Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| IOT | Other Identifier | iot 803 [institutional research committee] |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Approximately 300,000 patients undergo open surgical procedures to treat symptoms caused by disc herniation.
Among the various surgical techniques practiced the percutaneous discectomy occupies its space since the first description of the technique by Hijikata, 1975. Throughout, many techniques have been described. Studies indicate that the treatment was successful for pain and disability resulting from herniated disc associated with radiculopathy small.
However, some methods remove very small amounts of tissue with little change in volume of the disc. Thus, studies on the cadaver with Percutaneous Diskectomy by SpineJet ® showed more macroscopic changes of the disc with a predictable amount of removal and significant disc material.
The Percutaneous Diskectomy by SpineJet ® is a new technique of percutaneous diskectomy which creates a suction effect in tissues adjacent to the exit point of the fluid and the opening point of the collector. However, no studies have examined the effect of the Percutaneous Diskectomy by SpineJet ® in humans about the disk size after treatment or measures of disc degeneration by imaging methods or how these characteristics might correlate with clinical outcomes.
Thus, the study will compare outcomes of patients with contained or extruded disc herniation, with complaints of radiculopathy, concordant with the imaging findings. With treatment by surgical technique or the traditional by SpineJet ®, in order to determine whether percutaneous discectomy with SpineJet ® will produce results comparable to open microdiskectomy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| OMicro | Active Comparator | This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy |
|
| SJet | Experimental | This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open microdiscectomy | Procedure | The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| VAS for Lumbar Pain in 3 Months | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | VAS for Lumbar Pain at 3 Months |
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 3th Month | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | 3th month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Evaluation | Will be measured dichotomously: (present or absent) Variables: Infection; residual pain; herniation recurrency | 6th month |
| VAS for Lumbar - 1st Week | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the USP | São Paulo | São Paulo | 05403-010 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Hijikata S, Yamagishi M, Nakayama T, Oomori K. Percutaneous nucleotomy: a new treatment method for lumbar disk herniation. J Toden Hosp 1976, 6:6-13 | ||
| 17352640 | Background | Choy DS, Hellinger J, Tassi GP, Hellinger S. Percutaneous laser disc decompression. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Feb;25(1):60. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.9999. No abstract available. | |
| 2521319 |
Not provided
Not provided
Exclusion criteria were: neurological changes during conservative treatment, pregnancy, clinical status not adequate for surgical procedures, non-adherence to informed consent form. After inclusion in the study, patients were evaluated for pain and function and then randomly allocated in two groups
Patients referred to our tertiary hospital for lumbar back pain were recruited. They were included in the study if they had disc protrusion or small herniation in only one level, with magnetic resonance imaging findings compatible with symptoms, without neurological deficits, and with no resolution after six weeks of conservative treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | OMicro | This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision. |
| FG001 | SJet | This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | OMicro | This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | VAS for Lumbar Pain in 3 Months | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | intention to treat | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | VAS for Lumbar Pain at 3 Months |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | OMicro | This group will be formed by randomization, which gets out surgery to open microdiscectomy Open microdiscectomy : The open microdiscectomy, will be performed under general anesthesia in the prone position with horizontal. The level of the spine indicated for surgical treatment will be identified with the aid of fluoroscopy. An incision is made about the dorsal disc level involved with dissection of the paravertebral muscles on the side of disc herniation. After laminectomy and resection of part of the yellow ligament, partial discectomy is done under direct vision. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Alexandre Cristante Fogaça | IOT/HC University of SãoPaulo | +55 11 2661-6951 | aacristante@uol.com.br |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011843 | Radiculopathy |
| D007405 | Intervertebral Disc Displacement |
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet | Procedure | Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy. |
|
| 1st week from surgery |
| VAS for Lumbar 1st Month | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | 1st month from surgery |
| VAS for Lumbar Pain - 3rd Month | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | 3rd month from surgery |
| VAS for Lumbar Pain - 6th Month | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | 6th month from surgery |
| VAS for Lumbar Pain - 12th Month | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | 12th month from surgery |
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 1st Week | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | 1st week minus baseline |
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 1st Month | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | 1st month from baseline |
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 6th Month | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | 6th month from surgery |
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 12th Month | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | 12th month from surgery |
| VAS for Leg Pain - 1st Week | Pain Score for leg pain- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | 1st week from surgery |
| VAS for Leg Pain - 1st Month | Pain Score for leg pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | 1st month from surgery |
| VAS for Leg Pain - 3rd Month | Pain Score for leg pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | 3rd month from surgery |
| VAS for Leg Pain - 6rd Month | Pain Score for leg pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | 6th month from surgery |
| VAS for Leg Pain - 12th Month | pain scale - VAS for leg pain - 12th month | 12th month from surgery |
| Background |
| Davis GW, Onik G. Clinical experience with automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jan;(238):98-103. |
| 11380118 | Background | Mochida J, Toh E, Nomura T, Nishimura K. The risks and benefits of percutaneous nucleotomy for lumbar disc herniation. A 10-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 May;83(4):501-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b4.11508. |
| 10150569 | Background | Choy DS. Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD): 352 cases with an 8 1/2-year follow-up. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1995 Feb;13(1):17-21. doi: 10.1089/clm.1995.13.17. |
| 10101821 | Background | Wang JC, Shapiro MS, Hatch JD, Knight J, Dorey FJ, Delamarter RB. The outcome of lumbar discectomy in elite athletes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Mar 15;24(6):570-3. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199903150-00014. |
| 14749191 | Background | Pauza KJ, Howell S, Dreyfuss P, Peloza JH, Dawson K, Bogduk N. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. Spine J. 2004 Jan-Feb;4(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.07.001. |
| 9276049 | Background | Casey KF, Chang MK, O'Brien ED, Yuan HA, McCullen GM, Schaffer J, Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: comparison of preoperative and postoperative imaging studies. Arthroscopy. 1997 Aug;13(4):438-45. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90121-3. |
| 7713975 | Background | Delamarter RB, Howard MW, Goldstein T, Deutsch AL, Mink JH, Dawson EG. Percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Apr;77(4):578-84. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199504000-00011. |
| 9413969 | Background | Tonami H, Yokota H, Nakagawa T, Higashi K, Okimura T, Yamamoto I, Nishijima Y. Percutaneous laser discectomy: MR findings within the first 24 hours after treatment and their relationship to clinical outcome. Clin Radiol. 1997 Dec;52(12):938-44. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80228-0. |
| 10990391 | Background | Krugluger J, Knahr K. Chemonucleolysis and automated percutaneous discectomy--a prospective randomized comparison. Int Orthop. 2000;24(3):167-9. doi: 10.1007/s002640000139. |
| 17304141 | Background | Vigatto R, Alexandre NM, Correa Filho HR. Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 15;32(4):481-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255075.11496.47. |
| 9144678 | Background | Dullerud R, Nakstad PH. Side effects and complications of automated percutaneous lumbar nucleotomy. Neuroradiology. 1997 Apr;39(4):282-5. doi: 10.1007/s002340050410. |
| 11568690 | Background | Wittenberg RH, Oppel S, Rubenthaler FA, Steffen R. Five-year results from chemonucleolysis with chymopapain or collagenase: a prospective randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 1;26(17):1835-41. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00002. |
| 9820717 | Result | Slotman GJ, Stein SC. Laminectomy compared with laparoscopic diskectomy and outpatient laparoscopic diskectomy for herniated L5-S1 intervertebral disks. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998 Oct;8(5):261-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.1998.8.261. |
| 15752964 | Result | Amoretti N, Huchot F, Flory P, Brunner P, Chevallier P, Bruneton JN. Percutaneous nucleotomy: preliminary communication on a decompression probe (Dekompressor) in percutaneous discectomy. Ten case reports. Clin Imaging. 2005 Mar-Apr;29(2):98-101. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2004.10.024. |
| 9266296 | Result | Matsui H, Aoki M, Kanamori M. Lateral disc herniation following percutaneous lumbar discectomy. A case report. Int Orthop. 1997;21(3):169-71. doi: 10.1007/s002640050143. |
| 8267686 | Result | Mayer HM, Brock M. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy. J Neurosurg. 1993 Feb;78(2):216-25. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0216. |
| 9152922 | Result | Teng GJ, Jeffery RF, Guo JH, He SC, Zhu HZ, Wang XH, Wu YZ, Lu JM, Ling XL, Qian Y, Zhang YM, Zhu MJ, Guan L, He XM. Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy: a prospective multi-institutional study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997 May-Jun;8(3):457-63. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70589-x. |
| 8441936 | Result | Bernhardt M, Gurganious LR, Bloom DL, White AA 3rd. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of percutaneous discectomy. A preliminary report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Feb;18(2):211-7. |
| 27276397 | Derived | Cristante AF, Rocha ID, MartusMarcon R, Filho TE. Randomized clinical trial comparing lumbar percutaneous hydrodiscectomy with lumbar open microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc protrusions and herniations. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2016 May;71(5):276-80. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2016(05)06. |
| 25141111 | Derived | Rocha ID, Cristante AF, Marcon RM, Oliveira RP, Letaif OB, Barros Filho TE. Controlled medial branch anesthetic block in the diagnosis of chronic lumbar facet joint pain: the value of a three-month follow-up. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Aug;69(8):529-34. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(08)05. |
| BG001 | SJet | This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Schooling | Schooling (>=8 years and <8 years) | Number | participants |
|
| Married | Number | participants |
|
| Manual labor | Number | participants |
|
| Opioid use | Number | participants |
|
| Working currently | Number | participants |
|
| Receiving government benefit | Number | participants |
|
| Months away from work | Mean | Standard Deviation | Months |
|
| Months feeling pain | Mean | Standard Deviation | Months |
|
| VAS for lumbar pain preoperatively | Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=100, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| VAS for leg pain preoperatively | Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=100, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| ODI preoperatively | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| OG001 | SJet | This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Clinical Evaluation | Will be measured dichotomously: (present or absent) Variables: Infection; residual pain; herniation recurrency | Infection | Posted | Number | participants | 6th month |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | VAS for Lumbar - 1st Week | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1st week from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | VAS for Lumbar 1st Month | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | intention to treat | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | 1st month from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | VAS for Lumbar Pain - 3rd Month | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 3rd month from surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | VAS for Lumbar Pain - 6th Month | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 6th month from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | VAS for Lumbar Pain - 12th Month | Pain Score - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 12th month from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 1st Week | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | Intention to treat | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1st week minus baseline |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 1st Month | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1st month from baseline |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 3th Month | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | Intention to treat | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 3th month |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 6th Month | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | Intention to treat | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 6th month from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 12th Month | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) -> The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. The ODI is the most commonly outcome measures in patients with low back pain. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. If the FIRST statement is marked, the section score = 0, If the LAST statement is marked, it = 5. 0 is the best outcome and 50 is the worst outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 12th month from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | VAS for Leg Pain - 1st Week | Pain Score for leg pain- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1st week from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | VAS for Leg Pain - 1st Month | Pain Score for leg pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1st month from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | VAS for Leg Pain - 3rd Month | Pain Score for leg pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 3rd month from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | VAS for Leg Pain - 6rd Month | Pain Score for leg pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) -> minimum value=0 and maximum value=10, higher values represent a worse outcome and zero is a better outcome. | Intention to treat | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 6th month from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | VAS for Leg Pain - 12th Month | pain scale - VAS for leg pain - 12th month | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 12th month from surgery |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 0 |
| 20 |
| EG001 | SJet | This group will be formed by randomization, and receive the discectomy procedure addressed by the technique of Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet : Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet be performed under local anesthesia, in which a needle is placed via percutaneous posterolateral extra-pedicular, below the neural foramen in the center of the disc, using the traditional approach for discography. The researcher will confirm the proper placement of the needle in front and side incidences on the fluoroscopy. | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D006547 | Hernia |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| herniation recurrency |
|