Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Termination due to acquisition of PEAK Surgical by Medtronic
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate scar quality following incision with the PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and to compare these results to equivalently-aged scars formed following incision with a standard scalpel.
Subjects attended one of two evaluation dates scheduled on January 21, 2011 and February 23, 2011. During this visit, subjects gave informed consent and were instructed on evaluating their breast reduction scars using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale. Following subjects' self-evaluation, each subject was evaluated by three evaluators using the Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care (SOC) | Active Comparator | Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection. |
|
| PlasmaBlade | Experimental | The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the operation, including the skin incision. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 | Device | The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the operation, including the skin incision. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Scar Quality | The primary endpoint will be the difference in scar quality (color, thickness, stiffness, pliability, etc.) between the scalpel and PlasmaBlade skin incisions. | 0-18 months following breast reduction surgery |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Abhay Gupta, MD | Gupta Plastic Surgery | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gupta Plastic Surgery | San Diego | California | 92131 | United States |
Not provided
Subjects' breasts were randomized individually to the PEAK PlasmaBlade or SOC group.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Total Study Population |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Total Study Population |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | An integrity audit found that the data for this study could not be analyzed owing to unverifiable source documentation. The protocol-specified age range is used for this baseline measure. |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Scar Quality | The primary endpoint will be the difference in scar quality (color, thickness, stiffness, pliability, etc.) between the scalpel and PlasmaBlade skin incisions. | An integrity audit found that the data for this study could not be analyzed owing to unverifiable source documentation. | Posted | 0-18 months following breast reduction surgery |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 | The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the operation, including the skin incision. |
Not provided
Not provided
Upon Medtronic's acquisition of PEAK surgical, a study integrity audit was undertaken. Results of the audit showed that patient's rights and safety were maintained, but the source data, including baseline demographics, were unverifiable.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Swain, PhD | Medtronic Surgical Technologies | (+1-603) 294-5428 | robert.e.swain@medtronic.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C536821 | Gigantomastia |
| D000084462 | Hyperthermia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001832 | Body Temperature Changes |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D018882 | Heat Stress Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004598 | Electrosurgery |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Traditional Electrosurgery with scalpel | Device | Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection. |
|
|
| Number |
| participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
| 0 |
| 13 |
| 0 |
| 13 |
| EG001 | Traditional Electrosurgery With Scalpel | Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection. | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
Not provided
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |