Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-018501-10 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Onyx Therapeutics, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this phase-III trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in combination with capecitabine versus capecitabine in combination with placebo in the treatment of subjects with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer who are resistant to or have failed prior taxane and an anthracycline or for whom further anthracycline therapy is not indicated. After signing consent there can be up to 28 days before starting the treatment during which time a number of tests will be carried out which will include tumor evaluations and medical history. The following tests and evaluations will have to be done within 7 days of the start of treatment,on Day 1 of every cycle and at the end of study: Electrocardiogram, blood tests, patient quality of life questionnaires and a complete physical exam and vital signs. Treatment will be given in 21 day cycles with sorafenib/placebo to be taken every day for 21 days and capecitabine to be taken for the first 14 days. Patients will come in weekly for the first 6 weeks and then on Day1 for every cycle after the first 2 cycles. During the weekly visits the subjects will be check for any side effects and blood draws will happen for the study on Day 1 of each cycle. Subjects will be followed for overall survival.
Research summary (NRES, UK):
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide.
However, despite advances in treatment of the early-stage disease, about 25-40% of patients will develop recurrence or spread to other parts of the body that is largely incurable. The average survival of patients with breast cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastasis) is 2 to 3 years after diagnosis, and although a number of treatment options are available, including various chemotherapy agents, no single standard of care exists.
The study drug (Sorafenib) works by inhibiting certain pathways in the body that contribute to tumour growth and the formation of new blood vessels (angiogenesis). Angiogenesis plays an important role in the development, transformation and spread of breast cancer. Capecitabine is an approved chemotherapy drug for patients whose breast cancer has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic) and is not responsive to other classes of chemotherapy drugs.
Data from a Phase IIb clinical study suggests that there is a role for the combination of Sorafenib and Capecitabine to treat locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
Patients in this confirmatory Phase III study will be randomly assigned to receive either:
Participants will continue to receive treatments until there is radiographic or clinical progression of disease, side effects which require them to withdraw, pregnancy, protocol non-compliance or withdrawal of consent. Therefore length of participation will vary for individuals. This study is expected to close 31 March 2013.
This is a multicentre study which will take place across Europe, North and South America, Asia, Australia and South Africa. It is anticipated that approximately 519 participants will be recruited worldwide.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Capecitabine | Experimental | Capecitabine was administered orally at a dose of 1,000 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) twice daily (12 hours apart) on Days 1 through 14 of each 21-day cycle. Sorafenib was administered orally at a dose of 600 mg (200 mg in the morning, 400 mg in the evening) daily, continuously (that is, Days 1 to 21, inclusive). A treatment cycle consisted of 21 days. If tolerability criteria were met for a subject, capecitabine dose was escalated to 1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily and sorafenib dose to a total daily dose of 800 mg for that subject. |
|
| Placebo + Capecitabine | Placebo Comparator | Capecitabine was administered orally at a dose of 1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily (12 hours apart) on Days 1 through 14 of each 21-day cycle. Placebo matching to sorafenib was administered orally, 3 tablets (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) daily, continuously (that is, Days 1 to 21, inclusive). A treatment cycle consisted of 21 days. If tolerability criteria were met for a subject, capecitabine dose was escalated to 1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that subject. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | Drug | Capecitabine was administered orally at a dose of 1,000 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) twice daily (12 hours apart) on Days 1 through 14 of each 21-day cycle. Sorafenib was administered orally at a dose of 600 mg (200 mg in the morning, 400 mg in the evening) daily, continuously (that is, Days 1 to 21, inclusive). A treatment cycle consisted of 21 days. If tolerability criteria were met for a subject, capecitabine dose was escalated to 1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily and sorafenib dose to a total daily dose of 800 mg for that subject. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessed by the Independent Review Panel According to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 | PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression, radiological or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST version 1.1, progressive disease was determined when there was at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest sum on trial). In addition to a relative increase of 20%, the sum had demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Appearance of new lesions and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions was also interpreted as progressive disease. Participants without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of evaluable tumor evaluation. Median and other 95% confidence intervals (CIs) computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years or until disease radiological progression |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last known alive date. Median and other 95% CIs computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Reported Outcomes: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Symptom Index (8 Item) (FBSI-8) | The FBSI-8 was an 8-item questionnaire. Participants responded to each item using a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). A total scale score was calculated (range from 0 to 32), with higher scores indicating low symptomatology and reflecting a better Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). The results on the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of time-adjusted area under curve (AUC) for the FBSI-8 score were reported. The time-adjusted AUC was calculated by dividing the AUC by duration (in days) over the period of interest, and reported as 'scores on a scale'. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bayer Study Director | Bayer | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenbrae | California | 94904-2007 | United States | |||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23876062 | Result | Baselga J, Costa F, Gomez H, Hudis CA, Rapoport B, Roche H, Schwartzberg LS, Petrenciuc O, Shan M, Gradishar WJ. A phase 3 tRial comparing capecitabinE in combination with SorafenIb or pLacebo for treatment of locally advanced or metastatIc HER2-Negative breast CancEr (the RESILIENCE study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jul 22;14:228. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-228. | |
| 28830796 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Click here to find information about studies related to Bayer Healthcare products conducted in Europe | View source |
Not provided
Of 707 participants screened, 537 participants were randomized and 527 participants received at least 1 dose of study treatment. The reasons for 170 screen failures were adverse event in 21 participants, disease progression, recurrence or relapse in 2, consent withdrawn in 16, death in 4, and protocol violation in 127 participants.
At 154 sites in 22 countries, participants with histologically or cytologically confirmed human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative adenocarcinoma of the breast, and locally advanced or metastatic disease, were screened.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Capecitabine | Sorafenib tablets were administered orally continuously at a total daily dose of 600 mg (200 mg in the morning, 400 mg in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and sorafenib dose to a total daily dose of 800 mg for that participant. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo | Drug | Capecitabine was administered orally at a dose of 1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily (12 hours apart) on Days 1 through 14 of each 21-day cycle. Placebo matching to sorafenib was administered orally, 3 tablets (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) daily, continuously (that is, Days 1 to 21, inclusive). A treatment cycle consisted of 21 days. If tolerability criteria were met for a subject, capecitabine dose was escalated to 1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that subject. |
|
| Capecitabine | Drug | Capecitabine was administered orally at a dose of 1,000 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) twice daily (12 hours apart) on Days 1 through 14 of each 21-day cycle.days. If tolerability criteria were met for a subject, capecitabine dose was escalated to 1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily, |
|
| Time to Progression (TTP) by Central Review |
TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease radiological progression by central review. Per RECIST version 1.1, progressive disease was determined when there was at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest sum on trial). In addition to a relative increase of 20%, the sum had demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Appearance of new lesions and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions was also interpreted as progressive disease. Participants without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of evaluable tumor evaluation. Median and other 95% confidence intervals (CIs) computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. |
| From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Central Review | ORR was defined as the best tumor response (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) observed during treatment or within 30 days after termination of study treatment, assessed according to the RECIST version 1.1. CR=all target lesions disappeared, and any pathological lymph node, whether target or non-target, had a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. If any residual lesion was present, cyto-histology was made available to unequivocally document benignity. PR=at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR=CR+PR. CR and PR were confirmed by another scan at least 4 weeks later. | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) by Central Review | DCR was defined as the proportion of participants whose best response was CR, PR, stable disease (SD) or Non-CR/Non-PD. Per RECIST version 1.1, CR=all target lesions disappeared, any pathological lymph node, target/non-target, a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR=at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters. PD=at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference smallest sum on study. Appearance of new lesions and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. SD=neither sufficient shrinkage qualified for PR nor sufficient increase qualified for PD, taking smallest sum of diameters as a reference. Non-CR/Non-PD=persistence of 1/more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above normal limits. DCR=CR+PR+SD or Non-CR/Non-PD. CR and PR confirmed by another scan at least 4 weeks later. SD and Non-CR/Non-PD documented at least 6 weeks after randomization. | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression |
| Duration of Response (DOR) by Central Reader | DOR was defined as the time from date of first response (CR or PR) to the date when PD is first documented, or to the date of death, whichever occurred first according to RECIST version 1.1. CR=all target lesions disappeared, and any pathological lymph node, whether target or non-target, had a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. If any residual lesion was present, cyto-histology was made available to unequivocally document benignity. PR=at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants still having CR or PR and have not died at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. DOR defined for confirmed responders only (that is, CR or PR). 'NA' indicates that value could not be estimated due to censored data. Median and 95% CIs were computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression |
| Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, and end of treatment (EOT, 21 days after last dose of study drug) |
| Patient Reported Outcomes: Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Index Score | The EQ-5D was a generic Quality of life (QoL) based instrument validated in cancer populations. EQ-5D questionnaire contained a 5-item descriptive system of health states (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and visual analogue scale (VAS). A single HRQoL score ranging from -0.59 to 1 was generated from standard scoring algorithm developed by the EuroQoL was the EQ-5D index score, higher scores represent better health status. A change of at least 0.10 to 0.12 points was considered clinically meaningful. The results on the ANCOVA of time-adjusted AUC for the EQ-5D - Index Score were reported. The time-adjusted AUC was calculated by dividing the AUC by duration (in days) over the period of interest, and reported as 'scores on a scale'. | Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, and EOT (21 days after last dose of study drug) |
| Patient Reported Outcomes: Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score | The EQ-5D was a generic QoL preference based instrument and has been validated in the cancer populations. VAS was generated from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). This VAS score was referred to as the EQ-5D self-reported health status score. The results on ANCOVA of time-adjusted AUC were reported. The time-adjusted AUC was calculated by dividing the AUC by duration (in days) over the period of interest, and reported as 'scores on a scale'. | Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, and EOT (21 days after last dose of study drug) |
| Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil | Maximum observed drug concentration, directly taken from analytical data. Geometric mean and percentage geometric coefficient of variation (%CV) were reported. In the listed categories below, 'N' signifies the number of evaluable participants for the drug administered. | Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after capecitabine dosing at Cycle 2, Day 14 |
| Area Under Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of Capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil | AUC(0-tlast) is defined as AUC from time 0 to the last data point, calculated up by linear trapezoidal rule, down by logarithmic trapezoidal rule. Geometric mean and percentage geometric coefficient of variation (%CV) were reported. In the listed categories below, 'N' signifies the number of evaluable participants for the drug administered. | Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after capecitabine dosing at Cycle 2, Day 14 |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory Abnormalities | Hematological (anemia, hemoglobin, international normalized ratio [INR], lymphocyte, neutrophil, platelet, white blood cell [WBC]), biochemical (ALT [alanine aminotransferase], AST [aspartate aminotransferase], GGT [gamma-glutamyl-transferase], lipase, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperuricemia) evaluations were done. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4-Grade 3: Severe or medically significant; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization and CTCAE version 4-Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention were indicated. | From the start of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose |
| Sylmar |
| California |
| 91342 |
| United States |
| West Palm Beach | Florida | 33407 | United States |
| Joliet | Illinois | 60435 | United States |
| Evansville | Indiana | 47713 | United States |
| Louisville | Kentucky | 40207 | United States |
| Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Boston | Massachusetts | 02115-6084 | United States |
| Jackson | Mississippi | 39202 | United States |
| Springfield | Missouri | 65804 | United States |
| Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87131 | United States |
| Lake Success | New York | 11042 | United States |
| Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Bristol | Tennessee | 37620 | United States |
| Memphis | Tennessee | 38120 | United States |
| El Paso | Texas | 79905 | United States |
| Burlington | Vermont | 05405 | United States |
| Madison | Wisconsin | 53792 | United States |
| Mar del Plata | Buenos Aires | B7600CTO | Argentina |
| Buenos Aires | Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires | C1280AEB | Argentina |
| Buenos Aires | Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires | C1425AWC | Argentina |
| Garran | Australian Capital Territory | 2605 | Australia |
| Liverpool | New South Wales | 2170 | Australia |
| Waratah | New South Wales | 2298 | Australia |
| Adelaide | South Australia | 5000 | Australia |
| Bendigo | Victoria | 3550 | Australia |
| Frankston | Victoria | Australia |
| Perth | Western Australia | 6000 | Australia |
| Linz | Upper Austria | 4010 | Austria |
| Vienna | 1100 | Austria |
| Liège | Liège | 4000 | Belgium |
| Bruges | 8000 | Belgium |
| Bruxelles - Brussel | 1000 | Belgium |
| Edegem | 2650 | Belgium |
| Hasselt | 3500 | Belgium |
| Montreal | Quebec | H2L 4M1 | Canada |
| Montreal | Quebec | H3G 1A4 | Canada |
| Shenyang | Liaoning | 110001 | China |
| Beijing | 100021 | China |
| Beijing | 100071 | China |
| Nanning | 530021 | China |
| Shanghai | 200030 | China |
| Tianjin | 300060 | China |
| Xi'an | 710032 | China |
| České Budějovice | 370 01 | Czechia |
| Nová Ves pod Pleší | 262 04 | Czechia |
| Nymburk | 288 02 | Czechia |
| Olomouc | 775 20 | Czechia |
| Prague | 10034 | Czechia |
| Prague | 128 08 | Czechia |
| Prague | 150 06 | Czechia |
| Prague | 150 30 | Czechia |
| Clermont-Ferrand | 63011 | France |
| Lille | 59020 | France |
| Nantes | 44805 | France |
| Saint-Cloud | 92210 | France |
| Toulouse | 31052 | France |
| Erlangen | Bavaria | 91054 | Germany |
| Frankfurt am Main | Hesse | 60389 | Germany |
| Offenbach | Hesse | 63069 | Germany |
| Cologne | North Rhine-Westphalia | 50931 | Germany |
| Cologne | North Rhine-Westphalia | 51067 | Germany |
| Mainz | Rhineland-Palatinate | 55131 | Germany |
| Leipzig | Saxony | 04103 | Germany |
| Stendal | Saxony-Anhalt | 39576 | Germany |
| Berlin | 13589 | Germany |
| Athens | 11528 | Greece |
| Heraklion | 711 10 | Greece |
| Ioannina | 45500 | Greece |
| Larissa | 41100 | Greece |
| Pátrai | 26500 | Greece |
| Budapest | 1032 | Hungary |
| Nyíregyháza | H-4400 | Hungary |
| Pécs | 7624 | Hungary |
| Szentes | 6600 | Hungary |
| Szolnok | H-5004 | Hungary |
| Cork | Ireland |
| Dublin | 7 | Ireland |
| Dublin | 9 | Ireland |
| Dublin | DUBLIN 4 | Ireland |
| Dublin | DUBLIN 8 | Ireland |
| Galway | Ireland |
| Beersheba | 8410101 | Israel |
| Haifa | 3109601 | Israel |
| Haifa | 35152 | Israel |
| Jerusalem | 9112001 | Israel |
| Jerusalem | 9372212 | Israel |
| Petah Tikva | 4941492 | Israel |
| Ramat Gan | 5266202 | Israel |
| Bologna | Emilia-Romagna | 40138 | Italy |
| Forlì-Cesena | Emilia-Romagna | 47014 | Italy |
| Modena | Emilia-Romagna | 41124 | Italy |
| Ravenna | Emilia-Romagna | 48121 | Italy |
| Rome | Lazio | 00161 | Italy |
| Cremona | Lombardy | 26100 | Italy |
| Milan | Lombardy | 20089 | Italy |
| Monza-Brianza | Lombardy | 20900 | Italy |
| Palermo | Sicily | 90127 | Italy |
| Ancona | The Marches | 60126 | Italy |
| Pisa | Tuscany | 56126 | Italy |
| Nagoya | Aichi-ken | 464-8681 | Japan |
| Matsuyama | Ehime | 791-0280 | Japan |
| Suita | Osaka | 565-0871 | Japan |
| Hidaka | Saitama | 350-1298 | Japan |
| Kita-Adachigun | Saitama | 362-0806 | Japan |
| Bunkyo | Tokyo | 113-8677 | Japan |
| Koto-ku | Tokyo | 135-8550 | Japan |
| Chiba | 260-8717 | Japan |
| Fukuoka | 811-1395 | Japan |
| Kagoshima | 892-0833 | Japan |
| Osaka | 540-0006 | Japan |
| Gdansk | 80-952 | Poland |
| Gdynia | 81-519 | Poland |
| Poznan | 61-485 | Poland |
| San Juan | 00918 | Puerto Rico |
| Chelyabinsk | 454087 | Russia |
| Kazan' | 420029 | Russia |
| Port Elizabeth | Eastern Cape | 6045 | South Africa |
| Johannesburg | Gauteng | 2196 | South Africa |
| Pretoria | Gauteng | 0081 | South Africa |
| Pretoria | Gauteng | 0084 | South Africa |
| Pretoria | Gauteng | 0181 | South Africa |
| Santiago de Compostela | A Coruña | 15706 | Spain |
| Sabadell | Barcelona | 08208 | Spain |
| Terrassa | Barcelona | 08221 | Spain |
| Castellon | Castellón | 12002 | Spain |
| Palma de Mallorca | Illes Baleares | 07120 | Spain |
| Reus | Tarragona | 43204 | Spain |
| A Coruña | 15006 | Spain |
| Barcelona | 08003 | Spain |
| Barcelona | 08025 | Spain |
| Barcelona | 08035 | Spain |
| Barcelona | 08036 | Spain |
| Lleida | 25198 | Spain |
| Madrid | 28033 | Spain |
| Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
| Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| Madrid | 28041 | Spain |
| Madrid | 28050 | Spain |
| Palma de Mallorca | 07198 | Spain |
| Seville | 41013 | Spain |
| Seville | 41071 | Spain |
| Valencia | 46009 | Spain |
| Valencia | 46010 | Spain |
| Valencia | 46014 | Spain |
| Stockholm | 118 83 | Sweden |
| Stockholm | 171 76 | Sweden |
| Truro | Cornwall | TR1 3LJ | United Kingdom |
| Nottingham | Nottinghamshire | NG5 1PB | United Kingdom |
| London | NW3 2QG | United Kingdom |
| Manchester | M20 4BX | United Kingdom |
| Northwood | HA6 2RN | United Kingdom |
| Result |
| Baselga J, Zamagni C, Gomez P, Bermejo B, Nagai SE, Melichar B, Chan A, Mangel L, Bergh J, Costa F, Gomez HL, Gradishar WJ, Hudis CA, Rapoport BL, Roche H, Maeda P, Huang L, Meinhardt G, Zhang J, Schwartzberg LS. RESILIENCE: Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Sorafenib With Capecitabine Versus Placebo With Capecitabine in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Dec;17(8):585-594.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 22. |
| FG001 | Placebo + Capecitabine | Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that participant. |
| Participants Received Treatment |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Capecitabine | Sorafenib tablets were administered orally continuously at a total daily dose of 600 mg (200 mg in the morning, 400 mg in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and sorafenib dose to a total daily dose of 800 mg for that participant. |
| BG001 | Placebo + Capecitabine | Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that participant. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Other countries in the below category included Argentina, Australia, China, Israel and Japan. | Number | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) | ECOG status 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work; 2=Ambulatory, capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Number of Prior Chemotherapies for Metastatic Disease | Assessed by Interactive voice response system (IVRS). Participants with more than 1 actual number of prior chemotherapies were combined with participants with 1 prior chemotherapy. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Hormone Receptor Status | The hormone receptor status was assessed by IVRS, and considered as follows: in case, the tumor expressed estrogen and/or progesterone receptor, the participant was considered to have positive hormone receptor status. Otherwise, if both receptors were not expressed, then participant was considered to have a negative hormone receptor status. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Visceral Disease at Baseline | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessed by the Independent Review Panel According to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 | PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression, radiological or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST version 1.1, progressive disease was determined when there was at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest sum on trial). In addition to a relative increase of 20%, the sum had demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Appearance of new lesions and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions was also interpreted as progressive disease. Participants without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of evaluable tumor evaluation. Median and other 95% confidence intervals (CIs) computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | Full Analysis Set (FAS), also considered as Intent-to-treat (ITT) set, was defined as all randomized participants even if randomized but received no drug or if randomized and initially received incorrect drug prior to switching to correct study drug, these were included in FAS. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years or until disease radiological progression |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last known alive date. Median and other 95% CIs computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | FAS | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Progression (TTP) by Central Review | TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease radiological progression by central review. Per RECIST version 1.1, progressive disease was determined when there was at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest sum on trial). In addition to a relative increase of 20%, the sum had demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Appearance of new lesions and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions was also interpreted as progressive disease. Participants without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of evaluable tumor evaluation. Median and other 95% confidence intervals (CIs) computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | FAS | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Central Review | ORR was defined as the best tumor response (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) observed during treatment or within 30 days after termination of study treatment, assessed according to the RECIST version 1.1. CR=all target lesions disappeared, and any pathological lymph node, whether target or non-target, had a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. If any residual lesion was present, cyto-histology was made available to unequivocally document benignity. PR=at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR=CR+PR. CR and PR were confirmed by another scan at least 4 weeks later. | FAS | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage (%) of participants | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Disease Control Rate (DCR) by Central Review | DCR was defined as the proportion of participants whose best response was CR, PR, stable disease (SD) or Non-CR/Non-PD. Per RECIST version 1.1, CR=all target lesions disappeared, any pathological lymph node, target/non-target, a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR=at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters. PD=at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference smallest sum on study. Appearance of new lesions and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. SD=neither sufficient shrinkage qualified for PR nor sufficient increase qualified for PD, taking smallest sum of diameters as a reference. Non-CR/Non-PD=persistence of 1/more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above normal limits. DCR=CR+PR+SD or Non-CR/Non-PD. CR and PR confirmed by another scan at least 4 weeks later. SD and Non-CR/Non-PD documented at least 6 weeks after randomization. | FAS | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage (%) of participants | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Duration of Response (DOR) by Central Reader | DOR was defined as the time from date of first response (CR or PR) to the date when PD is first documented, or to the date of death, whichever occurred first according to RECIST version 1.1. CR=all target lesions disappeared, and any pathological lymph node, whether target or non-target, had a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. If any residual lesion was present, cyto-histology was made available to unequivocally document benignity. PR=at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants still having CR or PR and have not died at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. DOR defined for confirmed responders only (that is, CR or PR). 'NA' indicates that value could not be estimated due to censored data. Median and 95% CIs were computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. | Only responders in FAS were evaluated for this outcome measure. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | From randomization of the first participant until approximately 3 years later or until disease radiological progression |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Patient Reported Outcomes: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Symptom Index (8 Item) (FBSI-8) | The FBSI-8 was an 8-item questionnaire. Participants responded to each item using a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). A total scale score was calculated (range from 0 to 32), with higher scores indicating low symptomatology and reflecting a better Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). The results on the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of time-adjusted area under curve (AUC) for the FBSI-8 score were reported. The time-adjusted AUC was calculated by dividing the AUC by duration (in days) over the period of interest, and reported as 'scores on a scale'. | FAS participants with a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment during the study. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Scores on a scale | Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, and end of treatment (EOT, 21 days after last dose of study drug) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Patient Reported Outcomes: Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Index Score | The EQ-5D was a generic Quality of life (QoL) based instrument validated in cancer populations. EQ-5D questionnaire contained a 5-item descriptive system of health states (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and visual analogue scale (VAS). A single HRQoL score ranging from -0.59 to 1 was generated from standard scoring algorithm developed by the EuroQoL was the EQ-5D index score, higher scores represent better health status. A change of at least 0.10 to 0.12 points was considered clinically meaningful. The results on the ANCOVA of time-adjusted AUC for the EQ-5D - Index Score were reported. The time-adjusted AUC was calculated by dividing the AUC by duration (in days) over the period of interest, and reported as 'scores on a scale'. | FAS participants with a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment during the study. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Scores on a scale | Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, and EOT (21 days after last dose of study drug) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Patient Reported Outcomes: Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score | The EQ-5D was a generic QoL preference based instrument and has been validated in the cancer populations. VAS was generated from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). This VAS score was referred to as the EQ-5D self-reported health status score. The results on ANCOVA of time-adjusted AUC were reported. The time-adjusted AUC was calculated by dividing the AUC by duration (in days) over the period of interest, and reported as 'scores on a scale'. | FAS participants with a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment during the study. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Scores on a scale | Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, and EOT (21 days after last dose of study drug) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil | Maximum observed drug concentration, directly taken from analytical data. Geometric mean and percentage geometric coefficient of variation (%CV) were reported. In the listed categories below, 'N' signifies the number of evaluable participants for the drug administered. | Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PKS) included all participants with a valid pharmacokinetic profile of capecitabine. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | milligram per liter | Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after capecitabine dosing at Cycle 2, Day 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Area Under Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of Capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil | AUC(0-tlast) is defined as AUC from time 0 to the last data point, calculated up by linear trapezoidal rule, down by logarithmic trapezoidal rule. Geometric mean and percentage geometric coefficient of variation (%CV) were reported. In the listed categories below, 'N' signifies the number of evaluable participants for the drug administered. | PKS | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | milligram*hour per liter | Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after capecitabine dosing at Cycle 2, Day 14 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Grade 3 and 4 Laboratory Abnormalities | Hematological (anemia, hemoglobin, international normalized ratio [INR], lymphocyte, neutrophil, platelet, white blood cell [WBC]), biochemical (ALT [alanine aminotransferase], AST [aspartate aminotransferase], GGT [gamma-glutamyl-transferase], lipase, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperuricemia) evaluations were done. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4-Grade 3: Severe or medically significant; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization and CTCAE version 4-Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention were indicated. | Safety Analysis Set (SAF) was comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication (sorafenib, placebo or capecitabine). Participants were analyzed as treated. | Posted | Number | Participants | From the start of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose |
|
From start of study drug administration until 30 days after the last dose of study medication intake.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Capecitabine | Sorafenib tablets were administered orally continuously at a total daily dose of 600 mg (200 mg in the morning, 400 mg in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a subject, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and sorafenib dose to a total daily dose of 800 mg for that subject. | 80 | 260 | 256 | 260 | ||
| EG001 | Placebo + Capecitabine | Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a subject, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that subject. | 71 | 267 | 248 | 267 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bundle branch block right | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiopulmonary failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aplasia | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eye symptom | Eye disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute abdomen | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Enteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Melaena | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Swollen tongue | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal stenosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenic colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Death | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mucosal inflammation | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| General physical health deterioration | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gallbladder pain | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic failure | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperbilirubinaemia | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice cholestatic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cytomegalovirus enterocolitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femoral neck fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femur fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Humerus fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tendon rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wrist fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biopsy lung | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| White blood cell count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypercalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypophosphataemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bone pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myopathy | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mobility decreased | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal chest pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malignant pleural effusion | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastases to liver | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastases to spine | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastases to meninges | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tumour associated fever | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cancer metastatic | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cancer pain | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metastases to central nervous system | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Disturbance in attention | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Facial paralysis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lethargy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Presyncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal cord compression | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Brain oedema | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Central nervous system mass | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cytotoxic oedema | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Confusional state | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hydronephrosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal colic | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Menorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asphyxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemoptysis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary microemboli | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tracheal obstruction extrinsic | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erythema multiforme | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hysterectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleurodesis | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Central venous catheterisation | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Axillary lymphadenectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cancer surgery | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphoedema | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Superior vena cava syndrome | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral artery occlusion | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Venous thrombosis limb | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lacrimation increased | Eye disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mucosal inflammation | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lipase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| White blood cell count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypophosphataemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Results of exploratory analysis of biomarkers are anticipated in the month of February, 2016.
Bayer will have up to 30/45 days to review publications, and may request an additional publication delay of up to 60 days to allow for filing a Patent Application (if applicable).
No publication of single center data should be done prior to publication of multi-center data.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therapeutic Area Head | BAYER | clinical-trials-contact@bayer.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077157 | Sorafenib |
| D000069287 | Capecitabine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010671 | Phenylurea Compounds |
| D014508 | Urea |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009536 | Niacinamide |
| D009539 | Nicotinic Acids |
| D000147 | Acids, Heterocyclic |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D011725 | Pyridines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D005472 | Fluorouracil |
| D014498 | Uracil |
| D011744 | Pyrimidinones |
| D003853 | Deoxyribonucleosides |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Black |
|
| Asian |
|
| Hispanic |
|
| North America |
|
| Other |
|
| ECOG status=1 |
|
| ECOG status=2 |
|
| ECOG status=3 |
|
| ECOG status=4 |
|
| Prior chemotherapies=1 |
|
| Positive |
|
| No |
|
| Yes |
|
| Superiority or Other |
|
|
|
| Placebo + Capecitabine |
Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that participant. |
|
|
|
Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that participant.
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo + Capecitabine | Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that participant. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo + Capecitabine | Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that participant. |
|
|
| Placebo + Capecitabine |
Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that participant. |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo + Capecitabine | Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that participant. |
|
|
|
Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that participant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Placebo + Capecitabine |
Placebo tablets matching with sorafenib were administered orally continuously (1 tablet in the morning, 2 tablets in the evening) in a 3-week cycle. Capecitabine was administered orally at a total daily dose of 2,000 mg/m^2 (1,000 mg/m^2 twice daily, 12 hours apart). If tolerability criteria were met for a participant, capecitabine dose was escalated to 2,500 mg/m^2 total daily dose (1,250 mg/m^2 twice daily) and placebo dose to a total daily dose of 4 tablets (2 tablets twice daily) for that participant. |
|
|