Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ministry of Health, France | OTHER_GOV |
| Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
High sensitivity to targeted agents has been observed in patients whose tumor cells present a genetic/genomic deregulation of the target (Kit mutation, ERBB2 amplification, EGFR mutations) together with addiction to the given target. More recently, activation of "alternative pathways" (Kras mutation, PI3K mutations) have been reported as a common resistance mechanism to single agent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (trastuzumab, cetuximab).
From these data has emerged the hypothesis that identification of the deregulated pathway through new molecular tools could allow to propose a more tailored targeted regimen.
Based on these concepts, numbers of phase I/II trials enrich their populations in patients presenting specific molecular alterations.
High throughput technologies (array CGH, sequencing, gene expression array) identify deregulated genes. In addition, these technologies determine whether such genomic alterations are single (expected efficacy of single agent) or multiple (rationale for combination). In a pilot study that included 135 patients, we recently performed a combination of array CGH and hot spot mutation array in order to drive patients into phase I/II clinical trials. This study led to the conclusions that high throughput technologies i. are feasible (80%) and robust, ii. identify "targetable" genomic alterations in around 40% of samples.
In the present study, the investigators will perform high throughput technologies to drive 400 metastatic breast cancer patients into specific phase I/II trials.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biopsy | Other | Breast metastases biopsy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| number of patients included in early phase trials evaluating targeted drugs | To use whole genome / integrated biology approach to drive patients in early clinical trials. The goal is to include at least 30% of the patients in a clinical trial evaluating targeted agent, according to the molecular alteration detected on high throughput technologies | one year after obtaining the molecular profile |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| overall survival | To evaluate the efficacy of such patient selection in terms of survival | 3 years after inclusion in SAFIR |
| Progression free survival | To evaluate the efficacy of such patient selection in terms of progression free survival |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
women or men with metastatic breast cancer
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Fabrice André, MD phD | Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institut Bergonié | Bordeaux | France | ||||
| Centre François Baclesse |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21343554 | Background | Andre F, Delaloge S, Soria JC. Biology-driven phase II trials: what is the optimal model for molecular selection? J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1;29(10):1236-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6877. Epub 2011 Feb 22. No abstract available. | |
| 24508104 | Derived | Andre F, Bachelot T, Commo F, Campone M, Arnedos M, Dieras V, Lacroix-Triki M, Lacroix L, Cohen P, Gentien D, Adelaide J, Dalenc F, Goncalves A, Levy C, Ferrero JM, Bonneterre J, Lefeuvre C, Jimenez M, Filleron T, Bonnefoi H. Comparative genomic hybridisation array and DNA sequencing to direct treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective trial (SAFIR01/UNICANCER). Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):267-74. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70611-9. Epub 2014 Feb 7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Metastasis biopsy and DNA from biopsy
| 3 years after inclusion in SAFIR |
| To evaluate the efficacy of such patient selection in terms of survival response rate | To evaluate the efficacy of such patient selection in terms of best response rate | 3 years after inclusion in SAFIR |
| Caen |
| France |
| Centre Georges François Leclerc | Dijon | France |
| Centre Oscar Lambret | Lille | France |
| Centre Léon Bérard | Lyon | France |
| Institut Paoli Calmettes | Marseille | France |
| Centre Val D'Aurelle | Montpellier | France |
| Centre Alexis Vautrin | Nancy | France |
| Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest/ René Gauducheau | Nantes | France |
| Centre Antoine Lacassagne | Nice | France |
| Institut Curie | Paris | France |
| Institut Jean Godinot | Reims | France |
| Centre Eugène Marquis | Rennes | France |
| Centre Henri Becquerel | Rouen | France |
| Institut Curie/ René Huguenin | Saint-Cloud | France |
| Centre Paul Strauss | Strasbourg | France |
| Institut Claudius Regaud | Toulouse | France |
| Institut Gustave Roussy | Villejuif | France |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001706 | Biopsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003581 | Cytodiagnosis |
| D003584 | Cytological Techniques |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided