Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-019574-33 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Difficulties of recruitment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the benefit of the withdrawal of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) on renal function in patients one year after the end of the weaning period. The secondary objectives will focus on assessing the risks and consequences of withdrawal of Tacrolimus (Prograf®).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tacrolimus | Active Comparator |
| |
| Withdrawal of Tacrolimus | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tacrolimus | Drug | A control group continued conventional therapy, Tacrolimus (Prograf®) ("control" group) and will be followed in parallel group "withdrawal" that will stop treatment with Tacrolimus (Prograf®). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Renal function | The primary endpoint will be the improvement of renal function one year after complete withdrawal of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) assessed by measuring the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculated by the dosage of cystatin C according to the equation Bricon. The DFG will be compared between times J-30 and J480 (1 year after the withdrawal). | one year after complete withdrawal of Tacrolimus |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Renal function | Improvement of renal function by measuring serum creatinine, using the original MDRD equation, | one year after complete withdrawal |
| Acute rejection | Rate of histologically proven acute rejection by biopsy according to Banff classification 2009, |
Not provided
Pre-inclusion criteria :
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Magali GIRAL, Profesor | Nantes University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Jean-Paul SOULILLOU, Profesor | Nantes University Hospital | Study Chair |
| Christophe LEGENDRE, Profesor | Hôpital Necker - AP-HP | Study Chair |
| Emmanuel MORELON, Profesor | Hospices Civils de Lyon | Study Chair |
| Georges MOURAD, Profesor | CHU de Montpellier | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nantes University Hospital | Nantes | 44093 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36518770 | Derived | Masset C, Dantal J, Soulillou JP, Walencik A, Delbos F, Brouard S, Giral M; Nantes DIVAT Consortium. Case Report: Long-term observations from the tacrolimus weaning randomized clinical trial depicts the challenging aspects for determination of low-immunological risk patients. Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 28;13:1021481. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1021481. eCollection 2022. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016559 | Tacrolimus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018942 | Macrolides |
| D007783 | Lactones |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Patients randomized to the "withdrawal"group will begin the protocol with their usual dose of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) (initial dose). The initial dose of tacrolimus (Prograf®) will be reduced by one third at visit 3 (day 0) and again a third visit 5 (J60). The complete withdrawal Tacrolimus (Prograf®) begins to visit 7 (J120). The withdrawal of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) will be obtained in four months. Monitoring of all patients lasted 17 months in total from the screening visit, which corresponds to 12 months after complete withdrawal of Tacrolimus (Prograf®) for patients in the "withdrawal" group. |
|
| one year after complete withdrawal |
| Chronic rejection | Rate of chronic rejection histologically proven by biopsy according to Banff classification 2009, | One year after complete withdrawal |
| Steroid-resistant rejection | Rates of steroid-resistant rejection | One year after complete withdrawal |
| Graft survival | Rate of return to dialysis (graft survival) | One year after complete withdrawal |
| Cancer and infections | Incidence of cancer and infections | one year after complete withdrawal |
| Patients survival | Survival rate of patients | One year after complete withdrawal |
| Anti-HLA antibodies | Appearance of anti-HLA donor specific and non-donor specific antibodies measured by the technique Luminex | One year after complete withdrawal |
| Histological lesions of rejection | The appearance of histological lesions of cellular or humoral acute or chronic or subclinical rejection on the biopsy protocol | One year after complete withdrawal |
| Histological lesions of fibrosis | Onset or worsening of histological lesions of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy on biopsy inflammatory | One year after complete withdrawal |
| Hypertension, hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia | Incidence of hypertension, hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia | One year after complete withdrawal |
| Quality of life | Determination of the benefits of withdrawal of Tacrolimus on the quality of life of patients, defined by the scale of quality of life validated SF-36 used at the beginning (J-15) and at the end of the weaning period (J120) at 6 months (J300) and one year after complete withdrawal of Tacrolimus (J480) | One year after complete withdrawal |