Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| H6D-CR-LVIZ | Other Identifier | Eli Lilly and Company |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether, after two 8-week treatment periods, male patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) in China prefer 20 milligram (mg) tadalafil or 100 mg sildenafil. This trial consists of two treatment periods of 8 weeks each and an extension phase of 8 weeks, for a total of 24 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tadalafil then Sildenafil | Experimental | 20 mg tadalafil taken orally, as needed, for 8 weeks, followed by 100 mg sildenafil taken orally, as needed, for an additional 8 weeks. There is a washout period of 7-10 days between treatments. At the end of the two 8-week treatment periods, participants will be allowed to enter an 8-week extension phase on their preferred medication for erectile dysfunction (ED). |
|
| Sildenafil then Tadalafil | Active Comparator | 100 mg sildenafil taken orally, as needed, for 8 weeks, followed by 20 mg tadalafil taken orally, as needed, for an additional 8 weeks. There is a washout period of 7-10 days between treatments. At the end of the two 8-week treatment periods, participants will be allowed to enter an 8-week extension phase on their preferred medication for ED. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tadalafil | Drug | Administered Orally |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Preferring Tadalafil Over Sildenafil Measured at Week 18 Using Question 1 of the "Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor Treatment Preference" Questionnaire (PITPQ) | PITPQ Question (Q) 1 was a dichotomous outcome measure in which the participant selected his preferred study treatment (tadalafil or sildenafil) to receive during the Extension Phase. | Week 18 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Moderately or Strongly Preferring the Selected Treatment at Week 18 Using Question 2 of the PITPQ | PITPQ Q2 was a measure of the degree of treatment preference based on the participant's opinion. The question was, "For the treatment preference you selected in Q1, what is your degree of preference?". Choices were moderate or strong. | Week 18 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Study Subjects
Partners
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST) | Eli Lilly and Company | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. | Beijing | 100853 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Tadalafil Then Sildenafil | 20 milligrams (mg) tadalafil taken orally, as needed, for 8 weeks, followed by 100 mg sildenafil taken orally, as needed, for an additional 8 weeks. There was a washout period of 7 to 10 days between treatments. At the end of the two 8-week treatment periods, participants were allowed to enter an 8-week extension phase on their preferred medication for erectile dysfunction (ED). |
| FG001 | Sildenafil Then Tadalafil | 100 mg sildenafil taken orally, as needed, for 8 weeks, followed by 20 mg tadalafil taken orally, as needed, for an additional 8 weeks. There was a washout period of 7 to 10 days between treatments. At the end of the two 8-week treatment periods, participants were allowed to enter an 8-week extension phase on their preferred medication for ED. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Period 1 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Washout Period |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Treatment Period 2 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Extension Phase |
|
All randomized participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Tadalafil Then Sildenafil | 20 milligrams (mg) tadalafil taken orally, as needed, for 8 weeks, followed by 100 mg sildenafil taken orally, as needed, for an additional 8 weeks. There was a washout period of 7 to 10 days between treatments. At the end of the two 8-week treatment periods, participants were allowed to enter an 8-week extension phase on their preferred medication for erectile dysfunction (ED). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Preferring Tadalafil Over Sildenafil Measured at Week 18 Using Question 1 of the "Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor Treatment Preference" Questionnaire (PITPQ) | PITPQ Question (Q) 1 was a dichotomous outcome measure in which the participant selected his preferred study treatment (tadalafil or sildenafil) to receive during the Extension Phase. | Randomized participants who completed both treatment periods (Week 18), responded to the PITPQ, and were analyzed according to their assigned treatment. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 18 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Tadalafil (Treatment Periods) | 20 mg tadalafil taken orally, as needed, for 8 weeks either during Treatment Period 1 or Treatment Period 2. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Medical Officer | Eli Lilly and Company | 800-545-5979 |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007172 | Erectile Dysfunction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D012735 | Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068581 | Tadalafil |
| D000068677 | Sildenafil Citrate |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002243 | Carbolines |
| D011725 | Pyridines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sildenafil | Drug | Administered Orally |
|
| Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Overall Satisfaction Domain | Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF overall satisfaction was the sum of Q13 and Q14. Scores ranged from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF overall satisfaction domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF overall satisfaction domain score. Higher IIEF overall satisfaction domain scores were indicative of greater overall satisfaction. | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
| Change in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 2 | Participant-assessed diary that assessed the mean change from baseline in the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q2, "Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?". The SEP Q2 score was determined as the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of "yes" responses at endpoint minus the percentage of "yes" responses at baseline. Change in percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q2 at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in SEP Q2. | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
| Change in Psychosocial and Interpersonal Relationship Scale (PAIRS) Sexual Self-Confidence Domain | PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The sexual self-confidence domain score was the average score for Items 5, 10, 15, 23, 27, and 29. Sexual self-confidence domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS sexual self-confidence domain scores at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS sexual self-confidence domain score. Higher scores were indicative of greater sexual self-confidence. | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
| Drug Attributes Questionnaire (DRAQ) at Week 18 | DRAQ was a questionnaire used to record explanations for why participants preferred a drug. Participants identified their first and second reasons for drug preference from a choice of 7 reasons. Each reason for drug preference includes participants who selected that reason as their first or second reason. | Week 18 |
| Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Intercourse Satisfaction Domain | Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF intercourse satisfaction was the sum of Q6, Q7, and Q8 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions ranging from 0 to 15. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF intercourse satisfaction domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF intercourse satisfaction domain score. Higher scores were indicative of an increase in intercourse satisfaction. | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
| Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Sexual Desire Domain | Self-reported sexual desire over the past 4 weeks. IIEF sexual desire was the sum of Q11 and Q12. Scores ranged from 1 (low/almost never) to 5 (very high/almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF sexual desire domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF sexual desire domain score. Higher scores were indicative of increased sexual desire. | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
| Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Orgasmic Function Domain | Self-reported orgasmic function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF orgasmic function was the sum of Q9 and Q10 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (no stimulation) to 5 (almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 0 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF orgasmic function domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF orgasmic function domain score. Higher scores were indicative of better orgasmic function. | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
| Change in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 3 | Participant-assessed diary that assessed the mean change from baseline in the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q3, "Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?". The SEP Q3 score was determined as the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of "yes" responses at endpoint minus percentage of "yes" responses at baseline. Change in the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q3 at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in SEP Q3. | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
| Change in PAIRS Spontaneity Domain | PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The spontaneity domain score was the average score for Items 3, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, and 28. Spontaneity domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS spontaneity domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS spontaneity domain score. Higher scores were indicative of greater spontaneity. | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
| Change in PAIRS Time Concerns Domain | PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The time concerns domain score was the average score for Items 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 20, 24, and 25. Time concern domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS time concerns at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS time concerns domain score. Higher scores were indicative of more time concerns. | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
| Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function Domain | Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF erectile function was the sum of Q1 through Q5 and Q15 of the IIEF. Q1 through Q5 were scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Q15 was scored 1 (no/low confidence) to 5 (high confidence). IIEF erectile function domain scores ranged from 1 to 30. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF erectile function domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF EF domain score. Higher scores were indicative of better erectile function. | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
| China |
| For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. | Changsha | 410008 | China |
| For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. | Hangzhou | 310003 | China |
| For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. | Nanjing | 210008 | China |
| For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. | Shanghai | 200080 | China |
| For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. | Shenzhen | 518036 | China |
| For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. | Tianjin | 300211 | China |
| For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. | Wuhan | 430030 | China |
| For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. | Xi'an | 710004 | China |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG001 | Sildenafil Then Tadalafil | 100 mg sildenafil taken orally, as needed, for 8 weeks, followed by 20 mg tadalafil taken orally, as needed, for an additional 8 weeks. There was a washout period of 7 to 10 days between treatments. At the end of the two 8-week treatment periods, participants were allowed to enter an 8-week extension phase on their preferred medication for ED. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain | IIEF-EF was the sum of Questions (Q)1 through 5 and Q15 of the IIEF. Q1 to Q5 were scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Q15 was scored 1 (no/low confidence) to 5 (high confidence). IIEF-EF domain scores ranged from 1 to 30. Higher scores represented better erectile function. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Erectile Dysfunction (ED) Severity | Investigator-reported severity of a participant's ED. ED was defined as a consistent change in the quality of erection adversely affecting participant satisfaction with sexual intercourse. Severity was based on investigator opinion. | Number | participants |
|
| ED Duration | Number | participants |
|
| ED Etiology | Number | participants |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Moderately or Strongly Preferring the Selected Treatment at Week 18 Using Question 2 of the PITPQ | PITPQ Q2 was a measure of the degree of treatment preference based on the participant's opinion. The question was, "For the treatment preference you selected in Q1, what is your degree of preference?". Choices were moderate or strong. | Randomized participants who completed both treatment periods (Week 18), responded to the PITPQ, and were analyzed according to their assigned treatment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 18 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Overall Satisfaction Domain | Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF overall satisfaction was the sum of Q13 and Q14. Scores ranged from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF overall satisfaction domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF overall satisfaction domain score. Higher IIEF overall satisfaction domain scores were indicative of greater overall satisfaction. | All randomized participants with baseline and at least 1 IIEF post-baseline measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 2 | Participant-assessed diary that assessed the mean change from baseline in the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q2, "Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?". The SEP Q2 score was determined as the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of "yes" responses at endpoint minus the percentage of "yes" responses at baseline. Change in percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q2 at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in SEP Q2. | Randomized participants with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline SEP measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of "yes" responses | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Psychosocial and Interpersonal Relationship Scale (PAIRS) Sexual Self-Confidence Domain | PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The sexual self-confidence domain score was the average score for Items 5, 10, 15, 23, 27, and 29. Sexual self-confidence domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS sexual self-confidence domain scores at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS sexual self-confidence domain score. Higher scores were indicative of greater sexual self-confidence. | Randomized participants with baseline and at least 1 PAIRS post-baseline measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Drug Attributes Questionnaire (DRAQ) at Week 18 | DRAQ was a questionnaire used to record explanations for why participants preferred a drug. Participants identified their first and second reasons for drug preference from a choice of 7 reasons. Each reason for drug preference includes participants who selected that reason as their first or second reason. | Randomized participants who completed both treatment periods (Week 18), responded to the DRAQ, and were analyzed according to their assigned treatment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 18 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Intercourse Satisfaction Domain | Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF intercourse satisfaction was the sum of Q6, Q7, and Q8 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions ranging from 0 to 15. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF intercourse satisfaction domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF intercourse satisfaction domain score. Higher scores were indicative of an increase in intercourse satisfaction. | All randomized participants with baseline and at least 1 IIEF post-baseline measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Sexual Desire Domain | Self-reported sexual desire over the past 4 weeks. IIEF sexual desire was the sum of Q11 and Q12. Scores ranged from 1 (low/almost never) to 5 (very high/almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF sexual desire domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF sexual desire domain score. Higher scores were indicative of increased sexual desire. | Randomized participants with baseline and at least 1 IIEF post-baseline measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Orgasmic Function Domain | Self-reported orgasmic function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF orgasmic function was the sum of Q9 and Q10 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (no stimulation) to 5 (almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 0 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF orgasmic function domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF orgasmic function domain score. Higher scores were indicative of better orgasmic function. | Randomized participants with baseline and at least 1 IIEF post-baseline measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 3 | Participant-assessed diary that assessed the mean change from baseline in the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q3, "Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?". The SEP Q3 score was determined as the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of "yes" responses at endpoint minus percentage of "yes" responses at baseline. Change in the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q3 at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in SEP Q3. | Randomized participants with baseline and at least 1 SEP post-baseline measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of "yes" responses | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in PAIRS Spontaneity Domain | PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The spontaneity domain score was the average score for Items 3, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, and 28. Spontaneity domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS spontaneity domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS spontaneity domain score. Higher scores were indicative of greater spontaneity. | Randomized participants with baseline and at least 1 PAIRS post-baseline measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in PAIRS Time Concerns Domain | PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The time concerns domain score was the average score for Items 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 20, 24, and 25. Time concern domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS time concerns at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS time concerns domain score. Higher scores were indicative of more time concerns. | Randomized participants with baseline and at least 1 PAIRS post-baseline measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function Domain | Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF erectile function was the sum of Q1 through Q5 and Q15 of the IIEF. Q1 through Q5 were scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Q15 was scored 1 (no/low confidence) to 5 (high confidence). IIEF erectile function domain scores ranged from 1 to 30. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF erectile function domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF EF domain score. Higher scores were indicative of better erectile function. | Randomized participants with baseline and at least 1 IIEF post-baseline measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 363 |
| 30 |
| 363 |
| EG001 | Sildenafil (Treatment Periods) | 100 mg sildenafil taken orally, as needed, for 8 weeks either during Treatment Period 1 or Treatment Period 2. | 0 | 361 | 26 | 361 |
| EG002 | Tadalafil (Extension Phase) | Participants who preferred tadalafil over sildenafil received 20 mg tadalafil taken orally, as needed, for an additional 8 weeks. | 0 | 231 | 7 | 231 |
| EG003 | Sildenafil (Extension Phase) | Participants who preferred sildenafil over tadalafil received 100 mg sildenafil taken orally, as needed, for an additional 8 weeks. | 0 | 106 | 2 | 106 |
| Deafness | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye pain | Eye disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye swelling | Eye disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ocular hyperaemia | Eye disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastric haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Face oedema | General disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Feeling hot | General disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thirst | General disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Body temperature increased | Investigations | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Groin pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abnormal dreams | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasal obstruction | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Flushing | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Varicose vein | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D020018 | Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D026121 |
| Indole Alkaloids |
| D007211 | Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006575 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring |
| D013449 | Sulfonamides |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D013450 | Sulfones |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D010879 | Piperazines |
| D011687 | Purines |
| Had erections the next morning |
|
| The firmness of erections |
|
| Was able to get an erection every time |
|
| Had few side effects |
|
| Partner preferred this treatment |
|