ADMINISTRATION OF NIFIDEPINE VERSUS ATOSIBAN IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH A THREAT OF PREMATURE LABOR
ADMINISTRATION OF NIFIDEPINE VERSUS ATOSIBAN IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH A THREAT OF PREMATURE LABOR
This is a study for pregnant women who have been diagnosed with Threatened Preterm Labor. The principal aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Nifedipine treatment versus Atosiban treatment over these patients' newborn babies.
Preterm labor is defined as the presence of uterine contractions of sufficient frequency and intensity to effect progressive effacement and dilation of the cervix prior to term gestation (between 20 and 37 weeks).
It is a major health problem of increased incidence, affecting approximately between 7-10% of pregnant women in developed countries with a high socioeconomic costs and high rates of fetal mortality, although perinatal progress.
This study may allow to establish the existence of differences in perinatal outcomes and to define the first choice drug for tocolysis.
Inclusion Criteria:
The study population and the inclusion criteria is established by patients between the 24th and 33+6th weeks of pregnancy, fixed by an ecography during the first three-month period, and with a threat of preterm labor (TLP), by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG's) criteria:
Four contractions or more with a duration of at least 30 seconds during 30 minutes
Documented cervix changes:
Patient who had signed the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria of the pregnant mother and intrauterine fetal: