Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Phase II-study Investigating the Efficacy of Bevacizumab for Symptom Control in Patients With Malignant Ascites Due to Advanced-stage Gastrointestinal Cancers
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Phase II-study Investigating the Efficacy of Bevacizumab for Symptom Control in Patients With Malignant Ascites Due to Advanced-stage Gastrointestinal Cancers
Malignant ascites represents a severe clinical problem for physicians and patients being confronted with this common symptom of advanced-stage gastrointestinal cancer. Unfortunately, there is no standardized and evidence-based treatment for malignant ascites and therapies which are commonly being used are only temporarily effective. Newer modes of therapy, such as the application of the tri-functional antibody catumaxomab, are associated with significant side effects and are limited to patients in stages of good overall performance. Therefore, there is still an urgent need for more effective, longer-lasting, and less toxic modes of treatment for peritoneal effusions caused by gastrointestinal cancers.
Preclinical data strongly suggest that bevacizumab might be a very effective agent for the treatment of malignant ascites, which is in large part caused by the hyperpermeability-promoting factor VEGF. Emerging clinical results from cancer patients with malignant ascites treated with bevacizumab add further support to this idea. Bevacizumab has been tested in a variety of large clinical trials, has a good toxicity profile, and is effective in a number of human cancers underlying malignant ascites.
In the present study, Bevacizumab will be administered as an intraperitoneal infusion at an absolute standardized dosage of 400 mg. This dosage was chosen because it is comparable to the approved standard dosage for intravenous administration which was also used in both studies reporting the successful and safe intraperitoneal administration of Bevacizumab to patients with malignant ascites. Finally, a standardized dosage seems more practical in the particular patient population treated in this study.
Inclusion Criteria:
Hematology
Urinalysis:
Exclusion Criteria:
Ludwigsburg, Baden-Wurttemberg 71640, Germany
Potsdam, Brandenburg 14467, Germany
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg 20246, Germany
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg 20249, Germany
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse 60590, Germany
Hanover, Lower Saxony 30449, Germany
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia 45136, Germany
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia 45147, Germany
Mönchengladbach, North Rhine-Westphalia 41063, Germany
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate 55131, Germany
Leipzig, Saxony 04103, Germany
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt 06120, Germany
Neumünster, Schleswig-Holstein 24534, Germany
Berlin, State of Berlin 12351, Germany
Berlin, State of Berlin 13353, Germany
Berlin-Zehlendorf, State of Berlin 14195, Germany