Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of synchronized transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) using the NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS device (NEST) in subjects with Major Depressive Disorder. This is a multicenter study in which subjects will be randomized to receive treatment 5 days per week for 6 weeks. Subjects who complete 6 weeks of double-blind treatment may be eligible to receive up to four weeks of open label sTMS therapy or antidepressant medications during the follow-up phase of the study. Follow-up evaluation visits will be conducted during those four weeks, with the frequency of the visits determined by the treatment choice during that timeframe.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a mental disorder associated with significant functional impairment and disability. Affected individuals present with depressed mood, loss of interest or pleasure, feelings of guilt, low self-worth, disturbed sleep or appetite, low energy, and poor concentration.
Psychopharmacological therapy as today's mainstream treatment has revolutionized the clinical management for major depressive disorders and has been shown to improve the quality of life for many patients. With that, these therapies are not effective for all patients. Results released from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression Study (STAR*D), conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), show that approximately 30% of depressed subjects respond to an SSRI in their first trial, despite adequate dosing and duration of treatment. The SSRI antidepressants do have a more favorable side effect profile than older medications, but they still may be difficult for some patients to tolerate because of gastrointestinal distress, anxiety, insomnia, and sexual dysfunction.
In addition to the psychopharmacologic treatments for depression, other therapies such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have been shown to have a therapeutic effect in MDD. ECT induces seizures electrically in anesthetized subjects. It is generally safe and effective; however the procedure can have the negative side effect of memory loss and confusion. Treatment with repetitive stimulation (rTMS) is intended to stimulate groups of cells in areas of the brain linked to MDD. While the therapy is non-invasive, it is expensive, involves a complex method for locating the point of stimulation in the brain, and has the potential for seizures.
rTMS uses magnetic pulses which causes neuronal activation of specific areas in the brain. It is generally believed that this activation causes resetting of cortical oscillators to create a therapeutic effect in MDD. The investigators hypothesize that TMS using low energy, sinusoidal magnetic fields synchronized to a patient's individual alpha frequency,(sTMS), can also affect neuronal activity leading to a reemergence of intrinsic rhythms and clinical improvement in MDD. Preliminary study results using sTMS have shown improvements in depressive symptoms with minimal side effects.
This multicenter study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sTMS in subjects with Major Depressive Disorder. Subjects will be randomized to receive treatment 5 days per week for 6 weeks. At the end of Treatment Week 6, subject will have completed the study treatments and will be offered open label sTMS therapy or alternate antidepressant treatment as clinically indicated. At minimum, subjects will be asked to return for one follow-up visit four weeks after their last double-blind treatment (Week 10) for evaluation and study completion.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active sTMS | Experimental | Treatment with the NEST-1 Device |
|
| Sham | Sham Comparator | Treatment with a sham (inactive) device, identical in sound and appearance to the NEST-1 Device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEST-1 (NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS) | Device | The NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS (NEST) is an electromechanical medical device that produces and delivers a sinusoidal magnetic field to areas of the brain in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean HAM-D17 Total Score Change (Intent to Treat - All) | The mean HAM-D17 total score change from Baseline (Day 0) to Week 6 compared between the active treatment and sham-controlled groups. If any subject did not complete the double-blind phase in the ITT population, the assessment last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. The single value provided in each arm reflects the change seen. For this trial, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset of the HAM-D28, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. The HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response. | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| Mean HAM-D17 Total Score Change (Per Protocol - All) | The mean HAM-D17 total score change from Baseline (Day 0) to Week 6 compared between the active treatment and sham-controlled groups. All subjects in the Per Protocol analysis completed Week 6. Baseline HAM-D17 total score was directly compared to the HAM-D17 total score at Week 6. The single value provided in each arm reflects the change seen. For this trial, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset of the HAM-D28, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. The HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response. | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean HAM-D17 Total Score Change (Per Protocol - Non-Naive Subjects) | All subjects in the Per Protocol analysis completed Week 6. Baseline HAM-D17 total score was directly compared to Week 6 HAM-D17 total score. The single value provided in each arm reflects this change. This analysis included only Per Protocol subjects exposed to an antidepressant medication in their current episode (non-naive). This includes past history of intolerance, resistance, or inadequate dosing/duration. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset of the HAM-D28, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. The HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects are unable or unwilling to give informed consent.
Diagnosed with the following conditions (current unless otherwise stated):
Subjects meeting criteria for Axis II cluster A or B diagnosis based upon DSM-IV TR criteria, which in the judgment of the Investigator may hinder the subjects in completing the procedures required by the study protocol.
Subjects with a clinically defined neurological disorder including, but not limited to:
Subjects who are currently hospitalized due to severity of depression symptoms.
Subjects with any of the following treatment histories:
Use of any medication(s) listed on the Prohibited Concomitant Medication within 1 week of randomization.
Subjects are adequately benefiting from current antidepressant medication(s).
Significant acute suicide risk, defined as:
Cardiac pacemakers, implanted medication pumps, intracardiac lines, or acute, unstable cardiac disease.
Intracranial implant (e.g., aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, stents, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, which cannot be safely removed.
Clinically significant abnormality or clinically significant unstable medical condition, as indicated by medical history, physical examination, ECG results, or clinical laboratory testing, that in the Investigator's judgment might pose a potential safety risk to the subject or limit interpretation of the trial results, e.g., any uncontrolled thyroid disorders, hepatic, cardiac, pulmonary and renal malfunctioning.
Women who are currently pregnant or not using a medically acceptable means of birth control and women who are breastfeeding.
Positive urine drug screen for illicit substances. (A positive urine drug screen at screening may be repeated once prior to randomization).
Any condition which in the judgment of the Investigator would prevent the subject from completion of the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Leuchter, MD | UCLA Depression Research & Clinic Program | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCLA Depression Research & Clinic Program | Los Angeles | California | 90024 | United States | ||
| UCSD Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26143022 | Result | Leuchter AF, Cook IA, Feifel D, Goethe JW, Husain M, Carpenter LL, Thase ME, Krystal AD, Philip NS, Bhati MT, Burke WJ, Howland RH, Sheline YI, Aaronson ST, Iosifescu DV, O'Reardon JP, Gilmer WS, Jain R, Burgoyne KS, Phillips B, Manberg PJ, Massaro J, Hunter AM, Lisanby SH, George MS. Efficacy and Safety of Low-field Synchronized Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (sTMS) for Treatment of Major Depression. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):787-94. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Upon study closure, 291 subjects were consented for possible study participation with 202 of those subjects subsequently enrolled and randomized to treatment. Those entering the study at Screening while currently on an antidepressant required a minimum 1-week wash out period prior to completing a Baseline (Day 0) visit.
Enrollment occurred across 17 study sites (both academic and private clinical locations), initiated in May 2012 and all subject visits complete by July 2013. Three sites discontinued early due to departure of the Principal Investigator or due to a loss of contributing staff personnel. None were discontinued specifically due to a lack of enrollment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Active sTMS | Treatment with the NEST-1 Device NEST-1 (NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS): The NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS (NEST) is an electromechanical medical device that produces and delivers a sinusoidal magnetic field to areas of the brain in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| SHAM | Device | The sham device is configured to simulate the actual NEST-1 device without sTMS therapy being actively delivered. |
|
| Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Response at Week 6 or Early Termination (Intent to Treat) | For this outcome, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical response. Response is defined as a reduction of at least 50% in total HAM-D17 score from Baseline through Week 6. If any subject did not complete the double-blind phase (Week 6) in the ITT population, the assessment last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical response within the Intent to Treat population. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Response at Week 6 (Per Protocol - All) | For this outcome, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical response. Response is defined as a reduction of at least 50% in total HAM-D17 score from Baseline through Week 6. All subjects in the Per Protocol population completed Week 6. This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical response within the Per Protocol population. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Response at Week 6 (Per Protocol - Non-Naive Subjects) | The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical response, defined as a reduction of at least 50% in total HAM-D17 score from Baseline through Week 6. All subjects in the Per Protocol (PP) population completed Week 6. This analysis includes only PP subjects exposed to an antidepressant medication in their current episode (non-naive). This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical response within the Non-Naive, Per Protocol population. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Remission at Week 6 or Early Termination (Intent to Treat) | The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical remission. Remission is defined as a total HAM-D17 score ≤ 7. If any subject did not complete the double-blind phase (Week 6) in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population, the assessment last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical remission within the ITT population. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Remission at Week 6 (Per Protocol - All) | For this outcome, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical remission. Remission is defined as a total HAM-D17 score ≤ 7. All subjects in the Per Protocol population completed Week 6. This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical remission within the Per Protocol population at Week 6. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (up to week 6) |
| Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Remission at Week 6 or Early Termination (Per Protocol - Non-Naive Subjects) | The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical remission. Remission is defined as a total HAM-D17 score ≤ 7. All subjects in the Per Protocol population completed Week 6. This analysis includes only PP subjects exposed to an antidepressant medication in their current episode (non-naive). This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical remission at Week 6 within the Non-Naive, Per Protocol population. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| San Diego |
| California |
| 92103 |
| United States |
| UCLA-Harbor | Torrance | California | 90509 | United States |
| Hartford Hospital Institute of Living | Hartford | Connecticut | 06106 | United States |
| TMS Specialists Chicago | Chicago | Illinois | 60602 | United States |
| Sheppard Pratt Health System | Baltimore | Maryland | 21285 | United States |
| Washington University School of Medicine | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| University of Nebraska Medical Center | Omaha | Nebraska | 68198 | United States |
| Center for Mood Disorders and Neuromodulation Therapies, UMDNJ-SOM | Cherry Hill | New Jersey | 08003 | United States |
| Mount Sinai School of Medicine | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| Duke University Brain Stimulation and Neurophysiology Center | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Wake Forest University Medical Center | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27157 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Mood Disorders Treatment Research Program University of Pittsburgh-Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Butler Hospital Mood Disorders Research Program, Brown Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior | Providence | Rhode Island | 02906 | United States |
| MUSC Institute of Psychiatry, Brain Stimulation Lab | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| UT Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| R/D Clinical Research | Lake Jackson | Texas | 77566 | United States |
| Sham |
Treatment with a sham (inactive) device, identical in sound and appearance to the NEST-1 Device SHAM: The sham device is configured to simulate the actual NEST-1 device without sTMS therapy being actively delivered. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Active sTMS | Treatment with the NEST-1 Device NEST-1 (NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS): The NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS (NEST) is an electromechanical medical device that produces and delivers a sinusoidal magnetic field to areas of the brain in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. |
| BG001 | Sham | Treatment with a sham (inactive) device, identical in sound and appearance to the NEST-1 Device SHAM: The sham device is configured to simulate the actual NEST-1 device without sTMS therapy being actively delivered. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Baseline Mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) | For this trial, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset of the HAM-D28, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. The HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Length of Current Episode in Months | Mean | Standard Deviation | months |
| |||||||||||||||
| Antidepressant Exposure in Current Episode | Subjects were asked about previous antidepressant exposure in the current episode. It was possible to select more than one correct response in assessing antidepressant history. | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Education Level | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Mean HAM-D17 Total Score Change (Intent to Treat - All) | The mean HAM-D17 total score change from Baseline (Day 0) to Week 6 compared between the active treatment and sham-controlled groups. If any subject did not complete the double-blind phase in the ITT population, the assessment last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. The single value provided in each arm reflects the change seen. For this trial, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset of the HAM-D28, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. The HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response. | Includes all subjects who signed an informed consent, met all I/E criteria, were subsequently randomized and received at least 1 treatment (active sTMS or sham) session in the double-blind phase. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Mean HAM-D17 Total Score Change (Per Protocol - All) | The mean HAM-D17 total score change from Baseline (Day 0) to Week 6 compared between the active treatment and sham-controlled groups. All subjects in the Per Protocol analysis completed Week 6. Baseline HAM-D17 total score was directly compared to the HAM-D17 total score at Week 6. The single value provided in each arm reflects the change seen. For this trial, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset of the HAM-D28, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. The HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response. | Per Protocol Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean HAM-D17 Total Score Change (Per Protocol - Non-Naive Subjects) | All subjects in the Per Protocol analysis completed Week 6. Baseline HAM-D17 total score was directly compared to Week 6 HAM-D17 total score. The single value provided in each arm reflects this change. This analysis included only Per Protocol subjects exposed to an antidepressant medication in their current episode (non-naive). This includes past history of intolerance, resistance, or inadequate dosing/duration. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset of the HAM-D28, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. The HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. A reduction of 50% or more in total score from Baseline indicates clinical response. | Per Protocol Population - Non-Naive Subjects | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Response at Week 6 or Early Termination (Intent to Treat) | For this outcome, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical response. Response is defined as a reduction of at least 50% in total HAM-D17 score from Baseline through Week 6. If any subject did not complete the double-blind phase (Week 6) in the ITT population, the assessment last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical response within the Intent to Treat population. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Response at Week 6 (Per Protocol - All) | For this outcome, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical response. Response is defined as a reduction of at least 50% in total HAM-D17 score from Baseline through Week 6. All subjects in the Per Protocol population completed Week 6. This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical response within the Per Protocol population. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Per Protocol Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Response at Week 6 (Per Protocol - Non-Naive Subjects) | The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical response, defined as a reduction of at least 50% in total HAM-D17 score from Baseline through Week 6. All subjects in the Per Protocol (PP) population completed Week 6. This analysis includes only PP subjects exposed to an antidepressant medication in their current episode (non-naive). This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical response within the Non-Naive, Per Protocol population. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Per Protocol Population - Non-Naive Subjects | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Remission at Week 6 or Early Termination (Intent to Treat) | The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical remission. Remission is defined as a total HAM-D17 score ≤ 7. If any subject did not complete the double-blind phase (Week 6) in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population, the assessment last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used. This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical remission within the ITT population. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Includes all subjects who signed an informed consent, met all I/E criteria, were subsequently randomized and received at least 1 treatment (active sTMS or sham) session in the double-blind phase. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Remission at Week 6 (Per Protocol - All) | For this outcome, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical remission. Remission is defined as a total HAM-D17 score ≤ 7. All subjects in the Per Protocol population completed Week 6. This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical remission within the Per Protocol population at Week 6. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Per Protocol Population | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (up to week 6) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Who Demonstrate Clinical Remission at Week 6 or Early Termination (Per Protocol - Non-Naive Subjects) | The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) was utilized to determine clinical remission. Remission is defined as a total HAM-D17 score ≤ 7. All subjects in the Per Protocol population completed Week 6. This analysis includes only PP subjects exposed to an antidepressant medication in their current episode (non-naive). This outcome provides the total number of subjects in each arm that achieved clinical remission at Week 6 within the Non-Naive, Per Protocol population. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D28) was performed as a baseline assessment. A subset, the HAM-D17, was utilized as both a baseline and efficacy measure. It's considered the gold standard for rating depression severity and used frequently in clinical trials. HAM-D17 score ranges from 0-52; a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates at least moderate severity. | Per Protocol Population - Non-Naive Subjects | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline to End of Double-Blind Treatment Period (Week 6) |
|
All subject Adverse Events are tracked from the signing of Informed Consent through 4 weeks after the double-blind acute phase has been completed or Early Termination.
Primarily systematic assessments, some reporting was unsolicited although minimal.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Active sTMS | Treatment with the NEST-1 Device NEST-1 (NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS): The NeoSync EEG Synchronized TMS (NEST) is an electromechanical medical device that produces and delivers a sinusoidal magnetic field to areas of the brain in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. | 2 | 103 | 80 | 103 | ||
| EG001 | Sham | Treatment with a sham (inactive) device, identical in sound and appearance to the NEST-1 Device SHAM: The sham device is configured to simulate the actual NEST-1 device without sTMS therapy being actively delivered. | 1 | 99 | 42 | 99 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospitalization (Suicide Attempt) | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hospitalization (Risk of Self Harm) | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hospitalization (Dehydration) | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Visual Disturbance | Eye disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyschezia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-Specific GI Discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hand/Arm/Shoulder Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leg and Foot Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Agitation | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paresthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lack of Energy | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory Infection | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Andrew Leuchter, MD | University of California Los Angeles | (310) 825-0207 | afl@ucla.edu |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003865 | Depressive Disorder, Major |
| D003863 | Depression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| White |
|
| Other or Unknown |
|
| Intolerant of >= 1 Medication |
|
| Treatment Naive (ATHF 0) |
|
| Adequate Trial of >= 1 Medication |
|
| High school diploma |
|
| Vocational school |
|
| Some college |
|
| College degree |
|
| Professional or Graduate degree |
|
| Unknown |
|
|
|
Treatment with a sham (inactive) device, identical in sound and appearance to the NEST-1 Device SHAM: The sham device is configured to simulate the actual NEST-1 device without sTMS therapy being actively delivered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment with a sham (inactive) device, identical in sound and appearance to the NEST-1 Device SHAM: The sham device is configured to simulate the actual NEST-1 device without sTMS therapy being actively delivered. |
|
|
| OG001 |
| Sham |
Treatment with a sham (inactive) device, identical in sound and appearance to the NEST-1 Device SHAM: The sham device is configured to simulate the actual NEST-1 device without sTMS therapy being actively delivered. |
|
|
|
|
Treatment with a sham (inactive) device, identical in sound and appearance to the NEST-1 Device SHAM: The sham device is configured to simulate the actual NEST-1 device without sTMS therapy being actively delivered. |
|
|