Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ronya and George Kozmetsky (RGK) Foundation | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to build upon preliminary research and conduct a pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial on a promising culturally-grounded and gender-specific treatment program, the XY-Zone. The central hypothesis underlying this study purports that through receiving the XY-Zone treatment, adolescents will decrease their risk for dropping out of school. This hypothesis is supported by two years of preliminary data investigating the effectiveness of the XY-Zone.
To test the central hypothesis, the following specific aims will be pursued:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communities in Schools Services | Experimental | Communities in Schools services include case management, mental health services, mentorship services, after school programs, and academic assistance. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XY-Zone | Behavioral | The XY-Zone works to empower students to decrease risk factors and increase protective factors through three linear treatment steps. The first step is driven by guiding principles known as the five R's: respect, responsibility, relationship, role modeling, and reaching out. Through these principles, the participant explores healthy psychosocial behaviors and thoughts in a structured 10 session group setting. The leadership step builds upon the guiding principles and employs activities exploring true leadership through 10 sessions. During the leadership step, participants organize and carry out a service learning projects in their community. The third and final step is ambassador. Those in the ambassador step become a mentor to those in step one and are "expected to explore the principles of leadership and the five R's, and determine their personal relevance to their lives as young men" (Allen, 2009, p. i). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Youth Self Report | The Youth Self Report (Achenbach, 1991) is a 112-item scale designed for ages 11-18 years. Items are rated on a three-point scale from 0=never to 2=always true in the past 6 months. Eleven subscales can be calculated from the data, including: withdrawn, somatic complaints, anxious/depressed, social problems, thought problems, attention problems, delinquent behavior, aggressive behavior, self-destructive, and internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Scoring of subscales is gender specific. Test-retest reliability has been shown to be good (r=.84-.91). | One Year |
| Substance Use Self Report | Self-report data on alcohol and other drug use will be collected through items adapted from the Adolescent DATOS survey, which was used with more than 3,000 adolescents (Kristiansen & Hubbard, 2001; Hser, Grella, et al., 2001). | One Year |
| School Records | School records offer attendance, truancy, grades, grade promotion, and behavioral referral information. | One Year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale- II (Youth Report) | This 57 item Likert-style scale is designed for youth ages 11-18. The BERS-II (Epstein et al., 2004) assesses six dimensions: interpersonal strength, family involvement, intrapersonal strength, school functioning, affective strength, and career and vocational strength. The BERS-II youth report has strong internal consistency (alpha=.81-.91) and good test-retest reliability (r=.84-.91). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Students eligible to receive the XY-Zone must display one of the following risk factors:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Katherine L Montgomery, PhD, MSSW | Washington University in Saint Louis | Principal Investigator |
| David W Springer, PhD | The University of Texas at Austin | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communities in Schools | Austin | Texas | 78704 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Allen, A. (2008). The XY-Zone project evaluation of Communities in Schools-Central Texas. Independent Outcome Evaluation. | ||
| Background | Achenbach, T.M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/ 4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry. | ||
| Background | Epstein, M.H., Mooney, P., Ryser, G., & Pierce, C.D. (2004). Validity and reliability of the behavioral and emotional rating scale (2nd edition): Youth rating scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 14, 358-367. | ||
| 11448377 | Background | Hser YI, Grella CE, Hubbard RL, Hsieh SC, Fletcher BW, Brown BS, Anglin MD. An evaluation of drug treatments for adolescents in 4 US cities. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;58(7):689-95. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.7.689. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012309 | Risk-Taking |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| One Year |
| Resilience Scale | The resilience scale (Wagnild & Young, 1993) is a 25 item designed to measure resiliency across various populations and is appropriate for youth. Items are rated on a seven-point scale (1= strongly disagree to 7= strongly agree) and have good internal consistency (alpha= .85-.94). | One Year |
| Background | Kristiansen, P.L. & Hubbard, R.L. (2001). Methodological overview and research design for adolescents in the drug abuse treatment outcome studies. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 545-562. |
| 7850498 | Background | Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Meas. 1993 Winter;1(2):165-78. |
| Background | Singer, J. D. and Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Methods for studying change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press. |
| Background | Creswell J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. |
| Background | Miles M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Making good sense: Drawing and verifying conclusions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. |