International Randomized Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus CyberKnife for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
International Randomized Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus CyberKnife for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Primary Objective:
To compare the efficacy of TACE vs. CyberKnife SBRT in the treatment of locally recurrent HCC after initial TACE.
Secondary Objectives:
Inclusion Criteria:
Confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma by one of the following:
Hepatic lesion in patients for whom surgical resection is not possible or would not result in an opportunity for cure
Radiographic evidence of persistent, progressive or recurrent disease in an area previously treated with TACE. This evaluation should be determined after 6 weeks of initial TACE
Multi-specialty evaluation whereby the recurrent liver lesion was deemed by both the attending radiation oncologist and interventional radiologist amenable to treatment by the respective modality
Unifocal liver tumors not to exceed 7.5 cm in greatest axial dimension. Multifocal lesions will be restricted to lesions that can be treated within a single target volume within the same liver segment and to an aggregate of 7.5cm as long as the dose constraints to normal tissue can be met
Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2
Patients with liver disease classified as Child Pugh class A/B; if Child's class B, score must be 8 or less
Albumin >= 2.5 g/dL
Total bilirubin <= 3 mg/dL
INR <= 1.5
Creatinine <= 2.0 mg/dL
Age >= 18 years old
Life expectancy>= 6 months
Ability of the research subject or authorized legal representative to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Exclusion Criteria: