Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a phase I dose escalation study. Dose escalation will be via the traditional "up and down" scheme. SBRT:
Patients will receive one of the following radiation regimens:
Prior to enrollment all patients will be evaluated with a physical exam, review of pathology and laboratory values to confirm diagnosis, and baseline imaging studies.
Accelerator
Physicians will treat with a stereotactic radiosurgery system using 6MV photons to deliver stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Doses
Patients will receive a total dose ranging from 50-75 Gy in 5 fractions (10-15 Gy/fx). Dose escalation will be via the traditional "up and down" scheme.
In determining the radiation dose and fractionation scheme for this protocol, we used the linear-quadratic formalism for radiation cell killing to "equate" schemes that vary the dose/fraction and number of fractions. This concept of biologically equivalent dose (BED) states that the total effect is given by:
nd x (1 + d/(alpha-beta ratio))
where n is the # of fractions and d is the dose/fraction. The "alpha-beta ratio" characterizes the radiation response of a particular tissue; a higher value is indicative of a tissue that responds acutely to the effects of radiation. Due to their highly proliferative nature, most tumors fall into this category.
This final dose scheme (total dose 75 Gy) is biologically equivalent to the previously studied doses in the literature (60 Gy in 3 fractions), meaning the first two sets of patients will be treated to a radiobiologically smaller (and likely safer) dose. We would favor treating in five fractions, as opposed to three, to allow more repair of normal tissue, reoxygenation of tumor cells, and redistribution of tumor cells to more radiosensitive parts of the cell cycle. Using a smaller fraction size, 10-15 Gy compared to 20 Gy, will also help reduce late effects of radiation therapy. SBRT treatment will be given on an every other day schedule, excluding weekends. The prescription dose will be prescribed to the isodose line best encompassing the planning target volume (PTV) depending on the volume of tumor (HCC).
Localization, immobilization, and simulation
Within 5 - 10 days after fiducial placement, pPatients will undergo 4D FDG-PET/CT simulation with the goal of evaluating tumor motion to allow for gated treatment when indicated. This goal will be accomplished by using the Real-time Position Management (RPM) system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) to create a retrospective 4D CT scan. Following the institutional protocol, a helical CT scan and a 4D positron emission tomography (PET) scan with a patient with body immobilization device will be acquired. A patient will not eat or drink anything for four hours before the PET scan. Before the PET scan, blood sample will be taken from either a finger stick or a vein in the arm to check the sugar level. An injection of a small amount of a radioactive drug called FDG ( [F18] fluorodeoxyglucose) which is a chemical similar to sugar will be administered into a vein in the arm or hand. Approximately 45 to 60 minutes after the injection of FDG, the patient will be asked to urinate (to empty the bladder).
The patient will be set up in the PET/CT scanner using a vacuum cushion for immobilization in the supine position with feet tied and hands across the chest or above the head. There will also be a respiration-monitoring device called a marker block placed 5cm below the patient's xyphoid process. An infrared camera at the foot of the CT table will capture the images of the marker block and relay them to the RPM computer, which in turn will translate the images into a respiratory pattern. The audio coach (which instructs the patient in regulating breathing) will be calibrated to both patient comfort and time of expiration, inspiration, and full breathing cycle. The placing of the patient in a body immobilization device will take about 10-15 minutes. The patient will need to lie still for about 30 minutes before the completion of the 4D PET scan. The PET/CT scanner will then be programmed to acquire a retrospective 4D CT scan with a set of images for each phase of the breathing cycle. This scan will take place immediately after the PET scan. It will take around 5-10 minutes. The physician or physicist will then select the number of breathing phases to use while the software program selects the best image for each selected breathing phase.
The entire FDG-PET/CT scan procedure is expected to take about 2 hours.
Treatment Planning
Treatment planning will be carried out using the planning station for the radiosurgery equipment being used for treatment. The gross tumor volume (GTV) will be contoured on the fused image set. Two GTV volumes will be contoured; the gross tumor as seen on CT alone and the gross tumor corresponding to FDG avidity. No margins will be added for clinical target volume (CTV), but custom margins will be added for the planning target volume (PTV) based on the findings of the 4D FDG-PET/CT motion study assessment. The treatment will be prescribed to the isodose line that best covers the planning target volume, which will typically be the 80% isodose line.
Treatment Delivery
SBRT will take place within 14 days of the treatment planning scan. The planning data containing the coordinates of tumor isocenter, the external infrared markers, and the implanted markers are transferred to the appropriate platform depending on the treating machine. If the patient meets the criteria of gating technique then treatment delivery will be accomplished using the appropriate gating technology. Depending on the technology used external infrared markers attached to the patient's skin or a marker block placed on the patient's chest is used to determine the breathing pattern. The size of beam-on window will be determined based on the target motion as detected by the 4D FDG-PET/CT scan. The threshold for gated treatment delivery is determined based upon the target motion due to respiration.
The daily initial positioning during treatment delivery will be performed using lasers and skin marks and infrared optical markers as appropriate. The target isocenter will be verified using daily imaging. Depending on the platform used, the moving target will be positioned within the beam under infrared and/or image guidance
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBRT | Other |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy | Radiation | SBRT: Patients will receive one of the following radiation regimens:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) | MTD as determined by dose limiting toxicities (DLT), defined as any grade III stomach, bowel, liver, or spinal cord toxicity, or any grade IV toxicity per RTOG criteria. Only toxicities observed prior to 7 months after the last fraction of radiation were considered. The MTD is the highest dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 treated patients experiences a DLT. | Up to 16 Months |
| Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined as any grade III stomach, bowel, liver, or spinal cord toxicity, or any grade IV toxicity as defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). | Up to 16 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Local Control | Proportion of treated patients with stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), or complete response (CR) in the target lesion(s) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in the target lesion(s) at one-year post-treatment. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10mm short axis); PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Susannah Ellsworth, MD | UPMC Hillman Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPMC Hillman Cancer Center - Radiation Oncology | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15232 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | SBRT - 50 Gy | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: SBRT: Patients received 50 Gy in 5 fractions (10 Gy/fx) delivered over a 2-week period. |
| FG001 | SBRT - 60 Gy | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: SBRT: Patients received 60 Gy in 5 fractions (12 Gy/fx) delivered over a 2-week period. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 Gy |
| |||||||||||||
| 60 Gy |
|
All patients that received treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | SBRT - 50 Gy | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: SBRT: Patients received 50 Gy in 5 fractions (10 Gy/fx) delivered over a 2-week period. |
| BG001 | SBRT - 60 Gy | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: SBRT: Patients received 60 Gy in 5 fractions (12 Gy/fx) delivered over a 2-week period. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) | MTD as determined by dose limiting toxicities (DLT), defined as any grade III stomach, bowel, liver, or spinal cord toxicity, or any grade IV toxicity per RTOG criteria. Only toxicities observed prior to 7 months after the last fraction of radiation were considered. The MTD is the highest dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 treated patients experiences a DLT. | All patients that received study treatment. | Posted | Number | Gy | Up to 16 Months |
|
Adverse event data were collected for a period of up to 5 years.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | SBRT - 50 Gy | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: SBRT: Patients received 50 Gy in 5 fractions (10 Gy/fx) delivered over a 2-week period. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Stadterman, MPH, CCRP, Clinical Research Manager | UPMC Hillman Cancer Center | 4126475554 | stadtermanbm@upmc.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 4, 2023 | Sep 8, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016634 | Radiosurgery |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D013238 | Stereotaxic Techniques |
| D019635 | Neurosurgical Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Up to 6 years and 4 months (study population) |
| Local Response Rate | Proportion of patients who experience local partial response (PR), or complete response (CR) in the target lesion(s) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) at any point in the first year of follow-up. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. For non-target lesions: Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10mm short axis); PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. | Up to 6 years and 4 months (study population) |
| FACT-G - Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Over Time | Health related quality of life associated with this SBRT will be assessed over time using the FACT-G assessment tool, a self-administered questionnaire that measures quality of life within the prior 7 days in patients being treated for cancer. The tool has 27 items with a 5-point Likert-type scale, (0 = Not at all to 5 = Very Much). Subscales include Physical Well-Being max score=28), Social/Family Well-Being (max score=28), Emotional Well-Being (max score=24), Functional Well-Being (max score=28). Total scores range from 0 to 108. Questions are phrased so that higher numbers indicate a better health state, with some items reverse-scored. | 1-2 months, 3-5 months, 6-8 months, 9-11 months,12-14 months,15-17 months, 18-20 months, 21-23 months, 24-26 months |
| Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary Index (FSHI) Over Time | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary Index (FSHI) subscale was used to assess health-related quality of life associated with SBRT. The FACT-Hep is part of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT; 13) measurement system and includes the FACT-General (FACT-G) and an 8-item module specifically designed for patients diagnosed with hepatobiliary carcinomas. FACT-Hep questions are scored using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much), with overall scores ranging from 0-32. Questions are phrased so that higher numbers indicate a better health state, with some items reverse-scored. | 1-2 months, 3-5 months, 6-8 months, 9-11 months,12-14 months,15-17 months, 18-20 months, 21-23 months, 24-26 months |
| FACT-Hep-Trial Outcome Index (TOI) | Trial Outcome Index (TOI), the sum of the physical and functional well-being subscales and the additional concerns subscale is calculated. The TOI is a commonly used endpoint in clinical trials because it is responsive to change, whereas the social/family and emotional well-being subscale scores do not change as quickly over time or have as great of change subsequent to pharmacological treatment. The FACT-Hep is part of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT 13) measurement system and includes the FACT-General (FACT-G) and an 18-item module specifically designed for patients diagnosed with hepatobiliary carcinomas with domain scores ranging from 0-32. FACT-Hep questions are scored using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Total Index scores range from 0 to 128. Higher scores are associated with better QoL or fewer symptoms. | 1-2 months, 3-5 months, 6-8 months, 9-11 months,12-14 months,15-17 months, 18-20 months, 21-23 months, 24-26 months |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ECOG Performance Score | 0 = Asymptomatic (Fully active, able to carry on all predisease activities without restriction) 1 = Symptomatic but completely ambulatory (Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature). 2 = Symptomatic, <50% in bed during the day (Ambulatory and capable of all self care but unable to carry out any work activities) 3 = Symptomatic, >50% in bed, but not bedbound (Limited self-care) 4 = Bedbound (Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair) 5 = Death | Number | participants |
|
| Karnofsky Score of Performance Status | 100% Normal; no complaints or evidence of disease. 90% Can do normal activity; minor signs of disease.80% Normal activity with effort; some signs of disease.70% Cares for self. Unable to do normal activity / active work.60% Needs occasional assistance, but able to care for most needs.50% Requires considerable assistance/frequent medical care. 40% Disabled; requires special care/assistance.30% Severely disabled; hospitalization indicated although death not imminent. 20% Very sick; hospitalization needed; active supportive necessary. 10% Moribund; fatal processes progressing rapidly. 0% Dead. | Number | participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined as any grade III stomach, bowel, liver, or spinal cord toxicity, or any grade IV toxicity as defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). | All patients that received study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 16 Months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Local Control | Proportion of treated patients with stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), or complete response (CR) in the target lesion(s) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in the target lesion(s) at one-year post-treatment. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10mm short axis); PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. | All patients treated per protocol and radiologically evaluable. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 6 years and 4 months (study population) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Local Response Rate | Proportion of patients who experience local partial response (PR), or complete response (CR) in the target lesion(s) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) at any point in the first year of follow-up. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. For non-target lesions: Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10mm short axis); PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. | All patients treated per protocol and radiologically evaluable. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 6 years and 4 months (study population) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | FACT-G - Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Over Time | Health related quality of life associated with this SBRT will be assessed over time using the FACT-G assessment tool, a self-administered questionnaire that measures quality of life within the prior 7 days in patients being treated for cancer. The tool has 27 items with a 5-point Likert-type scale, (0 = Not at all to 5 = Very Much). Subscales include Physical Well-Being max score=28), Social/Family Well-Being (max score=28), Emotional Well-Being (max score=24), Functional Well-Being (max score=28). Total scores range from 0 to 108. Questions are phrased so that higher numbers indicate a better health state, with some items reverse-scored. | All treated patients that completed QoL surveys. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1-2 months, 3-5 months, 6-8 months, 9-11 months,12-14 months,15-17 months, 18-20 months, 21-23 months, 24-26 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary Index (FSHI) Over Time | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary Index (FSHI) subscale was used to assess health-related quality of life associated with SBRT. The FACT-Hep is part of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT; 13) measurement system and includes the FACT-General (FACT-G) and an 8-item module specifically designed for patients diagnosed with hepatobiliary carcinomas. FACT-Hep questions are scored using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much), with overall scores ranging from 0-32. Questions are phrased so that higher numbers indicate a better health state, with some items reverse-scored. | All patients on study that completed QoL surveys | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1-2 months, 3-5 months, 6-8 months, 9-11 months,12-14 months,15-17 months, 18-20 months, 21-23 months, 24-26 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | FACT-Hep-Trial Outcome Index (TOI) | Trial Outcome Index (TOI), the sum of the physical and functional well-being subscales and the additional concerns subscale is calculated. The TOI is a commonly used endpoint in clinical trials because it is responsive to change, whereas the social/family and emotional well-being subscale scores do not change as quickly over time or have as great of change subsequent to pharmacological treatment. The FACT-Hep is part of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT 13) measurement system and includes the FACT-General (FACT-G) and an 18-item module specifically designed for patients diagnosed with hepatobiliary carcinomas with domain scores ranging from 0-32. FACT-Hep questions are scored using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Total Index scores range from 0 to 128. Higher scores are associated with better QoL or fewer symptoms. | All patients on study that completed QoL surveys | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1-2 months, 3-5 months, 6-8 months, 9-11 months,12-14 months,15-17 months, 18-20 months, 21-23 months, 24-26 months |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| EG001 | SBRT - 60 Gy | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: SBRT: Patients received 60 Gy in 5 fractions (12 Gy/fx) delivered over a 2-week period. | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hepatobiliary disorders - Other, specifyLDH increased | Hepatobiliary disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Investigations - Other, specifyedema in lower extremities | Investigations | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Investigations - Other, specifyLDH increased | Investigations | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Investigations - Other, specifyRib pain | Investigations | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lymphocyte count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| White blood cell decreased | Investigations | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypermagnesemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypocalcemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypokalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypomagnesemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest wall pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Generalized muscle weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pelvic pain | Reproductive system and breast disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hoarseness | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders - Other, specifyErythema-right breast | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE v4 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D013514 |
| Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| Stable Disease |
|
| Initial Rx Therapy |
|
|
| Post completion of RX Therapy |
|
|
| 1-2 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 3-5 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 6-8 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 9-11 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 12-14 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 15-17 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 18-20 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 21-23 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 24-26 months post final Rx |
|
|
| Initial Rx Therapy |
|
|
| Post completion of RX Therapy |
|
|
| 1-2 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 3-5 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 6-8 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 9-11 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 12-14 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 15-17 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 18-20 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 21-23 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 24-26 months post final Rx |
|
|
| Initial Rx therapy session |
|
|
| After completion of final Rx |
|
|
| 01-02 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 03-05 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 06-08 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 09-11 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 12-14 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 15-17 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 18-20 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 21-23 months post final Rx |
|
|
| 24-26 months post final Rx |
|
|