Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-016522-14 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective was to assess the superiority of darbepoetin alfa versus placebo on the incidence of red blood cell transfusions during the 24-week double-blind treatment period in anemic patients with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS.
This study consists of a 3-week screening period, a 24-week double-blind treatment period, and a 48-week active treatment period and the long-term follow-up period.
An end of treatment period (EOTP) visit occurs at week 25, or 3 weeks after last dose of investigational product (IP) for participants who withdraw from the study. After entering the active treatment period, an end of active treatment period (EOATP) visit occurs at week 72 / 73, or 3 weeks after the last dose of darbepoetin alfa.
Long-term follow-up (LTFU) will occur every 26 weeks (± 4 weeks) from the EOATP visit (or EOTP visit if the participant does not enter the active treatment period) and will continue for a minimum of 3 years from the first dose of IP. Follow-up may occur through clinic visit or telephone contacts. Information on the participant's survival and progression to AML status will be collected during LTFU.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Darbepoetin alfa | Experimental | Participants received darbepoetin alfa 500 µg every three weeks (Q3W) for 24 weeks in the double-blind treatment period, and continued to receive darbepoetin alfa 500 µg Q3W during the active treatment period for an additional 48 weeks. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 24 weeks during the double-blind treatment period. From week 25 participants received darbepoetin alfa 500 µg Q3W during the active treatment period for 48 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darbepoetin alfa | Drug | Administered by subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With at Least One Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Week 5 to Week 25 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Erythroid Response Based on International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Criteria in the Double-blind Treatment Period | International Working Group 2006 erythroid response was defined as achieving an initial ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin from baseline and sustaining an average rise of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in a rolling 56-consecutive day period in the absence of RBC transfusion. Participants with no hemoglobin collected to the minimum time required to observe an IWG erythroid response (Week 13) were considered non-responders. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| MD | Amgen | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Innsbruck | 6020 | Austria | |||
| Research Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28626220 | Background | Platzbecker U, Symeonidis A, Oliva EN, Goede JS, Delforge M, Mayer J, Slama B, Badre S, Gasal E, Mehta B, Franklin J. A phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial of darbepoetin alfa in patients with anemia and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2017 Sep;31(9):1944-1950. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.192. Epub 2017 Jun 19. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| AmgenTrials clinical trials website | View source |
Not provided
Eligible participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive darbepoetin alfa or placebo. Randomization was stratified by International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) category (low vs intermediate-1 risk) established at screening.
This study was conducted at 49 centers in 9 countries. Participants were enrolled from 21 December 2011 to 06 January 2014.
Results are reported for the double-blind treatment period of the study, with a 07 October 2015 data cut-off; the study is ongoing.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 24 weeks. |
| FG001 | Darbepoetin Alfa | Participants received darbepoetin alfa 500 µg Q3W for 24 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Administered by subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks |
|
| Up to 24 weeks |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | The severity of each adverse event was graded using the the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 grading scale, where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life-threatening and grade 5 = death. Prespecified adverse events of interest for darbepoetin alfa, based on clinical data in anemic patients with cancer, included the following categories: hypersensitivity, cardiac failure, hypertension, malignancies, embolic and thrombolic events, venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), central nervous system vascular disorders, and ischemic heart disease. | From first dose of study drug until the end of the double-blind treatment period; 24 weeks. |
| Number of Participants With Disease Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) | Transformation to AML was assessed according to WHO guidelines in the absence of IP and any haematopoietic growth factors (2 weeks off dosing). Bone marrow and/or cytogenetic report confirmation of AML was required (marrow or peripheral blast cells ≥ 20%, presence of pathognomic AML cytogenetic change, or evidence of marrow blast criteria for erythroleukemia). A pathology report confirming other leukemias such as chloroma (granulocytic sarcoma, myeloid sarcoma) or leukemia cutis also constituted transformation to AML. | 24 weeks |
| Number of Participants With Malignancies Other Than AML, Basal Cell Carcinoma, or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin | Up to 24 weeks |
| Number of Participants Who Developed Neutralizing Antibodies to Darbepoetin Alfa | Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-darbepoetin alfa antibodies. Samples were first tested in an immunoassay to detect antibodies capable of binding to darbepoetin alfa. Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based assay to determine neutralizing activity against darbepoetin alfa. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. The number of participants who developed antibodies to darbepoetin alfa is defined as participants who were neutralizing antibody positive post-baseline with a negative or no result at baseline. | Baseline and end of double-blind treatment period (24 weeks) |
| Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) | The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement. End of treatment period (EOTP) analysis includes last available values. | Baseline, and weeks 13 and 25 |
| Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | The EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) is a global evaluation of overall health state with scores ranging from 0 (worse health state a participant can imagine) to 100 (best health state a participant can imagine). End of treatment period (EOTP) analysis includes last available values. | Baseline, and weeks 13 and 25 |
| Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Fatigue | The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. Clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue is defined as an increase of ≥ 3 points in the FACIT-Fatigue subscale score, from baseline to EOTP. | Baseline to week 24 |
| Linz |
| 4020 |
| Austria |
| Research Site | Salzburg | 5020 | Austria |
| Research Site | Vienna | 1140 | Austria |
| Research Site | Bruges | 8000 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Brussels | 1200 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Charleroi | 6000 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Ghent | 9000 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Haine Saint Paul - La Louviere | 7100 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Hasselt | 3500 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Liège | 4000 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Ottignies | 1340 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Roeselare | 8800 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Sint-Niklaas | 9100 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Brno | 625 00 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Hradec Králové | 500 05 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Olomouc | 775 20 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Ostrava-Poruba | 708 52 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Prague | 100 34 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Prague | 128 08 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Prague | 128 20 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Prague | 150 06 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Zlín | 760 01 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Avignon | 84902 | France |
| Research Site | Bobigny | 93009 | France |
| Research Site | Caen | 14033 | France |
| Research Site | Lyon | 69009 | France |
| Research Site | Lyon Cédex 3 | 69437 | France |
| Research Site | Nantes | 44035 | France |
| Research Site | Nice | 06202 | France |
| Research Site | Paris | 75015 | France |
| Research Site | Paris | 75475 | France |
| Research Site | Pontoise | 95301 | France |
| Research Site | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
| Research Site | Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy | 54511 | France |
| Research Site | Cologne | 50677 | Germany |
| Research Site | Dresden | 01307 | Germany |
| Research Site | Göttingen | 37075 | Germany |
| Research Site | Hanover | 30625 | Germany |
| Research Site | Leipzig | 04103 | Germany |
| Research Site | Mannheim | 68167 | Germany |
| Research Site | Regensburg | 93053 | Germany |
| Research Site | Rotenburg (Wümme) | 27356 | Germany |
| Research Site | Ulm | 89081 | Germany |
| Research Site | Athens | 11527 | Greece |
| Research Site | Athens | 12462 | Greece |
| Research Site | Ioannina | 45110 | Greece |
| Research Site | Pátrai | 26500 | Greece |
| Research Site | Thessaloniki | 57010 | Greece |
| Research Site | Alessandria | 15100 | Italy |
| Research Site | Bologna | 40138 | Italy |
| Research Site | Genova | 16132 | Italy |
| Research Site | Milan | 20122 | Italy |
| Research Site | Palermo | 90146 | Italy |
| Research Site | Pavia | 27100 | Italy |
| Research Site | Pesaro | 61100 | Italy |
| Research Site | Pisa | 56127 | Italy |
| Research Site | Reggio Calabria | 89124 | Italy |
| Research Site | Rionero in Vulture PZ | 85028 | Italy |
| Research Site | Roma | 00161 | Italy |
| Research Site | San Giovanni Rotondo FG | 71013 | Italy |
| Research Site | Udine | 33100 | Italy |
| Research Site | Zaragoza | Aragon | 50009 | Spain |
| Research Site | Salamanca | Castille and León | 37007 | Spain |
| Research Site | Barcelona | Catalonia | 08003 | Spain |
| Research Site | Valencia | Valencia | 46010 | Spain |
| Research Site | Valencia | Valencia | 46026 | Spain |
| Research Site | Basel | 4031 | Switzerland |
| Research Site | Lucerne | 6000 | Switzerland |
| Research Site | Muensterlingen | 8596 | Switzerland |
| Research Site | Zurich | 8091 | Switzerland |
| Received Treatment |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Primary Analysis Set includes all randomized and consented participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 24 weeks. |
| BG001 | Darbepoetin Alfa | Participants received darbepoetin alfa 500 µg Q3W for 24 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | French clinical sites, per regulation, did not complete the ethnicity question. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| IPSS Risk Category | The Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) IPSS score assesses the severity of MDS based on 3 prognostic factors each assigned a score: the percentage of bone marrow blasts, chromosome changes in the marrow cells (karyotype) and the presence of one or more low blood cell counts (cytopenias). The IPSS score is the sum of the bone marrow blast + karyotype + cytopenia score and ranges from 0 (low risk) to 3.5 (high risk). Prognosis is categorized as Low risk (score = 0), Intermediate-1 (score 0.5 to 1.0), Intermediate-2 (score 1.5 to 2.0) or High risk (score ≥ 2.5). | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of MDS | The World Health Organization (WHO) classification recognizes eight subtypes of MDS that are distinguished by the percentage of myeloblasts, presence or absence of ringed sideroblasts (i.e., erythroid precursors with iron deposits surrounding the nucleus), presence of a monocytosis or a deletion 5q. | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Time since MDS Diagnosis | Data available for 43 and 88 participants in each treatment group respectively | Mean | Standard Deviation | months |
| ||||||||||||||
| Hemoglobin | Data available for 35 and 75 participants in each treatment group respectively | Mean | Standard Deviation | g/dL |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During the Double-blind Treatment Period | Transfusion Primary Analysis Set which includes all randomized and consented participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had an end of treatment period (EOTP) visit ≥ day 29 (ie, start of week 5). | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 5 to Week 25 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Erythroid Response Based on International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Criteria in the Double-blind Treatment Period | International Working Group 2006 erythroid response was defined as achieving an initial ≥ 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin from baseline and sustaining an average rise of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in a rolling 56-consecutive day period in the absence of RBC transfusion. Participants with no hemoglobin collected to the minimum time required to observe an IWG erythroid response (Week 13) were considered non-responders. | Primary analysis set participants with a central laboratory baseline hemoglobin value | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Up to 24 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | The severity of each adverse event was graded using the the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 grading scale, where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life-threatening and grade 5 = death. Prespecified adverse events of interest for darbepoetin alfa, based on clinical data in anemic patients with cancer, included the following categories: hypersensitivity, cardiac failure, hypertension, malignancies, embolic and thrombolic events, venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), central nervous system vascular disorders, and ischemic heart disease. | Safety Analysis Set, including all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. One participant in the placebo arm inadvertently received a dose of darbepoetin alfa and is counted in the darbepoetin alfa group for safety analyses. | Posted | Number | participants | From first dose of study drug until the end of the double-blind treatment period; 24 weeks. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Disease Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) | Transformation to AML was assessed according to WHO guidelines in the absence of IP and any haematopoietic growth factors (2 weeks off dosing). Bone marrow and/or cytogenetic report confirmation of AML was required (marrow or peripheral blast cells ≥ 20%, presence of pathognomic AML cytogenetic change, or evidence of marrow blast criteria for erythroleukemia). A pathology report confirming other leukemias such as chloroma (granulocytic sarcoma, myeloid sarcoma) or leukemia cutis also constituted transformation to AML. | Safety analysis set with available data | Posted | Number | participants | 24 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Malignancies Other Than AML, Basal Cell Carcinoma, or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin | Safety analysis set | Posted | Number | participants | Up to 24 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Developed Neutralizing Antibodies to Darbepoetin Alfa | Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-darbepoetin alfa antibodies. Samples were first tested in an immunoassay to detect antibodies capable of binding to darbepoetin alfa. Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based assay to determine neutralizing activity against darbepoetin alfa. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. The number of participants who developed antibodies to darbepoetin alfa is defined as participants who were neutralizing antibody positive post-baseline with a negative or no result at baseline. | Safety analysis set participants with post-baseline antibody results | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline and end of double-blind treatment period (24 weeks) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) | The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement. End of treatment period (EOTP) analysis includes last available values. | FACIT-Fatigue Analysis Set, includes all participants in the primary analysis set who completed or partially completed both the baseline and at least 1 subsequent FACIT-F questionnaire. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, and weeks 13 and 25 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | The EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) is a global evaluation of overall health state with scores ranging from 0 (worse health state a participant can imagine) to 100 (best health state a participant can imagine). End of treatment period (EOTP) analysis includes last available values. | The EQ-5D visual analog analysis set includes all participants in the primary analysis set who completed both the baseline and at least 1 subsequent visual analog scale. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, and weeks 13 and 25 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Fatigue | The FACIT-Fatigue scale was a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. Clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue is defined as an increase of ≥ 3 points in the FACIT-Fatigue subscale score, from baseline to EOTP. | FACIT-fatigue analysis set | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline to week 24 |
|
|
From first dose of study drug to 24 weeks for participants who continued into the active treatment period or until 30 days after last dose (maximum of 28 weeks) for participants who did not continue.
One participant randomized to the Placebo arm inadvertently received one 200 µg dose of darbepoetin alfa and is reported in the Darbepoetin alfa group for adverse events.
Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of adverse events that exceed the indicated frequency threshold.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 24 weeks. | 8 | 48 | 25 | 48 | ||
| EG001 | Darbepoetin Alfa | Participants received darbepoetin alfa 500 µg Q3W for 24 weeks. | 11 | 98 | 56 | 98 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhagic anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukocytosis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertigo positional | Ear and labyrinth disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proctitis haemorrhagic | Gastrointestinal disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess | Infections and infestations | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess of salivary gland | Infections and infestations | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal infection | Infections and infestations | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Staphylococcal sepsis | Infections and infestations | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Menorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary arterial hypertension | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Extremity necrosis | Vascular disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asthenia | General disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea exertional | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 18.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Amgen Inc. | 866-572-6436 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009190 | Myelodysplastic Syndromes |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001855 | Bone Marrow Diseases |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068256 | Darbepoetin alfa |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004921 | Erythropoietin |
| D003115 | Colony-Stimulating Factors |
| D006023 | Glycoproteins |
| D006001 | Glycoconjugates |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Intermediate-1 |
|
| RA with ringed sideroblasts (RARS) |
|
| Refractory cytopenia multilineage dysplasia (RCMD) |
|
| MDS, unclassified (MDS-U) |
|
| MDS associated with isolated del(5q) |
|
| Refractory anemia with excess blasts-1 (RAEB-1) |
|
| Refractory anemia with excess blasts-2 (RAEB-2) |
|
| Unknown |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|