Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Null hypothesis: (1) there is no difference in rates of ICU-acquired infection based on using disposable or cleaned, reusable ECG leadwires and (2) In cardiac surgical telemetry floors, there is no difference in false or nuisance sightings or crisis calls based on using disposable or cleaned, reusable ECG leadwires.
Primary purposes: Using a randomized controlled trial methodology and randomizing similar (matched) intensive care units (ICU) to either disposable or cleaned, reusable ECG-LW: 1. Is there a difference in the rate of blood stream infection (BSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in ICU environments (medical ICU, surgical ICU, cardiothoracic ICU, and neuroscience ICU) and surgical site infection (SSI); specifically, sternal wound infections in cardiothoracic ICU that utilize disposable vs. cleaned, reusable ECG-LW? 2. Is there a difference in ICU length of stay based on ECG-LW used: disposable vs. cleaned, reusable? 3. After controlling for patient age, comorbidity index and after removing patients who's date of BSI or VAP infections were within 48 hours of admission to the ICU, is there a difference in the rate of (A) blood stream infection (BSI), (B) ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and (C) SSI in ICU environments (when applicable) that utilize disposable vs. cleaned, reusable ECG-LW? Secondary purposes: Using a randomized controlled trial methodology and randomizing similar telemetry units to either disposable or cleaned, reusable ECG-LW: 1. Is there a difference in the number of false/nuisance sightings/crisis calls (i.e., lead off, no telemetry, lead failure or other false alarms) identified by the Central Monitoring Unit (CMU)? 2. Is there a difference in true sightings/crisis calls identified by the CMU based on unit assignment of disposable or cleaned, reusable ECG-LW? 2b. If yes to #2, is there a difference in types of true sightings/calls identified by the CMUbased on assignment of disposable or cleaned, reusable ECG-LW?
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reusable ECG leadwires-ICU | No Intervention | Current ECG leadwires will be used | |
| Disposable ECG leadwires-ICU | Active Comparator | Disposable ECG-LW |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disposable ECG-LW | Other | Disposable ECG leadwires used in ICU and telemetry monitoring; 5 lead sets for ICU and 6-lead sets for telemetry |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Blood stream infection | culture findings | 7 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| false/nuisance alarms | alarms generated by ECG tracings due to various causes (leads off, leads crimped, etc) | 4 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nancy M Albert, PhD | The Cleveland Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|