Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University Medical Centre Ljubljana | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is to evaluate toxicity and effectiveness of electrochemotherapy with bleomycin in treatment of liver metastases of colorectal cancer in clinical study phase I and II.
The study will include 10-15 patients with colorectal cancer with synchronous or metachronous liver metastases, but electrochemotherapy will be performed on metastasis not more than 3 cm in the largest diameter.
Treatment effectiveness will be evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) in a monthly interval. Two or three month after the first operation the treated and untreated metastases will be resected and through histological analyses performed.
The secondary objectives of the trial are to quantify the impact of the treatment on the patient's quality of life, tolerance to the therapy and suitability for larger study to be conducted.
The study will be conducted on patients with colorectal cancer with synchronous or metachronous liver metastases. Included will be 10-15 patients.
Predominantly, patients with synchronous metastases will be included into the study. These patients present liver metastases at the time of primary tumor resection. Electrochemotherapy will be performed on one metastasis not more than 3 cm in largest diameter at the time of the primary tumor operation, but patients have to have at least 2 to 8 metastases. These metastases will be aimed to be resected in the following operation. It is a standard procedure that liver metastases are resected 2-3 months after the primary tumor resection, in the meantime they are on standard chemotherapeutic protocol (FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, Capecitabine). Only in the case of solitary metastasis smaller than 3 cm in diameter, it is resected during the resection of the primary tumor. In the study additional antitumor effectiveness of electrochemotherapy to other treatment (chemotherapy) will be evaluated, compared to non-electrochemotherapy treated metastases. Treatment effectiveness will be evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US), in a monthly interval. Two to three month after the first operation the treated and untreated metastases will be resected and thorough histological analysis performed.
The second group of patients will be with metachronous liver metastases not larger than 3 cm in diameter, that location is in the vicinity of hollow liver structures and would not be possible to resect them without extensive and potentially jeopardizing liver resection. One of them will be treated by electrochemotherapy. In a month interval treatment effectiveness will be evaluated by MRI. In the case that metastases will decrease in size and to the situation that metastases are resectable, second operation will be performed, metastases resected and thorough histopathological evaluation performed. Otherwise standard treatment procedure will be performed (chemotherapy).
All patients will be treated after the procedure is thoroughly described to them, and have signed informed consent.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrochemotherapy | Procedure | Treatment procedure: anesthesia, positioning of electrodes, intravenous in bolus administration of bleomycin (15 mg/m2), within 5-30 min after administration of bleomycin application of electric pulses (8 pulses, duration 100 microseconds, frequency 4 Hz with amplitude adequate to cover the whole treated lesion with electric field necessary for reversible plasma membrane permeabilization), removal of electrodes. The maximum duration of procedure is 90 minutes. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of Toxicity Related to Electrochemotherapy (Toxicity, Symptoms) | After operation on day 7 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Non-Serious Adverse Events | After operation on tha days 2, 7, 30, monthly | |
| Treatment Evaluation of Tumor Response - Measurements of Tumor Lesions by Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography (US-Doppler), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT), Histology |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eldar Gadzijev, MD, PhD | Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Department of Surgical Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia | Principal Investigator |
| Gregor Sersa, PhD (Biol.) | Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Department of Experimental Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institute of Oncology Ljubljana | Ljubljana | 1000 | Slovenia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21895032 | Derived | Edhemovic I, Gadzijev EM, Brecelj E, Miklavcic D, Kos B, Zupanic A, Mali B, Jarm T, Pavliha D, Marcan M, Gasljevic G, Gorjup V, Music M, Vavpotic TP, Cemazar M, Snoj M, Sersa G. Electrochemotherapy: a new technological approach in treatment of metastases in the liver. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Oct;10(5):475-85. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500224. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Bilateral, Multiple, Metachronous Metastases | The first group included patients with bilateral, multiple, metachronous metastases in whom standard treatment included twostage liver resection, due to the extent of the disease and/or their general condition. During the first operation, right portal vein was ligated and metastases on the left side were excised or ablated with radiofrequency ablation. At the same time, up to three metastases on the right side were treated with electrochemotherapy. During the second operation, both treated and non-treated metastases on the right side were removed with right hemihepatectomy. |
| FG001 | Synchronous Metastases | The second group (group II) included patients with synchronous metastases, but their general condition and extent of the disease did not allow simultaneous removal of the primary tumor and metastases. During the first operation, the primary tumor was removed (colorectal resection) and some of the liver metastases were treated by electrochemotherapy. About 6 weeks later, during the second operation for liver metastases, both treated and non-treated metastases were removed with liver resection. |
| FG002 | <= 3 Metachronous, Unresectable Liver Metastases | The third group included patients with up to three metachronous, unresectable liver metastases, demanding too excessive resection, or untreatable by standard thermal ablative methods, due to the close proximity of major blood vessels. Electrochemotherapy was offered to these patients as the only treatment option. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Group I | Patients with bilateral, multiple, metachronous metastases in whom standard treatment included twostage liver resection, due to the extent of the disease and/or their general condition. During the first operation, right portal vein was ligated and metastases on the left side were excised or ablated with radiofrequency ablation. At the same time, up to three metastases on the right side were treated with electrochemotherapy. During the second operation, both treated and non-treated metastases on the right side were removed with right hemihepatectomy. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Non-Serious Adverse Events | Posted | Number | patients with non-severe adverse events | After operation on tha days 2, 7, 30, monthly |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Group I | Patients with bilateral, multiple, metachronous metastases in whom standard treatment included twostage liver resection, due to the extent of the disease and/or their general condition. During the first operation, right portal vein was ligated and metastases on the left side were excised or ablated with radiofrequency ablation. At the same time, up to three metastases on the right side were treated with electrochemotherapy. During the second operation, both treated and non-treated metastases on the right side were removed with right hemihepatectomy. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small bowl obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infection NOS | Infections and infestations |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregor Sersa, PhD | Institute of Oncology Ljubljana | +386 1 5879 434 | gsersa@onko-i.si |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D053672 | Electrochemotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D000092722 | Electroporation Therapies |
| D018274 | Electroporation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI:
Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR
| After operation or 1st day after operation, 7th day, 30th day, monthly |
| BG001 | Group II | Patients with synchronous metastases, but their general condition and extent of the disease did not allow simultaneous removal of the primary tumor and metastases. During the first operation, the primary tumor was removed (colorectal resection) and some of the liver metastases were treated by electrochemotherapy. About 6 weeks later, during the second operation for liver metastases, both treated and non-treated metastases were removed with liver resection. |
| BG002 | Group III | Patients with up to three metachronous, unresectable liver metastases, demanding too excessive resection, or untreatable by standard thermal ablative methods, due to the close proximity of major blood vessels. Electrochemotherapy was offered to these patients as the only treatment option. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
Patients with synchronous metastases, but their general condition and extent of the disease did not allow simultaneous removal of the primary tumor and metastases. During the first operation, the primary tumor was removed (colorectal resection) and some of the liver metastases were treated by electrochemotherapy. About 6 weeks later, during the second operation for liver metastases, both treated and non-treated metastases were removed with liver resection.
| OG002 | Group III | Patients with up to three metachronous, unresectable liver metastases, demanding too excessive resection, or untreatable by standard thermal ablative methods, due to the close proximity of major blood vessels. Electrochemotherapy was offered to these patients as the only treatment option. |
|
|
| Secondary | Treatment Evaluation of Tumor Response - Measurements of Tumor Lesions by Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography (US-Doppler), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT), Histology | Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR | Posted | Number | metastases | After operation or 1st day after operation, 7th day, 30th day, monthly | metastases | metastases |
|
|
|
| Primary | Evaluation of Toxicity Related to Electrochemotherapy (Toxicity, Symptoms) | Posted | Number | events | After operation on day 7 |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 6 |
| 3 |
| 6 |
| EG001 | Group II | Patients with synchronous metastases, but their general condition and extent of the disease did not allow simultaneous removal of the primary tumor and metastases. During the first operation, the primary tumor was removed (colorectal resection) and some of the liver metastases were treated by electrochemotherapy. About 6 weeks later, during the second operation for liver metastases, both treated and non-treated metastases were removed with liver resection. | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| EG002 | Group III | Patients with up to three metachronous, unresectable liver metastases, demanding too excessive resection, or untreatable by standard thermal ablative methods, due to the close proximity of major blood vessels. Electrochemotherapy was offered to these patients as the only treatment option. | 3 | 8 | 7 | 8 |
| Colon perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders |
|
| Abdominal abcess | Gastrointestinal disorders |
|
| Fever | Infections and infestations |
|
| Atrial fibrilation | Cardiac disorders |
|
| Pulmonary hypertension | Vascular disorders |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations |
|
| Wound infection | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders |
|
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders |
|
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders |
|
| Transient liver failure | Hepatobiliary disorders |
|
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders |
|
| Cholestatic icterus | Hepatobiliary disorders |
|
| Biliary fistula | Hepatobiliary disorders |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D003584 |
| Cytological Techniques |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D055664 | Electrochemical Techniques |