Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The HIV/AIDS pandemic remains among the investigators greatest public health challenges. In the absence of an effective vaccine, focus has shifted to other prevention strategies such as pre-exposure prophylaxis. Tenofovir, with potent activity against retroviruses [1], was developed for oral use as Viread®, which is widely used for HIV treatment. The efficacy of Viread® has been demonstrated in treatment-experienced and naïve patients [2,3]. In antiretroviral-naive patients, the combination of tenofovir with lamivudine and efavirenz has been classified as a preferred regimen in the Department of Health and Human Services treatment guidelines[4], and has been adopted by the South African Department of health as the first line regimen in treatment-naïve HIV infected patients since April 2010. The durability of antiviral response, favourable resistance profile, once daily dosing, and excellent long term safety profile of tenofovir [5], makes this drug an attractive option in both treatment and prevention regimens and its long half-life [6], made it an ideal choice as the first antiretroviral drug to be formulated as a microbicide gel.
The CAPRISA 004 study conducted in South Africa which tested the effectiveness and safety of 1% tenofovir gel showed that the use of tenofovir in a gel formulation reduced HIV acquisition by 39% overall, and by 54% in women with high gel adherence [7]. There have been concerns raised regarding the use of tenofovir in both PrEP and treatment regimens due to the potential for selection of viral mutations and development of resistance in patients who have become HIV-infected while on PrEP.
There have been no studies conducted to determine whether using tenofovir in pre-exposure prophylaxis affects treatment outcomes in patients who later use tenofovir, which is part of the first line ART of South Africa.
This study aims to determine whether prophylactic exposure to tenofovir gel alters the therapeutic response to a tenofovir containing antiretroviral regimen.
Purpose:
To determine whether prophylactic exposure to tenofovir gel alters the therapeutic response to a tenofovir containing antiretroviral regimen
Study design:
Open label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial
Study population:
Women who become infected with HIV while participating in the CAPRISA 004 and CAPRISA 008 trials. There are 3 study populations:
Study population 1:
HIV positive women from the CAPRISA 004 tenofovir gel arm and HIV positive women from the clinical trial tenofovir gel provision arm of CAPRISA 008
Study population 2:
HIV positive women in the placebo arm of CAPRISA 004
Study population 3:
HIV positive women from the family planning service arm of CAPRISA 008
Study sites:
CAPRISA eThekwini and CAPRISA Vulindlela clinics.
Study duration:
3 years
Study intervention:
Enrolled women will be initiated on their assigned antiretroviral therapy regimen when they reach any of the following criteria:
At enrolment women in each of the three study populations will be assigned randomly to one of the two following antiretroviral regimens Intervention Arm: Tenofovir, lamivudine and efavirenz Control arm: Zidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz
Sample size: The projected sample size is 90 women. The number of women in each stratum is as follows:
Study population 1: n = 40 Study population 2: n = 30 Study population 3: n = 20
Primary endpoint:
The primary endpoint is the antiretroviral treatment failure rate at 12 months. Treatment failure is defined as viral load > 50 copies/ml, antiretroviral regimen changes for treatment failure or death
Secondary Endpoints:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenofovir, lamivudine and efavirenz | Experimental |
| |
| Zidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenofovir, lamivudine and efavirenz | Drug | Tenofovir, 300mg daily, lifelong Lamivudine, 300mg daily, lifelong Efavirenz, 600mg daily, lifelong |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Antiretroviral Treatment Failure Rate at 12 Months. | Treatment failure is defined as viral load > 50 copies/ml, antiretroviral regimen changes for treatment failure or death | 12 months post ART intiation or until time of death |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in CD4+ Cell Count From Randomisation to 12 Months Post-randomisation | Difference between 12 months and randomisation CD4+ count was calculated and then summarised | Measured at 12 months post ART initiation |
| Tenofovir Resistance, Defined as Presence of K65R, K70E or Any of the TAMS Mutations |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nivashnee Naicker, MBChB | Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPRISA | Durban | KwaZulu-Natal | 4000 | South Africa |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17045247 | Background | De Clercq E. Acyclic nucleoside phosphonates: past, present and future. Bridging chemistry to HIV, HBV, HCV, HPV, adeno-, herpes-, and poxvirus infections: the phosphonate bridge. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007 Apr 1;73(7):911-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.09.014. Epub 2006 Sep 19. | |
| 12045491 | Background | Schooley RT, Ruane P, Myers RA, Beall G, Lampiris H, Berger D, Chen SS, Miller MD, Isaacson E, Cheng AK; Study 902 Team. Tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-experienced patients: results from a 48-week, randomized, double-blind study. AIDS. 2002 Jun 14;16(9):1257-63. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200206140-00008. |
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 214 participants were assessed for eligibility: 60 were excluded due to high CD4+ count, 30 were already on ART, 8 were loss to follow-up and 43 refused participation. Of the 73 that were screened, 8 were screen failures due to high CD4+ count, 4 refused participation, 1 was very ill with TB and 1 could not be contacted.
Two arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Tenofovir-containing Regimen | Patients were initiated on EFV, FTC/3TC,TDF |
| FG001 | Tenofovir-sparing Regimen | Patients were initiated on EFV,FTC/3TC,ZDV |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| From randomisation until either time of termination or time of death |
| Reported Adverse Events With Severity Grades 3 and 4 Based on the DAIDS Toxicity Grading Tables | From randomisation until either time of termination or time of death |
| Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses | We will assess whether exposure to tenofovir gel at the time of HIV acquisition alters the subsequent humoral and cellular immune responses following antiretroviral treatment initiation | 3 years |
| Genital Viral Shedding (Viral Load on Tear Flow) | 3 years |
| 12965939 | Background | Squires K, Pozniak AL, Pierone G Jr, Steinhart CR, Berger D, Bellos NC, Becker SL, Wulfsohn M, Miller MD, Toole JJ, Coakley DF, Cheng A; Study 907 Team. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in nucleoside-resistant HIV-1 infection: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 1):313-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_1-200309020-00006. |
| Background | Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. December 1, 2009. Available from: www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2010. |
| 15249568 | Background | Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL, DeJesus E, Suleiman JM, Miller MD, Coakley DF, Lu B, Toole JJ, Cheng AK; 903 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA. 2004 Jul 14;292(2):191-201. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.2.191. |
| 20174579 | Background | Rohan LC, Moncla BJ, Kunjara Na Ayudhya RP, Cost M, Huang Y, Gai F, Billitto N, Lynam JD, Pryke K, Graebing P, Hopkins N, Rooney JF, Friend D, Dezzutti CS. In vitro and ex vivo testing of tenofovir shows it is effective as an HIV-1 microbicide. PLoS One. 2010 Feb 19;5(2):e9310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009310. |
| 20643915 | Background | Abdool Karim Q, Abdool Karim SS, Frohlich JA, Grobler AC, Baxter C, Mansoor LE, Kharsany AB, Sibeko S, Mlisana KP, Omar Z, Gengiah TN, Maarschalk S, Arulappan N, Mlotshwa M, Morris L, Taylor D; CAPRISA 004 Trial Group. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science. 2010 Sep 3;329(5996):1168-74. doi: 10.1126/science.1193748. Epub 2010 Jul 19. |
| 27835613 | Derived | Naicker N, Naidoo A, Werner L, Garrett N, Majola N, Asari V, Baxter C, Grobler A, Karim QA, Karim SSA. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir-containing antiretroviral therapy in women who acquired HIV while enrolled in tenofovir gel prophylaxis trials. Antivir Ther. 2017;22(4):287-293. doi: 10.3851/IMP3106. Epub 2016 Nov 4. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
All participants who were randomised and initiated on ART
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Tenofovir-containing Regimen | Patients were initiated on EFV, FTC/3TC,TDF |
| BG001 | Tenofovir-sparing Regimen | Patients were initiated on EFV,FTC/3TC,ZDV |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| CD4+ T cell count | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | cells/uL |
| |||||||||||||||
| Viral load | Mean | Standard Deviation | log10 copies/ml |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The Antiretroviral Treatment Failure Rate at 12 Months. | Treatment failure is defined as viral load > 50 copies/ml, antiretroviral regimen changes for treatment failure or death | All participants who randomised and initiated on ART | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months post ART intiation or until time of death |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in CD4+ Cell Count From Randomisation to 12 Months Post-randomisation | Difference between 12 months and randomisation CD4+ count was calculated and then summarised | All participants for whom CD4+ count measurements were recorded at randomisation and at 12 months | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | cells/uL | Measured at 12 months post ART initiation |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Tenofovir Resistance, Defined as Presence of K65R, K70E or Any of the TAMS Mutations | Resistance testing was only done on participants who were failing first line antiretroviral therapy. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From randomisation until either time of termination or time of death |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Reported Adverse Events With Severity Grades 3 and 4 Based on the DAIDS Toxicity Grading Tables | All participants who randomised and initiated on ART | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From randomisation until either time of termination or time of death |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses | We will assess whether exposure to tenofovir gel at the time of HIV acquisition alters the subsequent humoral and cellular immune responses following antiretroviral treatment initiation | Data were not collected for this Outcome Measure | Posted | 3 years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Genital Viral Shedding (Viral Load on Tear Flow) | Data were not collected for this Outcome Measure | Posted | 3 years |
|
|
19 July 2011 to 30 September 2014
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Tenofovir-containing Regimen | Patients were initiated on EFV, FTC/3TC,TDF | 10 | 29 | 1 | 29 | ||
| EG001 | Tenofovir-sparing Regimen | Patients were initiated on EFV,FTC/3TC,ZDV | 11 | 30 | 5 | 30 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malaise | General disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis perforated | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pelvic inflammatory disease | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperlactacidaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Benign hydatidiform mole | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abortion spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Delivery | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Premature labour | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Completed suicide | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess drainage | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Caesarean section | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Female sterilisation | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bartholin's abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abnormal loss of weight | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypophosphataemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The main limitation of the study was the small sample size. The eligible pool of participants was dependent on two other tenofovir gel trials, one of which experienced long delay in starting.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head of Statistics and Data Management | CAPRISA | +27 31 260 4392 | nonhlanhla.yende@caprisa.org |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068698 | Tenofovir |
| D019259 | Lamivudine |
| C098320 | efavirenz |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D063065 | Organophosphonates |
| D009943 | Organophosphorus Compounds |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000225 | Adenine |
| D011687 | Purines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D016047 | Zalcitabine |
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D003853 | Deoxyribonucleosides |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
| D015224 | Dideoxynucleosides |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|