Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of scheduled maintenance Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) treatment compared to on-demand TMS treatment for symptomatic worsening in patients who have shown a clinical response to acute TMS treatment.
This is a 12-month maintenance treatment study for patients who have responded to a 6 week course of acute TMS treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). The study will seek to assess the change in depressive symptomatology across the duration of maintenance treatment using observer and self-administered efficacy measures. Describe the efficacy of TMS re-introduction in patients not receiving maintenance pharmacotherapy who show a recurrence of depressive symptoms. Assess the safety and durability of acute TMS therapy followed by maintenance TMS treatment for up to 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scheduled Treatment Arm | Active Comparator | Following completion of the efficacy assessments at Week 6, One NeuroStar TMS session every four week and TMS reintroduction as needed for clinical deterioration. |
|
| Monthly Observational Follow up Arm | No Intervention | Following completion of the efficacy assessments at Week 6, Office follow up every 4 week and NeuroStar TMS reintroduction as needed for clinical deterioration. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NeuroStar TMS | Device | NeuroStar TMS treatmant - 120% of Observed MT, 10 pulses per second, 4 second on-time, 26 second off-time, 75 trains, 3,000 total pulses/sessions for 6 days. 3 treatments in taper week 1, 2 treatments in taper week 2 and 1 treatment in taper week 3. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients Maintaining a Sustained Response Throughout a 12 Month Maintenance Treatment Phase. | Sustained response is defined as not requiring TMS reintroduction at every observation point during the maintenance phase. | 12 month evaluation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Average Time to First Reintroduction of TMS Between the Two Maintenance Treatment Arms. | Change in depressive symptomatology will be assessed across the duration of maintenance treatment using observer and self-administered efficacy measures. | 12 Month evaluation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Investigators, site personnel directly affiliated with this study, and their immediate families (immediate family is defined as a spouse, parent, child or sibling, whether by birth or legal adoption).
Individuals diagnosed by the Investigator with the following conditions (current unless otherwise stated):
An Axis II Personality Disorder, which in the judgment of the Investigator may hinder the patient in completing the procedures required by the study protocol.
Individuals with a clinically defined neurological disorder or insult including, but not limited to:
Increased risk of seizure for any reason, including but not limited to prior diagnosis of increased intracranial pressure (such as after large infarctions or trauma), or history of significant head trauma with loss of consciousness for ≥ 5 minutes.
History of treatment with Vagus Nerve Stimulation.
Cardiac pacemakers, implanted medication pumps, intracardiac lines, or acute, unstable cardiac disease.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David G. Brock, MD | Neuronetics | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rush University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States | ||
| Sheppard Pratt Health System |
18 patients did not continue to randomization
A) 12 failed randomization criteria:
Acute phase endpoint HAMD17 total score <15 and had more than 25% improvement in total score HAMD17 compared with baseline
B) 2 Patients moved
C) 2 patients had inadequate response during Acute Phase
D) 1 patient refused to return
E) 1 patient had an unrelated panic attack
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Scheduled Treatment Arm | Following completion of the efficacy assessments at Week 6, One NeuroStar TMS session every four week and TMS reintroduction as needed for clinical deterioration. |
| FG001 | Monthly Observational Follow up Arm | Following completion of the efficacy assessments at Week 6, Office follow-up visit once every 4 week and TMS reintroduction as needed for clinical deterioration. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Scheduled Treatment Arm | 3 Week TMS taper, clinical assessments and one NeuroStar TMS session every 4th week of block and TMS reintroduction as needed for clinical deterioration. NeuroStar TMS: NeuroStar TMS treatmant - 120% of Observed MT, 10 pulses per second, 4 second on-time, 26 second off-time, 75 trains, 3,000 total pulses/sessions for 6 days. 3 treatments in taper week 1, 2 treatments in taper week 2 and 1 treatment in taper week 3. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Patients Maintaining a Sustained Response Throughout a 12 Month Maintenance Treatment Phase. | Sustained response is defined as not requiring TMS reintroduction at every observation point during the maintenance phase. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 month evaluation |
|
15 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Scheduled Treatment Arm | 3 Week TMS taper, clinical assessments and one NeuroStar TMS session every 4th week of block and TMS reintroduction as needed for clinical deterioration. NeuroStar TMS: NeuroStar TMS treatmant - 120% of Observed MT, 10 pulses per second, 4 second on-time, 26 second off-time, 75 trains, 3,000 total pulses/sessions for 6 days. 3 treatments in taper week 1, 2 treatments in taper week 2 and 1 treatment in taper week 3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director of Clinical Operations | Neuronetics | 16123067393 | steve.erickson@neurostar.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003865 | Depressive Disorder, Major |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baltimore |
| Maryland |
| 21285 |
| United States |
| Premier Psychiatric Group, L.L.C. | Lincoln | Nebraska | 68526 | United States |
| Butler Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island | 02906 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Center for Anxiety and Depression | Mercer Island | Washington | 98040 | United States |
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Satisfactory Response |
|
| Adverse Event |
|
| BG001 | Monthly Observational Follow up Arm | 3 Week TMS Taper, clinical assessments and office follow up every 4th week of block and NeuroStar TMS reintroduction as needed for clinical deterioration. NeuroStar TMS: NeuroStar TMS treatmant - 120% of Observed MT, 10 pulses per second, 4 second on-time, 26 second off-time, 75 trains, 3,000 total pulses/sessions for 6 days. 3 treatments in taper week 1, 2 treatments in taper week 2 and 1 treatment in taper week 3. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
Following completion of the efficacy assessments at Week 6, Office follow-up visit once every 4 week and TMS reintroduction as needed for clinical deterioration. NeuroStar TMS: NeuroStar TMS treatmant - 120% of Observed MT, 10 pulses per second, 4 second on-time, 26 second off-time, 75 trains, 3,000 total pulses/sessions for 6 days. 3 treatments in taper week 1, 2 treatments in taper week 2 and 1 treatment in taper week 3. |
|
|
| Secondary | Average Time to First Reintroduction of TMS Between the Two Maintenance Treatment Arms. | Change in depressive symptomatology will be assessed across the duration of maintenance treatment using observer and self-administered efficacy measures. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days | 12 Month evaluation |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 23 |
| 0 |
| 23 |
| EG001 | Monthly Observational Follow up Arm | 3 Week TMS Taper, clinical assessments and office follow up every 4th week of block and NeuroStar TMS reintroduction as needed for clinical deterioration. NeuroStar TMS: NeuroStar TMS treatmant - 120% of Observed MT, 10 pulses per second, 4 second on-time, 26 second off-time, 75 trains, 3,000 total pulses/sessions for 6 days. 3 treatments in taper week 1, 2 treatments in taper week 2 and 1 treatment in taper week 3. | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided