Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNTO1275CRD3002 | Other Identifier | Janssen Research & Development, LLC | |
| 2010-022759-42 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study (UNITI-2) will compare the effects (both positive and negative) of an initial treatment with ustekinumab to a placebo over 8 weeks in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease.
This study (CNTO1275CRD3002 or "UNITI-2") examines ustekinumab (an antibody medication that inhibits the inflammatory proteins IL-12 and IL-23) versus a placebo (otherwise identical except without the ustekinumab antibody) given intravenously (by an IV) in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Ustekinumab (also known as Stelara) is approved as a treatment for the skin condition of moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis, but this study will examine if ustekinumab can provide benefit in Crohn's disease and also assess for any risks or side effects. Both the positive and negative outcomes of IV placebo versus two different doses of IV ustekinumab will be tracked and compared over eight weeks, in approximately 612 patients who have previously failed or were intolerant to corticosteroids or immunomodulators (methotrexate, azathioprine, or 6-mercaptopurine) or are dependent on corticosteroid medications. Patients enrolling in this study will be assigned to one of the 3 treatment groups by chance (randomly, like rolling dice), and all will receive a single IV administration of study agent at the first study visit (after the screening period), and then will be asked to return for 3 additional visits through Week 8. Patients who complete this study through the Week 8 visit and remain eligible can enter the maintenance study (CNTO1275CRD3003 or "IM-UNITI"), where they will receive additional study agent, including the administration of ustekinumab in patients who receive placebo in this study and have not had improvement in their Crohn's disease. Patients who do not enter the CNTO1275CRD3003 study will have a final safety follow-up visit approximately 20 weeks after they received study agent when they entered into this study at the Week 0 visit. .All patients will receive a single intravenous (IV) administration of study drug (placebo or ustekinumab) at the start of the study.There are 3 treatment groups in this study: Group 1: Placebo; Group 2: ustekinumab 130 mg, Group 3: weight-range based ustekinumab doses approximating ustekinumab 6 mg/kg: 260 mg (weight <= 55 kg), 390 mg (weight > 55 kg and <= 85 kg), and 520 mg (weight > 85 kg).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo IV | Placebo Comparator | Group 1: Placebo Form=solution for injection route=intravenous use in a single dose. |
|
| Ustekinumab 130 milligram (mg) | Experimental | Group 2 ustekinumab 130 mg Type=exact unit=mg number=130 form=solution for injection route= intravenous use in a single dose. |
|
| Ustekinumab approximately (~) 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) | Experimental | Group 3: ustekinumab approximately 6 mg/kg Type=range unit=mg/kg number=6 form=solution for injection route= intravenous use in a single dose.weight-range based ustekinumab doses approximating ustekinumab 6 mg/kg: 260 mg (weight <= 55 kg) 390 mg (weight > 55 kg and <= 85 kg) and 520 mg (weight > 85 kg). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Placebo | Drug | Form=solution for injection, route=intravenous use, in a single dose. |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6 | Clinical response at Week 6 was defined as a reduction from baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of greater than or equal (>=) 100 points (in general, CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 600; higher score indicates higher disease activities). Participants with a baseline CDAI score of > = 220 to less than or equal (< =) 248 were considered to be in clinical response if a CDAI score of less than (<) 150 was attained. A decrease in CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity. | Week 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 8 | Clinical remission at Week 8 was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of <150 points. | Week 8 |
| Number of Participants in Clinical Response at Week 8 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial | Janssen Research & Development, LLC | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tucson | Arizona | United States | ||||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38310565 | Derived | Ghosh S, Feagan BG, Ott E, Gasink C, Godwin B, Marano C, Miao Y, Ma T, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ, Danese S, Abreu MT, Sands BE. Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis Through 5 Years in Crohn's Disease and 4 Years in Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Aug 6;18(7):1091-1101. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae013. | |
| 37391056 |
Not provided
Not provided
In November 2011, due to stability issue with the batch of the IV drug (130 mg Ustekinumab) sponsor temporarily suspended dosing of participants with ustekinumab. Study was restarted with 90 mg/ml on 17 February 2012.
A total of 640 participants were randomly assigned to receive study agent. The analyses (efficacy) were based on the 628 participants who were randomized after the study was restarted. However, one additional participant was excluded from efficacy analyses due to misconduct by the investigative site.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo IV | Participants randomized to receive a single dose of Placebo Intravenous (IV) infusion at week 0. |
| FG001 | Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) | Participants randomized to receive a single dose of ustekinumab 130 milligram (mg) IV at week 0. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Group 2 ustekinumab 130 mg |
| Drug |
Type=exact, unit=mg, number=130, form=solution for injection, route= intravenous use, in a single dose. |
|
| Group 3: ustekinumab approximately 6 mg/kg | Drug | Type=range, unit=mg/kg, number=6, form=solution for injection, route= intravenous use, in a single dose.weight-range based ustekinumab doses approximating ustekinumab 6 mg/kg: 260 mg (weight <= 55 kg), 390 mg (weight > 55 kg and <= 85 kg), and 520 mg (weight > 85 kg). |
|
Clinical response at Week 8 was defined as a reduction from baseline in the CDAI score of greater than or equal (>=) 100 points (in general, CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 600; higher score indicates higher disease activities). Participants with a baseline CDAI score of > = 220 to less than or equal (< =) 248 were considered to be in clinical response if a CDAI score of less than (<) 150 was attained. A decrease in CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity.
| Week 8 |
| Number of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) 70 Point Response at Week 6 | 70-point response is defined as at least 70 points reduction in CDAI score (in general, CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 600; higher score indicates higher disease activities). The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with Crohn's Disease. A decrease in CDAI over time indicates improvement in disease activity. | Week 6 |
| Number of Participants With CDAI 70 Point Response at Week 3 | 70-point response is defined as at least 70 points reduction in CDAI score (in general, CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 600; higher score indicates higher disease activities). The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with Crohn's Disease. A decrease in CDAI over time indicates improvement in disease activity. | Week 3 |
| Little Rock |
| Arkansas |
| United States |
| La Jolla | California | United States |
| Los Angeles | California | United States |
| San Diego | California | United States |
| Santa Monica | California | United States |
| Torrance | California | United States |
| Lone Tree | Colorado | United States |
| Boca Raton | Florida | United States |
| Gainesville | Florida | United States |
| Jacksonville | Florida | United States |
| Largo | Florida | United States |
| Miami | Florida | United States |
| Naples | Florida | United States |
| Port Orange | Florida | United States |
| Winter Park | Florida | United States |
| Athens | Georgia | United States |
| Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| Decatur | Georgia | United States |
| Macon | Georgia | United States |
| Idaho Falls | Idaho | United States |
| Chicago | Illinois | United States |
| Clive | Iowa | United States |
| Pratt | Kansas | United States |
| Topeka | Kansas | United States |
| Crestview Hills | Kentucky | United States |
| Lexington | Kentucky | United States |
| Louisville | Kentucky | United States |
| Baton Rouge | Louisiana | United States |
| Houma | Louisiana | United States |
| New Orleans | Louisiana | United States |
| Chevy Chase | Maryland | United States |
| Columbia | Maryland | United States |
| Towson | Maryland | United States |
| Boston | Massachusetts | United States |
| Worcester | Massachusetts | United States |
| Ann Arbor | Michigan | United States |
| Chesterfield | Michigan | United States |
| Novi | Michigan | United States |
| Troy | Michigan | United States |
| Ypsilanti | Michigan | United States |
| Rochester | Minnesota | United States |
| Jackson | Mississippi | United States |
| Ocean Springs | Mississippi | United States |
| Columbia | Missouri | United States |
| Kansas City | Missouri | United States |
| Lees Summit | Missouri | United States |
| Urbana | Missouri | United States |
| Las Vegas | Nevada | United States |
| Egg Harbor | New Jersey | United States |
| Marlton | New Jersey | United States |
| Morristown | New Jersey | United States |
| Great Neck | New York | United States |
| New York | New York | United States |
| Poughkeepsie | New York | United States |
| Chapel Hill | North Carolina | United States |
| Charlotte | North Carolina | United States |
| Raleigh | North Carolina | United States |
| Beavercreek | Ohio | United States |
| Cincinnati | Ohio | United States |
| Columbus | Ohio | United States |
| Mentor | Ohio | United States |
| Norman | Oklahoma | United States |
| Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States |
| Tulsa | Oklahoma | United States |
| Bend | Oregon | United States |
| Portland | Oregon | United States |
| Malvern | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Columbia | South Carolina | United States |
| North Charleston | South Carolina | United States |
| Germantown | Tennessee | United States |
| Nashville | Tennessee | United States |
| Austin | Texas | United States |
| Grapevine | Texas | United States |
| Houston | Texas | United States |
| Tyler | Texas | United States |
| Salt Lake City | Utah | United States |
| Charlottesville | Virginia | United States |
| Chesapeake | Virginia | United States |
| Virginia Beach | Virginia | United States |
| Bellevue | Washington | United States |
| Seattle | Washington | United States |
| Madison | Wisconsin | United States |
| Adelaide | Australia |
| Cairns | Australia |
| Central Queensland M C | Australia |
| Concord | Australia |
| Fremantle | Australia |
| Garran | Australia |
| Liverpool | Australia |
| Malvern | Australia |
| Parkville | Australia |
| Brussels | Belgium |
| Leuven | Belgium |
| Goiânia | Brazil |
| Porto Alegre | Brazil |
| Rio de Janeiro | Brazil |
| São Paulo | Brazil |
| Pleven | Bulgaria |
| Rousse | Bulgaria |
| Sofia | Bulgaria |
| Varna | Bulgaria |
| Calgary | Alberta | Canada |
| Edmonton | Alberta | Canada |
| Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada |
| Brandon | Manitoba | Canada |
| Kingston | Ontario | Canada |
| London | Ontario | Canada |
| Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Montreal | Quebec | Canada |
| Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | Canada |
| Saskatoon | Canada |
| Winnipeg | Canada |
| Osijek | Croatia |
| Rijeka | Croatia |
| Zagreb | Croatia |
| Amiens | France |
| Bordeaux | France |
| Caen | France |
| Lille | France |
| Paris | France |
| Rouen | France |
| Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy | France |
| Berlin | Germany |
| Bochum | Germany |
| Frankfurt | Germany |
| Halle | Germany |
| Hamburg | Germany |
| Hanover | Germany |
| Haßloch | Germany |
| Heidelberg | Germany |
| Kiel | Germany |
| Lÿneburg | Germany |
| Mannheim | Germany |
| Minden | Germany |
| München | Germany |
| Münster | Germany |
| Regensburg | Germany |
| Stade | Germany |
| Ulm | Germany |
| Békéscsaba | Hungary |
| Budapest | Hungary |
| Debrecen | Hungary |
| Gyula | Hungary |
| Mosonmagyaróvár | Hungary |
| Pécs | Hungary |
| Szekszárd | Hungary |
| Székesfehérvár | Hungary |
| Reykjavik | Iceland |
| Beer Yaakov | Israel |
| Haifa | Israel |
| Jerusalem | Israel |
| Kfar Saba | Israel |
| Petah Tikva | Israel |
| Rehovot | Israel |
| Tel Aviv | Israel |
| Chikushino-shi | Japan |
| Hachiōji | Japan |
| Hamamatsu | Japan |
| Hirosaki | Japan |
| Hiroshima | Japan |
| Kagoshima | Japan |
| Nishinomiya | Japan |
| Ohtsu | Japan |
| Osaka | Japan |
| Ōita | Japan |
| Sakura | Japan |
| Sapporo | Japan |
| Sendai | Japan |
| Suita-Shi | Japan |
| Tokyo | Japan |
| Tsu | Japan |
| Uruma | Japan |
| Yokkaichi | Japan |
| Yokohama | Japan |
| Yokosuka | Japan |
| Amsterdam | Netherlands |
| Amsterdam-Zuidoost | Netherlands |
| Maastricht | Netherlands |
| Rotterdam | Netherlands |
| Auckland | New Zealand |
| Christchurch | New Zealand |
| Dunedin | New Zealand |
| Grafton | New Zealand |
| Hamilton | New Zealand |
| Hastings | New Zealand |
| Plenty | New Zealand |
| Wellington | New Zealand |
| Bydgoszcz | Poland |
| Elblag | Poland |
| Krakow | Poland |
| Lodz | Poland |
| Warsaw | Poland |
| Moscow | Russia |
| Novosibirsk | Russia |
| Belgrade | Serbia |
| Cape Town | South Africa |
| Durban | South Africa |
| Pretoria | South Africa |
| Daegu | South Korea |
| Gyeonggi-do | South Korea |
| Seoul | South Korea |
| Madrid | Spain |
| Sabadell | Spain |
| Santiago de Compostela | Spain |
| Birmingham | United Kingdom |
| Brighton | United Kingdom |
| Bristol | United Kingdom |
| Cambridge | United Kingdom |
| Gloucester | United Kingdom |
| Harrow | United Kingdom |
| Liverpool | United Kingdom |
| London | United Kingdom |
| Manchester | United Kingdom |
| Norwich | United Kingdom |
| Nottinghamshirecc | United Kingdom |
| Oxford | United Kingdom |
| Shrewsbury | United Kingdom |
| Southampton | United Kingdom |
| Colombel JF, Sands BE, Gasink C, Yeager B, Adedokun OJ, Izanec J, Ma T, Gao LL, Lee SD, Targan SR, Ghosh S, Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ. Evolution of Symptoms After Ustekinumab Induction Therapy in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan;22(1):144-153.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.06.014. Epub 2023 Jun 28. |
| 37368103 | Derived | Dubinsky M, Ma C, Griffith J, Crowell M, Neimark E, Kligys K, O'Connell T. Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Between Risankizumab and Ustekinumab for Induction and Maintenance Treatment of Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease. Adv Ther. 2023 Sep;40(9):3896-3911. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02546-6. Epub 2023 Jun 27. |
| 36150926 | Derived | Adedokun OJ, Xu Z, Gasink C, Kowalski K, Sandborn WJ, Feagan B. Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses of Ustekinumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease. Clin Ther. 2022 Oct;44(10):1336-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Sep 21. |
| 34077627 | Derived | Narula N, Aruljothy A, Wong ECL, Homenauth R, Alshahrani AA, Marshall JK, Reinisch W. The impact of ustekinumab on extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease: A post hoc analysis of the UNITI studies. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Jun;9(5):581-589. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12094. Epub 2021 Jun 2. |
| 32964215 | Derived | Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Danese S, O'Brien CD, Ott E, Marano C, Baker T, Zhou Y, Volger S, Tikhonov I, Gasink C, Sands BE, Ghosh S. Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis of Results from Phase 2/3 Studies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Jun 15;27(7):994-1007. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa236. |
| 31279870 | Derived | Li K, Friedman JR, Chan D, Pollack P, Yang F, Jacobstein D, Brodmerkel C, Gasink C, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, De Hertogh G. Effects of Ustekinumab on Histologic Disease Activity in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology. 2019 Oct;157(4):1019-1031.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.037. Epub 2019 Jul 4. |
| 30739254 | Derived | Ghosh S, Gensler LS, Yang Z, Gasink C, Chakravarty SD, Farahi K, Ramachandran P, Ott E, Strober BE. Ustekinumab Safety in Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Crohn's Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Phase II/III Clinical Development Programs. Drug Saf. 2019 Jun;42(6):751-768. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00797-3. |
| 29909019 | Derived | Rutgeerts P, Gasink C, Chan D, Lang Y, Pollack P, Colombel JF, Wolf DC, Jacobstein D, Johanns J, Szapary P, Adedokun OJ, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ. Efficacy of Ustekinumab for Inducing Endoscopic Healing in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1045-1058. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.035. Epub 2018 Aug 29. |
| 29409871 | Derived | Adedokun OJ, Xu Z, Gasink C, Jacobstein D, Szapary P, Johanns J, Gao LL, Davis HM, Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Ghosh S, Sandborn WJ. Pharmacokinetics and Exposure Response Relationships of Ustekinumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology. 2018 May;154(6):1660-1671. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.043. Epub 2018 Feb 1. |
| 29142515 | Derived | Hibi T, Imai Y, Murata Y, Matsushima N, Zheng R, Gasink C. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease: a subpopulation analysis of phase 3 induction and maintenance studies. Intest Res. 2017 Oct;15(4):475-486. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.475. Epub 2017 Oct 23. |
| 27959607 | Derived | Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Gasink C, Jacobstein D, Lang Y, Friedman JR, Blank MA, Johanns J, Gao LL, Miao Y, Adedokun OJ, Sands BE, Hanauer SB, Vermeire S, Targan S, Ghosh S, de Villiers WJ, Colombel JF, Tulassay Z, Seidler U, Salzberg BA, Desreumaux P, Lee SD, Loftus EV Jr, Dieleman LA, Katz S, Rutgeerts P; UNITI-IM-UNITI Study Group. Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1946-1960. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602773. |
| FG002 | Ustekinumab Approximately (~) 6 Milligram Per Kilogram (mg/kg) | Participants randomized to receive tiered ustekinumab dose approximately (~) 6 mg/kg IV at week 0. Ustekinumab 260 mg for participants body weight less than or equal to (< =) 55 kg, ustekinumab 390 mg for weight greater than (>) 55 kg and < = 85 kg and ustekinumab 520 mg for weight > 85 kg. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo IV | Participants randomized to receive a single dose of Placebo Intravenous (IV) infusion at week 0. |
| BG001 | Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) | Participants randomized to receive a single dose of ustekinumab 130 milligram (mg) IV at week 0. |
| BG002 | Ustekinumab Approximately (~) 6 Milligram Per Kilogram (mg/kg) | Participants randomized to receive tiered ustekinumab dose approximately (~) 6 mg/kg IV at week 0. Ustekinumab 260 mg for participants body weight less than or equal to (< =) 55 kg, ustekinumab 390 mg for weight greater than (>) 55 kg and < = 85 kg and ustekinumab 520 mg for weight > 85 kg. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Gender | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 6 | Clinical response at Week 6 was defined as a reduction from baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of greater than or equal (>=) 100 points (in general, CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 600; higher score indicates higher disease activities). Participants with a baseline CDAI score of > = 220 to less than or equal (< =) 248 were considered to be in clinical response if a CDAI score of less than (<) 150 was attained. A decrease in CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity. | Efficacy analyses set included all the participants who were randomized after the study was restarted. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 6 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 8 | Clinical remission at Week 8 was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of <150 points. | Efficacy analyses set included all the participants who were randomized after the study was restarted. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants in Clinical Response at Week 8 | Clinical response at Week 8 was defined as a reduction from baseline in the CDAI score of greater than or equal (>=) 100 points (in general, CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 600; higher score indicates higher disease activities). Participants with a baseline CDAI score of > = 220 to less than or equal (< =) 248 were considered to be in clinical response if a CDAI score of less than (<) 150 was attained. A decrease in CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity. | Efficacy analyses set included all the participants who were randomized after the study was restarted. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 8 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) 70 Point Response at Week 6 | 70-point response is defined as at least 70 points reduction in CDAI score (in general, CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 600; higher score indicates higher disease activities). The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with Crohn's Disease. A decrease in CDAI over time indicates improvement in disease activity. | Efficacy analyses set included all the participants who were randomized after the study was restarted. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 6 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With CDAI 70 Point Response at Week 3 | 70-point response is defined as at least 70 points reduction in CDAI score (in general, CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 600; higher score indicates higher disease activities). The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with Crohn's Disease. A decrease in CDAI over time indicates improvement in disease activity. | Efficacy analyses set included all the participants who were randomized after the study was restarted. | Posted | Number | participants | Week 3 |
|
Up to Week 8 for all participants (for participants who do not enter the maintenance study, adverse events will be collected up to 20 weeks after the study agent administration)
1 participant randomized to placebo never received study agent (not included in the AE analysis) and 1 participant randomized to placebo received ustekinumab (analyzed for safety in 130 mg group);2 participants randomized to -6 mg/kg received dose closer to 130 mg of ustekinumab (analyzed for safety in 130 mg group).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo IV | Participants received single dose of Placebo Intravenous (IV) infusion at week 0. | 15 | 212 | 44 | 212 | ||
| EG001 | Ustekinumab 130 Milligram (mg) | Participants received single dose of ustekinumab 130 milligram (mg) IV at week 0. | 10 | 216 | 40 | 216 | ||
| EG002 | Ustekinumab Approximately (~) 6 Milligram Per Kilogram (mg/kg) | Participants received a single tiered ustekinumab dose approximately (~) 6 mg/kg IV at week 0. Ustekinumab 260 mg for participants body weight less than or equal to (< =) 55 kg, ustekinumab 390 mg for weight greater than (>) 55 kg and < = 85 kg and ustekinumab 520 mg for weight > 85 kg. | 9 | 211 | 44 | 211 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial Fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crohn's Disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal Obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Localised Intraabdominal Fluid Collection | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small Intestinal Obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small Intestinal Perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest Pain | General disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Impaired Healing | General disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-Cardiac Chest Pain | General disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile Duct Stone | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal Abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Genital Herpes | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Incisional Hernia | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysmenorrhoea | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumothorax Spontaneous | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary Granuloma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The global study was interrupted due to issues with the clinical supply.
A copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested in writing, such publication will be withheld for up to an additional 60 days.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vice President | Janssen Research & Development, LLC | ClinicalTrialDisclosure@its.jnj.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003424 | Crohn Disease |
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D003092 | Colitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Belgium |
|
| Bulgaria |
|
| Brazil |
|
| Canada |
|
| Germany |
|
| Spain |
|
| France |
|
| United Kingdom |
|
| Croatia |
|
| Hungary |
|
| Iceland |
|
| Israel |
|
| Italy |
|
| Japan |
|
| Korea |
|
| Netherland |
|
| New Zealand |
|
| Poland |
|
| Russia |
|
| Serbia |
|
| United States |
|
| South Africa |
|
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test |
2-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test, stratified by study region (Asia, Eastern Europe, or rest of world) and CDAI score (=< 300 or >300). |
| < 0.001 |
A fixed sequence testing procedure was used to control alpha at 0.05 over the outcome measures. |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|