Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10-I-0210 | |||
| IRC003 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Seasonal influenza is responsible for many hospitalizations and deaths each year, despite effective antiviral treatments. Some individuals have medical conditions such as heart or lung diseases that make them particularly at risk of severe influenza infections that may result in hospitalization or death. Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) is used most often to treat flu, but there are still many hospitalizations, complications, and deaths even with treatment. This study evaluated the use of combination antivirals (amantadine, oseltamivir, and ribavirin) compared to oseltamivir alone in the treatment of influenza in an at-risk population.
Seasonal influenza is responsible for approximately 226,000 excess hospitalizations annually and despite effective antivirals causes significant morbidity and mortality (estimated 24,000-50,000 deaths each year in the United States alone). The influenza virus that emerged in 2009 (A/California/07/2009 H1N1) caused fewer deaths (12,000 flu-related deaths in the U.S) but in contrast to seasonal flu, nearly 90 percent of the deaths with the 2009 H1N1 occurred among people younger than 65 years of age. The CDC has defined an at-risk population that accounts for the majority of hospitalization and morbidity associated with influenza. This study evaluated the use of combination antivirals as compared to oseltamivir alone in the treatment of influenza in an at-risk population.
Subjects who met the CDC definition for being at-risk and that present with an influenza-like illness were screened for the study. Those subjects with a confirmatory test for influenza (rapid antigen or PCR) were randomized in a 1:1 manner to receive a blinded study treatment consisting of either the combination of amantadine, oseltamivir, and ribavirin or oseltamivir alone for 5 days. Clinical, virologic, and laboratory assessments on Days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 were used for both safety and efficacy analysis.
Design:
Pilot study:
Due to the lack of reliable data concerning the AUC virologic endpoint, an "external" pilot study was conducted in the first 47 patients randomized to identify a primary endpoint and method of analysis, and to possibly modify the sample size. To ensure no effect on the type I error rate, data from these 47 patients were excluded from the primary and secondary efficacy analyses but were used in other analyses of secondary objectives.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | Experimental | Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir |
|
| Oseltamivir monotherapy | Active Comparator | Oseltamivir |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir | Drug | Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg, three capsules of Ribavirin 200 mg for total of 600 mg, and one capsule of Amantadine 100 mg. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Virus Detectable by Quantitative PCR (qPCR) in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs | The central laboratory performed a qualitative PCR test on the NP sample from Day 0 in order to confirm influenza infection and to determine the influenza type and subtype. For participants with a positive influenza test result at Day 0 from this qualitative PCR testing, the laboratory then performed qPCR testing of subsequent samples to quantify viral shedding. | At Day 3 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants by Virus Detection Status | Number of participants who had undetectable values (less than the limit of detection [LOD]), who had values between the LOD and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and who had values ≥LLOQ | At Day 0, 3 and 7. |
| qPCR Viral Shedding |
Not provided
Enrollment (Screening)
Signed informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedures
Presence of an underlying medical condition(s) that might increase risk of complications from influenza
History of an influenza-like illness defined as:
Onset of illness no more than 96 hours before screening defined as when the subject experienced at least one respiratory symptom, constitutional symptom, or fever
Willingness to have samples stored
Randomization
Signed informed consent
Presence of a medical condition(s) that had been associated with increased risk of complications from influenza
Onset of illness no more than 96 hours before screening defined as when the subject experienced at least one respiratory symptom, constitutional symptom, or fever
Positive test for influenza (either rapid antigen or PCR)
- Results from influenza testing obtained for clinical indications within 12 hours before screening/enrollment may be used if available. Randomization may proceed in cases of discrepant results (one positive and one negative)
One of the following to avoid pregnancy:
Willingness to have samples stored
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
(for Enrollment or Randomization)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| John Beigel, MD | Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc. in support of Clinical Research Section, LIR, NIAID, Natinal Institutes of Health | Study Chair |
| John Treanor, MD | University of Rochester | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Williamson Clinic | Birmingham | Alabama | 35211 | United States | ||
| East Valley Family Physicians |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12517228 | Background | Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Cox N, Anderson LJ, Fukuda K. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):179-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.2.179. | |
| 16494718 | Background | Monto AS. Vaccines and antiviral drugs in pandemic preparedness. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Jan;12(1):55-60. doi: 10.3201/eid1201.051068. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page | View source |
Not provided
Eight hundred eighty-one subjects were enrolled per protocol (signed consent). Two hundred fifty-one subjects were excluded during screening and did not participate in any other aspect of the trial. Three subjects were randomized improperly because they were given study drug kit prior to the randomization.
Outpatient or hospitalized participants at high risk for complications and morbidity, diagnosed with influenza by rapid antigen or PCR were recruited at 65 sites from 5 countries: 52 from the U.S., 2 from Australia, 3 from Mexico, and 4 each in Thailand and Argentina, between March 2011 to April 2016.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Combination Therapy | Drug: Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg, three capsules of Ribavirin 200 mg for total of 600 mg, and one capsule of Amantadine 100 mg. |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Oseltamivir | Drug | Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg. |
|
Median, 25% and 75% percentile of the value of viral shedding (Results <LOD were imputed as the LOD value, and Results >= LOD, \ |
| At Day 0, 3 and 7 |
| Number of Participants Shedding Virus | Number of participants with undetectable viral load at both Day 3 and Day 7; detectable at Day 3 and undetectable at Day 7; detectable at Day 7 (irrespective of whether or not detectable at Day 3). | At day 3 and 7. |
| Time to Alleviation of Influenza Clinical Symptoms. | The assessed symptoms were cough, nasal obstruction (stuffy nose), sore throat, fatigue, headache, muscle aches, feverishness, rhinorrhea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. Duration of clinical symptoms is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which all clinical symptoms are grade 0 (absent) or 1 (mild). A measurement is considered to be the 8AM or 8PM assessment during Days 0 to 7 (so two measurements are obtained per day) and then the daily assessment thereafter. Time will then be calculated in half-days through to Day 7. If a subject's first two assessments on (baseline assessment and first subsequent diary card assessment) satisfy this criterion, then the duration will be set to zero. For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with symptoms evaluated. | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| Time to Absence of Fever | Fever was considered present based on the diary cards if a subject reported a maximal temperature ≥38.0°C (for the period since the diary card was previously completed) or reported having taken an antipyretic drug (also for the period since the diary card was previously completed). Otherwise, fever was considered not present during the period since the diary card was previously completed, except that the evaluation was considered missing if either the temperature or the antipyretic drug use entry was not completed on the diary card. The duration of fever was defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive assessments (through to Day 7) or to the first assessment (Day 8 onwards) at which no fever was present according to this definition.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with fever evaluated. | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| Time to Resolution of All Symptoms AND Fever | The assessed symptoms were cough, nasal obstruction (stuffy nose), sore throat, fatigue, headache, muscle aches, feverishness, rhinorrhea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. Fever was considered present based on the diary cards if a subject reported a maximal temperature ≥38.0°C (for the period since the diary card was previously completed) or reported having taken an antipyretic drug (also for the period since the diary card was previously completed). Time to resolution of all clinical symptoms and fever is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which all clinical symptoms are grade 0 (absent) or 1(mild) and no fever >=38.0 C or antipyretic drug is reported. For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with symptoms and fever evaluated. | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| Time to Feeling as Good as Before the Onset of the Influenza Illness | Time to feeling as good as before influenza is defined as time to the first of two successive 'yes' responses to the question of 'feeling as good as you did before you had the flu'.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with question answered. | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| Time to Return to Pre-influenza Function | Time to return to pre-influenza function is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive 'Yes' answers to the global assessment question 'Are you functioning as well as you were before you had the flu'.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with question answered. | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| Time to Return of Physical Function to Pre-illness Leve | Time to return of physical function to pre-illness level was defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which the physical function score equals or is better than the pre-illness score (obtained by recall at enrollment).For subjects who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with physical function evaluated. | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Failure at Day 5 | Clinical failure at Day 5 is defined as the need for continued (non-study) antiviral use after Day 5. | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Develop Bronchitis, Pneumonia, or Other Complications of Influenza After Day 0. | Participants were assessed for the signs/symptoms suggestive of one of the following complications: Sinusitis, Otitis Media ,Bronchitis / Bronchiolitis, Pneumonia and antibiotic use for reason other than above. | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Required New or Increased Use of Supplemental Oxygen | Percentage of participants who required new or increased use of supplemental oxygen | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Required Hospitalization. | The percentage of participants hospitalized by 28 days was estimated from the Kaplan-Meier curves. | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| 28-day Mortality | Number of deaths | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| Chandler |
| Arizona |
| 85224 |
| United States |
| Thomas Lenzmeier Family Practice | Glendale | Arizona | 85308 | United States |
| Central Phoenix Medical Center | Phoenix | Arizona | 85020 | United States |
| WCCT Global LLC | Costa Mesa | California | 92626 | United States |
| Advanced Rx Clinical Research | Garden Grove | California | 92843 | United States |
| Torrance Clinical Research Institute, Inc. | Lomita | California | 90717 | United States |
| University of Southern California | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
| University of California at San Diego | San Diego | California | 92103 | United States |
| Westlake Medical Research (CA) | Thousand Oaks | California | 91360 | United States |
| Los Angeles BioMedical Research Institute | Torrance | California | 90502 | United States |
| Empire Clinical Research | Upland | California | 91786 | United States |
| University of Colorado | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
| Centennial - IMMUNOe International Research | Centennial | Colorado | 80112 | United States |
| University of Florida | Gainesville | Florida | 32610 | United States |
| Best Quality Research Inc. | Hialeah | Florida | 33016 | United States |
| San Marcus Research Clinic, Inc. | Miami | Florida | 33015 | United States |
| Medical Consulting Center | Miami | Florida | 33125 | United States |
| Suncoast Research Group, LLC | Miami | Florida | 33135 | United States |
| University of Miami | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| DMI Research, Inc. | Pinellas Park | Florida | 33782 | United States |
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Sneeze, Wheeze & Itch Associates, LLC | Normal | Illinois | 61761 | United States |
| Ridge Family Practice | Council Bluffs | Iowa | 51503 | United States |
| University of Iowa | Iowa City | Iowa | 52246 | United States |
| Research Integrity, LLC | Owensboro | Kentucky | 42303 | United States |
| Horizon Research Group, of Opelousas, LLC | Eunice | Louisiana | 70535 | United States |
| Centex Studies Inc. - Dr. Seep | Lake Charles | Louisiana | 70601 | United States |
| NIH Clinical Center | Bethesda | Maryland | 20892 | United States |
| Boston Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02111 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02115 | United States |
| UMass Medical School | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| Henry Ford Health Systems | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| Bronson Methodist Hospital | Kalamazoo | Michigan | 49007 | United States |
| West Florissant Internists | Bridgeton | Missouri | 63044 | United States |
| Clinical Research Advantage/ Skyline Medical Center | Elkhorn | Nebraska | 68022 | United States |
| Prairie Fields Family Medicine | Fremont | Nebraska | 68025 | United States |
| Southwest Family Physicians | Omaha | Nebraska | 68124 | United States |
| New Jersey Medical School | Newark | New Jersey | 07103 | United States |
| Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| University of Rochester Medical Center | Rochester | New York | 14642 | United States |
| James J. Peters, VA Medical Center | The Bronx | New York | 10468 | United States |
| University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27514 | United States |
| Duke University | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Panuto | Middleburg Heights | Ohio | 44130 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| University of Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Montgomery Medical | Smithfield | Pennsylvania | 15478 | United States |
| Health Concepts | Rapid City | South Dakota | 57702 | United States |
| Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Bart | Columbia | Tennessee | 38401 | United States |
| Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Slandzicki | Franklin | Tennessee | 37064 | United States |
| Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Hoppers | Jackson | Tennessee | 38305 | United States |
| Holston Medical Group | Kingsport | Tennessee | 37660 | United States |
| Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Rowe | Nashville | Tennessee | 37211 | United States |
| Clinical Research Solutions - Dr. Dar | Smyrna | Tennessee | 37167 | United States |
| University of Texas Tech Amarillo | Amarillo | Texas | 79106 | United States |
| Family Medicine Associates of Texas | Carrollton | Texas | 75010 | United States |
| 3rd Coast Research Associates | Corpus Christi | Texas | 78413 | United States |
| University of Texas at Houston | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Centex Studies Inc. - Dr. Pouzar | Houston | Texas | 77062 | United States |
| Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc. | Houston | Texas | 77098 | United States |
| Texas Tech HSC | Lubbock | Texas | 79430 | United States |
| Centex Studies Inc. - Dr. Garcia | Pharr | Texas | 78577 | United States |
| Village Health Partners | Plano | Texas | 75024 | United States |
| Endeavor Clinical Trials | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Bandera Family Healthcare Research | San Antonio | Texas | 78249 | United States |
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
| Virginia Commonwealth University | Richmond | Virginia | 23298 | United States |
| Instituto Medico Platense | La Plata | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Hospital Houssay | Vicente López | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciónes ClÃnicas (CEMIC) | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Fundación del Centro de Estudios Infectológicos (FUNCEI) | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Hospital General de Agudos J. M. Ramos MejÃa | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Hospital Rawson | Córdoba | Argentina |
| Instituto Centralizado de Asistencia e Investigación ClÃnica Integral (CAICI) | Santa Fe | Argentina |
| Holdsworth House Med Practice | Darlinghurst | New South Wales | 2010 | Australia |
| Taylor Square Private Clinic | Darlinghurst | New South Wales | 2010 | Australia |
| Westmead Hospital | Westmead | New South Wales | Australia |
| Royal Brisbane | Herston | Queensland | 4029 | Australia |
| Northside Clinic | Fitzroy North | Victoria | 3068 | Australia |
| The Alfred Hospital | Melbourne | Victoria | 3004 | Australia |
| Royal Melbourne Hospital | Parkville | Victoria | 3052 | Australia |
| Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición (INCMN) Salvador Zubirán | México | Mexico |
| Hospital General y de Alta Especialidad "Dr. Manuel GEA Gonzalez" | Tlalpan | Mexico |
| Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (INER) | Tlalpan | Mexico |
| Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University | Bangkoknoi | Bangkok | 10700 | Thailand |
| HIV-NAT, The Thai Red Cross AIDS | Patumwan | Bangkok | 10330 | Thailand |
| Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University | Muang | Changwat Khon Kaen | 40002 | Thailand |
| Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute | Muang | Changwat Nonthaburi | 11000 | Thailand |
| 16371626 | Background | Moscona A. Oseltamivir resistance--disabling our influenza defenses. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2633-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058291. No abstract available. |
| 28958678 | Derived | Beigel JH, Bao Y, Beeler J, Manosuthi W, Slandzicki A, Dar SM, Panuto J, Beasley RL, Perez-Patrigeon S, Suwanpimolkul G, Losso MH, McClure N, Bozzolo DR, Myers C, Holley HP Jr, Hoopes J, Lane HC, Hughes MD, Davey RT; IRC003 Study Team. Oseltamivir, amantadine, and ribavirin combination antiviral therapy versus oseltamivir monotherapy for the treatment of influenza: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;17(12):1255-1265. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30476-0. Epub 2017 Sep 22. |
| The DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), Version 1.0, December 2004 (Clarification, August 2009). | View source |
| Oseltamivir Monotherapy |
Drug: Oseltamivir Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg. |
| COMPLETED | Results were through database cutoff (10 November 2016) for efficacy analysis (through Day 28 visit) |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Intent To Treat (ITT) Population: all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Combination Therapy | Drug: Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg, three capsules of Ribavirin 200 mg for total of 600 mg, and one capsule of Amantadine 100 mg. |
| BG001 | Oseltamivir Monotherapy | Drug: Oseltamivir Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Influenza Diagnostic Test by Local Testing | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Positive Influenza Test by Local Testing | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Result of Influenza Test By Local Testing | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Confirmed Influenza Infection Status By Central Testing | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Influenza Type/Subtype By Central Testing | Influenza type/subtype by central lab testing was from site-collected swab on Day 0 (the first one if more than one was collected) and if that was missing, then from a Day -1 sample, if collected | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Quantitative PCR Viral Shedding | Limit of detection (LOD)/lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for Flu A and Flu B by qPCR is 3.2/3.9 and 3.4/4.0, respectively. Results <LOD were imputed as LOD; results >=LOD and <LLOQ were imputed as LLOQ, and results >ULOQ were imputed as ULOQ | The results are for the 454 participants with a confirmed positive test for influenza on a Day 0 sample from the central laboratory using a RT-PCR for influenza type and subtype. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | log10 copies/mL |
| |||||||||||||
| Presence of fever | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Symptom Score | Symptoms were scored on a 4-point scale : 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Overall Symptom Score | Overall symptom score was the sum of available scores for each of the 11 symptoms assessed (so ignoring missing values). The possible range of the overall symptom score is therefore 0 (no symptoms) to 44 (severe for all 10 symptoms). Participants with missing evaluations for all symptoms were given a missing overall symptom score. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Functional status | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Average Functional Status | Average functional status was calculated as the average of the ten items assessed (so ignoring missing values), scoring 0='yes, limited a lot', 50='yes, limited a little', 100='no, not limited at all'. The possible range of the functional status score is therefore 0 (worst possible status) to 100 (best possible status). Participants with missing evaluations for all items were given a missing average functional status. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Global assessment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Complications of Influenza | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Medical Conditions | Medication conditions that may increase risk of complications from influenza which are used to determine eligibility for the study. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Virus Detectable by Quantitative PCR (qPCR) in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs | The central laboratory performed a qualitative PCR test on the NP sample from Day 0 in order to confirm influenza infection and to determine the influenza type and subtype. For participants with a positive influenza test result at Day 0 from this qualitative PCR testing, the laboratory then performed qPCR testing of subsequent samples to quantify viral shedding. | The population analyzed was restricted to the 407 participants who had a confirmed positive test for influenza by qPCR in the central laboratory testing and were not in the pilot study for IRC003. 13 participants (5 in the Combination Therapy and 8 in the Oseltamivir Monotherapy) had missing endpoint samples so were excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants analyzed | At Day 3 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants by Virus Detection Status | Number of participants who had undetectable values (less than the limit of detection [LOD]), who had values between the LOD and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and who had values ≥LLOQ | The population analyzed is the Primary Efficacy Population (PEP), which included all participants who were randomized properly, had received at least one dose of study drug, and had influenza virus isolated and typed in the qualitative PCR evaluation at Day 0 from central laboratory testing. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Day 0, 3 and 7. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | qPCR Viral Shedding | Median, 25% and 75% percentile of the value of viral shedding (Results <LOD were imputed as the LOD value, and Results >= LOD, \ | The population analyzed is the Primary Efficacy Population (PEP), which included all participants who were randomized properly, had received at least one dose of study drug, and had influenza virus isolated and typed in the qualitative PCR evaluation at Day 0 from central laboratory testing. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Log10 copies/mL | At Day 0, 3 and 7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Shedding Virus | Number of participants with undetectable viral load at both Day 3 and Day 7; detectable at Day 3 and undetectable at Day 7; detectable at Day 7 (irrespective of whether or not detectable at Day 3). | The population analyzed is the Primary Efficacy Population (PEP), which included all participants who were randomized properly, had received at least one dose of study drug, and had influenza virus isolated and typed in the qualitative PCR evaluation at Day 0 from central laboratory testing. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At day 3 and 7. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Alleviation of Influenza Clinical Symptoms. | The assessed symptoms were cough, nasal obstruction (stuffy nose), sore throat, fatigue, headache, muscle aches, feverishness, rhinorrhea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. Duration of clinical symptoms is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which all clinical symptoms are grade 0 (absent) or 1 (mild). A measurement is considered to be the 8AM or 8PM assessment during Days 0 to 7 (so two measurements are obtained per day) and then the daily assessment thereafter. Time will then be calculated in half-days through to Day 7. If a subject's first two assessments on (baseline assessment and first subsequent diary card assessment) satisfy this criterion, then the duration will be set to zero. For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with symptoms evaluated. | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Days | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Absence of Fever | Fever was considered present based on the diary cards if a subject reported a maximal temperature ≥38.0°C (for the period since the diary card was previously completed) or reported having taken an antipyretic drug (also for the period since the diary card was previously completed). Otherwise, fever was considered not present during the period since the diary card was previously completed, except that the evaluation was considered missing if either the temperature or the antipyretic drug use entry was not completed on the diary card. The duration of fever was defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive assessments (through to Day 7) or to the first assessment (Day 8 onwards) at which no fever was present according to this definition.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with fever evaluated. | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Days | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Resolution of All Symptoms AND Fever | The assessed symptoms were cough, nasal obstruction (stuffy nose), sore throat, fatigue, headache, muscle aches, feverishness, rhinorrhea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. Fever was considered present based on the diary cards if a subject reported a maximal temperature ≥38.0°C (for the period since the diary card was previously completed) or reported having taken an antipyretic drug (also for the period since the diary card was previously completed). Time to resolution of all clinical symptoms and fever is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which all clinical symptoms are grade 0 (absent) or 1(mild) and no fever >=38.0 C or antipyretic drug is reported. For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with symptoms and fever evaluated. | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which includes all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Days | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Feeling as Good as Before the Onset of the Influenza Illness | Time to feeling as good as before influenza is defined as time to the first of two successive 'yes' responses to the question of 'feeling as good as you did before you had the flu'.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with question answered. | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Days | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Return to Pre-influenza Function | Time to return to pre-influenza function is defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive 'Yes' answers to the global assessment question 'Are you functioning as well as you were before you had the flu'.For participants who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with question answered. | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Days | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Return of Physical Function to Pre-illness Leve | Time to return of physical function to pre-illness level was defined as the time from Day 0 to the first of two successive measurements at which the physical function score equals or is better than the pre-illness score (obtained by recall at enrollment).For subjects who did not have two successive records meeting this criterion, follow-up was censored for analysis purposes at the time of the last but one diary card record with physical function evaluated. | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Days | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Failure at Day 5 | Clinical failure at Day 5 is defined as the need for continued (non-study) antiviral use after Day 5. | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants analyzed | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Develop Bronchitis, Pneumonia, or Other Complications of Influenza After Day 0. | Participants were assessed for the signs/symptoms suggestive of one of the following complications: Sinusitis, Otitis Media ,Bronchitis / Bronchiolitis, Pneumonia and antibiotic use for reason other than above. | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. The categories in the table are not mutually exclusive (because some participants had multiple complications) and the last row of the table summarizes all incidents. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants analyzed | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Required New or Increased Use of Supplemental Oxygen | Percentage of participants who required new or increased use of supplemental oxygen | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants analyzed | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Required Hospitalization. | The percentage of participants hospitalized by 28 days was estimated from the Kaplan-Meier curves. | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants analyzed | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 28-day Mortality | Number of deaths | The population analyzed is the Intention To Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who were randomized properly and who had received at least one dose of study drug. | Posted | Number | participants | From treatment initiation to Day 28 |
|
|
Adverse events were collected throughout the conduct of the study; from Day 0 to Day 28
All worsening and new symptoms were evaluated as potential adverse events.If a diagnosis was clinically evident (or subsequently determined), the diagnosis, rather than the individual signs and symptoms or lab abnormalities, were recorded as the AE. All worsening laboratory values were also evaluated as potential adverse events. The DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0) was used.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Combination Therapy | Drug: Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg, three capsules of Ribavirin 200 mg for total of 600 mg, and one capsule of Amantadine 100 mg. | 0 | 314 | 14 | 314 | 148 | 314 |
| EG001 | Oseltamivir Monotherapy | Drug: Oseltamivir Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg. | 1 | 312 | 6 | 312 | 163 | 312 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea haemorrhagic | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal compression fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Delirium | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Personality change | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary oedema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory distress | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetic foot | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (19.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Beigel, M.D. | Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc. is support to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) | 301-451-9881 | jbeigel@niaid.nih.gov |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007251 | Influenza, Human |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D009976 | Orthomyxoviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000547 | Amantadine |
| D012254 | Ribavirin |
| D053139 | Oseltamivir |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000218 | Adamantane |
| D001952 | Bridged-Ring Compounds |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D012263 | Ribonucleosides |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
| D000081 | Acetamides |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D053138 | Cyclohexenes |
| D003510 | Cyclohexanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| United States |
|
|
| Mexico |
|
|
| Australia |
|
|
| Thailand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fatigue |
|
|
| Feverishness |
|
|
| Diarrhea |
|
|
| Muscle aches |
|
|
| Vomiting |
|
|
| Headache |
|
|
| Nausea |
|
|
| Sore throat |
|
|
| Stuffy nose |
|
|
| Rhinorrhea |
|
|
|
|
| Moderate activities |
|
|
| Lifting groceries |
|
|
| Climbing stairs |
|
|
| Climbing 1 flight |
|
|
| Bending or kneeling |
|
|
| Walking > 1 mile |
|
|
| Walking blocks |
|
|
| Walking a block |
|
|
| Bathing/dressing self |
|
|
|
|
| Subject functions as well today as before flu |
|
|
|
| Otitis Media |
|
|
| Bronchitis/Bronchiolitis |
|
|
| Pneumonia |
|
|
| Using antibiotic for other reasons |
|
|
|
| Asthma |
|
|
| Neurological condition |
|
|
| Chronic Lung disease |
|
|
| Heart disease |
|
|
| Blood disorder |
|
|
| Endocrine |
|
|
| Kidney |
|
|
| Liver disorder |
|
|
| Metabolic |
|
|
| Weakened immune system |
|
|
| BMI >= 40 |
|
|
The difference in percents was calculated as the percent detectable in the Combination Therapy minus the percent detectable in the Oseltamivir Monotherapy. |
| Superiority or Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Oseltamivir Monotherapy |
Drug: Oseltamivir Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg. |
|
|
| Oseltamivir Monotherapy |
Drug: Oseltamivir Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg. |
|
|
Drug: Oseltamivir Subjects were prescribed the medication twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg. |
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| <LOD |
|
| Missing |
|
| <LOD |
|
| Missing |
|