Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Current antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome have a focus on the dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and clopidogrel. However, the patient's drug resistance of aspirin and clopidogrel is the important cause of poor clinical prognosis. Therefore, recently, clinical research about the triple antiplatelet therapy including cilostazol is actively conducted. But, clinical research about triple antiplatelet therapy for acute myocardial infarction is inadequate situation, and the ideal duration of triple antiplatelet therapy has been actively discussed. Therefore, we try to evaluate the clinical outcomes of triple antiplatelet therapy in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous intervention with drug eluting stent compared with dual antiplatelet therapy and investigate ideal duration of triple antiplatelet therapy through this research.
Drug-eluting stents (DES) have drastically changed the landscape of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with significant reductions in the angiographic restenosis rate and need for repeated revascularization. However, several studies showed that DES is associated with a higher incidence of in-stent thrombosis compared with bare metal stents. Therefore, the latest guideline for antiplatelet therapy after PCI with DES suggests that the dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) be administered for at least 12 months.But is it enough for high-risk patients? Some studies showed that as many as 50% of the patients who received PCI did not react positively to aspirin or clopidogrel.Furthermore, there is increased platelet activity in acute coronary syndrome, especially in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). compared with aspirin or clopidogrel.A recent study suggested that cilostazol could ameliorate platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel in patients who underwent primary PCI. Furthermore, some other studies showed that the administration of cilostazol after PCI could significantly lower the incidence of in-stent restenosis. Therefore, the present study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of additional administration of cilostazol with aspirin and clopidogrel in a real-world cardiology practice among patients presenting with AMI who received primary PCI with DES.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year | Experimental | Dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year : dual antiplatelet combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for 1 year |
|
| Triple antiplatelet therapy for 1 month | Experimental | Triple antiplatelet therapy for 1 month : triple antiplatelet therapy including cilostazol for 1 month and after then, dual antiplatelet therapy for 11 months |
|
| Triple antiplatelet therapy for 6 months | Experimental | Triple antiplatelet therapy for 6 months : triple antiplatelet combination therapy including cilostazol for 6 months and after then, dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 months and cilostazol |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| antiplatelet therapy | Drug | Dual antiplatelet therapy is defined as combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel and triple antiplatelet therapy is defined as combination therapy with aspirin,clopidogrel and cilostazol. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebral Events | Composite of total death, Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (Non-QMI , Q-MI), Repeat RevascularizationI (Target Vessel Revascularization +Non Target Vessel Revascularization , Coronary Artery Bypass Graft), Stroke (Ischemic & Hemorrhagic) | One Year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Individual outcome of primary end points, Stent thrombosis,Bleeding Complication,PFT (Platelet function test),Genotyping results |
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria: Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Seung Woon Rha, MD. PhD. | Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, 80, Guro-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul, 152-703, Korea | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Korea University Guro Hospital | Seoul | South Korea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19528339 | Background | Chen KY, Rha SW, Li YJ, Poddar KL, Jin Z, Minami Y, Wang L, Kim EJ, Park CG, Seo HS, Oh DJ, Jeong MH, Ahn YK, Hong TJ, Kim YJ, Hur SH, Seong IW, Chae JK, Cho MC, Bae JH, Choi DH, Jang YS, Chae IH, Kim CJ, Yoon JH, Chung WS, Seung KB, Park SJ; Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Investigators. Triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2009 Jun 30;119(25):3207-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.822791. Epub 2009 Jun 15. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| One year |