Ketamine Hydrochloride and Best Pain Management in Treati... | NCT01316744 | Trialant
NCT01316744
Sponsor
University of Glasgow
Status
Unknown status
Last Update Posted
May 13, 2011Estimated
Enrollment
214Estimated
Phase
Phase 3
Conditions
Cancer
Interventions
ketamine hydrochloride
pharmacogenomic studies
questionnaire administration
assessment of therapy complications
quality-of-life assessment
Countries
United Kingdom
Protocol Section
Identification Module
NCT ID
NCT01316744
Obsolete or Duplicate NCT IDs
Not provided
Organization Study
CDR0000696704
Secondary IDs
ID
Type
Description
Link
CRUK-KPS-2008-01
EU-21012
EUDRACT-2007-002080-27
ISRCTN-49116945
Brief Title
Ketamine Hydrochloride and Best Pain Management in Treating Cancer Patients With Neuropathic Pain
Official Title
A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial of Ketamine Versus Placebo in Conjunction With Best Pain Management in Neuropathic Pain in Cancer Patients
Acronym
Not provided
Organization
National Cancer Institute (NCI)NIH
Status Module
Record Verification Date
Mar 2011
Overall Recruitment Status or Expanded Access Status
Unknown status
Last Known Status
Recruiting
Delayed Posting
Not provided
Why Stopped
Not provided
Expanded Access Info
No
Start Date
Apr 2009
Primary Completion Date
Oct 2011Estimated
Completion Date
Not provided
First Submitted Date
Mar 15, 2011
First Submission Date that Met QC Criteria
Mar 15, 2011
First Posted Date
Mar 16, 2011Estimated
Results Waived
Not provided
Results First Submitted Date
Not provided
Results First Submitted that Met QC Criteria
Not provided
Results First Posted Date
Not provided
Certification/Extension (aka Delayed Results) First Submitted Date
Not provided
Certification/Extension First Submitted that Passed QC Review
Not provided
Certification/Extension First Posted Date
Not provided
Last Update Submitted Date
May 12, 2011
Last Update Posted Date
May 13, 2011Estimated
Sponsor/Collaborators Module
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Not provided
Lead Sponsor
University of GlasgowOTHER
Collaborators
Not provided
Oversight Module
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Description Module
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Ketamine hydrochloride may lessen neuropathic pain in patients with cancer. It is not yet known whether ketamine hydrochloride given together with the best pain management is more effective than a placebo given together with the best pain management in treating neuropathic pain in patients with cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying ketamine hydrochloride given together with the best pain management to see how well it works compared with giving a placebo together with the best pain management in treating cancer patients with neuropathic pain.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
To determine whether ketamine hydrochloride given in addition to best standard pain management improves malignant neuropathic pain compared to best standard pain management alone in patients with cancer.
Secondary
To compare initial treatment benefit (at day 4 of assessment period of 16 days) using the sensory component of the McGill Short-Form Questionnaire.
To compare difference in overall pain between the study arms based on the pain-intensity visual-analogue score (VAS).
To compare difference in neuropathic pain between the study arms based on the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain scale.
To assess worst pain score (index neuropathic site) between the two arms.
To compare patient distress between the two arms based on NCCN Distress Thermometer.
To assess the side effects and tolerability of trial drug.
To assess the effect of intervention on quality of life scores (based on Euroqol thermometer), anxiety and depression (based on HADS), and opioid requirements.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
Stage 1 (Run-in Period): Opioid doses are optimized, under a defined schedule, for up to a maximum of 10 days to ensure that all patients are on an optimized and stable regimen* prior to randomization. Following the run-in-period, patients undergo reassessment. Patients who have improved pain scores (i.e., < 4/10 on the visual-analogue score in the past 24 hours or < 5 McGill Sensory Scale Score) are taken off the study. Patients whose scores have not improved continue on to Stage 2 of the study.
NOTE: *Stable regimen is defined as the same dose of controlled release and no more variation than 2 breakthrough opioid doses over the normal for that patient for a period of 48 hours.
Stage 2 (Titration Period): Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Arm I: Patients receive oral ketamine hydrochloride 4 times a day. Doses are titrated until when analgesia is achieved or individual side effects appear, for up to 14 days.
Arm II: Patients receive an oral placebo 4 times a day. Doses are titrated until when analgesia is achieved or individual side effects appear, for up to 14 days.
Stage 3 (Assessment Period): Patients receive the trial medication (i.e., ketamine hydrochloride or placebo) at the fixed optimum dose (reached during the titration period) for 16 days.
Patients are allowed to receive breakthrough opioids at any time during the study.
Patients complete quality-of-life and pain-assessment questionnaires periodically. Some patients may undergo blood sample collection periodically for pharmacogenomics studies at a later date.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK.
Conditions Module
Conditions
Cancer
Keywords
long-term effects secondary to cancer therapy in adults
anxiety disorder
depression
pain
unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific
neuropathy
accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia
acute undifferentiated leukemia
adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission
adult acute myeloid leukemia in remission
adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities
adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22)
adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12)
adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22)
adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22)
Initial treatment benefit (at day 4 of assessment period of 16 days) using the sensory component of the McGill Short-Form Questionnaire
Difference in overall pain between the study arms based on the visual-analogue score
Other Outcomes
Not provided
Eligibility Module
Eligibility Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Histologically confirmed cancer
Index neuropathic pain ≥ 4 on 0-10 (as defined by Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs) that is related to underlying malignancy or resulting from treatment received for this malignancy
McGill Sensory Scale Score > 5
Received a trial of an adjuvant analgesic (gabapentin or amitriptyline or both)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Life expectancy ≥ 2 months
Fertile patients must use effective contraception
Able to comply with study procedures
Diastolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mm Hg at screening
No seizures in past 2 years
Not actively hallucinating
No cerebrovascular disease (strokes)
No psychotic disorders or cognitive impairment
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
See Disease Characteristics
At least 6 weeks since prior and no concurrent chemotherapy or radiotherapy that is likely to affect neuropathic pain
No change in tumoricidal treatment during the period of the study that is likely to alter pain during the course of the study
No concurrent class I antiarrhythmic drugs
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sex
All
Sex/Gender Based
Not provided
Sex/Gender Description
Not provided
Minimum Age
18 Years
Maximum Age
Not provided
Standard Ages
AdultOlder Adult
Study Population
Not provided
Sampling Method
Not provided
Contacts/Locations Module
Central Contacts
Not provided
Overall Officials
Name
Affiliation
Role
Marie T. Fallon
Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital
Principal Investigator
Barry J.A. Laird, MD
Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital
Difference in neuropathic pain between the study arms based on the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain scale
Worst pain score (index neuropathic site) in the previous 24 hours (between the two arms) at study baseline and then during study assessment period
Patient distress between the two arms based on NCCN Distress Thermometer
Side effects and tolerability of trial drug
Effect of the intervention on quality-of-life scores (based on Euroqol thermometer), anxiety and depression (based on HAD scale), and opioid requirements