Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will be a prospective, multicenter clinical trial in which a total of 400 subjects will be enrolled. All subjects will be followed over a 36 month time frame with a maximum of 15 clinical sites participating. Qualified subjects will provide informed consent for entry into the study.
The loss of near vision and the ability to perform tasks that require near vision is part of the normal aging process. This natural transformation in the eye occurs as a result of the loss of accommodation of the crystalline lens, a condition known as presbyopia. Presbyopia, characterized by a progressive, age-related loss of accommodation (i.e., the lens ability to focus clearly over a wide range of distances), is most prevalent of all visual deficiencies, affecting 100% of the population over the course of a normal life span. Loss of accommodation begins early in life and, for an emmetropic eye, generally culminates in a complete loss of functional near vision.
ReVision Optics has developed the Raindrop corneal inlay for the correction of near vision. The Raindrop is a 2mm corneal inlay, as small as a pinhead, thinner than a human hair and about 1/500th of a droplet of water. The inlay is the same refractive index as the human cornea. The inlay is placed in the non-dominant eye,centered over the pupil after a corneal flap (LASIK)has been made. The Raindrop is expected to provide presbyopic subjects with improvement of near and intermediate vision.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raindrop | Experimental | A single-arm study to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2 mm corneal inlay (Raindrop Near Vision Inlay) for the treatment of presbyopia (age-related near vision loss). The anterior curvature of the cornea is re-shaped after implanting the Raindrop Near Vision Inlay in the non-dominant eye under a femtosecond laser flap to improve near vision. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Raindrop Near Vision Inlay | Device | The Raindrop Near Vision Inlay is implanted in the cornea for treatment of presbyopia |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Improvement in Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (20/40 or Better) in the Implanted Eye | 75% of participants should achieve uncorrected near visual acuity in the implanted eye of 20/40 or better as compared to preoperative baseline | 24 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With no or Minimal Loss of Best Corrected Visual Acuity in the Implanted Eye | Less than 5% of participants should lose more than two lines of best corrected distance and near visual acuity in the implanted eye; and less than 1% of participants with preoperative best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BCDVA) of 20/20 in the implanted eye should have best corrected distance and near visual acuity worse than 20/40 in the implanted eye at 6 months postoperative and all subsequent visits. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
must be presbyopic adults, needing from +1.50 to +2.50 or reading add must have uncorrected near visual acuity worse than 20/40 and better than 20/200in the eye to be implanted must have an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better in both eyes must have a distance visual acuity correctable to 20/20 in both eyes must have a near visual acuity correctable to 20/20 in both eyes must have a manifest refraction spherical equivalent between -0.50 and +1.00D in the eye to be implanted with no more than 0.75D of refractive cylinder must report stable vision, i.e. no change in distance vision and or MRSE within 0.50D over prior 12 months must discontinue hard or rigid gas permeable lenses for at least 3 weeks and discontinue soft lenses for at least 1 week prior to baseline examination must have a minimum central corneal thickness of >500 microns in the eye to be implanted must have a mesopic pupil < 7.0mm and photopic pupil >3.0mm in the eye to be implanted subjects aged 45 years or younger must have an endothelial cell count
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects with a difference of >0.75 between the manifest refraction spherical equivalent and the cycloplegic refraction spherical equivalent Subjects with anterior segment pathology, including clinically significant cataracts, in the non-dominant eye Subjects with residual, recurrent, active ocular or uncontrolled eyelid disease, or any corneal abnormality (including endothelial dystrophy, guttata, recurrent corneal erosion, etc.) in the non-dominant eye Subjects with ophthalmoscopic signs of keratoconus (or keratoconus suspect) in the non-dominant eye Subjects with clinically significant dry eyes, as determined by either the presence of greater than mild symptoms of dryness or discomfort or SPK greater than grade 1 Subjects with distorted or unclear mires on topography maps of the non-dominant eye Subjects with macular degeneration, retinal detachment, or any other fundus pathology that would prevent an acceptable visual outcome in the non-dominant eye Subjects who have undergone LASIK surgery in the non-dominant eye Subjects with a history of herpes zoster or herpes simplex keratitis Subjects who have a history of steroid responsive rise in intraocular pressure, pre-operative IOP>21 mm Hg, glaucoma or are a glaucoma suspect Subjects with a history of diagnosed diabetes, autoimmune disease, connective tissue disease, or clinically significant atopic syndrome Subjects on chronic systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive therapy that may affect wound healing, and any immunocompromised subjects Subjects who are using ophthalmic mediation(s) other than artificial tears for treatment of any ocular pathology Subjects using systemic medications with significant ocular side effects Subjects who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study Subjects what are participating in any other ophthalmic drug or device studies during the time of this clinical investigation Subjects with known sensitivity to planned study concomitant medications
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Steven G Slade, M.D. | Principal Investigator | |
| Jon G Dishler, MD | Principal Investigator | |
| John Olkowski, M.D. | Principal Investigator | |
| Dan B Tran, M.D. | Principal Investigator | |
| Ralph Y Chu, M.D. | Principal Investigator | |
| Jeffrey Whitman, M.D. | Principal Investigator | |
| Robert P Lehmann, M.D. | Principal Investigator | |
| Gregory Parkhurst, M.D | Unaffilliated | Principal Investigator |
| Harvey L Carter, III, M.D. | Unaffilliated | Principal Investigator |
| Paul Dougherty, M.D. | Unaffilliated | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dougherty Laser Vision | Camarillo | California | 93010 | United States | ||
| Harvard Eye Associates |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26804761 | Derived | Whitman J, Dougherty PJ, Parkhurst GD, Olkowski J, Slade SG, Hovanesian J, Chu R, Dishler J, Tran DB, Lehmann R, Carter H, Steinert RF, Koch DD. Treatment of Presbyopia in Emmetropes Using a Shape-Changing Corneal Inlay: One-Year Clinical Outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2016 Mar;123(3):466-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.011. Epub 2016 Jan 27. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Raindrop | A single-arm study to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2 mm corneal inlay (Raindrop Near Vision Inlay) for the treatment of presbyopia (age-related near vision loss). The anterior curvature of the cornea is re-shaped after implanting the Raindrop Near Vision Inlay in the non-dominant eye under a femtosecond laser flap to improve near vision. The Raindrop Near Vision Inlay: The Raindrop Near Vision Inlay is implanted in the cornea for treatment of presbyopia |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| at 6 months postoperative and all subsequent visits |
| Number of Participants With Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism in the Implanted Eye | Less than 5% of participants should have postoperative manifest refractive astigmatism in the implanted eye that increases from baseline by greater than 2.00 D at 6 months postoperative and all subsequent visits. | At 6 months postoperative and all subsequent visits |
| John Hovanesian, M.D. | Unaffilliated | Principal Investigator |
| Laguna Hills |
| California |
| 92653 |
| United States |
| Coastal Vision | Newport Beach | California | 92660 | United States |
| Jon G. Dishler, M.D. | Greenwood Village | Colorado | 80111 | United States |
| Eyesight Hawaai | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96816 | United States |
| Chu Vision | Bloomington | Minnesota | 55420 | United States |
| Key-Whitman Eye Center | Dallas | Texas | 75204 | United States |
| Carter Eye Center | Dallas | Texas | 75205 | United States |
| Slade and Baker Vision Center | Houston | Texas | 77027 | United States |
| Lehmann Eye Center | Nacogdoches | Texas | 75965 | United States |
| NuVision. | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Raindrop | A single-arm study to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2 mm corneal inlay (Raindrop Near Vision Inlay) for the treatment of presbyopia (age-related near vision loss). The anterior curvature of the cornea is re-shaped after implanting the Raindrop Near Vision Inlay in the non-dominant eye under a femtosecond laser flap to improve near vision. The Raindrop Near Vision Inlay: The Raindrop Near Vision Inlay is implanted in the cornea for treatment of presbyopia |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Improvement in Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (20/40 or Better) in the Implanted Eye | 75% of participants should achieve uncorrected near visual acuity in the implanted eye of 20/40 or better as compared to preoperative baseline | Posted | Number | Count of Participants | 24 Months |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With no or Minimal Loss of Best Corrected Visual Acuity in the Implanted Eye | Less than 5% of participants should lose more than two lines of best corrected distance and near visual acuity in the implanted eye; and less than 1% of participants with preoperative best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BCDVA) of 20/20 in the implanted eye should have best corrected distance and near visual acuity worse than 20/40 in the implanted eye at 6 months postoperative and all subsequent visits. | Numbers analyzed at each timepoint differ due to participant availability | Posted | Number | Count of Participants | at 6 months postoperative and all subsequent visits |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism in the Implanted Eye | Less than 5% of participants should have postoperative manifest refractive astigmatism in the implanted eye that increases from baseline by greater than 2.00 D at 6 months postoperative and all subsequent visits. | Numbers analyzed at each timepoint differ due to participant availability. | Posted | Number | Count of Participants | At 6 months postoperative and all subsequent visits |
|
|
Day 1, Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Raindrop | A single-arm study to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2 mm corneal inlay (Raindrop Near Vision Inlay) for the treatment of presbyopia (age-related near vision loss). The anterior curvature of the cornea is re-shaped after implanting the Raindrop Near Vision Inlay in the non-dominant eye under a femtosecond laser flap to improve near vision. The Raindrop Near Vision Inlay: The Raindrop Near Vision Inlay is implanted in the cornea for treatment of presbyopia | 1 | 373 | 25 | 373 | 115 | 373 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death | General disorders | Not related to device |
| ||
| Hospitalization due to Ischemic Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-ocular and not related to device |
| ||
| Hospitalization due to Pneumonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-ocular and not related to device |
| ||
| Hospitalization due to adverse reaction to medication | General disorders | Infection to medication given to treat infection following surgery Seizure, reaction to systemic medication Non-ocular and not related to device |
| ||
| Hospitalization for Transient Ischemic Attack | Nervous system disorders | Non-ocular and not related to device |
| ||
| Hospitalization for elevated blood sugar | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-ocular and not related to device |
| ||
| Hospitalization for fainting/upper extremity pain - no formal diagnosis | General disorders | Non-ocular and not related to device |
| ||
| Hospitalization secondary to heart disease | Cardiac disorders | Non-ocular and not related to device |
| ||
| Hospitalization secondary to other surgery | Surgical and medical procedures | Transforminal lumbar fusion Cervical fusions with implanted plate and rods Pancreatectomy, Splenectomy (cancer) Gall Bladder removal Nephrectomy Emergency Appendectomy (2) Radical prostatectomy Non-ocular and not related to device |
| ||
| Infection secondary to achilles tendon surgery | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-ocular and not related to device |
| ||
| Melting of the flap | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgery to repair orbital bone fracture | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment | Relationship to device unknown |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ocular infection | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Epithelial ingrowth | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Loss in BCDVA of > 2 lines (11 letters or more) at 3 months or later | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment | BCDVA = Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity |
| |
| Late onset of haze beyond 6 months with loss of 2 lines (10 letters) or more BCVA | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment | BCVA = Best Corrected Visual Acuity |
| |
| Cataract (with loss in BCDVA greater than or equal to 2 lines at any time | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment | BCDVA = Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity |
| |
| Increase in Intraocular Pressure of greater than 10mmHg above baseline | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis (DLK) | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Secondary Surgical Intervention | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment | Inlay Exchange = 18 Inlay Explant = 38 Flap Lift = 4 Cataract Surgery = 1 |
| |
| Posterior Vitreous Detachment | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Transient Visual Disturbance | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Anterior Uveitis | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Corneal Epithelial Defect Involving the Keratectomy | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Broken Orbital Bone | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Lost, Misaligned, or Misplaced Flap | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
The investigator agreed to hold this information in confidence and not to disclose it to any third parties for a period of three years from the date of this agreement, or until this information becomes a matter of public knowledge or until a formal agreement for that purpose has been entered into by the parties.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tracy Shwaery, Global Clinical Research Manager | ReVision Optics | 9497072740 | 157 | tshwaery@revisionoptics.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011305 | Presbyopia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Asian |
|
| Hispanic |
|
| Other |
|
|
|