 (Day 168). Percentage inhibition in plasma Lp-PLA2 activity ratio is summarized. Percentage inhibition was calculated by dividing change from Baseline in plasma LpPLA2 by Baseline LpPLA2 multiplied by -100. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose (Week 24) visit value minus Baseline value. | ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in CogState Battery Overall Composite Score | CogState battery overall composite score comprised of 8 functional tests 1) Controlled oral word association test measured language fluency, planning and working memory. 2) Category naming test measured semantic fluency, planning and working memory. 3) One-back test measured working memory. 4) Trail B test measured motor speed, visual scanning and visual-motor integration, required attention and cognitive flexibility. 5) Go No-Go task evaluated accuracy and reaction time for each response. 6) International shopping list immediate and delayed recall tests measured episodic memory. 7) Identification task test assessed visual attention. 8) Trail A test measured psychomotor speed and attention. Composite score= total score (sum of all responses from 8 functional test) by formula (Total score at baseline - Week 24) / SD of total score at baseline. Score ranged: -1.070 to 0.907. Lower score indicated the better cognitive status. Change from Baseline= post-dose visit minus Baseline value | ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The data is presented in for adjusted mean and standard error of adjusted mean. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on a scale | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12 (Day 84), Week 24 (Day 168) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in CogState Battery Attention Composite Score | CogState battery attention composite score comprised of 2 functional tests including 1) Identification task test assessed visual attention and 2) Trail A test measured psychomotor speed and attention. Composite score calculated by standardizing the total score (sum of all responses from 2 functional test) by formula (Total score at baseline - Week 24) / SD of total score at baseline. The observed composite score ranged from minimum -1.756 and maximum 1.330. Higher score indicated the better attention. Baseline value was defined as the latest Day 0 value and Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit minus Baseline value | ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on a scale | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12 (Day 84), Week 24 (Day 168) |
|
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and non-SAE were reported for treatment period only (up to Week 24).
The safety population was used and defined as consisting of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of double-blind medication.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo Once Daily | Participants randomized to receive oral placebo tablet once daily following breakfast for a period of 24 weeks. In addition to their stable background therapy consisting of an AChEI and/or memantine. | 1 | 62 | 5 | 62 | 23 | 62 |
| EG001 | Rilapladib 250mg Once Daily | Participants randomized to receive oral rilapladib 250 mg tablet once daily following breakfast for a period of 24 weeks. In addition to their stable background therapy consisting of an AChEI and/or memantine. | 1 | 61 | 8 | 61 | 16 | 61 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femoral neck fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fractured coccyx | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Scapula fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sternal fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis microscopic | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inguinal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestine perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Complex partial seizures | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vestibular neuronitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cystitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000544 | Alzheimer Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003704 | Dementia |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D024801 | Tauopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000592856 | rilapladib |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| ANCOVA |
The analysis method was ANCOVA adjusted for Treatment, Baseline CSF Abeta1-40 and Age. |
| 0.829 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -250.3 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 265.66 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -771.9 |
| 271.2 |
Comparison of CSF Abeta40 between placebo and rilapladib 250 mg. |
| Superiority or Other |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Rilapladib 250 mg Once Daily | Participants randomized to receive oral rilapladib 250 mg tablet once daily following breakfast for a period of 24 weeks. In addition to their stable background therapy consisting of an AChEI and/or memantine. |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Rilapladib 250 mg Once Daily |
Participants randomized to receive oral rilapladib 250 mg tablet once daily following breakfast for a period of 24 weeks. In addition to their stable background therapy consisting of an AChEI and/or memantine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|