Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Becker CA Study |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sponsor terminated
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
While Core Becker patient follow-up is being completed this Continued Access Study is designed to enroll patients at a limited rate per month to allow for continued physician and patient experience with the device.
Up to 12 patients per month at sites across the United States will be enrolled in this research study. These patients will be implanted with the Becker 25 or Becker 50 Expander/Breast implant and monitored for 10 years for safety.
Silicone gel-filled breast implants were introduced in the early sixties and were in wide-scale distribution by the time the Medical Device Amendments to the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act was passed in 1976. In 1983, gel-filled breast implants were designated as Class III devices requiring premarket approval. In May 1990, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a proposed request (515(b)) for Pre-market Approval Applications (PMA) and in April 1991 published the final request. This final publication put manufacturers of gel-filled breast implants on notice that for continued marketing of gel-filled breast implants, a PMA was due to FDA in 90 days from the final publication date.
A pre-market approval (PMA) for the Mentor gel-filled breast implants was filed with the FDA in July 1991. At the FDA General and Plastic Surgery Advisory Committee meeting in November 1991, the committee recommended the submission of additional information to establish the safety and effectiveness of gel-filled breast implants.
In January 1992, the FDA Commissioner announced a voluntary moratorium of the sale of gel-filled breast implants to allow the advisory panel time to assess additional information. In April 1992, the moratorium was lifted but only for reconstruction and revision subjects. Every subject implanted had to be part of an adjunct study, in addition to being offered participation in a registry of gel-filled breast implant subjects. In order to be implanted with gel-filled implants for augmentation, women had to be enrolled in an IDE clinical trial.
A PMA for Mentor's MemoryGelâ„¢ Silicone Gel-Filled breast implants (which did not include the Becker Expander/Breast Implants) was subsequently filed with FDA in December 2003, and approved in November 2006 (P030053). As a condition of approval of P030053, new enrollment in Mentor's Adjunct Study has ceased, and women no longer have access to the Becker Expander/Breast Implants.
The Mentor Becker Expander/Breast Implant was used throughout the United States during this time (since 1992) under the Mentor Adjunct Study to allow continued access to the device and to collect some safety information, however was not evaluated in the MemoryGel Core Study. The gel fill used in the MemoryGel implants is the same gel fill that is used for the Becker device.
This protocol describes the study design procedures and population for a Continued Access (CA) Study for the Mentor Becker 25 and 50 Expander/Breast implants. While Core Becker patient follow-up is being completed, this CA Study is designed to enroll patients at a limited rate per month to allow for continued physician experience with the device. The safety data obtained may be used to provide supplemental information to the PMA. It will be requested that this study be initiated and renewed every six months until a final decision is reached regarding the Becker PMA.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reconstruction | Other | The study population will consist of women aged 18 or over who are undergoing primary breast reconstruction. The Reconstruction cohort will include subjects with loss of breast tissue due to mastectomy, contralateral breast for post-reconstruction symmetry or subjects with deformities secondary to disease, malignancy, trauma, and congenital deformity. Subjects in this cohort cannot have been implanted with breast implants, but may have tissue expanders. A Becker implant is considered a tissue expander until the port and fill tube have been removed. Women who undergo surgery primarily for a mastopexy will not be part of the reconstruction cohort. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentor Becker 25 Expander/Breast Implant | Device | The breast implant is comprised of the Becker implant and the injection dome/fill tube and has a low bleed, gel-filled outer lumen and an adjustable saline-fillable inner lumen. The inner lumen can be gradually filled with saline over an extended period of time via the fill tube by injecting saline through the injection dome. Once expanded to the desired volume, the fill tube and injection dome are removed through a small incision under local anesthetic, and the prosthesis remains in position as a breast implant. The Becker 25 Expander/Breast Implant has a silicone gel volume of approximately 25% and saline volume of approximately 75%. The Becker Expander/Breast Implant is available in sizes 150 - 800cc. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety by Incidence, Severity, and Duration of Adverse Events | 4 Years | |
| Safety by Method of Resolution of Adverse Events | 4 Years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mark A. Walker | Binghamton, NY | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mentor Worldwide LLC | Santa Barbara | California | 93111 | United States |
Not provided
The Becker CA Study was an open-label, multi-center study to provide continued physician and patient experience with the smooth Becker 25 and 50 Expander/Breast Implant. Subjects included women who required primary breast reconstruction.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Reconstruction | The study population will consist of women aged 18 or over who are undergoing primary breast reconstruction. The Reconstruction cohort will include subjects with loss of breast tissue due to mastectomy, contralateral breast for post-reconstruction symmetry or subjects with deformities secondary to disease, malignancy, trauma, and congenital deformity. Subjects in this cohort cannot have been implanted with breast implants, but may have tissue expanders. A Becker implant is considered a tissue expander until the port and fill tube have been removed. Women who undergo surgery primarily for a mastopexy will not be part of the reconstruction cohort. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Reconstruction | The study population will consist of women aged 18 or over who are undergoing primary breast reconstruction. The Reconstruction cohort will include subjects with loss of breast tissue due to mastectomy, contralateral breast for post-reconstruction symmetry or subjects with deformities secondary to disease, malignancy, trauma, and congenital deformity. Subjects in this cohort cannot have been implanted with breast implants, but may have tissue expanders. A Becker implant is considered a tissue expander until the port and fill tube have been removed. Women who undergo surgery primarily for a mastopexy will not be part of the reconstruction cohort. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Safety by Incidence, Severity, and Duration of Adverse Events | The study was prematurely discontinued. The sample size was not large enough for statistical significance. Because only 11 subjects were enrolled in the Becker CA Study, demographic information and key safety information were listed by subject only and no formal summary tables were prepared. | Posted | Number | Events | 4 Years |
|
Not provided
Ten of the 11 subjects in the CA Study had one or more postoperative complications. Severity was mild for all but 1 moderate case of infection and 2 moderate cases of Grade III capsular contracture
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Reconstruction | The study population will consist of women aged 18 or over who are undergoing primary breast reconstruction. The Reconstruction cohort will include subjects with loss of breast tissue due to mastectomy, contralateral breast for post-reconstruction symmetry or subjects with deformities secondary to disease, malignancy, trauma, and congenital deformity. Subjects in this cohort cannot have been implanted with breast implants, but may have tissue expanders. A Becker implant is considered a tissue expander until the port and fill tube have been removed. Women who undergo surgery primarily for a mastopexy will not be part of the reconstruction cohort. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delayed Wound Healing | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Because only 11 subjects were enrolled in the Becker CA Study, demographic information and key safety information were listed by subject only and no formal summary tables were prepared.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Vellucci | Mentor Worldwide, LLC | (805) 879-6000 | lvelucci@its.jnj.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018427 | Breast Implants |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019736 | Prostheses and Implants |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Mentor Becker 50 Expander/Breast Implant | Device | The breast implant is comprised of the Becker implant and the injection dome/fill tube and has a low bleed, gel-filled outer lumen and an adjustable saline-fillable inner lumen. The inner lumen can be gradually filled with saline over an extended period of time via the fill tube by injecting saline through the injection dome. Once expanded to the desired volume, the fill tube and injection dome are removed through a small incision under local anesthetic, and the prosthesis remains in position as a breast implant. The Becker 50 Expander/Breast Implant has a 50% gel volume and a 50% saline volume, so a 400cc implant would nominally have 200cc of saline and 200cc of silicone. The Becker 50 Expander/Breast Implant is available in sizes from 300 to 700cc. |
|
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Safety by Method of Resolution of Adverse Events | The study was prematurely discontinued. The sample size was not large enough for statistical significance. Because only 11 subjects were enrolled in the Becker CA Study, demographic information and key safety information were listed by subject only and no formal summary tables were prepared. | Posted | Number | Procedures | 4 Years |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 11 |
| 0 |
| 11 |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| Grade III Capsular Contracture | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound Dehiscence | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Breast - Unacceptably High Sensitivity | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Excess Tissue/Dog Ear | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Grade IV Capsular Contracture | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Seroma | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Extrusion | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Wrinkling | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications |
|
| Nipple - Unacceptably High Sensitivity | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Asymmetry | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Irritation/Inflammation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertrophic Scarring | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Necrosis | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Swelling (Excessive) | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Size Change - Patient Request | General disorders |
|
| Grade II Capsular Contracture w/Surgical | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications |
|
Not provided
Not provided