Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008/07183-5 | Other Grant/Funding Number | FAPESP |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to compare the canine guidance (CG) and bilateral balanced occlusion (BBO) on denture satisfaction and kinesiographic parameters of complete denture wearers, by means of a cross-over trial. Edentulous patients will receive new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures and, after the intraoral adjustments and adaptation period, will randomly receive a sequence of occlusal schemes: BBO followed by CG, or CG followed by BBO.
Reference for published version of the complete study:
Paleari AG, Marra J, Rodriguez LS, De Souza RF, Pero AC, De A Mollo Jr F, Compagnoni MA. A cross-over randomised clinical trial of eccentric occlusion in complete dentures.J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Apr 9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02299.x. [Epub ahead of print]
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canine Guidance | Experimental | Complete dentures adjusted with "mutually protected articulation in which the vertical and horizontal overlap of the canine teeth disengage the posterior teeth in the excursive movements of the mandible" (The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J. Prosthet. Dent., 94(1): 10-92) |
|
| Bilateral Balanced Occlusion | Sham Comparator | Complete dentures as conventionally adjusted: anterior and posterior teeth presented bilateral contact in excentric positions |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occlusal scheme | Procedure | Before enrollment, all participants will receive conventional complete dentures adjusted according to the bilateral balanced occlusion concept. Following randomization, canine guidance will be achieved by adding composite resin (Restorative Z100, 3M Brazil, Sumaré, SP, Brazil) on the lingual surface of the maxillary canines. A sham comparator will also employ the addition of composite, but without changing eccentric contacts. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Denture Satisfaction | Assessed by a questionnaire questionnaire based on the criteria used by Celebic and Knezovic-Zlataric (A comparison of patient's satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. J Dent. 2003;21:445-451) and used by Souza et al. (Validation of the Brazilian versions of two inventories for measuring oral health-related quality of life of edentulous subjects. Gerodontology. 2012;29:e88-95.). Eight questions were answered according to a three-point scale (0=unsatisfactory; 1=regular; 2=good), whose sum provided a summary satisfaction score that ranged from 0 (the participant is completely dissatisfied with existing dentures) to 16 (maximum satisfaction). | 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.a) Maximum Mouth Opening, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Raphael F de Souza, DDS, PhD | University of Sao Paulo | Principal Investigator |
| Marco A Compagnoni, DDS, PhD | Araraquara Dental School -Universidade Estadual Paulista (Sao Paulo State University) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Araraquara Dental School -Universidade Estadual Paulista (Sao Paulo State University) | Araraquara | São Paulo | 14801-903 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22486470 | Derived | Paleari AG, Marra J, Rodriguez LS, de Souza RF, Pero AC, Mollo Fde A Jr, Compagnoni MA. A cross-over randomised clinical trial of eccentric occlusion in complete dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Aug;39(8):615-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02299.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Institutional page of the Araraquara Dental School (research site) | View source |
Not provided
Participants waited 30 days following the completion of treatment, in order to have them functionally adapted to their new dentures. Six spontaneously declined to participate before random assignment due to lack of interest.
Recruitment period: July to December 2012. Convenience sample composed by 50 patients, who had volunteered to receive new complete dentures at Araraquara Dental School - UNESP.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Canine Guidance, Then Bilateral Balanced Occlusion | Canine guidance: Complete dentures adjusted with "mutually protected articulation in which the vertical and horizontal overlap of the canine teeth disengage the posterior teeth in the excursive movements of the mandible" (The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J. Prosthet. Dent., 94(1): 10-92); Bilateral Balanced Occlusion: Complete dentures as conventionally adjusted, i.e. anterior and posterior teeth presented bilateral contact in excentric positions |
| FG001 | Bilateral Balanced Occlusion, Then Canine Guidance | Bilateral Balanced Occlusion: Complete dentures as conventionally adjusted, i.e. anterior and posterior teeth presented bilateral contact in excentric positions; Canine guidance: Complete dentures adjusted with "mutually protected articulation in which the vertical and horizontal overlap of the canine teeth disengage the posterior teeth in the excursive movements of the mandible" (The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J. Prosthet. Dent., 94(1): 10-92). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 (30 Days) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Period 2 (30 Days) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Canine Guidance, Then Bilateral Balanced Occlusion | Canine guidance: Complete dentures adjusted with "mutually protected articulation in which the vertical and horizontal overlap of the canine teeth disengage the posterior teeth in the excursive movements of the mandible" (The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J. Prosthet. Dent., 94(1): 10-92); Bilateral Balanced Occlusion: Complete dentures as conventionally adjusted, i.e. anterior and posterior teeth presented bilateral contact in excentric positions |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Denture Satisfaction | Assessed by a questionnaire questionnaire based on the criteria used by Celebic and Knezovic-Zlataric (A comparison of patient's satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. J Dent. 2003;21:445-451) and used by Souza et al. (Validation of the Brazilian versions of two inventories for measuring oral health-related quality of life of edentulous subjects. Gerodontology. 2012;29:e88-95.). Eight questions were answered according to a three-point scale (0=unsatisfactory; 1=regular; 2=good), whose sum provided a summary satisfaction score that ranged from 0 (the participant is completely dissatisfied with existing dentures) to 16 (maximum satisfaction). | Convenience sampling. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale | 30 days |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Canine Guidance | Complete dentures adjusted with "mutually protected articulation in which the vertical and horizontal overlap of the canine teeth disengage the posterior teeth in the excursive movements of the mandible" (The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J. Prosthet. Dent., 94(1): 10-92) |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof. Marco Antonio Compagnoni | Araraquara Dental School -Universidade Estadual Paulista (Sao Paulo State University) | +55-16-3331-6411 | compagno@foar.unesp.br |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009066 | Mouth, Edentulous |
| D007575 | Jaw, Edentulous |
| D001733 | Bites and Stings |
| D010342 | Patient Acceptance of Health Care |
| D017060 | Patient Satisfaction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D007571 | Jaw Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.b) Maximum Mouth Opening, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.c) Maximum Mouth Opening, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.a) Rest Position, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.b) Rest Position, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.c) Rest Position, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (3.a) Mandibular Chewing Movement, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (3.b) Mandibular Chewing Movement, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (3.c) Mandibular Chewing Movement, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (4.a) Upper Denture Base Movement, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (4.b) Upper Denture Base Movement, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Kinesiographic Parameters -- (4.c) Upper Denture Base Movement, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | 30 days |
| Institutional page of the Ribeirão Preto Dental School (PI's institution ) | View source |
| Principal Investigator´s CV (RF Souza) | View source |
| Study director´s CV (MA Compagnoni) | View source |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG001 | Bilateral Balanced Occlusion Then Canine Guidance | Bilateral Balanced Occlusion: Complete dentures as conventionally adjusted, i.e. anterior and posterior teeth presented bilateral contact in excentric positions; Canine guidance: Complete dentures adjusted with "mutually protected articulation in which the vertical and horizontal overlap of the canine teeth disengage the posterior teeth in the excursive movements of the mandible" (The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J. Prosthet. Dent., 94(1): 10-92); |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 | Bilateral Balanced Occlusion | Bilateral Balanced Occlusion: Complete dentures as conventionally adjusted, i.e. anterior and posterior teeth presented bilateral contact in excentric positions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.a) Maximum Mouth Opening, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.b) Maximum Mouth Opening, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.c) Maximum Mouth Opening, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.a) Rest Position, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.b) Rest Position, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.c) Rest Position, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (3.a) Mandibular Chewing Movement, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (3.b) Mandibular Chewing Movement, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (3.c) Mandibular Chewing Movement, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (4.a) Upper Denture Base Movement, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (4.b) Upper Denture Base Movement, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (4.c) Upper Denture Base Movement, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA). Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | 30 days |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 44 |
| 0 |
| 44 |
| EG001 | Bilateral Balanced Occlusion | Complete dentures as conventionally adjusted: anterior and posterior teeth presented bilateral contact in excentric positions | 0 | 41 | 0 | 41 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D009140 |
| Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D011041 | Poisoning |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |