Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
ECLIPSE will evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation therapy used to treat tumors less than or equal to 3.5 centimeters (cm) in participants with pulmonary metastatic disease.
ECLIPSE is a treatment, Phase 1 multicenter, prospective, single-arm study with participants serving as their own control. This study is to enroll participants who will undergo cryoablation of at least 1 metastatic pulmonary tumor that is less than or equal to 3.5 cm. Participants will be followed for 5 years post their cryoablation procedure.
Cryoablation is the process of destroying tissue by the application of extremely cold temperatures. Galil Medical Cryoablation Systems are used as a surgical tool in the fields of general surgery, dermatology (skin), neurology (nerves), chest surgery (including lung), Ears-Nose-Throat (ENT), gynecology, oncology (cancer), proctology (colon/rectal), and urology (kidney).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Other | Participants will undergo a cryoablation procedure with the Galil Medical Cryoablation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Participant preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management for the study cryoablation procedure will be identical to those for standard cryoablation treatment routinely performed at the clinical centers that participated in this study and will be at the discretion of the Investigators. No more than 3 tumors in 1 lung can be treated in a single session, and no more than 5 total lung tumors (across both lungs) can be treated during the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoablation | Device | Application of extremely cold temperatures to the identified tumor(s). |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60 | Local tumor control was achieved if either the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or <25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used. | Baseline and Month 60 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local tumor control was achieved if the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of the greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or <25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hiran Fernando, MD | Boston Medical Center | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center | Los Angeles | California | 90095 | United States | ||
| Karmanos Cancer Institute |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18442957 | Background | Gillams A. Lung tumour ablation - where are we now? Cancer Imaging. 2008 Apr 22;8(1):116-7. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0015. | |
| 16714662 | Background | Ahmed A, Littrup P. Percutaneous cryotherapy of the thorax: safety considerations for complex cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jun;186(6):1703-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1068. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Cryoablation | Participants underwent a cryoablation procedure with the Galil Medical Cryoablation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Participant preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management for the study cryoablation procedure were identical to those for standard cryoablation treatment routinely performed at the clinical centers that participated in this study and were at the discretion of the Investigators. No more than 3 tumors in 1 lung were treated in a single session, and no more than 5 total lung tumors (across both lungs) were treated during the study. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Cryoablation | Participants underwent a cryoablation procedure with the Galil Medical Cryoablation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Participant preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management for the study cryoablation procedure were identical to those for standard cryoablation treatment routinely performed at the clinical centers that participated in this study and were at the discretion of the Investigators. No more than 3 tumors in 1 lung were treated in a single session, and no more than 5 total lung tumors (across both lungs) were treated during the study. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 60 | Local tumor control was achieved if either the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or <25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used. | Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of tumors | Baseline and Month 60 | Tumors | Tumors |
Baseline up to Month 60
Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Cryoablation | Participants underwent a cryoablation procedure with the Galil Medical Cryoablation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Participant preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management for the study cryoablation procedure were identical to those for standard cryoablation treatment routinely performed at the clinical centers that participated in this study and were at the discretion of the Investigators. No more than 3 tumors in 1 lung were treated in a single session, and no more than 5 total lung tumors (across both lungs) were treated during the study. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sr. Clinical Trial Specialist | Galil Medical, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Boston Scientific | 651-287-5000 | GalilClinical@bsci.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 9, 2011 | Sep 6, 2019 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 27, 2012 | Sep 6, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003452 | Cryosurgery |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055011 | Ablation Techniques |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
All participants received the same treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 |
| Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Disease-specific survival was analyzed as time in days from study cryoablation to participant death due to lung cancer. All deaths with documented lung disease progression were categorized as disease-specific deaths for this analysis. Participants who were alive were censored at the date of their last visit. Participants who died from causes other than lung cancer and did not have documented disease progression were censored at the time of death. | Up to Month 60 |
| Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Disease recurrence or progression will be determined locally by evidence of an increase in tumor size and/or contrast enhancement that met the definition of local tumor failure. Local tumor failure defined as a >20% increase from baseline in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Participants without disease recurrence or progression were censored at the date of their last visit or their date of death due to any cause. The percentage of participants with disease recurrence or progression after the study cryoablation procedure at the specified number of days is presented. | Baseline (0 days), Week 1 (7 days), and Months 3 (90 days), 6 (180 days), 12 (365 days), 24 (730 days), 36 (1095 days), 48 (1460 days), and 60 (1825 days) |
| Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | ECOG Performance Status defined as a set of criteria with corresponding scores used by the Investigator to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG Performance Status Scoring: 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (for example, light house work, office work); 2=Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead. | Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 |
| Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The KPS Scale is a standard way of measuring the ability of cancer patients to perform ordinary tasks. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score means the participant is better able to carry out daily activities. KPS may be used to determine a participant's prognosis, to measure changes in a participant's ability to function. | Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 |
| Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The SF-12 is a shortened version of the well-known SF-36. The SF-12 assesses eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality and general health perception). Assessments were made by examining the change in the baseline scores to those reported post-operatively. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher value indicates a better quality of life of the participant. | Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 |
| Cryoablation Technical Success of the Study Cryoablation Procedure | A technically successful treatment was defined by an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin. Technical success was calculated on a per tumor level as well as a participant level. To be considered a technical success on a participant level, all tumors treated during the baseline procedure were required to meet the technical success criteria (that is, an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin). | Up to 60 months |
| Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. UADE was any serious adverse effect, any life-threatening problem or death caused by or associated with a device, if it was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the application; or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device. The AEs that are presented were considered related to the cryoablation procedure. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section. | Baseline up to 30 days post-cryoablation |
| Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging | Evidence of additional metastatic disease post cryoablation procedure as measured by imaging is presented. | Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 |
| Detroit |
| Michigan |
| 48201 |
| United States |
| Mayo Clinic Rochester | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Institut Gustave Roussy | Villejuif | Cedex | 94805 | France |
| 15947313 | Background | Asimakopoulos G, Beeson J, Evans J, Maiwand MO. Cryosurgery for malignant endobronchial tumors: analysis of outcome. Chest. 2005 Jun;127(6):2007-14. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.6.2007. |
| 16678583 | Background | Kawamura M, Izumi Y, Tsukada N, Asakura K, Sugiura H, Yashiro H, Nakano K, Nakatsuka S, Kuribayashi S, Kobayashi K. Percutaneous cryoablation of small pulmonary malignant tumors under computed tomographic guidance with local anesthesia for nonsurgical candidates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):1007-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.12.051. |
| 15798173 | Background | Wang H, Littrup PJ, Duan Y, Zhang Y, Feng H, Nie Z. Thoracic masses treated with percutaneous cryotherapy: initial experience with more than 200 procedures. Radiology. 2005 Apr;235(1):289-98. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2351030747. |
| 16809741 | Background | Blazeby JM, Avery K, Sprangers M, Pikhart H, Fayers P, Donovan J. Health-related quality of life measurement in randomized clinical trials in surgical oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3178-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2951. |
| 8628042 | Background | Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. |
| Starting Hospice |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | ECOG Performance Status Scoring: 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (for example, light house work, office work); 2=Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| Physical Function as Assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale | The KPS Scale is a standard way of measuring the ability of cancer patients to perform ordinary tasks. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score means the participant is better able to carry out daily activities. KPS may be used to determine a participant's prognosis, to measure changes in a participant's ability to function. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure | The SF-12 is a shortened version of the well-known SF-36. The SF-12 assesses eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality and general health perception). Assessments were made by examining the change in the baseline scores to those reported post-operatively. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher value indicates a better quality of life of the participant. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Cryoablation | Participants underwent a cryoablation procedure with the Galil Medical Cryoablation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Participant preparation, anesthesia, intra-operative monitoring, and postoperative management for the study cryoablation procedure were identical to those for standard cryoablation treatment routinely performed at the clinical centers that participated in this study and were at the discretion of the Investigators. No more than 3 tumors in 1 lung were treated in a single session, and no more than 5 total lung tumors (across both lungs) were treated during the study. |
|
|
| Secondary | Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Local tumor control was achieved if the greatest trans-axial diameter of a treated tumor was ≤20% greater than at the pre-procedure assessment (per-tumor assessment) or if the sum of the greatest trans-axial diameters of all treated tumors for a participant was ≤20% greater than the sum for the pre-procedure assessment of those tumors (per-participant assessment). Complete Response defined as tumor disappearance (scar) or <25% of original size. If tumor/ablation zone had likely disappeared, the measurement was recorded as 0 mm; if tumor/ablation zone was present but too small to measure, the measurement was recorded as 5 mm. Partial Response defined as greater than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Stable Disease defined as less than 30% decrease in sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Local Failure defined as greater than 20% increase in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Worst response per participant was used. | Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of tumors | Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 | Tumors | Tumors |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Disease-Specific Participant Survival Post-Cryoablation | Disease-specific survival was analyzed as time in days from study cryoablation to participant death due to lung cancer. All deaths with documented lung disease progression were categorized as disease-specific deaths for this analysis. Participants who were alive were censored at the date of their last visit. Participants who died from causes other than lung cancer and did not have documented disease progression were censored at the time of death. | Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Up to Month 60 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time in Days to Disease Recurrence or Progression Following Study Cryoablation | Disease recurrence or progression will be determined locally by evidence of an increase in tumor size and/or contrast enhancement that met the definition of local tumor failure. Local tumor failure defined as a >20% increase from baseline in the sum of the largest diameter of all targeted tumors. Participants without disease recurrence or progression were censored at the date of their last visit or their date of death due to any cause. The percentage of participants with disease recurrence or progression after the study cryoablation procedure at the specified number of days is presented. | Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline (0 days), Week 1 (7 days), and Months 3 (90 days), 6 (180 days), 12 (365 days), 24 (730 days), 36 (1095 days), 48 (1460 days), and 60 (1825 days) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | ECOG Performance Status defined as a set of criteria with corresponding scores used by the Investigator to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG Performance Status Scoring: 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (for example, light house work, office work); 2=Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead. | Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the KPS Scale at Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The KPS Scale is a standard way of measuring the ability of cancer patients to perform ordinary tasks. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score means the participant is better able to carry out daily activities. KPS may be used to determine a participant's prognosis, to measure changes in a participant's ability to function. | Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 1 and Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the SF-12 Generic Measure at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 | The SF-12 is a shortened version of the well-known SF-36. The SF-12 assesses eight domains (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality and general health perception). Assessments were made by examining the change in the baseline scores to those reported post-operatively. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher value indicates a better quality of life of the participant. | Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cryoablation Technical Success of the Study Cryoablation Procedure | A technically successful treatment was defined by an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin. Technical success was calculated on a per tumor level as well as a participant level. To be considered a technical success on a participant level, all tumors treated during the baseline procedure were required to meet the technical success criteria (that is, an ablation volume encompassing the tumor with at least a 5 mm margin). | Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population). | Posted | Number | percentage of tumors | Up to 60 months | Tumors | Tumors |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event (AE), a Serious AE, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. UADE was any serious adverse effect, any life-threatening problem or death caused by or associated with a device, if it was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the application; or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device. The AEs that are presented were considered related to the cryoablation procedure. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section. | Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline up to 30 days post-cryoablation |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Metastatic Disease Spread as Measured by Imaging | Evidence of additional metastatic disease post cryoablation procedure as measured by imaging is presented. | Participants for whom cryoablation via Galil Medical Cryoablation System was attempted or performed (ITT Population) with available data at the respective time point. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 |
|
|
|
| 20 |
| 40 |
| 6 |
| 40 |
| 32 |
| 40 |
| Vascular access complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bilateral subdural hematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fever | General disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Flu like symptoms | General disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain at procedure site | General disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lung infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Burn | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Intraoperative hemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Postoperative hemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest wall pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in left arm | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vaginal inflammation | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment | This is a sex-specific adverse event that only affects female participants. |
|
| Alveolar hemorrhage | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Atelectasis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hemoptysis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pleural hemorrhage | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Shortness of breath | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 4.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
BTG can require Investigator to postpone publications/presentations for up to 12 months so data from all sites can be published. BTG will limit review of Investigator's draft to confirm Confidential Information is not being disclosed. If BTG notes publishing Study results may affect obtaining a patent, Investigator will not publish for up to 60 days until patent application is filed. Investigator will acknowledge BTG in any publication/presentation.
| D012140 |
| Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| Local Control, Month 6 |
|
|
| Local Control, Month 12 |
|
|
| Local Control, Month 24 |
|
|
| Local Control, Month 48 |
|
|
| Local Control, Month 36 |
|
|
| Complete Response, Month 3 |
|
|
| Complete Response, Month 6 |
|
|
| Complete Response, Month 12 |
|
|
| Complete Response, Month 24 |
|
|
| Complete Response, Month 36 |
|
|
| Complete Response, Month 48 |
|
|
| Partial Response, Month 3 |
|
|
| Partial Response, Month 6 |
|
|
| Partial Response, Month 12 |
|
|
| Partial Response, Month 24 |
|
|
| Partial Response, Month 36 |
|
|
| Partial Response, Month 48 |
|
|
| Stable Disease, Month 3 |
|
|
| Stable Disease, Month 6 |
|
|
| Stable Disease, Month 12 |
|
|
| Stable Disease, Month 24 |
|
|
| Stable Disease, Month 36 |
|
|
| Stable Disease, Month 48 |
|
|
| Local Failure, Month 3 |
|
|
| Local Failure, Month 6 |
|
|
| Local Failure, Month 12 |
|
|
| Local Failure, Month 24 |
|
|
| Local Failure, Month 36 |
|
|
| Local Failure, Month 48 |
|
|
|
| Month 3 |
|
|
| Month 6 |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
| Month 24 |
|
|
| Month 36 |
|
|
| Month 48 |
|
|
| Month 60 |
|
|
|
| Month 1 (30 days) |
|
|
| Month 3 (90 days) |
|
|
| Month 6 (180 days) |
|
|
| Month 12 (365 days) |
|
|
| Month 24 (730 days) |
|
|
| Month 36 (1095 days) |
|
|
| Month 48 (1460 days) |
|
|
| Month 60 (1825 days) |
|
|
|
| Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| Change at Month 6 |
|
|
| Change at Month 12 |
|
|
| Change at Month 24 |
|
|
| Change at Month 36 |
|
|
| Change at Month 48 |
|
|
| Change at Month 60 |
|
|
|
| Change at Month 1 |
|
|
| Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| Change at Month 6 |
|
|
| Change at Month 12 |
|
|
| Change at Month 24 |
|
|
| Change at Month 36 |
|
|
| Change at Month 48 |
|
|
| Change at Month 60 |
|
|
|
| Physical Functioning, Change at Month 6 |
|
|
| Physical Functioning, Change at Month 12 |
|
|
| Physical Functioning, Change at Month 24 |
|
|
| Physical Functioning, Change at Month 36 |
|
|
| Physical Functioning, Change at Month 48 |
|
|
| Physical Functioning, Change at Month 60 |
|
|
| Role Physical, Change at Month 1 |
|
|
| Role Physical, Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| Role Physical, Change at Month 6 |
|
|
| Role Physical, Change at Month 12 |
|
|
| Role Physical, Change at Month 24 |
|
|
| Role Physical, Change at Month 36 |
|
|
| Role Physical, Change at Month 48 |
|
|
| Role Physical, Change at Month 60 |
|
|
| Bodily Pain, Change at Month 1 |
|
|
| Bodily Pain, Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| Bodily Pain, Change at Month 6 |
|
|
| Bodily Pain, Change at Month 12 |
|
|
| Bodily Pain, Change at Month 24 |
|
|
| Bodily Pain, Change at Month 36 |
|
|
| Bodily Pain, Change at Month 48 |
|
|
| Bodily Pain, Change at Month 60 |
|
|
| Social Functioning, Change at Month 1 |
|
|
| Social Functioning, Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| Social Functioning, Change at Month 6 |
|
|
| Social Functioning, Change at Month 12 |
|
|
| Social Functioning, Change at Month 24 |
|
|
| Social Functioning, Change at Month 36 |
|
|
| Social Functioning, Change at Month 48 |
|
|
| Social Functioning, Change at Month 60 |
|
|
| Mental Health, Change at Month 1 |
|
|
| Mental Health, Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| Mental Health, Change at Month 6 |
|
|
| Mental Health, Change at Month 12 |
|
|
| Mental Health, Change at Month 24 |
|
|
| Mental Health, Change at Month 36 |
|
|
| Mental Health, Change at Month 48 |
|
|
| Mental Health, Change at Month 60 |
|
|
| Role Emotional, Change at Month 1 |
|
|
| Role Emotional, Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| Role Emotional, Change at Month 6 |
|
|
| Role Emotional, Change at Month 12 |
|
|
| Role Emotional, Change at Month 24 |
|
|
| Role Emotional, Change at Month 36 |
|
|
| Role Emotional, Change at Month 48 |
|
|
| Role Emotional, Change at Month 60 |
|
|
| Vitality, Change at Month 1 |
|
|
| Vitality, Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| Vitality, Change at Month 6 |
|
|
| Vitality, Change at Month 12 |
|
|
| Vitality, Change at Month 24 |
|
|
| Vitality, Change at Month 36 |
|
|
| Vitality, Change at Month 48 |
|
|
| Vitality, Change at Month 60 |
|
|
| General Health Perception, Change at Month 1 |
|
|
| General Health Perception, Change at Month 3 |
|
|
| General Health Perception, Change at Month 6 |
|
|
| General Health Perception, Change at Month 12 |
|
|
| General Health Perception, Change at Month 24 |
|
|
| General Health Perception, Change at Month 36 |
|
|
| General Health Perception, Change at Month 48 |
|
|
| General Health Perception, Change at Month 60 |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Serious AE |
|
| UADE |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
| Month 24 |
|
|
| Month 36 |
|
|
| Month 48 |
|
|
| Month 60 |
|
|