Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The hypothesis of this feasibility study is that focal treatment with ExAblate MRgFUS has the potential to be a safe and effective non-invasive treatment for low to intermediate risk, organ-confined prostate cancer involving low incidence of morbidity. The study hypothesis will be tested by measuring treatment-related safety and initial effectiveness parameters in the ExAblate MRgFUS treated patients, as described above.
Based on the result of this study, InSightec will initiate a larger study in an effort to approve low risk, organ-confined prostate cancer as an indication for its ExAblate MRgFUS device.
Objective of this feasibility trial is to assess safety and initial effectiveness of ExAblate MRgFUS in the treatment of low to intermediate risk, localized (organ confined) prostate cancer tumors.
ExAblate treatment will be implemented as a focal tumor-selective therapy, directed at pre-defined volume(s)/sector(s) in the prostate, (identified as cancerous by mapping biopsy with or without multi-parametric MRI), rather than a whole gland or hemi-ablation treatment.
Safety: evaluate incidence and severity of adverse events associated with ExAblate's MRgFUS focal treatment of low risk organ confined prostate cancer. The risk of ExAblate treatment-related incontinence and impotence will also be assessed in this study.
Effectiveness: determine the tumor control effect of ExAblate's MRgFUS focal treatment of low risk organ-confined prostate cancer (confirmed by TRUS-guided Transperineal Mapping Biopsy results).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | ExAblate Treatment Arm |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRgFUS Treatment | Device | Local treatment of prostate cancer using Magnetic Resonance Imaging guided endorectally applied focused ultrasound energy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety and initial Effectiveness |
| 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | Incidence and severity of device/treatment related AE's from treatment and up to 24 months follow-up | 24 months |
| Effectiveness | Evaluating effectiveness of ExAblate MRgFUS to achieve adequate tumor control in low risk organ-confined prostate cancer patients based on periodic PSA follow-up (according to study schedule) and TPBx (Transperineal Biopsy) at two years follow-up. (TPBx will be performed between 6 and 24 months, if clinically indicated) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
ASA status > 2
Contraindications to MRI 2.1. Claustrophobia 2.2. Implanted ferromagnetic materials or foreign objects 2.3. Known intolerance to the MRI contrast agent (e.g. Gadolinium or Magnevist) 2.4. Known contraindication to utilization of MRI contrast agent
Severely abnormal coagulation (INR>1.5)
Patient with unstable cardiac status including:
4.1. Unstable angina pectoris on medication 4.2. Documented myocardial infarction within 40 days prior to enrolment 4.3. Congestive heart failure NYHA class IV 4.4. Unstable arrhythmia status, already on anti-arrhythmic drugs
Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication)
Severe cerebrovascular disease (multiple CVA or CVA within 6 months)
History of orchiectomy, PCa-specific chemotherapy, cryotherapy, Photodynamic therapy or radical prostatectomy for treatment of prostate cancer; any prior radiation therapy to the pelvis for prostate cancer or any other malignancy.
Patient under medications that can affect PSA for the last 3 months prior to MRgFUS treatment (Androgen Deprivation Treatment; alpha reductase inhibitors)
Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary supine position during treatment (approximately 3 hrs.)
Any rectal pathology, anomaly or previous treatment, which can change acoustic properties of rectal wall or prevent safe probe insertion (e.g., fistula, stenosis, fibrosis).
Any spinal pathology which can prevent safe administration of epidural anesthesia
Identified calcification of 2 mm or more in largest diameter neighboring the rectal wall (in a distance of less than 5 mm) and interfering with the acoustic beam path.
Lower limb musculo-skeletal fixed deformities.
Prostate with multiple cystic lesions.
Evidence for seminal vesicle/lymph node involvement of cancer.
Subjects with distance of the less than 2mm margin between the tumor and the prostate capsule
Bladder cancer
Patient that had TURP procedure before
Urethral stricture/bladder neck contracture
Patient with baseline symptoms of incontinence defined as urine leak in any of the following circumstances:
20.1. Before the patient can get to the toilet 20.2. When coughing or sneezing 20.3. While being asleep 20.4. While being physically active/exercising 20.5. After finishing urinating and being dressed 20.6. Leaking for no obvious reason
Patient with baseline impotence scoring 17 or below in the IIEF-5 (SHIM) questionnaire
Active UTI
Prostatitis NIH categories I, II and III
Implant near (<1 cm) the prostate
Interest in future fertility
Current participation in another clinical investigation of a medical device or a drug or has participated in such a study within 30 days prior to study enrollment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Health Network | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2C4 | Canada | ||
| Sheba Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23283106 | Derived | Lindner U, Ghai S, Spensieri P, Hlasny E, Van Der Kwast TH, McCluskey SA, Haider MA, Kucharczyk W, Trachtenberg J. Focal magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: Initial North American experience. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012 Dec;6(6):E283-6. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.12218. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 24 months |
| Effectiveness | Assessing post-ExAblate non-perfused volume (NPV) changes from immediate post- treatment measurement to at 6 and 24 months | 24 months |
| QOL | Patients will complete the EPIC-SF12-AUASI questionnaire periodically during study (from baseline up to 24 months post treatment), according to study schedule, to evaluate patient function and satisfaction after prostate cancer treatment. | 24 months |
| Tel Litwinsky |
| Israel |
| Sapienza University Hospital | Rome | Italy |
| National Cancer Center Singapore | Singapore | 168753 | Singapore |
| St. Mary's Hospital | London | United Kingdom |
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |