Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study FDC114615 is a two year, multi-centre, randomised, open-label trial to assess the efficacy of Dutasteride plus tamsulosin when compared to the standard practice of watchful waiting, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin in treatment naive men with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).
Once consented, each subject will undergo screening procedures to ensure the prostate volume and post void residual are within eligible range. If all entry criteria are met, subjects will be randomised (1:1) to receive Dutasteride plus tamsulosin with lifestyle advice or watchful waiting, with lifestyle advice, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin. Escalation will be initiated when no improvement from baseline is scored using the International Prostate Symptom Score (version 2) (IPSS) questionnaire.
After randomisation, the subjects return to site at one month, then every 13 weeks until two years of treatment is complete or they are withdrawn. Key assessments, such as Adverse Events (AE's) and concomitant medication monitoring and completion of the quality of life questionnaires are performed at each visit and the data recorded.
This will be a European, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group study. The aim of the study is to investigate whether Dutasteride plus Tamulson treatment with lifestyle advice is more effective than watchful waiting treatment plus lifestyle advice plus step-up therapy with tamsulosin for improvement of symptoms and Acte Urinary Retention (AUR) and BPH-related prostatic surgery, in older men (≥50 yrs), with moderate symptoms of BPH (IPSS 8-19), enlarged prostates (≥30cc) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ≥1.5ng/mL.
Data from all participating centres will be pooled prior to analysis. Investigative centres will be pooled a priori into clusters based on geographic location; these clusters may be used in analyses to adjust for site effects. Clusters will be defined once all investigative centres have been identified and randomisation has been completed.
Subjects will be screened for inclusion into the study and eligible subjects will be randomised by investigative centre. Subjects will be allocated to one of two treatment groups, according to a pre-determined randomisation schedule (in a 1:1 ratio):
Approximately 760, treatment naive men with symptomatic BPH will be randomised into the study in order to achieve at least 592 evaluable subjects. 380 into the Dutasteride plus tamsulosin with lifestyle advice arm and 380 into the watchful waiting plus lifestyle advice arm.
Treatment naïve is defined as a man that has recently been diagnoses with BPH whom has received no prescribed therapeutic treatment. For example, medicines such as 5 α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) or invasive procedures such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) prescribed to directly treat the BPH symptoms are considered therapeutic treatments. As per the entry criteria, phytotherapy is allowed unless it was performed less than two weeks prior to the screening visit.
The anticipated recruitment period will be approximately 6 months. The study will be conducted in approximately 8 countries within Europe.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dutasteride plus tamsulosin | Active Comparator | Dutasteride plus tamsulosin arm + lifestyle advice |
|
| Watchful waiting with escalation to tamsulosin | Experimental | Watchful waiting with escalation to tamsulosin |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dutasteride plus tamsulosin | Drug | Take 1 capsule daily |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach | The IPSS questionnaire is a 7-item self-administered questionnaire designed to quantify the following urinary symptoms: Question 1 (Q1), incomplete emptying; Q2, frequency; Q3, intermittency; Q4, urgency; Q5, weak stream; Q6, straining; Q7, nocturia. It has an additional, independent eighth question to assess change in BPH-related health status (BHS) and quality of life. BHS scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "delighted" and 6 indicates "terrible." The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). Change from Baseline in IPSS total score was calculated as the Month 24 value minus the Baseline value. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Indicated Improvement Categories in the IPSS at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach | Symptom improvement was assessed using IPSS categorical changes from Baseline. Change from Baseline categories were summarized by treatment group using five improvement levels: >=1 point through >=5 points. IPSS percent change from Baseline was summarized using seven improvement levels: >0 percent, >=10 percent, >=20 percent, >=25 percent, >=30 percent, >=40 percent, and >=50 percent. Change in IPSS from Baseline was analysed using the LOCF method and is summarized for the following categories: >=2 points, >=3 points, and percent change >=25. The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). |
Not provided
Note: If total serum PSA is >4 ng/mL and unless PSA value has been stable for at least the past 2 years, the investigator should make every appropriate effort to exclude the possibility of prostate cancer, e.g. further Digital rectal examination (DRE), review TRUS taken within previous month, consider 8-12 core prostate biopsy in accordance with routine clinical practice
Exclusion Criteria:
Excluded medication and therapies Current or any prior use of the following prohibited medications
Current use of:
Have a known (immediate or delayed) hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to the study medication or excipients that, in the opinion of the Investigator or GlaxoSmithKline contraindicates their participation.
Recent Medical Procedures
Medical history
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Aigrefeuille-sur-Maine | 44140 | France | |||
| GSK Investigational Site |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site. | View source |
Not provided
IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (click on the link provided below)
Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
Treatment-naïve men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled and were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive dutasteride plus tamsulosin once daily plus lifestyle advice or watchful waiting plus lifestyle advice.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin | Participants received a combination of dutasteride 0.5 milligrams (mg) plus tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus lifestyle advice for 24 months. |
| FG001 | Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| tamsulosin |
| Drug |
Take 1 capsule daily when escalation criteria met |
|
| Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the BPH Impact Index (BII) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach | The BII is a 4-item questionnaire covering physical discomfort, worry, bother, and impact on usual activities, with a minimum score of 0 (best) and a maximum score (worst) of 13 points. Individual missing questionnaire responses were imputed, as applicable. Change from Baseline in the BII score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| Change From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach | Each participant was asked the following question "If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?". This response was rated from 0 ("delighted") to 6 ("terrible"). Change from Baseline in the BHS score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| Number of Events of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH | The number of participants with the first occurrence of clinical progression (CP) of BPH occurring on or after the randomization date are summarized by treatment and year. Time is based on the date of the first-occurring CP event, and is relative to the randomization date. CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom deterioration by IPSS >=3 points from Baseline (Visit 2); acute urinary retention related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single >=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value >=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). For components that required multiple episodes, the first of the multiple episodes was utilized in terms of timing. | Up to 2 years |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated First-occurring Component of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH | CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom progression (symptom deterioration by IPSS >=3 points from Baseline [Visit 2]); acute urinary retention (AUR) related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single >=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value >=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). The number of participants with CP of BPH, the number of participants with the indicated first-occurring component of CP of BPH, the number of participants with two simultaneously first-occurring components ("Tied for first component"), and the number of participants with multiple first-occurring components were summarized by treatment group. | Up to Month 24 |
| Number of Participants Who Had Any BPH-related Surgery, Who Had the Indicated Type of Surgery, Who Had 2 BPH-related Surgeries, and Who Had >=3 BPH-related Surgeries | BPH-related surgery was summarized for events occurring on or after the date of randomization. The number of participants who had any BPH-related surgery, the indicated type of surgery, and multiple surgeries was summarized by treatment. Type of surgery data (cystoscopy, transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP], and prostatectomy) are presented in terms of the first-occurring BPH-related surgery after randomization. It was possible for a single participant to have multiple surgeries. | Up to Month 24 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach | The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 1 was: "Overall, how satisfied are you with the treatment and its effect on your urinary problems?" There were seven possible responses, including: "very satisfied," "satisfied," "somewhat satisfied," neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied." Response categories were created by grouping together "very satisfied," "satisfied," and "somewhat satisfied" responses into the category of "Any Satisfaction (AS)," and separately grouping "neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied" responses into the category of "Neutral or Any Dissatisfaction (N/AD)." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach | The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 2 was: "Would you ask your doctor for the treatment you received in this study?" There were three possible responses, including: "Yes," "No," and "Not sure." Response categories included "Yes" and "No or Not Sure," created by grouping together "No" and "Not sure." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| Exposure to Study Drug | Study drug exposure (days) = treatment stop date - treatment start date + 1. Participants in the Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes subgroup could have been escalated to study drug at any time during the study. Therefore, it is possible that participants were exposed to tamsulosin for a shorter length of time than participants in the dutasteride plus tamsulosin group. | Up to 2 years |
| Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Starting Post-randomization | A post-randomization adverse event is defined as an event with an onset on or after the randomization date or with a missing onset date. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment was exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate in other situations. Refer to the general non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of non-serious AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold of >=5%) and SAEs. | Up to 2 years |
| Angers |
| 49000 |
| France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Angers | 49933 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Corsept | 44560 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | La Montagne | 44620 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | La Rochelle | 17000 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Laval | 53000 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Le Temple-de-Bretagne | 44360 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Mûrs-Erigné | 49610 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nantes | 44300 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nieul-sur-Mer | 17137 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sautron | 44880 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Thouars | 79100 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tiercé | 49125 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Vihiers | 49310 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Aichach | Bavaria | 86551 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nuremberg | Bavaria | 90441 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hagenow | Brandenburg | 19230 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Oranienburg | Brandenburg | 16515 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Strausberg | Brandenburg | 15344 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Marburg | Hesse | 35039 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Buchholz | Lower Saxony | 21244 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Essen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 45130 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Leipzig | Saxony | 04109 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hettstedt | Saxony-Anhalt | 06333 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kiel | Schleswig-Holstein | 24143 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Berlin | 10249 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Eisleben Lutherstadt | 06295 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Argos | 21200 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Athens | 10552 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Athens | 115 22 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Athens | 11527 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Athens | 151 26 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Larissa | 41110 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pátrai | 265 04 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rhodes | 85100 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Thessaloniki | 546 42 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Thessaloniki | 564 29 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Vasto (CH) | Abruzzo | 66054 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Foggia | Apulia | 71100 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Avellino | Campania | 83100 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Naples | Campania | 80131 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rome | Lazio | 00161 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Milan | Lombardy | 20132 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Fermo Della Battaglia (CO) | Lombardy | 22020 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Turin | Piedmont | 10126 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Cagliari | Sardinia | 09134 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pisa | Tuscany | 56124 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Doetinchem | 7009 BL | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Maarssen | 3607 KN | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sneek | 8601 ZK | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | The Hague | 2582 LJ | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Voerendaal | 6367 ED | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wildervank | 9648 BE | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Winterswijk | 7101 BN | Netherlands |
| GSK Investigational Site | Arad | 310175 | Romania |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bucharest | Romania |
| GSK Investigational Site | Alava | 01004 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Barcelona | 8907 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Coslada | 28822 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Córdoba | 14004 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Fuenlabrada (Madrid) | 28942 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Galdakano | 48960 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Getafe | 28905 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Marbella | 29600 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Málaga | 29010 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Mendaro, Guipuzcoa | 20850 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Murcia | 30008 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pamplona | 31008 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Sebastián | 20014 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Valencia | 46010 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Valladolid | 47012 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Chalfont St Giles | Buckinghamshire | HP8 4QG | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sandbach | Cheshire | CW11 1EQ | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bath | BA1 3NG | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bristol | BS2 8HW | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Broadway, Fleetwood | FY7 8GU | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Chadderton, Oldham | OL9 0LH | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | Glasgow | G51 4TF | United Kingdom |
| GSK Investigational Site | High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne | NE7 7DN | United Kingdom |
All participants were given lifestyle advice. If any International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was the same or greater than the Baseline value at any study visit (post-randomization), participants received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes). Tamsulosin was continued until the end of the study unless the participant elected to withdraw from the study. If participants did not receive tamsulosin, they were not classified as escalated (Watchful Waiting Escalated=No).
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin | Participants received a combination of dutasteride 0.5 milligrams (mg) plus tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus lifestyle advice for 24 months. |
| BG001 | Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No | All participants were given lifestyle advice. If any International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was the same or greater than the Baseline value at any study visit (post-randomization), participants received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes). Tamsulosin was continued until the end of the study unless the participant elected to withdraw from the study. If participants did not receive tamsulosin, they were not classified as escalated (Watchful Waiting Escalated=No). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach | The IPSS questionnaire is a 7-item self-administered questionnaire designed to quantify the following urinary symptoms: Question 1 (Q1), incomplete emptying; Q2, frequency; Q3, intermittency; Q4, urgency; Q5, weak stream; Q6, straining; Q7, nocturia. It has an additional, independent eighth question to assess change in BPH-related health status (BHS) and quality of life. BHS scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "delighted" and 6 indicates "terrible." The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). Change from Baseline in IPSS total score was calculated as the Month 24 value minus the Baseline value. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. | Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Any participant who received a treatment randomization number was considered to have been randomized. Participants with data available at the specified time point or using LOCF (post-Baseline) were summarized. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on a scale | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Indicated Improvement Categories in the IPSS at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach | Symptom improvement was assessed using IPSS categorical changes from Baseline. Change from Baseline categories were summarized by treatment group using five improvement levels: >=1 point through >=5 points. IPSS percent change from Baseline was summarized using seven improvement levels: >0 percent, >=10 percent, >=20 percent, >=25 percent, >=30 percent, >=40 percent, and >=50 percent. Change in IPSS from Baseline was analysed using the LOCF method and is summarized for the following categories: >=2 points, >=3 points, and percent change >=25. The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). | ITT Population. Participants with data available at the specified time point or using LOCF (post-Baseline) were summarized. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the BPH Impact Index (BII) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach | The BII is a 4-item questionnaire covering physical discomfort, worry, bother, and impact on usual activities, with a minimum score of 0 (best) and a maximum score (worst) of 13 points. Individual missing questionnaire responses were imputed, as applicable. Change from Baseline in the BII score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. | ITT Population. Participants with data available at the specified time point or using LOCF (post-Baseline) were summarized. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on a scale | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach | Each participant was asked the following question "If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?". This response was rated from 0 ("delighted") to 6 ("terrible"). Change from Baseline in the BHS score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. | ITT Population. Participants with data available at the specified time point or using LOCF (post-Baseline) were summarized. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on a scale | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Events of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH | The number of participants with the first occurrence of clinical progression (CP) of BPH occurring on or after the randomization date are summarized by treatment and year. Time is based on the date of the first-occurring CP event, and is relative to the randomization date. CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom deterioration by IPSS >=3 points from Baseline (Visit 2); acute urinary retention related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single >=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value >=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). For components that required multiple episodes, the first of the multiple episodes was utilized in terms of timing. | ITT Population. Only those participants at risk for CP at the specified visit were analyzed. | Posted | Number | Events | Up to 2 years |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated First-occurring Component of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH | CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom progression (symptom deterioration by IPSS >=3 points from Baseline [Visit 2]); acute urinary retention (AUR) related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single >=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value >=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). The number of participants with CP of BPH, the number of participants with the indicated first-occurring component of CP of BPH, the number of participants with two simultaneously first-occurring components ("Tied for first component"), and the number of participants with multiple first-occurring components were summarized by treatment group. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Participants | Up to Month 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Had Any BPH-related Surgery, Who Had the Indicated Type of Surgery, Who Had 2 BPH-related Surgeries, and Who Had >=3 BPH-related Surgeries | BPH-related surgery was summarized for events occurring on or after the date of randomization. The number of participants who had any BPH-related surgery, the indicated type of surgery, and multiple surgeries was summarized by treatment. Type of surgery data (cystoscopy, transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP], and prostatectomy) are presented in terms of the first-occurring BPH-related surgery after randomization. It was possible for a single participant to have multiple surgeries. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Participants | Up to Month 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach | The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 1 was: "Overall, how satisfied are you with the treatment and its effect on your urinary problems?" There were seven possible responses, including: "very satisfied," "satisfied," "somewhat satisfied," neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied." Response categories were created by grouping together "very satisfied," "satisfied," and "somewhat satisfied" responses into the category of "Any Satisfaction (AS)," and separately grouping "neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied" responses into the category of "Neutral or Any Dissatisfaction (N/AD)." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. | ITT Population. Participants with data available at the specified time point or using LOCF (post-Baseline) were summarized. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach | The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 2 was: "Would you ask your doctor for the treatment you received in this study?" There were three possible responses, including: "Yes," "No," and "Not sure." Response categories included "Yes" and "No or Not Sure," created by grouping together "No" and "Not sure." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. | ITT Population. Participants with data available at the specified time point or using LOCF (post-Baseline) were summarized. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Exposure to Study Drug | Study drug exposure (days) = treatment stop date - treatment start date + 1. Participants in the Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes subgroup could have been escalated to study drug at any time during the study. Therefore, it is possible that participants were exposed to tamsulosin for a shorter length of time than participants in the dutasteride plus tamsulosin group. | Treated Subjects Population: all participants starting protocol pharmacological treatment, either dutasteride plus tamsulosin or (escalated to) tamsulosin, as indicated by a nonmissing electronic Case Report Form treatment start date | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days | Up to 2 years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Starting Post-randomization | A post-randomization adverse event is defined as an event with an onset on or after the randomization date or with a missing onset date. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment was exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate in other situations. Refer to the general non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of non-serious AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold of >=5%) and SAEs. | ITT Population | Posted | Number | Participants | Up to 2 years |
|
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) starting post-randomization (including events with an onset on or after the randomization date or with a missing onset date) were collected (up to 2 years).
SAEs and non-serious AEs are reported for members of the ITT Population.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin | Participants received a combination of dutasteride 0.5 milligrams (mg) plus tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus lifestyle advice for 24 months. | 38 | 369 | 43 | 369 | ||
| EG001 | Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No | All participants were given lifestyle advice. If any International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was the same or greater than the Baseline value at any study visit (post-randomization), participants received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes). Tamsulosin was continued until the end of the study unless the participant elected to withdraw from the study. | 25 | 373 | 13 | 373 | ||
| EG002 | Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes | All participants were given lifestyle advice. If any IPSS was the same or greater than the Baseline value at any study visit (post-randomization), participants received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes). Tamsulosin was continued until the end of the study unless the participant elected to withdraw from the study. | 19 | 229 | 12 | 229 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic valve stenosis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrioventricular block | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiomyopathy | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tachyarrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Heart valve incompetence | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erysipelas | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pilonidal cyst | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive airways | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infected cyst | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inguinal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhoids | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis acute | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis necrotising | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Presyncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebellar infarction | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral infarction | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colon cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| B-cell lymphoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bladder neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchial carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastases to bone | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastases to liver | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myxoid liposarcoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ankle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural haematuria | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Craniocerebral injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory acidosis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia megaloblastic | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphadenopathy | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Death | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Polymyalgia rheumatica | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Calculus bladder | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure acute | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal impairment | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostatitis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Goitre | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ulcerative keratitis | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transaminases increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metabolic acidosis | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erectile dysfunction | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Retrograde ejaculation | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011470 | Prostatic Hyperplasia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068538 | Dutasteride |
| D000077409 | Tamsulosin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001378 | Azasteroids |
| D013260 | Steroids, Heterocyclic |
| D013256 | Steroids |
| D000072473 | Fused-Ring Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D000096926 | Benzenesulfonamides |
| D013449 | Sulfonamides |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D013450 | Sulfones |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| White - Arabic/North African Heritage |
|
| African American/African Heritage |
|
| Mixed Race |
|
| Missing |
|
| Month 6, n=359, 368 |
|
| Month 9, n=359, 368 |
|
| Month 12, n=359, 368 |
|
| Month 15, n=359, 368 |
|
| Month 18, n=359, 368 |
|
| Month 21, n=359, 368 |
|
| Month 24, n=359, 368 |
|
| t-test, 2 sided | Values are based on t-tests from the general linear model | <0.001 | Month 3 | Adjusted Mean Difference | -2.1 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.31 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.7 | -1.5 | Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All. | Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided | Values are based on t-tests from the general linear model | <0.001 | Month 6 | Adjusted Mean Difference | -1.5 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.31 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.1 | -0.9 | Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All. | Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided | Values are based on t-tests from the general linear model | <0.001 | Month 9 | Adjusted Mean Difference | -1.6 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.31 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.2 | -1.0 | Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All. | Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided | Values are based on t-tests from the general linear model | <0.001 | Month 12 | Adjusted Mean Difference | -1.6 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.32 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.2 | -1.0 | Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All. | Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided | Values are based on t-tests from the general linear model | <0.001 | Month 15 | Adjusted Mean Difference | -1.6 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.34 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.3 | -1.0 | Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All. | Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided | Values are based on t-tests from the general linear model | <0.001 | Month 18 | Adjusted Mean Difference | -1.7 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.35 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.4 | -1.0 | Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All. | Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided | Values are based on t-tests from the general linear model | <0.001 | Month 21 | Adjusted Mean Difference | -1.9 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.34 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.5 | -1.2 | Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All. | Superiority or Other |
| t-test, 2 sided | Values are based on t-tests from the general linear model | <0.001 | Month 24 | Adjusted Mean Difference | -1.8 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.34 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.5 | -1.2 | Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline = Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. The adjusted mean difference is based on dutasteride plus tamsulosin minus Watchful Waiting All. | Superiority or Other |
All participants were given lifestyle advice. If any International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was the same or greater than the Baseline value at any study visit (post-randomization), participants received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes). Tamsulosin was continued until the end of the study unless the participant elected to withdraw from the study. If participants did not receive tamsulosin, they were not classified as escalated (Watchful Waiting Escalated=No). |
|
|
All participants were given lifestyle advice. If any International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was the same or greater than the Baseline value at any study visit (post-randomization), participants received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes). Tamsulosin was continued until the end of the study unless the participant elected to withdraw from the study. If participants did not receive tamsulosin, they were not classified as escalated (Watchful Waiting Escalated=No). |
|
|
All participants were given lifestyle advice. If any International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was the same or greater than the Baseline value at any study visit (post-randomization), participants received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes). Tamsulosin was continued until the end of the study unless the participant elected to withdraw from the study. If participants did not receive tamsulosin, they were not classified as escalated (Watchful Waiting Escalated=No).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No |
All participants were given lifestyle advice. If any International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was the same or greater than the Baseline value at any study visit (post-randomization), participants received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes). Tamsulosin was continued until the end of the study unless the participant elected to withdraw from the study. If participants did not receive tamsulosin, they were not classified as escalated (Watchful Waiting Escalated=No). |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| OG002 | Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes | All participants were given lifestyle advice. If any IPSS was the same or greater than the Baseline value at any study visit (post-randomization), participants received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily (Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes). Tamsulosin was continued until the end of the study unless the participant elected to withdraw from the study. |
|
|