Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-004755-39 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This will be a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase II study with primary objectives to assess whether expression of select chemotherapy markers is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in participants treated with bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). The study population will consist of participants with first-line mCRC.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 | Experimental | Participants will receive bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
|
| Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI | Experimental | Participants will receive bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Fluorouracil | Drug | 5-Fluorouracil 400 milligrams per meter-squared (mg/m^2) by IV bolus and subsequent 2400 mg/m^2 by IV infusion over 46 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 20 percent (%) increase in sum of largest diameters (LD) of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 millimeters (mm). Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Christiane Langer, M.D. | Genentech, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham | Alabama | 35294 | United States | |||
The trial included a 21-day Screening period during which participants provided information for demographics, medical history, and cancer/treatment history and completed urinalysis collection.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 | Participants with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), leucovorin as 400 milligrams per meter-squared (mg/m^2), oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via intravenous (IV) infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Bevacizumab | Drug | Bevacizumab 5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight via IV infusion will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. If participants are discontinued from oxaliplatin or irinotecan due to unacceptable toxicity, bevacizumab may be given in 3-week cycles with capecitabine. |
|
|
| Irinotecan | Drug | Irinotecan 180 mg/m^2 via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
|
| Leucovorin | Drug | Leucovorin 400 mg/m^2 or dose deemed appropriate by Investigator via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
|
| Oxaliplatin | Drug | Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2 via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
|
| Capecitabine | Drug | Capecitabine 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 may be offered in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan, to be given orally twice a day on Days 1 to 14 in 3-week cycles. |
|
| From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| OS in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 | Objective response was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to less than (<) 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 | Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| OS in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| OS in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS | Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| Little Rock |
| Arkansas |
| 72205-7199 |
| United States |
| Bellflower | California | 90706 | United States |
| Duarte | California | 91010 | United States |
| Fountain Valley | California | 92708 | United States |
| Fresno | California | 93720 | United States |
| Hayward | California | 94545 | United States |
| Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
| Oakland | California | 94611 | United States |
| Pleasant Hill | California | 94523 | United States |
| Roseville | California | 95661 | United States |
| Sacramento | California | 95817 | United States |
| Sacramento | California | 95825 | United States |
| San Francisco | California | 94115 | United States |
| San Jose | California | 95119 | United States |
| Santa Clara | California | 95051 | United States |
| South San Francisco | California | 94080 | United States |
| Vallejo | California | 94589 | United States |
| Walnut Creek | California | 94596 | United States |
| Denver | Colorado | 80218 | United States |
| Stamford | Connecticut | 06902 | United States |
| Trumbull | Connecticut | 06611 | United States |
| Hollywood | Florida | 33021 | United States |
| Jacksonville | Florida | 32256 | United States |
| Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| Port Saint Lucie | Florida | 34952 | United States |
| Boise | Idaho | 83712 | United States |
| Joliet | Illinois | 60435 | United States |
| Maywood | Illinois | 60153 | United States |
| Peoria | Illinois | 61615 | United States |
| Goshen | Indiana | 46526 | United States |
| Indianapolis | Indiana | 46237 | United States |
| Terre Haute | Indiana | 47802 | United States |
| Fairway | Kansas | 66205 | United States |
| Elizabethtown | Kentucky | 42791 | United States |
| Scarborough | Maine | 04074 | United States |
| Burlington | Massachusetts | 01805 | United States |
| Billings | Montana | 59102 | United States |
| Lincoln | Nebraska | 68506 | United States |
| Cherry Hill | New Jersey | 08003 | United States |
| Manasquan | New Jersey | 08736 | United States |
| Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87106 | United States |
| Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87110 | United States |
| Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87131-5636 | United States |
| Farmington | New Mexico | 87401 | United States |
| Las Cruces | New Mexico | 88011 | United States |
| Santa Fe | New Mexico | 87505 | United States |
| Rochester | New York | 14642 | United States |
| Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Greensboro | North Carolina | 27403 | United States |
| High Point | North Carolina | 27262 | United States |
| Washington | North Carolina | 27889 | United States |
| Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Columbus | Ohio | 43219 | United States |
| Toledo | Ohio | 43623 | United States |
| Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73142 | United States |
| Dunmore | Pennsylvania | 18512 | United States |
| Media | Pennsylvania | 19063 | United States |
| Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15212 | United States |
| Charleston | South Carolina | 29414 | United States |
| Corpus Christi | Texas | 78404 | United States |
| Houston | Texas | 77090 | United States |
| Madison | Wisconsin | 53792 | United States |
| Wauwatosa | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| Edmonton | Alberta | T6G 1Z2 | Canada |
| Tallinn | 13419 | Estonia |
| Tartu | 51014 | Estonia |
| Cork | Ireland |
| Dublin | 24 | Ireland |
| Galway | Ireland |
| Oslo | 0407 | Norway |
| Coimbra | 3000-075 | Portugal |
| Lisbon | 1649-035 | Portugal |
| Porto | 4200-072 | Portugal |
| Aarau | 5000 | Switzerland |
| Basel | 4031 | Switzerland |
| Lucerne | 6004 | Switzerland |
| Zurich | 8063 | Switzerland |
| FG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized participants regardless of receiving any study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
| BG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 20 percent (%) increase in sum of largest diameters (LD) of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 millimeters (mm). Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | OS in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 | Objective response was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to less than (<) 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 | Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population; only those participants with liver or liver plus lymph node metastases were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population; only those participants with liver or liver plus lymph node metastases were included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population; only those participants with liver or liver plus lymph node metastases were included in the analysis. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population; only those participants with liver or liver plus lymph node metastases were included in the analysis. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population; only those participants with liver or liver plus lymph node metastases were included in the analysis. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population; only those participants with liver or liver plus lymph node metastases were included in the analysis. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population; only those participants with liver or liver plus lymph node metastases were included in the analysis. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population; only those participants with liver or liver plus lymph node metastases were included in the analysis. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS | Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | OS in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | OS in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS | Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS | Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population; only those participants with liver or liver plus lymph node metastases were included in the analysis. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels | The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. | ITT Population; only those participants with liver or liver plus lymph node metastases were included in the analysis. The "Number of Participants Analyzed" reflects the number of evaluable participants for the outcome measure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall) |
|
Serious Adverse Events (AEs): Baseline until 3 months after last dose or study discontinuation/termination (up to 45 months overall); Other AEs: Baseline until 28 days after last dose or study discontinuation/termination (up to 45 months overall).
Safety Population: All randomized participants who received at least one partial or complete dose of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. | 79 | 185 | 185 | 185 | ||
| EG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. | 87 | 183 | 181 | 183 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestine perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain lower | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal ulcer haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Enteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ileal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenic colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal motility disorder | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal varices haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumoperitoneum | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Enterovesical fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastric haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Reflux gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Candida sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endocarditis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subcutaneous abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device related infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Kidney infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenic sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Perineal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia parainfluenzae viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory distress | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hiccups | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary thrombosis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Interstitial lung disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary artery thrombosis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Failure to thrive | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malnutrition | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypophosphataemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metabolic alkalosis | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device dislocation | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mucosal inflammation | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Multi-organ failure | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral swelling | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Systemic inflammatory response syndrome | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device malfunction | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gait disturbance | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Localised oedema | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arterial thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Embolism venous | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Venous thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jugular vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Immune thrombocytopenic purpura | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial flutter | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardio-respiratory arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Left ventricular dysfunction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial thrombosis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infusion related reaction | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stoma site haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toxicity to various agents | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound dehiscence | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal wound dehiscence | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal anastomosis complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal compression fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aphonia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ataxia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhage intracranial | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombotic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperbilirubinaemia | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischaemic hepatitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biloma | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholangitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis chronic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic steatosis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Polyarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhabdomyolysis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proteinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Confusional state | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mental status changes | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meningioma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colostomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhoids | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proctalgia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mucosal inflammation | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Temperature intolerance | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neuropathy peripheral | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral sensory neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hiccups | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin hyperpigmentation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperhidrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| White blood cell count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proteinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lacrimation increased | Eye disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infusion related reaction | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Communications | Hoffmann-La Roche | 800-821-8590 | genentech@druginfo.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005472 | Fluorouracil |
| D000068258 | Bevacizumab |
| D000077146 | Irinotecan |
| D002955 | Leucovorin |
| D000077150 | Oxaliplatin |
| D000069287 | Capecitabine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014498 | Uracil |
| D011744 | Pyrimidinones |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
| D002166 | Camptothecin |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
| D005575 | Formyltetrahydrofolates |
| D013763 | Tetrahydrofolates |
| D005492 | Folic Acid |
| D011622 | Pterins |
| D011621 | Pteridines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D003067 | Coenzymes |
| D045762 | Enzymes and Coenzymes |
| D056831 | Coordination Complexes |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D003853 | Deoxyribonucleosides |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level >1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with VEGF-A level ≤5 pg/mL at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High, VEGF-A High) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level >1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA and VEGF-A level >5 pg/mL at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High, VEGF-A Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level >1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA and VEGF-A level ≤5 pg/mL at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low, VEGF-A High) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA and VEGF-A level >5 pg/mL at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low, VEGF-A Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA and VEGF-A level ≤5 pg/mL at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level >1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses.
|
|
|
Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses.
|
|
|
| OG001 |
| Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) |
Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level >1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level >1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
|
|
|
Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles.
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level >1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level >1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with ERCC-1 level ≤1.7 × 10^-3 ERCC-1/B-actin mRNA at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (KRAS Mutant) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with mutant KRAS at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low) |
Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with VEGF-A level ≤5 pg/mL at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (KRAS Mutant) |
Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with mutant KRAS at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with VEGF-A level ≤5 pg/mL at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (KRAS Mutant) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with mutant KRAS at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with VEGF-A level ≤5 pg/mL at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with VEGF-A level ≤5 pg/mL at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low) | Participants with untreated mCRC who were candidates for first-line therapy received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Depending on the regimen to which the participant was randomized, bevacizumab was given as 5 mg/kg, leucovorin as 400 mg/m^2, oxaliplatin as 85 mg/m^2, irinotecan as 180 mg/m^2, and 5-fluorouracil as 400 mg/m^2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m^2 continuous 46-hour infusion. All treatments were administered via IV infusion and started on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle. Participants could be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan and given as 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 twice a day on Days 1 to 14, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Participants with VEGF-A level ≤5 pg/mL at Baseline were included in separate analyses. |
|
|
|