Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-A01343-50 | Other Identifier | RCB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is now widely used for cancer imaging purpose, notably for preoperative work-up. It aims at visualizing organs metabolism. In case of cancer, metabolism is, classically, increased and some hot spots are visible on PET images. Because of respiratory motion and because the liver is intrinsically FDG avid, some tumours (especially the smallest ones) can be occulted and missed by the clinician.
The investigators developed a respiratory-gated PET method in order to reduce the motion issue. This protocol has been validated on lung pathologies. The investigators designed a study to investigate its effect on liver cancer (primary or metastasis) to check if it allows the detection of a higher number of tumour lesions.
To that aim, patients who are planned to undergo a surgical intervention on the liver can be proposed to participate this study. After the standard PET acquisition (acquired in free-breathing), an additional 10 minutes respiratory-gated PET acquisition is performed without additional injection. After that, a breath-hold (~10s) CT is performed.
Introduction:
18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) became a major imaging modality for management of patients with suspected hepatic cancer notably because of its ability to detect distant metastases. Hepatic resection is known to be the only curative treatment in a subset of patients suffering liver neoplasm. Eligibility for hepatic surgery lays on conventional staging comprising contrast-enhanced CT, magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography of the liver. Recently, 18F-FGD PET/CT has been introduced as a staging modality in the preoperative work up.
However, many physiological issues could affect PET interpretation. Indeed, some lesions could be missed by the physician due to histology of the lesion (e.g. in case of moderate or well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or mucinous carcinoma). Unlike, local inflammations could be wrongly considered as malignant.
Another issue for liver examination with PET imaging is the respiratory motion as it produces blurring in reconstructed images. Therefore, some lesions may be missed or underestimated. This motion issue is well known for thoracic imaging and various methods were proposed to deal with it. We have developed a respiratory motion compensation method where gated PET events are selected on the base of a breath-hold CT (CT-based).
To our knowledge, no sensitivity study was performed to assess the usefulness of gated acquisitions in term of lesions detection at abdominal stage. W In this trial, we apply our gating method on the liver to compare lesion-per-lesion sensitivity of clinical (Ungated) and CT-based PET images.
PET/CT acquisitions:
All acquisitions (Ungated and CT-based) are performed on a whole-body PET/CT system.
To summarize respiratory-gated PET processing, the breath-hold CT sequence is visible on the respiratory signal as a plateau. A selection range is placed around this plateau to select only the PET events which correspond to the same position as that of tissues at the time of breath-hold CT.
Image Reconstruction:
After compensation for random coincidences, all 3-dimensional (3D) sinograms are FORE-rebinned into two dimensions and scatter-corrected. The attenuation coefficients at 511 keV are calculated from the CT acquisition, in order to correct for tissue self-attenuation. Ungated volumes are corrected with the free-breathing whole-body CT scan and CT-based volumes are corrected with the end-expiration breath-hold CT. All PET volumes are reconstructed using AWOSEM with the following parameters: 4 iterations, 8 ordered subsets in 168 x 168 x 81 matrices (4.06 mm x 4.06 mm x 2 mm). Finally, a 3D isotropic Gaussian post filter with a full width at half maximum of 5 mm was applied.
Image analysis:
Each PET examination is blindly and independently analysed by experienced nuclear medicine physicians, i.e. neither the type of image nor the patients' information are known. Each clinician has to report the number of lesions detected in both Ungated and CT-based PET datasets. Should it be the case, for each lesion, they are asked to precise its location according to the Couinaud segmental classification and its maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax).
Surgical procedure and histopathological analysis:
During surgery, intraoperative ultrasound are performed in order to detect and localize all liver lesions. Surgery is aimed at obtaining disease-free resection margins. The type of liver resection (hepatectomy or wedge(s)) is at the surgeon discretion as well as the use of radiofrequency tumour ablation. When available, surgical specimen are analysed in the department of histopathological analysis of our institution to determine the type of cancer and the location of the resected lesions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investigation arm | Experimental | "standard and respiratory-gated PET acquisitions " for patients included in the trial. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| standard and respiratory-gated PET acquisitions | Other | After fasting for at least 6 hours, normal glucose blood level was checked and each patient received an intravenous injection of 18F-FDG (5MBq/kg). After a 60-minute uptake phase in a quiet environment, patients underwent the PET/CT examination.
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Detected Uptakes on PET Images | Observers have to analyse Ungated and/or CT-based PET images. They have to report, for each uptake they see, the corresponding liver segment (according to Couinaud segmental classification). | day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lesions Uptake Measurement (SUVmax) | For each detected uptake (in Ungated or CT-based PET images), observers have to report the corresponding maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The SUVmax was obtained automatically in a volume of interest encompassing the entire lesion. | Day 1 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marc-Etienne Meyer, Pr | CHU Amiens | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| centre hospitalier universitaire d'Amiens | Amiens | Picardy | 80054 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22382308 | Result | Fin L, Daouk J, Bailly P, Slama J, Morvan J, El Esper I, Regimbeau JM, Chatelain D, Diouf M, Meyer ME. Improved imaging of intrahepatic colorectal metastases with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose respiratory-gated positron emission tomography. Nucl Med Commun. 2012 Jun;33(6):656-62. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328351fce8. | |
| Result | Daouk J, Fin L, Bailly P, Slama J, Diouf M, Morvan J, El Esper I, Regimbeau J-M, Chatelain D, Meyer M-E. The Benefits of Respiratory Gating in 18F-FDG PET Imaging of the Liver, The International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Engineering 2(1):5-10, 2012 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Investigation Arm | Patients definitely included in the trial. All these patients underwent non-gated and gated PET/CT as well as hepatic surgery. In addition, histological analysis of the resected lesions were also obtained. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Patients presenting liver lesions planned for hepatic surgery
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Investigation Arm | Patients included in the trial. n=50 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Detected Uptakes on PET Images | Observers have to analyse Ungated and/or CT-based PET images. They have to report, for each uptake they see, the corresponding liver segment (according to Couinaud segmental classification). | Patients who underwent liver resection | Posted | Number | number of real metastatic lesions | day 1 |
|
1 year
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Investigation Arm | Patients included in the trial. n=50 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pr. Marc-Etienne Meyer | Centre Hospital-Universitaire d'Amiens | +33 3 22 45 59 64 | meyer.marc-etienne@chu-amiens.fr |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008113 | Liver Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lesions Uptake Measurement (SUVmax) | For each detected uptake (in Ungated or CT-based PET images), observers have to report the corresponding maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The SUVmax was obtained automatically in a volume of interest encompassing the entire lesion. | The number of participant has been determined on the basis of the annual possible recruitment in the institution to keep the study feasible. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | g/L | Day 1 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 50 |
| 0 |
| 50 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D008107 |
| Liver Diseases |