Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-005365-61 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Celgene Corporation | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
STUDY DESIGN:
This is a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, efficacy and safety study in 30 patients with erosive osteoarthritis of interphalangeal joints. The study is composed of 4 phases: a pre-randomization phase for up to 35 days followed by a 91-day randomized, double-blind two arm treatment phase, followed by a 77-day open label treatment phase for all study participants and a 28-day observational follow-up phase. Efficacy of the double blind and open label phase will be assessed at study day 84 and 168 after treatment start respectively.
STUDY DURATION:
The study length will be approximately 231 days for individual patients. With approximately a 12 month recruitment period the study is planned to last from January 2010 until July 2011 (19 months).
STUDY OBJECTIVES:
The primary objective is to evaluate the 84-day efficacy of apremilast 20 mg twice per day [BID], subsequent to a 7-day dose titration, compared with placebo, for the treatment of the symptoms of erosive hand osteoarthritis. Further objectives are to evaluate the effects on pain, disease activity, structural damage, quality of life, safety and tolerability.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apremilast capsules | Experimental | Apremilast in 10 mg capsules |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apremilast | Drug | Apremilast is supplied as 10 mg capsules for oral administration. After a 7-day titration phase patients will receive 20 mg PO BID apremilast. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of subjects in each treatment group who achieve a significant 50% improvement in AUSCAN Index at day 84 after treatment start compared with baseline | Proportion of subjects in each treatment group who achieve a significant 50% improvement in AUSCAN Index at day 84 after treatment start compared with baseline. | Day 84 after treatment start compared with baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute values and change from baseline of the Patient self Assessment score (VAS) from baseline, day 84 and day 168 as well as proportion of patients in each treatment group who achieve improvements | Patients self assessment of pain (VAS) | Day 84 and at day 168 after treatment start compared with Baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Must meet the following laboratory criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Georg Schett, MD | University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof. G. Schett, University Hospital Erlangen | Erlangen | Bavaria | 91054 | Germany | ||
| Prof. Ulf Müller-Ladner, Kerckhoff-Klinik |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C505730 | apremilast |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo capsules identical to apremilast |
|
| Change of the Physicians and Patients self assessment of global status (VAS)score from baseline, day 84 and day 168. |
Physicians and Patients self assessment of global status (VAS) |
| Day 84 and at day 168 after treatment start compared with Baseline |
| Change of the HAQ score from baseline, day 84 and day 168 in each treatment group who achieve improvements | HAQ | Day 84 and at day 168 after treatment start compared with Baseline |
| Change of the SACRAH score from baseline, day 84 and day 168 in each treatment group who achieve improvements | SACRAH | Day 84 and at day 168 after treatment start compared with Baseline |
| Change of the duration of the joint stiffness from baseline, day 84 and day 168 in each treatment group who achieve improvements | Duration of joint stiffness | Day 84 and at day 168 after treatment start compared with Baseline |
| Change of swollen and tender joints from baseline compared to day 84 and day 168 in each treatment group. | Swollen and tender joint counts | Day 84 and at day 168 after treatment start compared with Baseline |
| Measuring radiology changes from baseline, day 84 and day 168 using the RAMRIS score in each treatment. | RAMRIS scoring system | Day 84 and at day 168 after treatment start compared with Baseline |
| Changes of the SF36 from baseline, day 84 and day 168 in each treatment group. | SF36 | Day 84 and at day 168 after treatment start compared with Baseline |
| Bad Nauheim |
| 61231 |
| Germany |
| Prof. Matthias Schneider, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Klinik für Endokrinologie, Diabetologie und Rheumatologie | Düsseldorf | 40225 | Germany |