Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this pilot study is to develop a more advanced software program that will collect, compare and analyze tumor images for evaluation. Another purpose of this study is to learn if a new radio-tracer for tumor imaging called 3'-deoxy-3'(18) F-fluorothymidine (FLT) can improve the evaluation of tumors during a PET/CT scan. This new type of image tracking is meant to improve the visualization of tumor active and size.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET | Experimental | This is a single arm trial, in which all patients receive three FDG-PET scans and three FLT-PET scans, before, during and after pre-operative chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3'-deoxy-3'-(18) F-fluorothymidine | Drug | Radio-tracer for tumor imaging |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility: Determined by the Number of Participants Who Had All Three Sets of Completed Serial PET Scans That Were Imported for Analysis | Determine the possibility of aquiring three sets of serial Positron emission tomography (PET) scans from 5 patients at designated time points and to develop a mechanism to import and analyze images from F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET, Fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG)-PET and Computed Tomography (CT) on a single advanced software platform with deformable image registration capability. We will report patient acceptance of and compliance with this regimen, as well as the utility of the software platform for conducting the proposed analysis. | 1 year |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Analyze Correlation Between FDG and FLT PET Scans, and the Correlation Between Both Types of PET Scan and the Response to Treatment. | We will compare the findings of FDG and FLT PET scans at pre-treatment, mid-treatment and post-treatment time points to determine how closely they correlate with each other, and if there is a specific time point at which any observed differences between FDG and FLT PET scans are most pronounced. We will also determine which of the six PET scans may correlate most closely with the response to treatment as determined by pathologic findings at esophagectomy. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Harvey J. Mamon, MD, PhD | Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States | ||
| Brigham and Women's Hospital |
Not provided
Single arm open label pilot study. Study was expected to enroll five patients at Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital. The study was initiated in August 2010 and the primary completion date was March 2013.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | All Participants | All participants in the trial received an FDG PET scan before and after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. In addition, as experimental staging studies, patients on this protocol received a third FDG PET scan during chemoradiation, and received three FLT PET scans before, during and after chemoradiation. All patients received standard of care chemotherapy and radiation and went on to esphagectomy. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Participants | All participants in the trial received an FDG PET scan before and after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. In addition, as experimental staging studies, patients on this protocol received a third FDG PET scan during chemoradiation, and received three FLT PET scans before, during and after chemoradiation. All patients received standard of care chemotherapy and radiation and went on to esphagectomy. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Feasibility: Determined by the Number of Participants Who Had All Three Sets of Completed Serial PET Scans That Were Imported for Analysis | Determine the possibility of aquiring three sets of serial Positron emission tomography (PET) scans from 5 patients at designated time points and to develop a mechanism to import and analyze images from F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET, Fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG)-PET and Computed Tomography (CT) on a single advanced software platform with deformable image registration capability. We will report patient acceptance of and compliance with this regimen, as well as the utility of the software platform for conducting the proposed analysis. | Posted | Number | participants | 1 year |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | All Participants | All participants in the trial received an FDG PET scan before and after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. In addition, as experimental staging studies, patients on this protocol received a third FDG PET scan during chemoradiation, and received three FLT PET scans before, during and after chemoradiation. All patients received standard of care chemotherapy and radiation and went on to esphagectomy. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvey Mamon MD, PhD | Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute | 617-732-8564 | hmamon@lroc.harvard.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004938 | Esophageal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 1 year |
| Boston |
| Massachusetts |
| 02115 |
| United States |
| Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | Boston | Massachusetts | 02115 | United States |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Analyze Correlation Between FDG and FLT PET Scans, and the Correlation Between Both Types of PET Scan and the Response to Treatment. | We will compare the findings of FDG and FLT PET scans at pre-treatment, mid-treatment and post-treatment time points to determine how closely they correlate with each other, and if there is a specific time point at which any observed differences between FDG and FLT PET scans are most pronounced. We will also determine which of the six PET scans may correlate most closely with the response to treatment as determined by pathologic findings at esophagectomy. | Not Posted | 1 year | Participants |
| 0 |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 5 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D006258 |
| Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |