Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study the investigators are presenting the advantages as well as the disadvantages of ACUTE SHORTENING AND RELENGTHENINIG VS SEGMENT TRANSPORT methods.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMPLICATION | No Intervention |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASR METHOD | Other |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| TREATMENT PERIOD AND COMPLICATION RATE |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:TIBIA PSEUDOARTHROSES -
Exclusion Criteria:BONE LOSS GREATER THAN 10 CM
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cengiz Sen | Istanbul | 34290 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Paley D, Sen C, Tetsworth K. Acute Shortening With Subsequent Relengthening Versus Bone Transport In The Treatment Of Tibial Bone Defect, 11th Asami North America Annual Scientific Meeting, February 18-25, Berkeley Ca, 2001 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided