Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Clinical study investigating the feasibility and safety of using an anchored Calypso transponder in the airways of the lung for real-time monitoring of tumor location during radiotherapy
The Calypso anchored lung transponders are a modified version of the previously FDA-cleared Calypso soft tissue transponders. This modification includes an anchoring mechanism to hold the transponder positionally stable within small airways of the lung. Transponders are placed locally to the tumor within the lung and during subsequent radiotherapy the Calypso system may be used to monitor the location of the transponders and, by extension, the tumor, in real-time. This allows for improved tumor-targeting as well as gating of the radiation beam when the tumor moves outside the target field during respiratory motion.
The goals of this investigation are to show that patients with implanted anchored transponders can be localized with the Calypso System, that anchored transponder implantation and use are feasible and safe, and that anchored transponders are positionally stable in the small airways of patients with cancer of the lung.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transponder implantation | Experimental | Implantation of anchored Beacon transponder in the lung |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implantation of anchored Beacon transponder in the lung | Device | Anchored Beacon transponder has an anchoring feature to secure it in the small airways of the lung. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To Determine the Proportion of Patients Who Can be Localized by the Calypso System Using the Anchored Transponders. | Whether a patient can be localized by the Calypso System using the anchored transponders will be determined during the first week (i.e., the first five fractions) of radiation therapy. | 1-2 weeks following implantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To Assess the Implantation Procedure of the Anchored Transponder in the Lung | The implantation procedure of the anchored transponder in the lung will be assessed with respect to a number of criteria: ability to implant transponders where intended, implanting physician's satisfaction with the process, and geometric configuration of the implanted transponders. | 1-2 weeks following implantation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lisa Levine, PhD | Varian Medical Systems | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama | 35233 | United States | ||
| Radiological Associates of Sacramento |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria and enrolled in the study were implanted with anchored transponders unless the patient's status changed prior to implantation. For example, if the patient's therapeutic plan was changed to exclude radiotherapy or the patient receives chest implants that preclude them from the study.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Transponder Implantation | Implantation of anchored Beacon transponder in the lung: Anchored Beacon transponder has an anchoring feature to secure it in the small airways of the lung. Patients were implanted with 2-3 anchored transponders prior to radiotherapy. Transponders wereused for tumor localization during radiotherapy. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| To Assess the Positional Stability of the Anchored Transponders Short Term Through the Completion of Radiotherapy and Long Term Through One Year of Follow-up. | The positional stability of the anchored transponder configuration will be assessed using changes in intertransponder distance. Inter-transponder distance will be calculated from CT scans acquired at treatment planning (baseline), 2-4 subsequent follow-up CT scans acquired during radiation therapy, and 4 follow-up CT scans taking place between 10-13 months post-radiotherapy | 1-14 months, depending on the duration of radiotherapy and time between follow-up visits. |
| To Evaluate Adverse Events Associated With the Anchored Transponder and the Implantation Procedure | Adverse events associated with the anchored transponder and implantation procedure from the time of implantation through the completion of the follow-up period will be recorded and assessed. | Time of implantation through the completion of the follow-up period of the study (0-14 months) |
| To Collect Target Localization and Tracking Data With the Calypso System During Radiation Treatment Sessions | Target localization and tracking data will be collected with the Calypso System during radiation treatment sessions. | Depending on the type of radiation treatment, this will take place over the course of 1-2 weeks or 1-7 weeks |
| To Record Usability Data, Including User Intervention in Response to the Localization and Tracking Data During the Radiation Treatment Sessions | To record usability data, including user intervention in response to the localization and tracking data (e.g., pausing the bean, patient re-alignment, etc.) during the radiation treatment sessions. | Depending on the type of radiation treatment, this will take place over the course of 1-2 weeks or 1-7 weeks |
| To Calculate the Potential Reduction in Volume and Dose of Normal Lung Irradiated When a Reduced Margin is Used for the Planning Target Volume | To calculate the potential reduction in volume and dose of normal lung irradiated when routine institutional planning target volume margins are reduced to a margin of 0.5 cm circumferentially made possible by realtime localization and tracking of the tumor. This calculation will be done for a subset of the patients. | 1-2 weeks following implantation |
| Sacramento |
| California |
| 95815 |
| United States |
| University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| Washington University | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| New York University Langone Medical Center | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA) | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74133 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| University of Heidelberg / Thoraxklinik / DKFZ | Heidelberg | Germany |
| Stellenbosch University / Tygerberg Hospital | Cape Town | South Africa |
| University Hospital Basel | Basel | Switzerland |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
All patients who underwent implantation
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Transponder Implantation | Implantation of anchored Beacon transponder in the lung: Anchored Beacon transponder has an anchoring feature to secure it in the small airways of the lung. Patients were implanted with 2-3 anchored transponders prior to radiotherapy. Transponders wereused for tumor localization during radiotherapy. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Tumor characteristics | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Co-morbidities | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Baseline symptoms | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Prior Thoracic Surgery | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | To Determine the Proportion of Patients Who Can be Localized by the Calypso System Using the Anchored Transponders. | Whether a patient can be localized by the Calypso System using the anchored transponders will be determined during the first week (i.e., the first five fractions) of radiation therapy. | Two patients were not included in the analysis. One patient became ineligible for Calypso localization after receiving a pacemaker, and one patient did not undergo radiation therapy because of disease progression. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1-2 weeks following implantation |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | To Assess the Implantation Procedure of the Anchored Transponder in the Lung | The implantation procedure of the anchored transponder in the lung will be assessed with respect to a number of criteria: ability to implant transponders where intended, implanting physician's satisfaction with the process, and geometric configuration of the implanted transponders. | Not Posted | 1-2 weeks following implantation | Participants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | To Assess the Positional Stability of the Anchored Transponders Short Term Through the Completion of Radiotherapy and Long Term Through One Year of Follow-up. | The positional stability of the anchored transponder configuration will be assessed using changes in intertransponder distance. Inter-transponder distance will be calculated from CT scans acquired at treatment planning (baseline), 2-4 subsequent follow-up CT scans acquired during radiation therapy, and 4 follow-up CT scans taking place between 10-13 months post-radiotherapy | Not Posted | 1-14 months, depending on the duration of radiotherapy and time between follow-up visits. | Participants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | To Evaluate Adverse Events Associated With the Anchored Transponder and the Implantation Procedure | Adverse events associated with the anchored transponder and implantation procedure from the time of implantation through the completion of the follow-up period will be recorded and assessed. | Not Posted | Time of implantation through the completion of the follow-up period of the study (0-14 months) | Participants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | To Collect Target Localization and Tracking Data With the Calypso System During Radiation Treatment Sessions | Target localization and tracking data will be collected with the Calypso System during radiation treatment sessions. | Not Posted | Depending on the type of radiation treatment, this will take place over the course of 1-2 weeks or 1-7 weeks | Participants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | To Record Usability Data, Including User Intervention in Response to the Localization and Tracking Data During the Radiation Treatment Sessions | To record usability data, including user intervention in response to the localization and tracking data (e.g., pausing the bean, patient re-alignment, etc.) during the radiation treatment sessions. | Not Posted | Depending on the type of radiation treatment, this will take place over the course of 1-2 weeks or 1-7 weeks | Participants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | To Calculate the Potential Reduction in Volume and Dose of Normal Lung Irradiated When a Reduced Margin is Used for the Planning Target Volume | To calculate the potential reduction in volume and dose of normal lung irradiated when routine institutional planning target volume margins are reduced to a margin of 0.5 cm circumferentially made possible by realtime localization and tracking of the tumor. This calculation will be done for a subset of the patients. | Not Posted | 1-2 weeks following implantation | Participants |
Adverse events were recorded from the time of patient implantation until approximately 12 months following the completion of radiotherapy.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Transponder Implantation | Implantation of anchored Beacon transponder in the lung: Anchored Beacon transponder has an anchoring feature to secure it in the small airways of the lung. Patients were implanted with 2-3 anchored transponders prior to radiotherapy. Transponders wereused for tumor localization during radiotherapy. | 17 | 69 | 7 | 69 | 36 | 69 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contiguous Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment | Pneumonia |
| |
| lung infection with pulmonary abcess and bronchopleural fistula | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| consolidation on major fissure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| acute bronchopneumonia | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| anethesia induced short cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| hypotension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| atelectasis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| imaging evidence of post obstructive pneumonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| hemoptysis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| anchored transponder migration outside the lung | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| chest pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| sore throat | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| sputum production | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| wheezing | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| post extubation bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| vomiting | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| excoriations in oropharynx | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| weakness | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| fever | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| dyspnea on exertion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| pulmonary edema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| nausea | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| throat/chest tightness | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| headache | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| dry mouth | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| chills | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| neck pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Allen | Varian Medical Systems | 206-330-2605 | julie.allen@varian.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Switzerland |
|
|
| Germany |
|
|
|
|
| Metastatic to the lung |
|
|
|
|
| other pulmonary conditions |
|
|
| Coronary Artery Bypass graft surgery |
|
|
| Congestive heart failure |
|
|
| Prior pneumothorax |
|
|
| Angioplasty or coronary artery stenting |
|
|
|
| Sputum production |
|
|
| Wheezing |
|
|
| Hemoptysis |
|
|